Doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 The PIFS Ambiguity A tutorial on some practical limitations to the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEEE CSMA/CA DCF CSE 6590 Fall /7/20141.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,
Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.
Contents IEEE MAC layer operation Basic CSMA/CA operation
Lecture 5: IEEE Wireless LANs (Cont.). Mobile Communication Technology according to IEEE (examples) Local wireless networks WLAN a.
Doc.: IEEE /328r0 Submission May 2001 Menzo Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Interpretations of Backoff Menzo Wentink Intersil
Dynamic Bandwidth Scheduling for QoS Enhancement over IEEE WLAN Sangwook Kang, Sungkwan Kim, Mingan Wang, Sunshin An Korea University European Wireless.
Module C- Part 1 WLAN Performance Aspects
Doc.: IEEE /605r3 Submission November 2001 S. Kandala, et. al. Slide 1 CFB Ending Rule under HCF Srinivas Kandala, Ken Nakashima, Yashihiro Ohtani.
14.1 Chapter 14 Wireless LANs Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Network Technology CSE Network Technology CSE3020 Week 9.
1 QoS Schemes for IEEE Wireless LAN – An Evaluation by Anders Lindgren, Andreas Almquist and Olov Schelen Presented by Tony Sung, 10 th Feburary.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Voice Traffic Performance over Wireless LAN using the Point Coordination Function Wei Supervisor: Prof. Sven-Gustav Häggman Instructor: Researcher Michael.
Network Security Wireless LAN. Network Security About WLAN  IEEE standard  Use wireless transmission medium such as radio, microwave, infrared.
Wireless LAN Simulation - IEEE MAC Protocol
Lecture #2 Chapter 14 Wireless LANs.
Opersating Mode DCF: distributed coordination function
MAC layer Taekyoung Kwon. Media access in wireless - start with IEEE In wired link, –Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection –send.
IEEE Project started by IEEE for setting standard for LAN. This project started in (1980, February), Name given to project is year and month.
Lecture 4 Wireless Medium Access Control
Computer and Data Communications Semester Mohd Nazri Mahmud Session 4a-12 March 2012.
CSE 6590 Wireless LANs and IEEE MAC 15 October 2015.
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard
IEEE Wireless LAN Standard. Medium Access Control-CSMA/CA IEEE defines two MAC sublayers Distributed coordination function (DCF) Point coordination.
Doc.: IEEE /065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.
Submission doc.: IEEE /569r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions.
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Chapter 6 Medium Access Control Protocols and Local Area Networks Wireless LAN.
WLAN. Networks: Wireless LANs2 Distribute Coordination Function (DCF) Distributed access protocol Contention-Based Uses CSMA/ CA – Uses both physical.
doc.: IEEE /243r2 Submission May 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Proposed Changes to the e D1.0 Draft Mathilde Benveniste.
Doc.: IEEE /452 Submission December, 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 A Hybrid Coordination Function for QoS Michael Fischer Intersil Corporation.
Doc.: IEEE /243r1 Submission May 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Proposed Changes to the e D1.0 Draft Mathilde Benveniste.
MAC Sublayer MAC layer tasks: – Control medium access – Roaming, authentication, power conservation Traffic services – DCF (Distributed Coordination.
Doc.: IEEE /457 Submission December 2000 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 An Enhanced-DCF Proposal Based on ‘Tiered Contention’
802.11: Introduction Reference: “IEEE : moving closer to practical wireless LANs”; Stallings, W.; IT Professional, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, May- June.
MAC Layer Protocols for Wireless Networks. What is MAC? MAC stands for Media Access Control. A MAC layer protocol is the protocol that controls access.
MAC for WLAN Doug Young Suh Last update : Aug 1, 2009 WLAN DCF PCF.
Design and Implementation of a Reservation-based MAC Protocol for Voice/Data over IEEE Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks Shiann-Tsong Sheu, Tzu-Fang Sheu.
CSMA/CA Simulation  Course Name: Networking Level(UG/PG): UG  Author(s) : Amitendu Panja, Veedhi Desai  Mentor: Aruna Adil *The contents in this ppt.
Distributed-Queue Access for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: V. Baiamonte, C. Casetti, C.-F. Chiasserini Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE /599r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 ‘Cyclic Prioritized Multiple Access (CPMA): An Access Mechanism.
COE-541 LAN / MAN Simulation & Performance Evaluation of CSMA/CA
November 2000 Jin-Meng Ho, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /367 Submission p-DCF for Prioritized MAC Service Jin-Meng Ho, Sid Schrum, and.
DSSS PHY packet format Synchronization SFD (Start Frame Delimiter)
Doc.: IEEE /110 Submission May 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 QoS Support in : Contention-Free MAC Perspective Sunghyun Choi.
EA C451 (Internetworking Technologies)
Medium Access Control MAC protocols: design goals, challenges,
Lecture 27 WLAN Part II Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for Collaborative BT and b MAC Mechanisms.
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
Chapter 6 Medium Access Control Protocols and Local Area Networks
QoS in Wireless Networks
Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details
EDCA Backoff Rules Mathilde Benveniste
Wireless LAN Simulation IEEE MAC Protocol
Management Frame Channel Access Latency in TGh
Neighborhood Capture and OBSS
CSE 313 Data Communication
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
July 2007 doc.: IEEE /2090r0 Aug 2007 Discussion on CCA Sensing on 20/40 MHz Secondary Channel with PIFS and DIFS Date: Authors: Notice:
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
HCF Channel Access And Inter-BSS Channel Sharing
Fast Active Scan Proposals
‘Shield’: Protecting High-Priority Channel Access Attempts
Chapter 15 Wireless LANs Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 1 The PIFS Ambiguity A tutorial on some practical limitations to the use of PIFS in the MAC Michael Fischer CHOICE-Intersil Medical Drive San Antonio, TX x107

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 2 The Problem The MAC defines PIFS as a "Priority" Inter-Frame Space, longer than SIFS and shorter than DIFS PIFS is intended to provide the AP with priority access to the medium when contending with DCF stations that wait for DIFS PIFS is supposed to permit a point coordinator to retain "control" of the medium, when a station does not respond, without leaving the medium idle for a DIFS period Since the formation of TGe there have been numerous proposals to expand the use of PIFS Unfortunately, PIFS is more useful paper (or on a wired medium) than in an BSA: In the expected/common case, PIFS works well, but in the alternate case, PIFS can be ambiguous, and may result in more collisions The ambiguity results in part from the way several PHYs are specified

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 3 PCF case: SIFS-PIFS Ambiguity From clause : –If a CF-Pollable STA does not respond to a CF-Poll (of any type) within the SIFS period following a transmission from the PC, or a non-CF- Pollable STA does not return the ACK frame within a SIFS period following a transmission from the PC that requires acknowledgment, then the PC shall resume control and may transmit its next frame after a PIFS period from the end of the PC's last transmission. There is one CCA measurement prior to the PIFS Tx-decision point: –CCA(busy) after SIFS is reasonable evidence that a response has started, –But the CCA must react to the very beginning of the transmission, and –PHYs with multiple antennas are allowed to check only one per slot time, –So CCA(idle) after SIFS is much weaker evidence that no response has started, and can lead to a destructive collision. Recommendation: Only use PHYs that sample all antennas every slot and have fast-reacting CCA for point coordinators.

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 4 SIFS-PIFS Ambiguity Details (+)CF-Poll Wireless Medium Point Coordinator Addressed Station transmit PHY-TXEND.indication PHY-RXEND.indication PHY-TXSTART.request RxRF+ RxPlcp M1Rx/ Tx SIFS PHY-CCA.indication(busy) here says response has begun, and prevents transmission after PIFS; but, lack of CCA(busy) does NOT necessarily mean response has not begun. Tx/ Rx CCAM2Rx/ Tx SLOT PIFS transmit after SIFS transmit after PIFS (preamble of) response to CF-Poll Collision! receive First CCA reading after SIFS boundary

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 5 DCF case: PIFS-DIFS Ambiguity The AP could, in theory, gain priority access to the medium during the contention period by starting transmissions after PIFS. There is one CCA measurement between the PIFS Tx-decision point and the DIFS Tx-decision point: –CCA(busy) after PIFS causes station to defer to AP, –But the CCA must react to the very beginning of the transmission, and –PHYs with multiple antennas are allowed to check only one per slot time, –So CCA(idle) after PIFS is much weaker evidence that no transmission has started, and can lead to a destructive collision. Recommendation: Be careful about using PIFS during contention period. Unlike the PCF case, this requires fast, multi-antenna CCA at all contending stations. –But a collision only occurs if some station has backoff count =1.

doc.: IEEE /336 Submission November 2000 Michael Fischer, Intersil Slide 6 PIFS-DIFS Ambiguity Details Other frame Wireless Medium Station Access Point PHY-RXEND.indication receive PHY-RXEND.indication PHY-TXSTART.request RxRF+ RxPlcp M1 SIFS Occurrence of PHY-CCA.indication(busy) here prevents transmission after DIFS; but lack of CCA(busy) does NOT necessarily mean that no other transmission has begun. CCA (idle) SLOT PIFS transmit after DIFS Collision! SLOT CCA (idle) M2Rx/ Tx receive RxRF+ RxPlcp M1CCAM2Rx/ Tx DIFS preamble of frame transmit after PIFS First CCA reading after PIFS boundary