Comparison of Patient Profiles: Wavefront-Guided LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD Inouye Eye Hospital Tokyo, Japan Michiho Suzuki-Judge,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ME5888. Night Carrier Operations Spectacles ME5888.
Advertisements

LaserVision Refractive Audit Mr John Fenton FRCSI.
Arthur Cummings, Richard Corkin Wellington Eye Clinic UPMC Beacon Hospital, Dublin ICO Cavan, 12 th May 2011.
Juan Carlos Abad, MD Jaime Arango, MD; Camilo Tobón, MD ASCRS Poster P-225 Abad et al. Drs. Abad and Arango are consultants to Addition Technology Dr.
Dose-response for Mitomycin-C in prevention of haze in photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia: Six month preliminary results CDR Elizabeth M. Hofmeister,
LASIK Eye Surgery Laurie Koscielak ITMG November 29, 2007.
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Intracorneal ring segments followed by collagen cross-linking and PRK for treatment of keratoconus A Iovieno, MD; ME Légaré, MD; DS Rootman, MD Department.
5 Years Results of Off-Pump VS On-Pump CABG 5 Years Results of Off-Pump VS On-Pump CABG Prospective Non-randomized Comparative Study Piya Cherntanomwong*,
SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CERVICAL DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE WITH MYELORADICULOPATHY: TWO-LEVEL ANTERIOR DISCECTOMY VERSUS ONE LEVEL ANTERIOR CORPECTOMY Istanbul.
Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2004 ISRS/AAO Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD ISRS / AAO Meeting New Orleans- October 22, 2004.
Wavefront Sensing of the Human Eye
Sze H. Wong Emil W. Chynn, MD, MBA Maximiliano Plana, MD Emily Ceisler, MD ASCRS, May 2013 San Francisco, CA LASEK /Epi-LASIK to treat amblyopes is not.
Bioptic Surgery Kangnam Eyence Eye Clinic Woon Bong Jwa.
Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
Comparison of flap thickness results using M2 130 micron flap and one use plus 100 micron flap Ahmed El-Massry M.D. Ophthalmology Department Alexandria.
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.
Characterization of Higher Order Ocular Aberrations (HOA) In ‘Normal’ Versus Myopic Eyes To Study The Effect Of Myopia On Higher Order Aberrations Amit.
Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,
Evaluation of Zonal Equivalent Keratometry Readings After LASIK Timmy Kovoor, MD Orkun Muftuoglu, MD V.Vinod Mootha, MD Steven Verity, MD R. Wayne Bowman,
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.
Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express.
Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.
Michael J. Endl, M.D. The author of this poster has no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Early Results of Static and Dynamic Iris.
Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) retreatment surgery Colm McAlinden, 1,2 Jonathan Moore, 2,3 1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster,
Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.
Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.
iTrace Dynamic Laser Refraction: Clinical Application
Effect of Refractive State on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty ASCRS 2011 Kevin Lai Stony Brook University School of Medicine Elaine M. Miglino Floral Park.
Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
Prevention of epithelial in-growth following LASIK enhancement surgery Mark E Johnston MD FRCSC Omaha NE NO FINANCIAL INTERESTS.
Omni-Focal Treatment for Correction of Presbyopia in Hyperopes: 1 Year Results Efekan Coskunseven, Baha Toygar, Serife Atun, Haluk Talu, Ebru Arslan Dunya.
US TRENDS IN REFRACTIVE SURGERY: 2004 ASCRS SURVEY Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Washington, D.C. April 16, 2005.
Augenabteilung am St. Franziskus Hospital Münster Influence of Mydriatic Eye-drops on Wavefront-sensing and Automated Refraction Taneri S, Oehler S, MacRae.
Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,
John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.
Vance Thompson MD Mitch Ibach OD.
CATz for Highly Irregular Corneas after Keratorefractive Surgery Hamed M. Anwar, MD, FRCS Alaa El-Danasoury, MD, FRCS 1 Institutional affiliation: Magrabi.
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Decentration With and Without Active Eye-Tracking System Mark Edmund Johnston MD FRCSC P 167: The author.
CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study
Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront
Safe Lasik on Thin Cornea with Moderate Myopia
Comparison of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens with the Verisyse Phakic Intraocular Lens in High Myopia Jigna Joshi MD Marian Macsai MD Parag Majmudar.
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.
Wavefront Correction of high refractive errors
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System
Aspherical ablation profiles in excimer laser treatments
C. Lackerbauer MD, A. Wolf MD, A. Kollias, MD, A. Kampik, MD,
Marotte D, Denoyer A, Pisella PJ.
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Patient Profiles: Wavefront-Guided LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD Inouye Eye Hospital Tokyo, Japan Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD Inouye Eye Hospital Tokyo, Japan

Purpose  To document profiles of patients who selected either wavefront-guided LASIK or conventional LASIK.

Methods  Records of 396 LASIK procedures from 199 patients at Inouye Eye Hospital between 11/06 and 06/07 were reviewed.  Tx: VISX S4IR  79 males and 120 females  Age range: 20 to 57 (33.6  8.4)  Pre-op spherical equivalent range: to D (-5.38  2.02)  Records of 396 LASIK procedures from 199 patients at Inouye Eye Hospital between 11/06 and 06/07 were reviewed.  Tx: VISX S4IR  79 males and 120 females  Age range: 20 to 57 (33.6  8.4)  Pre-op spherical equivalent range: to D (-5.38  2.02)

Methods  All patients were informed of pros, cons and price differences between the procedures and made their own decisions. Wavefront-guidedConventional ProsLess HOA Less night glare Less tissue ablation ConsMore tissue ablationMore HOA More night glare Price300,000JPY for both eyes (3,000 USD) 200,000JPY for both eyes (2,000 USD)

Methods  Patient data was categorized by age, sex, occupation and pre-op refraction for comparative analysis.  X 2, ANOVA and T- test analyses were applied to the data.  Patient data was categorized by age, sex, occupation and pre-op refraction for comparative analysis.  X 2, ANOVA and T- test analyses were applied to the data.

Results (Wavefront-guided / Conventional) (male : female ratio) 251 cases 125 patients (63.4%) 145 cases 74 patients (36.6%) Male 40% Female 60% Male 39% Female 61% Conventional WFG

Results (age) Statistical differences found for all age groups under 40 62% 30% 31% 28% 48% 38% 57% 50% 38% 70% 69% 72% 52% 42% Conventional: mean 33.4  7.7 (20~57) WFG: mean 33.9  9.6 (20~56)

Results (occupation) 31% 50% 64% 69% 50%36% % shown only for X 2 values tested as significantly different

Results (pre-op spherical equivalent) (D) 26% 27% 48% 94% 74% 73% 52%

Conclusions  At our hospital in Tokyo, wavefront- guided to conventional LASIK ratio was 63.6 to  Average age and sex were not determinant factors in patients’ decisions for level of LASIK treatment.  Patients in their late 20s and 30s chose wavefront-guided LASIK more than conventional LASIK.  At our hospital in Tokyo, wavefront- guided to conventional LASIK ratio was 63.6 to  Average age and sex were not determinant factors in patients’ decisions for level of LASIK treatment.  Patients in their late 20s and 30s chose wavefront-guided LASIK more than conventional LASIK.

Conclusions  Patients in their early 20s chose conventional LASIK more often.  Housewives and students (dependants) chose conventional LASIK more often.  High myopia patients chose conventional LASIK because they were made aware of concerns for opportunities of enhancement if needed.  Patients in their early 20s chose conventional LASIK more often.  Housewives and students (dependants) chose conventional LASIK more often.  High myopia patients chose conventional LASIK because they were made aware of concerns for opportunities of enhancement if needed.

Thank you for your interest!