Run to the Roar Peer Partnering with your Thinking Partners.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Engaging Students in Classroom Discussion. Learning Targets O I can explain the difference between text-based discussion and other discussion formats.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Dream, Design, Deliver Elementary PD Plan Courtney Bitar Tonya Cox Jay Nocco Barb Walker Suzanne Whaley.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Implementing Peer Coaching in PLTs Teacher Leadership for High Student Growth Sara Overby WCPSS Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy,
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Integrating Culture in the Language Classroom Iris Moye and Leslie Opp-Beckman University of Oregon.
Jefferson County Public Schools University of Louisville.
Effective Teamwork Reflection. “Before”-Individual Reflection Individually and silently respond to the prompts below on the provided paper: 1.What shared.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Our Learning Journey Shelly R. Rider. The Overarching Habits of Mind of a Productive Mathematical Thinker.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Coaching Mentoring and Reflecting Effectively: Creating a Culture of Excellence Through Colleague Collaboration and Reflective Practice Helene Chan, Norman.
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
DISCOVERY MIDDLE SCHOOL COLLEGE AND CAREER READY STANDARDS.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
STEM/Tech Ready Grant Overview WUSD Tech Ready Team.
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Empowering the Team.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics 8/18/14.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
The Coaching Cycle: Before, during, after
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Critical Friends to Support ERWC Fidelity Kathleen D. Rowlands ERWC i3 Coaches.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
English Department Chairs October 14, 2014 Sara Overby, Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
HHCKLA Buddhist Wisdom Primary School 香海正覺蓮社佛教正慧小學 Planning the Whole-school Language Policy – Enhancing the Quality of Language Learning and Teaching.
COMMON CORE ACADEMY SESSION ELEVEN: RECIPROCAL TEACHING MARCH 14, 2013/APRIL 25, 2013 Participants will identify the goal and principles underlying Reciprocal.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Identifying a focus for our peer observations in 2011.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Assessment for Learning in Mathematics Classrooms Chris Suurtamm University of Ottawa.
Implementing Peer Coaching in Your School Teacher Leadership for High Student Growth Sara Overby WCPSS Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy,
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
To provide an overview of the Peer Mentoring/Coaching Process
CCRS Implementation
Implementation data will continue to be collected
Coaching.
Coaching and Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Run to the Roar Peer Partnering with your Thinking Partners

“Peer partnering is a confidential process through which two or more professional colleagues work together to reflect on current practices; expand, refine, and build new skills; share ideas; teach one another; conduct classroom research; or solve problems in the workplace.” How to Plan and Implement a Peer Coaching Program by Pam Robbins The Definition

Our Purpose To create small content teams of teachers (2 or 3 teachers) within our PLC to support, collaborate, observe, reflect on practice, refine lessons, share ideas, and aid each other in planning and implementing strategic lessons in your classroom. Our Focus To engage and empower students in their own learning by planning and implementing strategic lessons in every classroom.

Peer Partnering Is and Is not Is 1. Observation based and specific 2. Based on Professional Dialog 3. Congenial 4. Supportive 5. Confidential 6. Changed to meet the needs of the inviting teacher Is not 1. General 2. Based on Social Dialog 3. Competitive 4. Evaluative 5. Public 6. The same for everyone

Peer Partnering with your Thinking Partners Designate a group facilitator. Read each chuck and code the text (use provided coding key, only the key is necessary) when directed to do so. Discuss that chunk within your group. Be prepared to share your thoughts whole group.  The Pre-Conference  The Observation  The Post Conference Excerpt from How to Plan and Implement a Peer Coaching Program by Pam Robbins

The Tool for the Observed Teacher  Praise: What went well? Be specific as you identify aspects of the teaching-learning process that you believe were effective. What evidence led you to these conclusions? How do these behaviors relate to strategic teaching?  Question: Questions you have—aspects of the class or lesson you’re wondering about for which a 3rd-party observer might have insights.  Polish: How can you build on identified strengths? In which areas would you like to change or improve? What ideas do you have for learning and developing in the identified areas?

The Tool for the Observer  Praise: What went well? Be specific as you identify aspects of the teaching-learning process that you believe were effective. What evidence led you to these conclusions? What specific, authentic praise can you offer the observed teacher in relation to strategic teaching?  Question: What questions do you have about the lesson or the students in the class that you observed? What are you curious about? What needs clarification?  Polish: Suggestions and ideas for consideration. How can the observed teacher build on identified strengths? In which areas might the observed teacher wish to focus learning and improvement? (Ideally, these suggestions will be framed as questions; for example, “What might happen if..? How do you think your students would react to...?, etc.)

Peer Partnering with your Thinking Partner  The Pre-Conference  The Observation  The Post Conference These will need to be completed using the PQP form for the observation for each group member by our next PD session on February 8th. You will share your experience with your content triads (or duos) at that session within your content area after school.

Language Arts/ English Thinking Partners  Hadden, Breeding, J. Smith  Horton, Lett, McCants  Collier, Dahlke, Elrod  Durough, Karr, Shamwell  Miller, Bush

Mathematics Thinking Partners  Anderson, Brewer, King  Mack, Maxwell, Wade  Oliver, Griffin, Grayson  Windham, Spratley, West

Science and Social Studies Thinking Partners  S. Smith, Caudle, Moody  Chastain, Williams, Stratton  Key, Perkins, Dennis  Jones, Stewart, Medlen

Electives and Collaborative Thinking Partners  Wilbanks, Spiegel, McKinnon  Wood, Rutledge, Nash  Willis, Jefferson  D. Wilson, Tankesley  Baragona, Ball  Lee, Vonk

Eleven Benefits for Peer Partnering with your Thinking Partners  An improved sense of professional skill (related to Strategic Teaching)  An enhanced ability to analyze your own lessons  A better understanding of teaching and learning (Focus on Learning)  A wider repertoire of instructional strategies (Before, During and After)  An increased sense of efficacy (I can do this!)  Stronger professional ties with colleagues  Improved teaching performance  Enhanced student progress  A better articulated curriculum  A more cohesive school culture (PLC)  A positive school climate How to Plan and Implement a Peer Coaching Program by Pam Robbins

Parking Lot Postings Reflect on the Partnering from today: Questions Questions Concerns Concerns Comments Comments This is the exit slip for today.