Anti-Slug Control Experiments Using Nonlinear Observers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING GROUP Førsteamanuensis Tore Haug-Warberg Professor Heinz Preisig Professor Sigurd Skogestad Førsteamanuensis Nadi Skjøndal-Bar.
Advertisements

Benjamin Stephens Carnegie Mellon University 9 th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots December 8, 2009 Modeling and Control of Periodic.
TransAT – OLGA Coupling
Kalman’s Beautiful Filter (an introduction) George Kantor presented to Sensor Based Planning Lab Carnegie Mellon University December 8, 2000.
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Prepared By: Kevin Meier Alok Desai
Stabilization of Desired Flow Regimes in Pipelines
1 Operation of heat pump cycles Jørgen Bauck Jensen & Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
First Order Linear Equations Integrating Factors.
Muhammad Moeen YaqoobPage 1 Moment-Matching Trackers for Difficult Targets Muhammad Moeen Yaqoob Supervisor: Professor Richard Vinter.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
First African Control Conference, Cape Town, 04 December 2003
Book Adaptive control -astrom and witten mark
PSE and PROCESS CONTROL
Kalman Filter (Thu) Joon Shik Kim Computational Models of Intelligence.
Complete Pose Determination for Low Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using Stereo Vision Luke K. Wang, Shan-Chih Hsieh, Eden C.-W. Hsueh 1 Fei-Bin Hsaio.
Probabilistic Robotics Bayes Filter Implementations Gaussian filters.
Department of Chemical Engineering,
Multiple Model approach to Multi-Parametric Model Predictive Control of a Nonlinear Process a simulation case study Boštjan Pregelj, Samo Gerkšič Jožef.
Public PhD defence Control Solutions for Multiphase Flow Linear and nonlinear approaches to anti-slug control PhD candidate: Esmaeil Jahanshahi Supervisors:
1 1 Subsea process systems engineering Integrated and new processes for separation (vapor pressure and dewpoint control) and water handling, with emphasis.
The “ ” Paige in Kalman Filtering K. E. Schubert.
Benjamin Stephens Carnegie Mellon University Monday June 29, 2009 The Linear Biped Model and Application to Humanoid Estimation and Control.
Objectives Discuss final project deliverables Control Terminology
Secure In-Network Aggregation for Wireless Sensor Networks
1 Anti-slug control on a small-scale two-phase loop Heidi Sivertsen and Sigurd Skogestad Departement of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Chapter 11 Compensator Design When the full state is not available for feedback, we utilize an observer. The observer design process is described and.
NCAF Manchester July 2000 Graham Hesketh Information Engineering Group Rolls-Royce Strategic Research Centre.
Unscented Kalman Filter 1. 2 Linearization via Unscented Transform EKF UKF.
Lecture 25: Implementation Complicating factors Control design without a model Implementation of control algorithms ME 431, Lecture 25.
1 Decentralized control Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.
1 1 Vinicius de Oliveira | an intelligent adaptive anti-slug control system for production maximization Vinicius de Oliveira Control and Automation Engineering.
Control limitations for unstable plants
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Differential Equations Linear Equations with Variable Coefficients.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Differential Equations MTH 242 Lecture # 05 Dr. Manshoor Ahmed.
Stabilizing control and controllability:
The Unscented Kalman Filter for Nonlinear Estimation Young Ki Baik.
1 Effect of Input Rate Limitation on Controllability Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Austin, Texas November 7 th, 2002 Espen Storkaas & Sigurd Skogestad.
1 Feedback: Still the simplest and best solution Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Process control group of Sigurd Skogestad, Departmenmt of Chemical Engineering, NTNU, Trondheim,
1 1 Sigurd Skogestad | Closed-loop model identification and PID/PI tuning for robust anti-slug control Closed-loop model identification and PID/PI tuning.
1 Sammenligning av lineære og ulineære metoder for robust Anti-slug regulering Slug (liquid) buildup Two-phase pipe flow (liquid and vapor) Sigurd Skogestad.
Coordinator MPC with focus on maximizing throughput
Probably© the smoothest PID tuning rules in the world: Lower limit on controller gain for acceptable disturbance rejection Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Unscented Kalman Filter for a coal run-of-mine bin
Comparison of nonlinear model-based controllers and gain-scheduled Internal Model Control based on identified model Esmaeil Jahanshahi and Sigurd Skogestad.
The thematic content of the series:
Feedback: The simple and best solution
Stabilization of Desired Flow Regimes in Pipelines
PSG College of Technology
Kalman’s Beautiful Filter (an introduction)
Unscented Kalman Filter
Active Control of Gas Lift Wells Simulation and Experimental Series
Feedback: The simple and best solution
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Christoph J. Backi and Sigurd Skogestad
State and parameter estimation for a Gas-Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Differential Equations
Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, USA
Espen Storkaas and Sigurd Skogestad Dep. of Chemical Engineering
Simplified First Principle Model for Severe
Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, USA
Hafez Sarkawi (D1) Control System Theory Lab
Espen Storkaas and Sigurd Skogestad
Presentation transcript:

Anti-Slug Control Experiments Using Nonlinear Observers The thematic content of the series: 1 Facts Revenue from the last two years; Localization; History and surroundings 2 Research Six strategic areas; Three Centres of Excellence; Laboratories; Cooperation with SINTEF; 3 Education and student activities Study areas and programmes of study; Quality Reform; Further- and continuing education; Internationalization 4 Innovation and relationships with business and industry Innovative activities; Agreements with the public and private sectors 5 Dissemination Publications, events and the mass media Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, NTNU Library 6 Organization and strategy Board and organization; Vision, goal and strategies; For more on terminology, see www.uhr.no/informasjon/index.htm (“terminologiliste”) See also www.ntnu.no/intersek/english_matters/ (”Selected administrative terms with translations”) Anti-Slug Control Experiments Using Nonlinear Observers Esmaeil Jahanshahi, Sigurd Skogestad, Esten I. Grøtli Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU) American Control Conference - June 17th 2013, Washington, DC

Outline Introduction Motivation Modeling Observer design Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) High-Gain observe Fast UKF State-feedback Experimental results Controllability limitation

Introduction * figure from Statoil

Slug cycle (stable limit cycle) Experiments performed by the Multiphase Laboratory, NTNU

Introduction Anti-slug solutions Conventional Solutions: Choking (reduces the production) Design change (costly) : Full separation, Slug catcher Automatic control: The aim is non-oscillatory flow regime together with the maximum possible choke opening to have the maximum production

Motivation Objective: using topside pressure for control PT PC uz Pt,s Motivation Objective: using topside pressure for control Problem 1: Nonlinearity Additional Problem 2: Unstable zero dynamics (RHP-zero) MS=5.87, MT=6.46

Solution?! PT Nonlinear observer K State variables uc Pt Questions: Is this solution applicable for anti-slug control? Can observer bypass fundamental limitations? Which kind of observer is suitable? Experiments

Modeling

Modeling: Simplified 4-state model θ h L2 hc wmix,out x1, P1,VG1, ρG1, HL1 x3, P2,VG2, ρG2 , HLT P0 Choke valve with opening Z x4 h>hc wG,lp=0 wL,lp L3 wL,in wG,in w x2 L1 State equations (mass conservations law):

Experiments 3m

Bifurcation diagrams Top pressure Subsea pressure Gain = slope Experiment Bifurcation diagrams Top pressure Subsea pressure Gain = slope

Observer Design

1. Unscented Kalman Filter Nonlinear plant: (1) Prediction step:

1. Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) (2) Update step: (3) Correction step:

2. High-Gain Observer

2. High-Gain Observer where

3. Fast UKF Nonlinear model with transformed states: This is the high-gain observer without the observer term, therefore we do not need to specify the observer gain manually. High-gain Strategy: Large Qk and small Rk increase the UKF gain UKF gain: - Scaling of states and measurement in the model

State Feedback Kc : a linear optimal controller calculated by solving Riccati equation Ki : a small integral gain (e.g. Ki = 10−3)

Experimental Results

High-gain observer – top pressure Experiment High-gain observer – top pressure measurement: topside pressure valve opening: 20 %

Experiment Fast UKF – top pressure measurement: topside pressure valve opening: 20 %

High-gain observer – subsea pressure Experiment High-gain observer – subsea pressure measurement: topside pressure valve opening: 20 %

PI Controller – subsea pressure Experiment PI Controller – subsea pressure measurement: subsea pressure valve opening: 40 %

Linear observer (KF) – subsea pressure Experiment Linear observer (KF) – subsea pressure measurement: subsea pressure valve opening: 40 %

Summary of experiments Stabilizing Control Method \ CV Subsea pressure Top Pressure Linear Controllers (PI, H∞) Working Not Working Fast Linear Observer Fast Nonlinear Observer Not Working??!* Slow Nonlinear Observer Not Robust* Max. Valve 40% 20% * Estimation works (open-loop), but slow * Estimation also not working

Chain of Integrators Fast nonlinear observer using subsea pressure: Not Working??! Fast nonlinear observer (High-gain) acts like a differentiator Pipeline-riser system is a chain of integrator Measuring top pressure and estimating subsea pressure is differentiating Measuring subsea pressure and estimating top pressure is integrating

Controllability limitation – top pressure Measuring topside pressure we can stabilize the system only in a limited range RHP-zero dynamics of top pressure Z = 20% Z = 40% Ms,min 2.1 7.0

Conclusions Nonlinear observers work only when measuring topside pressure This works in a limited range (valve opening) A fast observer is needed for stabilizing control Fast nonlinear observers fail when measuring subsea pressure Observer can counteract nonlinearity But cannot bypass fundamental limitation (non-minimum-phase system) Thank you!