JAROSLAW NOWAK For the MiniBooNE Collaboration LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Sixth International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few-GeV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Charged Z’s at Ruslan Chistov (ITEP, Moscow) Representing the Belle Collaboration Quarkonium Working Group Workshop (Nara, NWU, December 2-5/2008) ●
Advertisements

05/31/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, NuInt '07 1 Charged Current Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/XXX Teppei Katori for the MiniBooNE.
03/07/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University, PMN07 1 Neutrino Interaction measurements in MiniBooNE hep-ex/ Teppei Katori and D. Chris Cox for.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Neutrino-induced meson production model for neutrino oscillation experiments Satoshi Nakamura Nuclear Theory Group.
Neutrino-induced meson productions Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University, Japan Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.), T. Sato (Osaka Univ.) T.-S.H.
Neutrino-interactions in resonance region Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.), T. Sato (Osaka Univ.)
Miami 2010 MINIBOONE  e e  2008! H. Ray, University of Florida.
Neutrino Interactions with Nucleons and Nuclei Tina Leitner, Ulrich Mosel LAUNCH09 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
L.V. Fil’kov, V.L. Kashevarov Lebedev Physical Institute Dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities of the pion NSTAR 2007.
Quark Hadron Duality and Rein-Sehgal Model † Krzysztof M. Graczyk , Cezary Juszczak, Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics Wrocław University,
On description of resonance region in the FKR model Krzysztof M. Graczyk, Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Wrocław Poland.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Howard Budd, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester (in collaboration.
Arie Bodek, Univ. of Rochester1 Vector and Axial Form Factors Applied to Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering Howard Budd University of Rochester
Diffractive W/Z & Exclusive CDF II DIS 2008, 7-11 April 2008, University College London XVI International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and.
1. Introduction 2.     3.  p    n 4.     5.     A   A 6. Discussion 7. Summary Bosen Workshop 2007 Review on.
MiniBooNE Update Since Last PAC Meeting (Nov 2007) Steve Brice (FNAL) PAC Meeting 27 March 2008.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
M. Giorgini University of Bologna, Italy, and INFN Limits on Lorentz invariance violation in atmospheric neutrino oscillations using MACRO data From Colliders.
Neutrino-induced meson productions off nucleon in the resonance region Satoshi Nakamura Osaka University Collaborators : H. Kamano (RCNP, Osaka Univ.),
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Exclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in Two-Photon Interactions Bertrand Echenard University of Geneva on behalf of the LEP collaborations Hadronic Physics.
ニュートリノ原子核反応 佐藤 透 ( 阪大 理 ) JPARC Dec Our previous works on neutrino reaction single pion production(Delta region) nuclear coherent pion production.
12 February 2003 M.Sakuda Neutrino - Nucleus Interactions Low Energy Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Makoto Sakuda (KEK) in collaboration with C.Walter,
K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Mary Hall Reno Neutrino-nucleon interactions: what can we learn from electromagnetic interactions and quark-hadron duality? Hallsie Reno Trento, May 2005.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
EMC effect in few-body nuclei at large x Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Elba X Workshop Electron-Nucleus Scattering X June 23-27, 2008.
Recent results from SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments Žarko Pavlović Los Alamos National Laboratory Rencontres de Moriond 18 March 2011.
J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.
Measurements of neutrino charged current scattering in K2K Fine-Grained Detector Introduction Introduction K2K Near Detector K2K Near Detector CC interactions.
MC GEnerator for Neutrino Interaction Experiments Authors: Costas Andreopoulos, Panos Stamoulis, George Tzanakos Object-Oriented Design Extensive use of.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
* Collaborators: A. Pich, J. Portolés (Valencia, España), P. Roig (UNAM, México) Daniel Gómez Dumm * IFLP (CONICET) – Dpto. de Física, Fac. de Ciencias.
Marialaura Colantoni1 Workshop on Hadron Structure and Spectroscopy Marialaura Colantoni* on behalf of the COMPASS coll. *Universita’ del Piemonte.
NSTAR2011, Jefferson Lab, USA May 17-20, 2011 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Tamer Tolba for the WASA-at-COSY collaboration Institut für Kernphysik.
Exclusive electroproduction of two pions at HERA V. Aushev (on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration) April 11-15, 2011 Newport News Marriott at City Center.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
Preliminary Results for CCQE Scattering with the MINOS Near Detector Mark Dorman, UCL On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration NUINT 09, CC/NC QE Scattering,
Outline: IntroJanet Event Rates Particle IdBill Backgrounds and signal Status of the first MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Analysis Janet Conrad & Bill.
Neutrino DIS measurements in CHORUS DIS2004 Strbske Pleso Alfredo G. Cocco INFN – Napoli.
Status of QEL Analysis ● QEL-like Event Selection and Sample ● ND Flux Extraction ● Fitting for MINOS Collaboration Meeting FNAL, 7 th -10 th December.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
WG2: Neutrino Scattering Physics Conveners: M. Kordosky (William & Mary), M. Yokoyama (Tokyo) and J.Nieves (IFIC, Valencia) Please refer to the following.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
1 Quasielastic neutrino scattering: Low energy results (and interpretations) R. Tayloe, NuFact'09 Chicago, IL 7/09 Outline: - Overview of CCQE process.
Path forward: theory vs experiment needs, QE discussion input Comments/Observations: R. Tayloe, Nuint'09.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Axial-vector mass MA and K2K Q2 distribution
Jun Kameda (ICRR) RCCN International workshop at Kashiwa (Dec.10,2004)
Coherent Pion Production
Top quark angular distribution results (LHC)
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
Study of Strange Quark in the Nucleon with Neutrino Scattering
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
in the Rein-Sehgal Model
Presentation transcript:

JAROSLAW NOWAK For the MiniBooNE Collaboration LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Sixth International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few-GeV Region May 18th - 22nd, 2009 Sitges, Barcelona (Spain)

Rein-Sehgal model of resonance excitations with M A =1.1GeV [Annals of Physics, 133, 79 (1981)] Rein-Sehgal model for coherent π + production with M A =1.03 GeV [Nucl. Phys. B223, 29, (1983)] Rescale to reproduce MiniBooNE NC π 0 results (PLB 664, 1, 2008) ProcessFraction of reconstructed CC1π + events CC1 π + Resonant81 CC1 π + Coherent5.9 CCQE5.3 Multi-pion3.8 CC1 π No muon mass in dynamics in CCπ + 5/22/092J. Nowak - NuInt09 The Q 2 distribution has been presented by Bonnie Fleming at NuInt 07 #events / 5.58E20POT/bin

Graczyk and SobczykPhys.Rev.D77:053001,2008 ANL Lalakulich et al., Phys.Rev.D71:074003,2005 Hernandez et al, Phys.Rev.D76:033005,2007 All models are described by the Rarita-Schwinger formalism Vector form factors from Lalakulich et al. Phys.Rev.D74:014009,2006 Axial-vector form factors: Adler model – used also in The analyses for ANL and BNL With the biggest contribution From C 5 A (Q 2 ) 3

Muon mass in resonace excitation model  Muon mass included only in the leptonic current –KLN model [Kuzmin, Lyubushkin and Naumov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 35, S133 (2004)]  Improving the KLN model by adding the pion-pole terms – BRS model [Berger and Sehgal, Phys. Rev. D 76, (2007)]  Similar prediction by Graczyk & Sobczyk [ Phys.Rev.D77:053003,2008 ] 5/22/09J. Nowak - NuInt09 Muon mass in coherent π + production is introduced by applying Adler’s screening factor [D. Rein and L. M. Sehgal, Phys. Lett. B 657, 207 (2007) ] Multiply by Adler’s screening factor With muon mass partial cross sections depend on the helicity Only three Functions Modified 4

Axial vector form factor Vector form factor The relationship between vector form factor in the Rein-Sehgal model and the Rarita-Schwinger form factors taken from Graczyk and Sobczyk, Phys.Rev.D77:053001,2008 5/22/09J. Nowak - NuInt095

Model (M A =1.1GeV)χ 2 /ndf Rein-Sehgal280/39 BRS(m μ )341/39 + new G V 138/39 +C 5 A (dipole)24.7/39 Data/MC (absolutely normalized) Improvement In the agreement With data for Q 2 And for E ν vs. Q 2 PRELIMINARY 5/22/096 PRELIMINARY Reconstructed Q 2 (GeV 2 ) #events /5.58E20POT/bin

Modelχ 2 /ndf Rein-Sehgal280/39 Lalakulich v1, C 5 A (0)=1.2, M A = /39 Lalakulich v2, C 5 A (0)=1.2, M A = /39 Hernandez, C 5 A (0)=0.867, M A = /39 Graczyk v1, C 5 A (0)=1.2, M A =0.9490/39 Graczyk v2, C 5 A (0)=0.98, M A = /39 All models but the Rein-Sehgal are with muon mass effect and new vector form factor PRELIMINARY 5/22/097J. Nowak - NuInt09 Lalakulich v.1 Lalakulich v.2 Hernandez Graczyk v.1Graczyk v.2 Reconstructed Q 2 (GeV 2 ) #events for 5.58E20POT/bin

The fit for the M A 1π has been performed for the improved Rein-Sehgal model: Absolutely normalized distributions Fit for entire range of Q 2 and without the coherent π + production M A 1π =1.16±0.15 GeV with χ 2 /ndf =22/39 For 0.0<Q 2 /GeV 2 <1.0 M A 1π =1.17±0.13 GeV with χ 2 /ndf =14/32 For Q 2 >0.2 GeV 2 PRELIMINARY Rein-Sehgal The same analysis for the default model In Nuance gives M A 1π =1.77±0.27 GeV with χ 2 /ndf =22/39 5/22/098J. Nowak - NuInt09

GA M A 1π PRELIMINARY Keeping the dipole form of the C 5 A we performed two-parameter fits Default contribution to CCπ + events M A only fit 1σ contour Best fit M A 1π =1.37 GeV C 5 A (0)=0.97 Best fit M A 1π =1.15 GeV Coherent<0.04 G A RS (0)=0.764 M A 1π and coherent contribution M A 1π and C 5 A (0) 5/22/099J. Nowak - NuInt09

PRELIMINARY The new model of charged Current pion production Improved agreement with data We performed fits for three models 5/22/0910J. Nowak - NuInt09 2a. Coherent contribution and M A 1π M A 1π =1.15 GeV Coherent<0.04 2b. M A 1π and C 5 A (0) M A 1π =1.37 GeV C 5 A (0)= The fit result for M A 1π for Q 2 >0.2GeV 2 M A 1π =1.17±0.13 GeV. #events / 5.58E20POT/bin PRELIMINARY Best fit values obtained for the new model with BRS (muon mass), new G V and C 5 A

5/22/09J. Nowak - NuInt0911

5/22/09J. Nowak - NuInt0912 M A 1π =1.16±0.15 GeV with χ 2 /ndf =22/39 For 0.0<Q 2 /GeV 2 <1.0 M A 1π =1.17±0.13 GeV with χ 2 /ndf =14/39 For Q 2 >0.2 GeV 2 M A 1π =1.06±0.1 GeV For shape Q 2 >0.2 GeV 2 with χ 2 /ndf =110/39 (absolutely normalized)

 SciBooNE K2K, PRL 95, (2005) 1.1 GeV 2.2 GeV 1.3 GeV MiniBooNE, PHLTA,B664,41 NC coherent pion production is Of all NC π 0 (19.5 ±1.1 (stat) ±2.5 (sys))% 5/22/0913J. Nowak - NuInt09