Dipole leakage and low CMB multi-poles (Indo-UK meeting) 10 th August, 2011 by S antanu D as IUCAA, Pune PhD Supervisor : Prof. Tarun Souradeep.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Advertisements

The Ability of Planck to Measure Unresolved Sources Bruce Partridge Haverford College For the Planck Consortium.
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
Foreground Contamination of CMB Maps By Tuhin Ghosh Under the Supervision of Prof. Tarun Souradeep.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
FastICA as a LOFAR-EoR Foreground Cleaning Technique Filipe Abdalla and Emma Woodfield University College London with Saleem Zaroubi, Vibor Jelic, Panos.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Removing foregrounds from CMB maps using non-Gaussianity measurement Dr. Rajib Saha Assistant Professor Physics Department IISER Bhopal INDO-UK Scientific.
Cosmology topics, collaborations BOOMERanG, Cosmic Microwave Background LARES (LAser RElativity Satellite), General Relativity and extensions, Lense-Thirring.
The Low-Order Multipoles and Dust in the Vicinity of the Solar System Valeri Dikarev 1,2,4, Oliver Preuß 1 Sami Solanki 1 Harald Krüger 1,2, Alexander.
Constraints on Material, Size and Abundance of Interplanetary Dust from the WMAP Data Valeri Dikarev 1,2,4, Oliver Preuß 1 Sami Solanki 1 Harald Krüger.
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
The Cosmic Microwave Background. Maxima DASI WMAP.
Patricio Vielva Astrophysics Department (IFCA, Santander) Currently Astrophysics Group (Cavendish Lab., Cambridge) Wiaux, Vielva, Martínez-González.
The Nobel prize in Physics 2006 piet mulders VU October 4, 2006
(Rajib Saha,Pankaj Jain,Tarun Souradeep, astro-ph/ ) A Blind Estimation of Angular Power Spectrum of CMB Anisotropy from WMAP.
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
Nidhi Joshi Centre for Theoretical Physics Jamia Millia Islamia Collaborators: Aditya Rotti, Tarun Souradeep Confronting particle-cosmology with Planck.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Towards an optimized scanning.
Seeing the universe through redshifted 21-cm radiation Somnath Bharadwaj Physics & CTS IIT Kharagpur.
The World Around Us: day and night. Look at these Solar System objects What are they?
Bill Reach 2009 May 14 Greater IPAC Technology Symposium.
Search for B-modes in CMB Polarization  QUIET and other experiments Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration Ultimate High Energy Physics QUIET collaboration.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Gary PrézeauUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 Adding Polarized Point Sources to Simulations Development of.
CMB & Foreground Polarisation CMB 2003 Workshop, Minneapolis Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA/ISAS.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Christopher CantalupoUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 CTP Working Group Presented by Christopher Cantalupo.
Gaitskell CMB Polarization DASI Recent Results Brown Astro Journal Club Rick Gaitskell (Brown University)
The W ILKINSON M ICROWAVE A NISOTROPY P ROBE Mission.
Probing anisotropic expansion history of the universe with CMBR Ajit M. Srivastava Institute of Physics Bhubaneswar Work done with: Ranjita K. Mohapatra,
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Systematic effects in CMB data of ESA’s satellite Planck Tarun Souradeep (IUCAA, Pune) & Francois Bouchet (IAP, Paris) CEFIPRA mid-term presentation (Mussoorie,
MILANK OVITCH cycles. What are the Milankovitch Cycles They are a series of theoretical cycles presented by Yugoslav Astronomer Milutin Milankovitch that.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano The Planck satellite:
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
Adventures in Parameter Estimation Jason Dick University of California, Davis.
Methods of excitation: nuclear reactions
Planck Report on the status of the mission Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
On the detection of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r using the CMB B-modes
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
The Planck Satellite Matthew Trimble 10/1/12. Useful Physics Observing at a redshift = looking at light from a very distant object that was emitted a.
WG2 Meeting, Paris, 28-11/ WG2 and LFI-DPC Davide Maino, Carlo Baccigalupi.
Szapudi´s talk – False Detection Rate Simultaneous hypothesis testing - Setting the statistical significance Detections of Non-Gaussianity in CMB observations.
WMAP The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Universe.
Planck working group 2.1 diffuse component separation review Paris november 2005.
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
The Growth of Structure
Cosmic Microwave Background
Point source contamination in Galaxy cluster
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
Planck mission All information and images in these slides can be found browsing through
Chapter 30 Section 4 Big Bang Theory.
(for the Algorithm Development Group of the US Planck Team)
Beam Deconvolution Map-Making
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
CMBR Kinematic Dipole Anisotropy (~300 km/s velocity toward Leo); map of the temperature fluctuation relative to the MEAN (black body with T=2.728 Kelvin)
Physics Seminar Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies and polarization with Planck Assoc. Prof. Guillaume Patanchon Astroparticle.
Big Bang.
SMP: Active Galactic Nuclei Supeluminal Motions etc.
of Montgomery College Planetarium
Bayesian Estimation of the isotropy violation in the CMB sky
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Systematics session: Gain stability
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Dipole leakage and low CMB multi-poles (Indo-UK meeting) 10 th August, 2011 by S antanu D as IUCAA, Pune PhD Supervisor : Prof. Tarun Souradeep

Problem formulation monopole : K dipole : mK fluctuation : ~ μK CMB monopoleCMB dipoleCMB fluctuation Remove monopole Remove dipole Experiments are designed to measure the things up to and extremely high accuracy. Several theories are formulated based on these analysis. So even a small mistake in the data analysis technique is not acceptable.

Problem formulation I t is seen that the power at the low multi-poles of the CMBR power spectrum is lesser than the theoretically expected power T here may be some physics behind this lesser power at low multi-poles. H owever it may also happen that this is only a measurement effect. W MAP beam is noncircular. (noncircular beam → power transfer from pole to pole) B ut for data analysis people consider the beam to be circular. D ue to noncircular beam some power can gets transferred from dipole to higher multipoles.

Beam of WMAP satellite Direction of the two beams Orientation of the beam

Analysis Take Dipole Map Dipole map in the galactic coordinate Temperature : T = mK Direction : (l,b) = (264.31⁰,48.05 ⁰)

Analysis Take Dipole Map Scan it WMAP scan pattern elliptical beam Scan the dipole map for 6 month & get the TOD (WMAP scans the entire sky once in 6 months)

Analysis Take Dipole Map Scan it WMAP scan pattern elliptical beam Reconstruct map Mapmaking algorithm From the TOD reconstruct the map

Analysis Take Dipole Map Scan it WMAP scan pattern elliptical beam Reconstruct map Mapmaking algorithm Remove dipole After removing the dipole from the scanned map we can get this type of map.

Analysis Take Dipole Map Scan it WMAP scan pattern elliptical beam Remove dipole Extract quadrupole & higher multipoles l =2 (quadrupole)l =3 (octapole) l =4 l =5 Reconstruct map Mapmaking algorithm

Figure is showing the power leakage for different eccentricity Results Figure is showing the quadrupole power for different eccentricity Simulation with beam FWHM ~ 20 arcmin

Galactic coordinate Ecliptic coordinate Simulation with φ 1 =30, φ 2 =45 Beam FWHM ~ 40 arcmin and eccentricity = 0.8

Galactic coordinate Ecliptic coordinate Simulation with φ 1 =20, φ 2 =45 Beam FWHM ~ 40 arcmin and eccentricity = 0.8

Galactic coordinate Ecliptic coordinate Simulation with φ 1 =10, φ 2 =45 Beam FWHM ~ 40 arcmin and eccentricity = 0.8

Conclusion 1.Power can gets transferred from the dipole to quadrupole and higher multi-poles due to the noncircular beam. 2.The amount of power transfer depends on the eccentricity high eccentricity → more power leakage 3.The shape of the quadrupole and higher multipoles due to power leakage depends on the orientation of the two beams of the WMAP satellite. 4.The amount of power transfer depends on the orientation of the dipole. Two casesDipole to quadrupole ratio Eccentricity = 0.8~ ~1200 Actual sky~550

Future Plan We are planning to simulate this effect for the PLANCK satellite scan pattern and check what are all the effects we get for PLANCK maps. We are planning to simulate this effect for the actual beam shape of WMAP satellite instead of taking the elliptical beam.