INVESTING IN INNOVATION (i3) SUMMARY OF 2015 i3 HIGHEST-RATED APPLICATIONS (HRAs)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Hawaii Department of Education April 2005 Title II A – Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Title II D – Enhancing.
Advertisements

Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Made Possible by the Broadband.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Federal Initiatives Update Investing in Innovation (i3)
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
First in the World 2015 Grant Competition Introductory Webinar April
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
RACE TO THE TOP Michael Lach February 15, 2010 MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM: Regional Conference.
Excellence for All Children 1 Higher Academic Standards A Defining Moment for Tennessee Schools.
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION National Teacher Forum U.S. Department of Education April 30, 2009.
Alaska Native Education Program Project Director’s Meeting Juneau, Alaska.
SBIR STTR Small Business Innovation Research & Small Business Technology Transfer at the National Science Foundation.
Summary of 2014 i3 Highest-Rated Applications (HRAs) Type of Grant HRA Absolute Priorities and Subparts 1.
Increasing Special Education Research Opportunities THE POLICY BEHIND EXPANDING EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES.
Ministry of Research and Innovation Research Programs International Society for Computational Biology July 23, 2008.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Overview Slides April 17, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Scale-up and Validation Applications Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
“Talking Freight” Presented by the Federal Highway Administration United States Department of Transportation July 27, 2011.
Escondido Union School District Budget Update The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Investing in Innovation Program (i3) Mathematics and Science Partnership Conference March 22, 2011.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.
Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets.
The Federal Stimulus: An Overview
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Presenters: Martin J. Blank, Martin J. Blank, President, Institute for Educational Leadership; Director, Coalition for Community Schools S. Kwesi Rollins.
Using Evidence to Guide Social Policy and Spending Ron Haskins March 1, 2012.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
July 25, 2011 National Education Statistics Agenda Committee Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund.
A+ College Ready Parent Information. What is A+ College Ready? 2.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
INVESTING IN INNOVATION FUND (i3) FY 2015 VALIDATION APPLICATIONS RECEIVED SUMMARY DOCUMENT.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Data TypeSummary Data TableSummary Graphic Competition Absolute Priority Competitive Preference Priority* *Calculated as a percentage of the total number.
ALSDE/A+ College Ready Parent Information. What is the ALSDE/A+ College Ready AP Initiative? 2.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Summary of 2013 i3 Highest-Rated Applications (HRAs) Type of Grant Absolute Priority Competitive Preference Priority* *Calculated as a percentage of the.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Race to the Top Assessment August 2, 2011 Patrick Rooney.
Welcome! PROGRAM MEETING July 23, 2012 OSEP Personnel Development Program 1.
Keystones to Opportunity Pennsylvania’s Vision for Sustainable Growth in Reading Achievement.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
ECHS A+ College Ready Parent Meeting August 16, 2012 – 7 PM A Partnership Between &
Alabama State Department of Education AP Initiative/A+ College Ready Parent Information.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
Teacher Incentive Fund to 2012: approx. $1.8 billion awarded for 131 TIF grants (4 cohorts) LEAs, SEAs*, non-profits* (*partnering with LEAs) Purpose:
State Board of Education February 10, Update on EOC Reports: Assessment Survey Results Full-Day 4K, CDEP.
Small Business Innovation Research Small Business Technology Transfer Research Prepared by: Susan Malone Back, PhD, MBA Director, SBIR/STTR Resource Center.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
The Diplomas Now Approach
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
DoD Ex-Officio Transition Support October 2018
Title Plans and Assurances Spoke Committee Presentation
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Presentation transcript:

INVESTING IN INNOVATION (i3) SUMMARY OF 2015 i3 HIGHEST-RATED APPLICATIONS (HRAs)

“As a nation, we expend tremendous time, capital and talent into finding the next great business idea, but too often we overlook the important innovations happening in our own schools, in our own communities. But what if we prized the ingenuity and creativity of our teachers and schools the same way we do for entrepreneurs and start-ups?” –Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education 2

 i3 is a Department of Education signature grant program focused on seeding and scaling innovations in K–12 public education. i3 rewards applicants for the rigor of evidence that supports their application—the more rigorous the research, the larger the award; early-stage innovations do not require evidence of effectiveness and receive commensurately smaller grants.  Through five competitions from 2010 to 2015, i3 has awarded $1.2 billion in grants to 143 grantees out of 4,300 applications. These grantees have secured over $200 million in private sector matching funds. This year, the Department received more than 400 applications for the 2015 i3 competition.  The Department awards three types of grants, from greatest amount of funding available to least: “Scale-up grants,” “Validation grants,” and “Development grants.” This “tiered” structure enables i3 to support programs at various phases of growth—from early-stage efforts to organizations with a national reach. 3 i3 IS THE DEPARTMENT’S LEADING PROGRAM FOCUSED ON INNOVATION AND EVIDENCE

THE i3 HRAs WILL SUPPORT STUDENTS ACROSS 18 STATES CompetitionOrganizationImplementation Locations Scale-upChildren’s Literacy InitiativeCO, FL, NJ, TX Scale-upNational Math and Science InitiativeCA, GA, IL, MI, ND, OH, TX, Scale-upNew Teacher CenterCA, CO, FL, NY ValidationColumbus State Community CollegeOH ValidationThe Curators of the University of MissouriMO ValidationJacksonville State UniversityAL, AR, UT DevelopmentThe After-School CorporationNY DevelopmentAssociation of Alaska School BoardsAK DevelopmentCenter for Supportive SchoolsNC DevelopmentDesoto Independent School DistrictTX DevelopmentMcREL InternationalCO DevelopmentMetropolitan-Nashville Public SchoolsTN DevelopmentNew Visions for Public Schools, Inc.NY 4

THE i3 HRAs WILL SERVE ~300,000 STUDENTS WITH OVER $110M IN FEDERAL FUNDING  There are 13 HRAs for the 2015 competition. These 13 organizations were selected from over 400 applications and, assuming they meet their required private-sector match, will receive a total investment of over $113 million in federal funds.  Approximately 300,000 students will be served by these 13 projects.  All three of the Scale-up projects are previous i3 Validation grant recipients that are now significantly expanding the impact of their evidence-based approaches. The three highest-rated Scale-up applicants are:  Children’s Literacy Initiative (CLI): CLI supports early literacy to ensure that students are reading on grade level by 3 rd grade—a key indicator of their long-term success. This award will allow CLI to serve an additional 49,500 students in Colorado, Florida, New Jersey and Texas.  National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI): NMSI will partner with 40 schools to increase the number of students taking and earning qualifying scores on Advanced Placement math, science, and English exams, enabling them to reach an additional 60,000 students.  New Teacher Center: The New Teacher Center partners with educators to improve student reading and mathematics learning by improving the instructional practice of teachers, improving teacher retention, developing teacher leaders, and disseminating of best practices. This project will enable them to serve an additional 117,000 students and over 1,800 teachers. 5

THE i3 HRAs ADDRESS A RANGE OF STUDENT NEEDS, INCLUDING RESHAPING STUDENTS’ HIGH SCHOOL EXPERIENCES 6 Absolute Priority # of Development HRAs # of Validation HRAs # of Scale-up HRAs High School RedesignN/A1– Non-Cognitive Factors1N/A Rural: High School Redesign N/A1– Rural: Non-Cognitive Factors 2N/A Standards & AssessmentsN/A1– STEM Education3N/A1 Teachers & Principals––2 Utilizing Technology1N/A Total733 Key: N/A = Priority not available in grant category; “–” = HRA not included in that priority

APPENDIX A: DevelopmentValidationScale-upTotal Local Educational Agency2002 Nonprofit with consortium of schools 1001 Nonprofit with Local Educational Agency Total73313 HRAs BY COMPETITION AND APPLICANT TYPE 7 HRAs BY ABSOLUTE PRIORITY AND FUNDING

APPENDIX B: PriorityDevelopmentValidationScale-upTotal High School RedesignN/A10,000– Non-Cognitive Factors2,500N/A 2,500 Standards & Assessments N/A25,500– STEM Education2,910N/A60,00062,910 Rural3,30020,000–23,300 Teachers & Principals N/A 166,492 Utilizing Technology5,000N/A 5,000 Total13,71055,500226,492295,702 TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS SERVED BY COMPETITION AND ABSOLUTE PRIORITY 8 TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS SERVED BY COMPETITION AND APPLICANT TYPE Organization TypeDevelopmentValidationScale-UpTotal Local Educational Agency2,010–– Nonprofit with consortium of schools 1,800–– Nonprofit with LEA9,90055,500226,492291,892 Total3,71055,500226,492295,702 Key: N/A = Priority not available in grant category; “–” = HRA not included in that priority