Effects of Gesture and Semantic-Phonologic Treatments for Verb Retrieval Amy D. Rodriguez 1,2, Anastasia M. Raymer 1,3, Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi 1,2 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation of Music Therapy: Social Joint Attention Behaviors In Preschool-Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Karen L. Herzel, Brenda.
Advertisements

Remembering Can Cause Forgetting – but Not in Negative Moods Psychological Science – 2007 Karl-Heinz Bauml and Christof Kuhbandner Presented by Tachelle.
A comparison of intention and pantomime gesture treatments for word retrieval in people with aphasia Neina F. Ferguson, M.S.*, Kelli Evans, Ph.D.*, & Anastasia.
Attentionally Dependent Bilateral Advantage on Numerosity Judgments Jenny Ewing & Nestor Matthews Department of Psychology, Denison University, Granville.
Examining the Relationship Between Confrontational Naming Tasks & Discourse Production in Aphasia Leila D. Luna & Gerasimos Fergadiotis Portland State.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 8 Aphasia: disorders of comprehension.
Using Multiple Baseline Designs to Demonstrate the Efficacy of Using Behavior Therapy to Teach Children Vocal Imitation Jeffrey R. Miller, Katie M. Wiskow,
Assessing Preference for Attention in a Child Diagnosed with Autism Jodi Ogle, Cierra Micke, Kelly Paulson, Carrie Haessly, Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Matt.
Experimental Design: Single-Participant Designs/ The Operant Approach.
Participants Negative BOLD and Aging: An fMRI Investigation K.M. McGregor 1,2, K.D. White 1,2,3, M. Benjamin 1,3, W.K. Berg 2, I. Fischler 2, J. Craggs.
PLS-5 Training.
Introduction Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA) is a treatment technique designed to improve the naming abilities by increasing the level of activation within.
MossTalk Training for Word Retrieval Across Semantic Categories Tiffany Johnson, Erin Todd, & Anastasia Raymer* Old Dominion University, Norfolk VA; *Brain.
Second Language Acquisition Video series with Dr. Frank Tuzi
Putting Together the Pieces: Meaning Matters in Children’s Plural Comprehension Craig Van Pay, Areanna Lakowske & Jennifer Zapf.
BACKGROUND Lesion Characteristics Related to Naming Improvement in Aphasic Stroke Patients: The Role of Anterior Cortex and the Basal Ganglia R.B. Parkinson.
Effects of Bilingualism on the A ttention N etwork T est: I ts significance and Implications Sujin Yang & Barbara Lust Cornell University (
Language and Cognition Colombo 2011 Day 7 Working with groups.
Gary L. Cates, Ph.D., NCSP Illinois State University
Sex Differences in Visual Field Lateralization: Where are they? Christine Chiarello 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, Janelle Julagay 1 & Christiana.
Individual Differences in Lexical Processing and Cerebral Asymmetries Christine Chiarello*, Suzanne Welcome*, Laura K. Halderman*, Janelle Julagay*, Ronald.
Poster # 95: METRONOME PACING IN CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL APRAXIA OF SPEECH (DAOS) John Seikel, Jaime Lewis, Audrey Weston, Barbara Bain, Shari Goode,
Educational Benefits On Communication Behaviors In Persons With Dementia Kristi Morris-Johnson, B.A.S., Bobby Jo Mineheine, B.A.S., and Mark Mizuko, Ph.D,
Aphasia – Treatment effectiveness and evidence based practice.
Compensatory Reorganization in Recovery from Aphasia after Stroke Bruce Crosson, Ph.D. Brain Rehabilitation Research Center Malcom Randall VA Medical Center.
Single-Subject Designs
Creation of a Short Form Boston Naming Test for Individuals with Aphasia Christina M. del Toro 1,3, Diane L. Kendall 1,3, & Craig Velozo 2,4 Malcom Randall.
TEACHING ALPHABETIC KNOWLEDGE SKILLS TO PRESCHOOLERS WITH SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT AND TYPICALLY DEVELOPING LANGUAGE Addie Lafferty, Shelley Gray,
Phonological Probe Phonological Probe – Item 1 Phonological Probe – Item 2.
Developing Communication Skills in Children with ASD Kerry Shelton CEP 843.
BDAE: Acoustic Comprehension Scores
An Electrophysiological study of translation priming in French/English bilinguals Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger 2 & Phillip J. Holcomb 1.
Chapter 11 Research Methods in Behavior Modification.
T HE I NTERGENERATIONAL O BSERVATION S CALE : P ROCESS, P ROCEDURES, AND O UTCOMES Background Shannon Jarrott, Ph.D., Cynthia L. Smith, Ph.D., & Aaron.
Reducing Anxiety Christine Velardi. The Power of Positive Recollections: Reducing Test Anxiety and Enhancing College Student Efficacy and Performance.
Single-Case Research: Standards for Design and Analysis Thomas R. Kratochwill University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Single Subject Research (Richards et al.) Chapter 8.
+ Treatment of Aphasia Week 12 April 1 st, Review Involvement of semantic and phonological stages in naming. Differentiating features of naming.
Investigating the Use of a Blocked Trial Procedure to Facilitate Conditional Discriminations Nicholas K. Reetz, Paula Petit, Sarah Camp, Valerie VanTussi,
Building Complex Sentences Project Nicole M. Koonce University of Illinois at Chicago Summer 2009 Research Internship SPED 595 We live at the level of.
Repetition Priming and Anomia: An Investigation of Stimulus Dosage Catherine A. Off, Ph.C., CCC-SLP 1 ; Holly Kavalier, B.A. 1 ; Margaret A. Rogers, Ph.D.
Implicit Relational Learning in a Multiple-Object Tracking Task: Do People Really Track the Objects? Tiffany Williams and Olga Lazareva (Department of.
Tracking Treatment Progress of Families with Oppositional Preschoolers Jaimee C. Perez, M.S., Stephen Bell, Ph.D., Robert W. Adams Linda Garzarella, B.A.,
Language and Cognition Colombo 2011 Day 7 Specific Issues in Aphasia – Treatments for production impairments.
Multidisciplinary Diagnosis of (C)APD: Panel Discussion Teri James Bellis, Ph.D. The University of South Dakota Vermillion, SD USA.
Evaluation of a Closed-Loop BCI-FES System on Recovery of Upper Extremity Function Based on Functionality Post Stroke: A Case Series Angela Gille, OTS.
Does Phonological Awareness Intervention Impact Speech Production in a 3-year-old? Kayla Knueppel, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders Vicki.
Single-Subject Experimental Research
+ Treatment of Aphasia Week 10 March 17 th, 2011.
Participants were oBroca’s aphasic as per Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) 14 o Agrammatic speakers as per narrative analysis and Verb Inflection Test (VIT)
Self-Perception of Language Performance Following Stroke M. E. Gaiefsky 1,2, A. B. Moore 1,2,6, L. J. Gonzalez Rothi 1,4, M. Marsiske 2, M. Diehl 3 & B.
Results (continued) Results Abstract Methods The motor imagery group was read a detailed script and in summary asked to do the following during rest intervals:
Fourth Year Follow-up of Assistive Devices Intervention Study Among the Home-Based Elderly Shin-yi Lin, MS Machiko R. Tomita, Ph. D. Linda F. Fraas, MA,
An Innovative Approach to Fair Evaluations for People with Cognitive Disabilities.
Phonomotor treatment for anomia
Lexical and morphosyntactic minimal pairs. Evidence for different processing Luca Cilibrasi, Vesna Stojanovik, Patricia Riddell, School of Psychology,
Comparing the effectiveness of orthographic and phonological cues in the treatment of anomia. Lyndsey Nickels 1, Antje Lorenz 1,2, 1 Macquarie Centre for.
CONCLUSIONS Time Courses of fMRI Activations Spanning The Stimulus-Response Interval During Word Generation By Nonfluent Aphasics C. Ashley Orynich 1,5,
◆ Initial Baseline ∙ Naming AccuracyB = BaselineP = ProbeM = Maintenance Using Semantic Features Analysis to Treat Discourse in Context in Aphasia Jill.
ADULT LANGUAGE EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE GROUP Extravaganza 2007 Anika Hobbs and Kate Schuj Group Co-Leaders.
Use of a Modified Changeover Delay Procedure to Decrease Scrolled Responses by a Child With Autism Nicholas K. Reetz, Shantel R. Mullins, Sara L. Daugherty,
Chapter 7: A Comprehensive and Evidence- Based Treatment Program.
Project VIABLE - Direct Behavior Rating: Evaluating Behaviors with Positive and Negative Definitions Rose Jaffery 1, Albee T. Ongusco 3, Amy M. Briesch.
Background Purposes of the Study Methods Elayne Hansen and Dr. Marie Stadler, Ph.D. CCC-SLP  Communication Sciences and Disorders  University of Wisconsin-Eau.
Introduction Individuals with ASD show inhibitory control deficits that may be associated with the disabling repetitive behaviors characterizing this disorder.
Consistent and inconsistent interaural cues don't differ for tone detection but do differ for speech recognition Frederick Gallun Kasey Jakien Rachel Ellinger.
with Stroke-Induced Aphasia: A Systematic Review
Visual Memory is Superior to Auditory Memory
Results: Behavioral Performance Area and Laterality of activation
aphasia treatment overviews spring 2017
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Gesture and Semantic-Phonologic Treatments for Verb Retrieval Amy D. Rodriguez 1,2, Anastasia M. Raymer 1,3, Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi 1,2 1 Malcom Randall VA RR&D Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Gainesville, FL; 2 University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 3 Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA METHODS Participants Treatment Design  Single-participant across behaviors and participants  Gesture treatments and semantic-phonologic treatments applied randomly in each participant with one-month break between treatment phases Baselines and Daily Probes  60 pictures selected from set of 250 verbs for naming: 20 verbs trained during each treatment phase (n=40) and 20 verbs never trained  Baseline: Probe tasks administered in 4-8 consecutive sessions  Treatment phases: Probe tasks administered daily prior to treatment DISCUSSION  Of the four participants, three demonstrated significant naming improvement on trained items with the semantic- phonologic treatment and one demonstrated significant naming improvement on trained items with the gesture treatment  These results suggest that gesture treatment may not be superior to semantic-phonologic treatment for verbs  Findings indicate that verbs are amenable to same types of treatments as nouns, despite their presumed different neural representations  Lack of generalization to untrained items suggests that gesture treatments and semantic-phonologic treatments affect individual representations rather than the word retrieval process, so careful selection of verbs is necessary for functional gains in ability to communicate  Results need to be replicated in similar individuals with verb retrieval impairments with order of treatment presentation counterbalanced  Future studies should also continue to investigate the differences between gesture treatments and semantic- phonologic treatments and focus on ways to enhance their generalizability ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Supported by the Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, an NIH (NIDCD) Program Project grant to the University of Florida (subcontract to Old Dominion University), and an NIDCD Fellowship for “Research Symposium in Clinical Aphasiology”. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Reports have suggested that gesture treatments and semantic-phonologic treatments are effective in improving lexical retrieval in anomia. Most studies focus on noun production, with verb production less commonly reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of gesture treatment and semantic-phonologic treatment on verb retrieval within the same participants. We predicted that gesture treatment might be superior to semantic- phonologic treatment for verbs, as pantomimes and verbs have closer neural correlates (Druks, 2002). RESULTS Treatment Procedure  Each treatment phase consisted of 10 one-hour treatment sessions  Gesture Treatment: 1. Stimulus was presented, clinician modeled the target verb and gesture, participant repeated the target verb and gesture three times 2. Participant practiced the target gesture three times 3. Participant practiced the target word three times 4. After a 5-second interval, participant produced the target word and gesture  Semantic-Phonologic Treatment: 1. Stimulus was presented, clinician modeled the target verb, participant repeated the target verb three times 2. Participant answered four yes/no questions about the meaning and sound of the target word (related verb, associated noun, initial phoneme, rhyming word) 3. Participant produced the target word three times 4. After a 5-second interval, participant produced the target word P198P281 P304P326 P198P281P304P326 Age (yrs) Education (yrs)1412 GenderMMFM Time post CVA (mos) WAB AQ (max 100) BNT (max 60)41633 ANT (max 52) NVB (%, verbs only) Picture Naming Sentence Completion Word/Picture Verification P198P281P304P326 Gesture Treatment Trained Items Untrained Items Semantic-Phonologic Treatment Trained items Untrained Items Effect Sizes for Trained and Untrained Items Visual display of performance on daily naming probes Baseline Gesture TX (blue) M Sem-Phon Tx (red) Baseline Gesture TX (blue) M Sem-Phon Tx (red) M Baseline Sem-Phon Tx (red) M Gesture Tx (blue) Baseline Gesture Tx (blue) M Sem-Phon Tx (red) M