Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Advertisements

DIScovery SciEnce through Computational Thinking (DISSECT) Enrico Pontelli.
Funding for Education Scholarship Russ Pimmel NSF ASEE Annual Conference June 20, 2006.
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Computer & Information Science and Engineering Directorate (CISE) National Science Foundation (NSF) CPATH CISE Pathways to Revitalized Undergraduate Computing.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
1 Jill Singer Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for Education & Human Resources National Science Foundation Sustainability.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Proposal Strengths and Weakness as Identified by Reviewers Russ Pimmel & Sheryl Sorby FIE Conference Oct 13, 2007.
NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
1 The NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program Jill Singer Program Director, Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Overview of NSF Education R & D Programs with an Emphasis on the TUES Program Louis Everett Susan Finger Sue Fitzgerald.
1 ASBMB Special Symposium: Student Centered Education in the Molecular and Life Sciences II University of Richmond July 21, 2011 Transforming Undergraduate.
Webinar NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program
Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate of Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation Webinar NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
National Science Foundation 1 The New CCLI Program, and other Funding Opportunities for Undergraduate Geoscience Education Jeffrey Ryan Program Director.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Nuts & Bolts Session National Science Foundation CCLI Grant Writing Linnea Fletcher ASMCUE Program 7 – 9 pm (2 hours) May 28, 2009.
Building Strategic, Sustainable Collaborations in Research and Education Richard A. Aló Program Director, National Science Foundation Division.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate of Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM Education:
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
1. Most of the information presented in this workshop represents the presenter’s opinion and not an official NSF position 2.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
David Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University April 8, 2015 Webinar SAGE/GAGE FACILITIES SUPPORTING BROADER EDUCATIONAL IMPACTS: SOME CONTEXTS.
Congress created the NSF in 1950 as an independent federal agency. Budget ~$7.0 billion (2012) Funding for basic research.
Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate of Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation Webinar NSF’s Improving Undergraduate STEM.
GEO-AGEP webinar, August 2, 2012 Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
S L I D E 0 An Introduction to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and its Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) Program.
Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case. Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)
Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship The NSF Reviewers’ Perspective NSF Training Grants Workshop.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
1 The College of William and Mary “Cutting Edge” Early Career Workshop June, 2008 Jill Singer Division of Undergraduate Education Directorate for Education.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Writing More Effective IUSE-EHR Proposals Jeff Ryan, University of South Florida Jill Singer, SUNY Buffalo State Earth Educators’ Rendezvous July 14, 2015.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Description of a Process for Enhancing Pre-service Programs to Better Prepare General Education Teachers to Teach Students with Disabilities 2016 CEEDAR.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
June 21, 2016 Wayne State Univeristy
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Standard Four Program Impact
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM SOLICITATION NSF

CCLI Vision and Scope Vision: Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate students Vision: Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate students Supports efforts that Supports efforts that Bring advances in STEM disciplinary knowledge into curriculum Bring advances in STEM disciplinary knowledge into curriculum Create or adapt learning materials and teaching strategies Create or adapt learning materials and teaching strategies Develop faculty expertise Develop faculty expertise Promote widespread implementation of educational innovations Promote widespread implementation of educational innovations Prepare future K-12 teachers Prepare future K-12 teachers Enhance our understanding of how students learn STEM topics Enhance our understanding of how students learn STEM topics Enhance our understanding how faculty adopt instructional approaches Enhance our understanding how faculty adopt instructional approaches Build capacity for assessment and evaluation Build capacity for assessment and evaluation Further the work of the program itself Further the work of the program itself

CCLI Vision and Scope (Cont) Program especially encourages projects that: Program especially encourages projects that: Have potential to transform undergraduate STEM education Have potential to transform undergraduate STEM education Produce widespread adoption of classroom practices based on how students learn Produce widespread adoption of classroom practices based on how students learn Explore cyberlearning Explore cyberlearning

PROJECT COMPONENTS Creating Learning Materials and Strategies Creating Learning Materials and Strategies Incorporate ideas from research on teaching and learning Incorporate ideas from research on teaching and learning Incorporate scientific advances in disciplines Incorporate scientific advances in disciplines Implementing New Instructional Strategies Implementing New Instructional Strategies Implement proven or promising techniques in ways that encourage widespread adoption Implement proven or promising techniques in ways that encourage widespread adoption Add knowledge about transfer of strategies and impact on learning Add knowledge about transfer of strategies and impact on learning Developing Faculty Expertise Developing Faculty Expertise Increase instructor’s knowledge and skills on curricula and teaching practices Increase instructor’s knowledge and skills on curricula and teaching practices Involve diverse group of faculty Involve diverse group of faculty

PROJECT COMPONENTS (cont) Assessing and Evaluating Student Achievement Assessing and Evaluating Student Achievement Develop and disseminate valid and reliable tests of STEM knowledge and skills Develop and disseminate valid and reliable tests of STEM knowledge and skills Collect, synthesize, and interpret information about students Collect, synthesize, and interpret information about students Conducting Research on Undergraduate STEM Education Conducting Research on Undergraduate STEM Education Explore how undergraduate STEM students learn Explore how undergraduate STEM students learn Explore how practices have diffused and how faculty and programs implement changes Explore how practices have diffused and how faculty and programs implement changes NOTE: NOTE: Instrumentation and equipment requests are appropriate -- based learning impact

Important Project Features Quality, Relevance, and Impact Quality, Relevance, and Impact Describe a recognized need or opportunity and an innovative approach Describe a recognized need or opportunity and an innovative approach Student Focus Student Focus Link activities and improvements in STEM learning Link activities and improvements in STEM learning Knowledge about STEM Education: Knowledge about STEM Education: Build on existing work & disseminate new finding and results Build on existing work & disseminate new finding and results STEM Education Community-Building STEM Education Community-Building Interact with others in the STEM education community Interact with others in the STEM education community Sustainability Sustainability Demonstrate reasonable expectation of persistent effects Expected Measurable Outcomes Expected Measurable Outcomes Describe goals & expected measurable outcomes Describe goals & expected measurable outcomes Project Evaluation Project Evaluation Monitor progress toward expected outcomes and success in achieving them Monitor progress toward expected outcomes and success in achieving them

Type 1 Projects 70 to 75 awards expected 70 to 75 awards expected Total budget up to $200,000 for 2 to 3 years Total budget up to $200,000 for 2 to 3 years 250,000 when 4-year and 2-year schools collaborate 250,000 when 4-year and 2-year schools collaborate Deadline Deadline May 21, 2009 (A-M states) May 21, 2009 (A-M states) May 22, 2009 (N-Z states) May 22, 2009 (N-Z states) Typically involve a single institution & one program component Typically involve a single institution & one program component Contribute to the understanding of undergraduate STEM education Contribute to the understanding of undergraduate STEM education

Type 2 Projects 20 to 25 awards expected 20 to 25 awards expected Total budget up to $600,000 for 2 to 4 years. Total budget up to $600,000 for 2 to 4 years. Deadline January 13, 2010 Deadline January 13, 2010 Typically involve multiple institutions & several program components – but exceptions Typically involve multiple institutions & several program components – but exceptions Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions Produce evidence on the effectiveness Produce evidence on the effectiveness Institutionalize at the participating schools Institutionalize at the participating schools

Type 3 Projects 3 to 5 awards expected 3 to 5 awards expected Budget negotiable, but not to exceed $5,000,000 over 5 years. Budget negotiable, but not to exceed $5,000,000 over 5 years. Deadline January 13, 2010 Deadline January 13, 2010 Large scale efforts Large scale efforts Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions Produce evidence of student learning in a broad population Produce evidence of student learning in a broad population Describe impact of the work on the prevailing models Describe impact of the work on the prevailing models Describe strategies for implementation in new contexts Describe strategies for implementation in new contexts

CCLI Central Resource Projects 1 to 3 awards expected 1 to 3 awards expected Budget negotiable, depending on the scope and scale of the activity Budget negotiable, depending on the scope and scale of the activity Small focused workshop projects -- 1 to 2 years & up to $100,000 Small focused workshop projects -- 1 to 2 years & up to $100,000 Large scale projects -- 3 to 5 years & $300,000 to $3,000,000 Large scale projects -- 3 to 5 years & $300,000 to $3,000,000 Deadline January 13, 2010 Deadline January 13, 2010 Implement activities to sustain the STEM community Implement activities to sustain the STEM community Increase the capabilities of and communications in the STEM community Increase the capabilities of and communications in the STEM community Increase and document the impact of CCLI projects Increase and document the impact of CCLI projects

NSF Merit Review Criteria`` Standard intellectual merit and the broader impacts review criteria Standard intellectual merit and the broader impacts review criteria Additional intellectual merit review criteria Additional intellectual merit review criteria Produce exemplary material, processes, or models that enhance student learning Produce exemplary material, processes, or models that enhance student learning Yield important findings related to student learning Yield important findings related to student learning Build on existing knowledge about STEM education Build on existing knowledge about STEM education State expected outcomes & integrate them into evaluation plan State expected outcomes & integrate them into evaluation plan Describe evaluation plan that is likely to produce useful information Describe evaluation plan that is likely to produce useful information Additional broader impacts review criteria Additional broader impacts review criteria Contribute to the understanding of STEM education Contribute to the understanding of STEM education Help build the STEM education community Help build the STEM education community Have a broad impact on recognized need or opportunity Have a broad impact on recognized need or opportunity Have the potential to contribute to transformative change Have the potential to contribute to transformative change