Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simple Linear Regression 1. Correlation indicates the magnitude and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. Linear Regression: variable.
Advertisements

Chapter 17 Overview of Multivariate Analysis Methods
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 14 Using Multivariate Design and Analysis.
Chapter 7 – K-Nearest-Neighbor
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
Bivariate Regression CJ 526 Statistical Analysis in Criminal Justice.
Discrim Continued Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth. Types of Discriminant Function Analysis They are the same as the types of multiple regression Direct Discrim.
Discriminant Analysis – Basic Relationships
Ch 11: Correlations (pt. 2) and Ch 12: Regression (pt.1) Nov. 13, 2014.
Data Analysis Statistics. Inferential statistics.
Multiple Regression – Basic Relationships
Correlation and Regression Analysis
Non-parametric statistics
Discriminant Analysis Testing latent variables as predictors of groups.
SW388R7 Data Analysis & Computers II Slide 1 Multiple Regression – Basic Relationships Purpose of multiple regression Different types of multiple regression.
Review Regression and Pearson’s R SPSS Demo
Discriminant analysis
SW388R7 Data Analysis & Computers II Slide 1 Discriminant Analysis – Basic Relationships Discriminant Functions and Scores Describing Relationships Classification.
Selecting the Correct Statistical Test
Elements of Multiple Regression Analysis: Two Independent Variables Yong Sept
Multiple Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression.
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INTERVAL-RATIO VARIABLES
CHAPTER 26 Discriminant Analysis From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
Discriminant Function Analysis Basics Psy524 Andrew Ainsworth.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.. Multivariate Analysis of Variance.
Chapter Eighteen Discriminant Analysis Chapter Outline 1) Overview 2) Basic Concept 3) Relation to Regression and ANOVA 4) Discriminant Analysis.
Chapter 18 Four Multivariate Techniques Angela Gillis & Winston Jackson Nursing Research: Methods & Interpretation.
Discriminant Analysis
18-1 © 2007 Prentice Hall Chapter Eighteen 18-1 Discriminant and Logit Analysis.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Examining Relationships in Quantitative Research
Discriminant Analysis Discriminant analysis is a technique for analyzing data when the criterion or dependent variable is categorical and the predictor.
Regression Chapter 16. Regression >Builds on Correlation >The difference is a question of prediction versus relation Regression predicts, correlation.
SW388R6 Data Analysis and Computers I Slide 1 Multiple Regression Key Points about Multiple Regression Sample Homework Problem Solving the Problem with.
17-1 COMPLETE BUSINESS STATISTICS by AMIR D. ACZEL & JAYAVEL SOUNDERPANDIAN 6 th edition (SIE)
Multiple Discriminant Analysis
Adjusted from slides attributed to Andrew Ainsworth
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter Eighteen Discriminant and Logit Analysis.
Review for Final Examination COMM 550X, May 12, 11 am- 1pm Final Examination.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter Seventeen Correlation and Regression.
Chapter 6 – Three Simple Classification Methods © Galit Shmueli and Peter Bruce 2008 Data Mining for Business Intelligence Shmueli, Patel & Bruce.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 12 Testing for Relationships Tests of linear relationships –Correlation 2 continuous.
Chapter Eight: Using Statistics to Answer Questions.
Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Introduction to Discriminant Analysis 2.Assumptions for Discriminant Analysis 3.Discriminant Analysis in SPSS.
Two-Group Discriminant Function Analysis. Overview You wish to predict group membership. There are only two groups. Your predictor variables are continuous.
 Seeks to determine group membership from predictor variables ◦ Given group membership, how many people can we correctly classify?
Discriminant Function Analysis Mechanics. Equations To get our results we’ll have to use those same SSCP matrices as we did with Manova.
Chapter 13 Understanding research results: statistical inference.
D/RS 1013 Discriminant Analysis. Discriminant Analysis Overview n multivariate extension of the one-way ANOVA n looks at differences between 2 or more.
Welcome to Introductory SPSS Workshop  Dr. Satyendra Singh Director, Centre for Emerging Markets Professor, Marketing and International Business Editor,
MANOVA Lecture 12 Nuance stuff Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS. Discriminant Analysis  Discriminant analysis builds a predictive model for group membership. The model is composed of a discriminant.
(Slides not created solely by me – the internet is a wonderful tool) SW388R7 Data Analysis & Compute rs II Slide 1.
Interpretation of Common Statistical Tests Mary Burke, PhD, RN, CNE.
STATISTICAL TESTS USING SPSS Dimitrios Tselios/ Example tests “Discovering statistics using SPSS”, Andy Field.
Regression. Why Regression? Everything we’ve done in this class has been regression: When you have categorical IVs and continuous DVs, the ANOVA framework.
Chapter 12 REGRESSION DIAGNOSTICS AND CANONICAL CORRELATION.
I. ANOVA revisited & reviewed
Different Types of Data
Bivariate & Multivariate Regression Analysis
Multiple Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression
Multiple Regression.
Regression.
Multiple Regression – Part II
Discriminant Analysis
Discriminant Analysis – Basic Relationships
Linear Discriminant Analysis
Prediction/Regression
Multiple Regression – Split Sample Validation
Aaker, Kumar, Day Seventh Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Presentation transcript:

Discriminant Analysis Dr. Satyendra Singh Professor and Director University of Winnipeg, Canada

What is a Discriminant Analysis? It forms linear combination of the independent or predictor variables to serve as a basis for classifying cases into one of the groups DV: Market Orientation of firms (7-pt Scale) o Low and High (Must be on nominal Scale) IV: Culture o Market, Adhocracy, Clan, Hierarchical (Constant sum = 100) 1

Data Integrity Run as usual checks: mean, median, outlier… Ensure all variables have complete information Careful when deleting cases with missing information. Instead check for pattern o eg. educated people gave complete info How many cases do we need? 20 cases per IV as a thumb rule SPSS produces case summary for eligible cases 2

Mean Summary for Eligible Cases 3

Analyze IV (group)mean Differences Wilks’ Lambda: λ = 0 (gr. mean is unequal) o We want lower λ and p<.05 for the group to be unequal for discriminant analysis o Adhocracy and market culture are most different for low and high market oriented firms 4

Run the test 5

Canonical Discriminant Function 19 Canonical discriminant coefficients are in unstandardized unit We can compute group centroid mean (discriminant score) = const. + b. mkt + C adh+… SPSS gives this value so we know how far the groups are from each other, ie how powerful the function is in discriminating between the groups. 6

Loading or Structure Matrix Correlations Important for us Correlation >.3 Can be used for ranking with caution Same unit is better By default, SPSS assumes that all groups have equal prior probabilities So for 2 gr.5 and for 3 gr.33 so on 7 Centroid Distance =.23 – (-.20) =.43

Group 1 Distribution 8

Group 2 Distribution 9

All-groups Distribution 10

Interpretation: Means and Structure Matrix Adhocracy culture contributes most to making firms market oriented, followed by market, hierarchical and clan culture. 11

Classification Results For example, if beer 12

Predictive Power of the Model… Maximum Chance Criterion: o it calculates the percentage of correctly classified cases if all the cases were placed in one group with the greatest possibility of occurrence o Because high market oriented group (ie. largest group) occurs 53.7% (ie 50/93) of time, it could be correct if all cases were assigned to this group. o C max = 53.7% 13

Predictive Power of the Model… Proportional Chance Criterion: o it compares the model with the priori chance of classifying cases correctly without the discriminant function o Because we’ve unequal group (low = 43, High = 50, Total = 93), we use the formula o Proportion Chance Criterion (C prop)= p*p + (1-p) * (1-p) o proportion of cases in gr 1 (p) o Proportion of cases in gr 2 (1-p) o C prop = (43/93) * (43/93) + (1-(43/93)) * (1-(43/93)) =.5017 = 50.17% 14

Predictive Power Comparison Our discriminant model has the highest discriminatory power because So we accept the model. 15

Questions?