CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Advertisements

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF PETS V. Soldatov¹, D. Gudkov¹, I. Syratchev², A. Samoshkin¹, G. Riddone², A. Olyunin¹, S. Atieh² 1 – JINR, Dubna,
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
RF particle acceleration Kyrre N. Sjøbæk * FYS 4550 / FYS 9550 – Experimental high energy physics University of Oslo, 26/9/2013 *k.n.sjobak(at)fys.uio.no.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Development of Dielectric-Based Wakefield Power Extractors Chunguang Jing 1,2, W. Gai 1, A. Kanareykin 2, Igor Syratchev, CERN 1. High Energy Physics Division,
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
RF Power production at CTF3 X-band structure collaboration meeting,SLAC 6 th July 2009 Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  30 GHz power production  12 GHz power production.
Overview of the CLIC RF Structure Development Program W. Wuensch Second Collaboration Meeting on X-band Structures KEK,
June 2007, CERN. HDS 60 (cells) copper was processed from both sides Low Vg a/λ=0.16 High Vg a/λ=0.19 HDS 11 titanium Very often we do observe, that after.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
X-Band RF Structure and Beam Dynamics Workshop, December 2008 CERN experience with 12 GHz high power waveguide components Igor Syratchev (CERN)
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
2nd CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), CERN January 2008 Introduction to the CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) Design. I. Syratchev.
RF structure design KT high-gradient medical project kick-off Alberto Degiovanni TERA Foundation - EPFL.
Development of Dielectric PETS Chunguang Jing and Wei Gai ANL and Euclid CLIC workshop 2013.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
The CLIC accelerating structure development program Walter Wuensch CARE05 23 November 2005.
The NLC RF Pulse Compression and High Power RF Transport Systems Sami G. Tantawi, G.Bowden, K.Fant, Z.D.Farkas, W.R.Fowkes J.Irwin, N.M.Kroll, Z.H.Li,
ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
I. Syratchev, structure team meeting, Re-circulation Re-visited I. Syratchev.
I. Syratchev, HGW 2012, KEK, Japan The high power demonstration of the PETS ON/OFF operation with beam. I. Syratchev for CLIC team.
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
X-band Based FEL proposal
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
X-band high-power variable RF splitter
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
NC Accelerator Structures
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators
Summary of the test structure design
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Physics Design on Injector I
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer structure (PETS)
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Presentation transcript:

CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure. (2004) CLIC linac subunit layout: CLIC accelerating Structure (HDS) Main beam 30 GHz, 200 MW per structure CLIC Power Extraction and Transfer Structure (PETS) with ‘On/Off’ option. Drive beam (164 A)

INTRODUCTION Mission: PETS should generate 800 MW, 42 ns, 30 GHz RF pulses (8 bunches spacing HDS design ). Following present CLIC main linac layout (1 PETS x 4 HDS), the PETS active length should not exceed 0.7m. PETS aperture: For the given length and RF power of the PETS, beam current scales as: and transverse wake amplitude: Constraints: #1. Drive beam accelerator length/cost scales inverse proportionally with the drive beam current. #2. Combining rings. In general higher energies require larger rings. #3. PETS reliability. One should not accept a design, when electric surface fields in PETS exceed values of that in a main linac. #4. Transverse wake in a PETS should be within acceptable level. As a compromise, PETS apertures from 20 mm to 25 mm were chosen for detailed study. Circularly symmetric structures P=800 MW L=0.7 m Drive beam current, A Drive beam energy, GeV Beam aperture, mm Beam aperture, mm HDS level Transverse wake, n/s E surf. , MeV/m Beam aperture, mm Beam aperture, mm

Phase advance and aperture PETS longitudinal impedance (by GDFIDL) 2.2 GeV 25 mm “66 GHz” check 2.7 GeV Drive beam current, A 22.5 mm V/pC/m P=800 MW L=0.7 m 3.66 GeV 20.0 mm Frequency, GHz Phase/cell degrees PETS parameters: F= 29.9855 GHz Aperture = 22.5 mm R/Q = 320.2 Ohm/m Beta = 0.798 C /cell = 1400 I Drive beam = 164 A RF power = 800 MW Active length = 0.7 m Damping slots: 8 x 2 mm 20.0 mm W , normalized 22.5 mm 25 mm PETS Phase/cell degrees The higher phase advance, the less HOM damping.

CLIC PETS in general PETS machining prototype Finally adopted PETS is represented by 22.5 mm diameter circular waveguide with shallow (~1.3 mm deep) sinus-type corrugations with 1400 phase advance per period (3.8885 mm). Eight HOM damping slots are placed symmetrically around the circumference splitting the whole structure into 8 identical pieces. To simplify the fabrication, the active profile of each of 8 racks was chosen to be flat The damping slot width (2 mm) and slot’s rounding radii (0.8 mm) provided quasi-constant surface electric field distribution. This technology is very similar to that was chosen for HDS accelerating structure. PETS geometry provides certain margins towards active length and RF power to be produced without affecting beam stability along the decelerator. PETS architecture 854 70 23 61 700 PETS Power Extractor (PPE) at 800 MW E max = 135 MV/m H max =0.22MA/m PETS regular part Matching section

Transverse modes damping in PETS The transverse HOM mode in PETS to taken care of has a frequency and group velocity practically identical to the decelerating one. The only way do damp it is to use its symmetry properties. Damping mechanism in PETS can be explained as a coherent radiation of many RF sources represented by the individual period of corrugation into the infinite radial slot. The angle of radiation here depends on the phase advance and distance between them. The higher the phase advance, the smaller the angle and less the damping. In any case radiation (damping) is strongest when phase advance and period are matched. For the practical reason the infinite slot is replaced by the brad-band RF matched load: Individual RF sources Transverse wake amplitude (GDFIDL) Transverse wake spectra (GDFIDL) Un-damped Un-damped Damped Wt, V/pC/m/mm V/A/mm/m Damped Distance, m Frequency, GHz

Transverse modes damping in PETS. HFSS versus GDFIDL. Z0=5.857 Two modes time domain approximation Power extraction Z0 Bunch F, GHz Q k, V/pC/mm/m M0 32.90 10000 0.4 F, GHz Q k, V/pC/mm/m M1 29.55 8.9(52) 0.27 M2 34.20 9.5(56) 0.12 =0.87 Damped =1.77 mm Un-damped =1.77 mm Damped =0.88 mm

PLACET simulations (Daniel) Beam jitter amplification Practically no effect on the beam transport of the transverse HOM can be observed now! Transverse modes: M1 M2 Kt, V/pC/m/mm 0.904 0.473 F, GHz 27.844 34.915 Beta 0.876 C 0.646 C Q loaded (HFSS) 40 38

RF power extraction. Adiabatic matching section Reflection regular cells Matching section S12TM02 S11TM01 Power S11TM01 Transmition S11TM02 15 matching cells S12TM02 Number of matching cells PETS is a very over-moded RF system. Any geometrical perturbation can provoke coupling of the decelerating mode to the number of HOMs. In order to extract RF power into the smooth waveguide efficiently, a long adiabatic section is needed. A number of gradually reduced corrugations (periods) was optimised to bring the reflection and mode conversion to better than – 40 Db. Total length of matching section is 58 mm (15 periods). Number of regular cells

PETS 30 GHz 8 cannel quasi-optical RF power extractor HFSS simulations Low power prototype Backward Losses, dB Forward 20 mm Frequency, GHz -2% level Power extracted No Ohmic losses Emax: 88 MV/m at 800 MW Frequency, GHz

PETS 30 GHz 8 cannel quasi-optical RF power extractor (continued) Prototype low power RF measurements Power budget per channel: E01 mode launcher Matching transformer Reflection S11 Efficiency: 97.0 % Channel number Power extracted Average extracted Average expected S1-2...5 S1-6...9

Full geometry HFSS simulation Power Extractor Isolation, dB Output Matching section S11(02) Regular PETS (6 cells) S12(01) S12(02) Frequency, GHz Input Matching section R12.75 R13.0 Extractor resonances Extraction, dB Matching ring (S 3.0mm) Frequency, GHz

CLIC PETS ON/OFF principle of operation Ranking 1 (TRC report) Few examples: 1. Length – 0.7 m,  - 0.798 (CLIC PETS) For constant impedance structure, the RF power distribution along the structure can be expressed as: If we need to avoid power production at the end of the structure, than the detuning should be sufficient (without losses) if: Where FD is a new detuned synchronous frequency, L – length of the structure and  - group velocity. For CLIC PETS FD = 31.69 GHz: Output power First Zero Frequency (FZF) Detuned frequency, GHz 2. FZF versus group velocity and structure length L=0.9 m L=0.7 m L=0.5 m FZF, GHz CLIC PETS Vgroup/C “ON” Power “OFF” Distance, m

CLIC PETS ON/OFF mechanism description Ideally, by insertion of 4 (1.6 mm thick) wedges through the damping slots, sufficient PETS synchronous frequency detuning can be achieved: PETS parameters evolution during wedges movement. “ON” “OFF” Vgroup/C R/Q, Ohm The need to have a technological (~0.2 mm) slit between the wedge and damping slot unfortunately forces the radiation of generated RF power. This potentially can destroy the RF loads which are not designed for the high power use. The solution is to introduce another slot along the edge of the wedge. For that we pay by certain field enhancement in a technological slit when the wedge passes its intermediate position. Wedges position, mm Wedges position, mm Esurf., V/mx1W Q-factor Straight wedge Slotted wedge Field enhancement inside the slit Ohmic value Wedges position, mm Wedges position, mm Radiation Qext=3x106 Qext=105

CLIC PETS ON/OFF mechanism description (continued) Damping animation FZF Frequency, GHz Wedges inserted Vgroup/C Surface field PETS aperture Amplitude, norm. The “ON/OFF” operation can be performed with the proposed method. The FZF point is established at a radial position of the wedge of 12.0 mm. If “variable” attenuation option is required, the danger of undesired field enhancement in a technological slit does appear. Power Wedges position, mm

CLIC PETS variable attenuator option. Draft. Hans (CLIC meeting, 20.02.04) Corrugated slotted wedge Not very much-“OFF” position “OFF” position FZF Surface field Frequency, GHz Esurf., V/mx1W Amplitude, norm. Power Wedges position, mm Vgroup/C Wedges position, mm

Structure symmetry radial distortion To simplify the geometry for HFSS, the two adjusted racks were moved by 0.5 mm in radial direction(see picture). V. Pointing density EZ E-field 900 0.5 mm 0.5 mm Phase, degree E EZ Amplitude Ex10 External Q-factor: 4.8x104 Cooper Q-factor: 1.2x104 The imperfection in radial positioning of the single rack (within acceptable tolerances) does not create problems neither with power damping, nor with any transverse action on the beam.

Ongoing activity Future studies #1. Structure The technical drawings of 40 cm PETS full scale prototype are under preparation. The brazed version of extractor is on a waiting list. #2. ON/OF mechanism RF design of the variable option to be finalized (incl. GDFIDL runs). Future studies #1. Structure The use of damping slot for monitoring of the beam position inside PETS. #2. ON/OF mechanism Mechanical design for the fast switching should be developed.