Michelson Interferometer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
24.6 Diffraction Huygen’s principle requires that the waves spread out after they pass through slits This spreading out of light from its initial line.
Advertisements

Fisica Generale - Alan Giambattista, Betty McCarty Richardson Copyright © 2008 – The McGraw-Hill Companies s.r.l. 1 Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction.
Interferometry It deals with experimental study of the phenomenon of interference. Instruments used in this study are based on principle of interference.
Interference of Light Waves
Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
Diffraction of Light Waves
Chapter 37 Wave Optics.
Chapter 24 Wave Optics.
Interference Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 22.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics II----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Interference Conditions for Interference: (i) (  2 
Physics 1402: Lecture 33 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded after Thanks Giving –Homework 09: Friday December 4 Optics –interference.
Double Slit Interference. Intensity of Double Slit E= E 1 + E 2 I= E 2 = E E E 1 E 2 = I 1 + I 2 + “interference”
Physics 1502: Lecture 34 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … –Homework 09: Friday December 4 Optics –Interference –Diffraction »Introduction.
Newton’s Rings Another method for observing interference in light waves is to place a planoconvex lens on top of a flat glass surface, as in Figure 24.8a.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Chapter 25:Optical Instruments Cameras Homework assignment : Read Chap.25, Sample exercises : 4,21,24,41,43  Principle of a camera ss’ D Intensity of.
9.12 Diffraction grating • Order of diffraction
3: Interference, Diffraction and Polarization
Chapter 37 Wave Optics. Wave optics is a study concerned with phenomena that cannot be adequately explained by geometric (ray) optics.  Sometimes called.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Interference and the Wave Nature of Light
EXAMPLE Young’s double-slit experiment is performed with 589-nm light and a distance of 2.00 m between the slits and the screen. The tenth interference.
Interference of Light Waves
Chapter 24 Wave Optics. General Physics Review – waves T=1/f period, frequency T=1/f period, frequency v = f velocity, wavelength v = f velocity, wavelength.
1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves
Diffraction is the bending of waves around obstacles or the edges of an opening. Huygen’s Principle - Every point on a wave front acts as a source of tiny.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Physics 1C Lecture 27B.
Interference in Thin Films, final
Newton’s Rings. AB P Q O Air film Plano convex lens Glass plate Thickness of air film is zero at point of contact O.
Ch 16 Interference. Diffraction is the bending of waves around obstacles or the edges of an opening. Huygen’s Principle - Every point on a wave front.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Young’s double slit experiment Young’s double slit experiment 9.10 Interference of light waves Relationship between x,,
Lecture Nine: Interference of Light Waves: I
Lecture 24 Interference of Light.
Lecture 26-1 Lens Equation ( < 0 )  True for thin lens and paraxial rays.  magnification m = h’/h = - q/p.
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Physics 1C Lecture 27A. Interference Treating light as a particle (geometrical optics) helped us to understand how images are formed by lenses and mirrors.
Newton’s rings between two curved surfaces
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Announcements HW set 10 due this week; covers Ch (skip 24.8) and Office hours: Prof. Kumar’s Tea and Cookies 5-6 pm today My office hours.
6.2 Two slit interference Coherence Two-Slit Interference Thin film Interference.
Coherent Sources. Wavefront splitting Interferometer.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
Conditions for Interference
INTERFEROMETER.
Interference: Division of wave fronts
Interference of Light Waves
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
Lecture 16 Interference Chapter 24.1  24.4 Outline Conditions for Interference Experiments Showing Interference Interference in Thin Films.
Coherent Sources.
1 Chapter 9 Interference November 14 General considerations of interference 9.1 General considerations Introduction: Wave equation  Superposition principle.
1 The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Snell’s Law Image formation.
Interference and Diffraction By Dr.P.M.Patel
2. Diffraction Grating Basic principles: Diffraction
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Chapter 24 Wave Optics. Young’s Double Slit Experiment Thomas Young first demonstrated interference in light waves from two sources in Light is.
Michelson Interferometer
Lecture 26-1 Lens Equation ( < 0 )  True for thin lens and paraxial rays.  magnification m = h’/h = - q/p.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Resolving Power
Multiple Beam Interference
Lens Equation ( < 0 ).
INTERFERENCE.
INTERFEROMETER.
Stokes Relations : (c) (a) (b) n1 n2 r2Ei rEi tEi t’tEi r’tEi trEi n1
1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves
The distance of the nth bright fringe from the centre
Physics 3 – Dec 7, 2017 P3 Challenge –
Presentation transcript:

Michelson Interferometer This instrument can produce both types of interference fringes i.e., circular fringes of equal inclination at infinity and localized fringes of equal thickness 1 1 1

INTERFEROMETER

Albert Abraham Michelson Michelson Interferometer Albert Abraham Michelson (1852-1931)

Michelson-Morley Experiment In 1878, Michelson thought the detection of motion through the ether might be measurable. In trying to measure the speed of the Earth through the supposed "ether", you could depend upon one component of that velocity being known - the velocity of the Earth around the sun, about 30 km/s. Using a wavelength of about 600 nm, there should be a shift of about 0.04 fringes as the spectrometer was rotated 360°. Though small, this was well within Michelson's capability. Michelson, and everyone else, was surprised that there was no shift. Michelson's terse description of the experiment: "The interpretation of these results is that there is no displacement of the interference bands. ... The result of the hypothesis of a stationary ether is thus shown to be incorrect." (A. A. Michelson, Am. J. Sci, 122, 120 (1881))

Experimental set up

Michelson Interferometer 6

Michelson Interferometer 7

Circular fringes Effective arrangement of the interferometer An observer at the detector looking into B will see M1, a reflected image of M2(M2//) and the images S’ and S” of the source provided by M1 and M2. This may be represented by a linear configuration. 8

Longitudinal section –Circular fringes P rn N O q S S d D

In Young’s double-hole experiment: For small qm Radius of nth bright ring

Internal reflection implies that the reflection is from an interface to a medium of lesser index of refraction. External reflection implies that the reflection is from an interface to a medium of higher index of refraction. 11

In Michelson interferometer Order of the fringe: When the central fringe is dark the order of the fringe is As d is increased new fringes appear at the centre and the existing fringes move outwards, and finally move out of the field of view. For any value of d, the central fringe has the largest value of m.

In Michelson interferometer For central dark fringe: The first dark fringe satisfies: For small θ

Radius of nth dark ring: 14

Haidinger Fringe

1. Measurement of wavelength of light Move one of the mirrors to a new position d’ so that the order of the fringe at the centre is changed from mo to m.

2. Measurement of wavelength separation of a doublet (λ1 and λ1+λ) If the two fringe patterns coincide at the centre: (Concordance) The fringe pattern is very bright 18

Concordance

2. Measurement of wavelength separation of a doublet (λ1 and λ1+λ) As d is increased p and q increase by different amounts, with When the bright fringes of λ1 coincide with the dark fringes of λ1+λ, and vice-versa and the fringe pattern is washed away (Discordance).

Discordance = (q+1/2)

2. Measurement of wavelength separation of a doublet (λ1 and λ1+λ) - Δ can be measured by increasing d1 to d2 so that the two sets of fringes, initially concordant, become discordant and are finally concordant again. - If p changes to p+n, and q changes to q+(n-1) we have concordant fringes again. 23

Measurement of the coherence length of a spectral line Measurement of thickness of thin transparent flakes Measurement of refractive index of gases

Displacement Sensitivity: 10-16 cm LIGO - Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory To detect Gravitational waves, one of the predictions of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity When Gravitational waves pass through the interferometer they will displace the mirrors! Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Washington, Livingston, Louisiana Arm length: 4 Km Displacement Sensitivity: 10-16 cm 25

Fabry-Perot Interferometer 26 26 26

Fabry-Perot Interferometer θ o 30 27

Multiple Beam Interference 28 28 28

Optical Reversibility and Phase Changes on Reflection G.G. Stokes used the principle of optical reversibility to investigate the reflection of light at an interface between two media. The reversibility principle states that If there is no absorption of light, a light ray that is reflected or refracted will retrace its original path if its direction is reversed.

r and t are fractional amplitudes reflected and transmitted respectively According to principle of reversibility, the combined effect of reversing the reflected and transmitted beams should just be the incident beam (in absence of absorption). © SPK

Thin films: multiple beam interference © SPK

Δ= 2μ d cos θ Path difference between rays 2 and 1 = μ (PN) [(OS + SR)(in film)] – [OM( in air) ] = [(PS + SR)(in film)] – [OM( in air)] = [(PR)(in film)] – [OM( in air)] = μ (PN + NR) – OM = μ (PN) = μ (OP Cos θ) Δ= 2μ d cos θ 32

= aor’= - aor = aotr’t’(1+ r’ + r’ + r’ +…) = aotr’t’(1/(1 –r’ )) CASE - I If 2μ d cos θm = m λ then rays 2,3,4, 5, …. are in phase and 1 out of phase. Amplitude of 2+3+4+5 …. = aotr’t’(1+ r’ + r’ + r’ +…) 2 4 6 = aotr’t’(1/(1 –r’ )) 2 = aotr’t’(1/tt’) = aor’= - aor 33

= aor +(- aor) = 0 = ao = aott’(1+ r’ + r’ + r’ +…) Total reflected Amplitude: 1+(2+3+4+…) = aor +(- aor) = 0 Amplitude of transmitted beams α, β, γ, δ … = aott’(1+ r’ + r’ + r’ +…) 2 4 6 = ao 34

If 2μ d cos θm = (m+1/2) λ then rays 1,2,4, 6, … are in phase CASE - II If 2μ d cos θm = (m+1/2) λ then rays 1,2,4, 6, … are in phase and 3,5,… are out of phase. Rays α, γ, … in phase and rays β , δ, … are out of phase

Optical field in reflected beam where : is the incident wave;  is the phase arising from the extra optical path length.

Resultant reflected scalar wave If the number of terms of the series approaches infinity, the series converges and the resultant becomes where,

Reflected irradiance

Optical field in transmitted beam

Transmitted irradiance

For Transmitted rays = 2mπ Path diff. 2μd cos θm = m = (2m+1)π Path diff. 2μd cos θm = (2m+1)/2

For Reflected rays

Interference filter

An interference filter is designed for normal incidence of 488 nm light. The refractive index of the spacer is 1.35. What should be the thickness of the spacer for normal incidence of light. It will pass different wavelength if the angle of incidence is not 90o.

We now introduce Coefficient of Finesse

Airy function A Airy function represents the transmitted flux-density distribution. Note:  is related to path difference . The complementary [1 - A()] represents the reflected flux-density distribution.

I0 d or  Multiple beam interference has resulted in redistribution of energy density in comparison to sinusoidal two-beam patter.

IR/I IT/I d or 

Variation of intensities with phase d or  51

Bright fringes Transmitted rays Dark fringes Reflected rays Dark fringes Transmitted rays Bright fringes Reflected rays 52

Fabry-Perot Interferometer 53 53 53

Fabry-Perot Interferometer θ o 30 54

The conditions of interference are precisely those discussed earlier The conditions of interference are precisely those discussed earlier. With =1, the bright fringes in transmission are given by: 2d cosm= m The radii of the rings are therefore given by the formula obtained in Michelson interferometer i.e., Rn ≈ D2m2 = D2n/d However, there is an essential difference between M.I. and F.P.: One uses a two beam interference while the other uses multiple beam interference. Hence the formula for the intensities and the sharpness of the fringes are quite different.

The intensity is given by: Where F is Coefficient of finesse of the mirror system. F = (2r/(1-r2))2 and we also know that, for bright fringe : 2d cosm= m What we can conclude from these equations: The intensity falls on either side of the maximum. The fall in intensity is dictated by the value of the Coefficient of finesse F. The Coefficient of finesse is larger for values of the reflection coefficient r approaching unity. Thus very sharp rings are obtained by increasing the polish of the mirrors.

I0 57

Transmitted intensity 58

Full width at half maximum =IT/Io φm 59

wikipedia

When two mirrors are held fixed and adjusted for parallelism by screwing some sort of spacer, it is said to be an Etalon. A quartz plate polished and metal-coated will also serve as an Etalon (with   1).

Chromatic resolving power The ability of the spectroscope or the interferometer to separate the components of multiplets is known as chromatic resolving power (CRP). In a two beam interferometer, like Michelson interferometer and Young’s double slit set-up, the bright fringes are as broad as the dark fringes. The fringes are not sharp. For good resolution, the bright fringes must be as sharp as possible.

Michelson fringes Fabry-Perot fringes 63

Fabry-Perot interferometer Doublet separation in Fabry-Perot interferometer 64

Resolved wavelengths s: separation w: width 65

Unresolved wavelengths 66

Barely resolved 67

Chromatic resolving power of Fabry Perot interferometer - Where, λ is the minimum wavelength interval of a doublet that the instrument is capable of barely resolving. - The criterion for bare resolution is called the Rayleigh criterion. - The smaller the value of λ, the higher is the resolving power of the instrument. Barely resolved Using: 2d cos θm= mλ ; ( Pabry-Perot - bright fringe in transmission ) 68

FWHM: Angular distance at which the intensity falls to half the peak intensity

sin(a+b) =sin a cos b+ cos a sin b ; & Using 70

Using F1/2 71

λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP<1000 Sodium doublet λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP<1000 72

λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP ~ 1000 Sodium doublet λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP ~ 1000 73

λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP >1000 Sodium doublet λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP >1000 74

λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP >> 1000 Sodium doublet λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP >> 1000 75

λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP>>>1000 Sodium doublet λ1= 589.0 nm λ2= 589.6 nm Δλ= 0.6 nm λ/Δλ~1000 CRP>>>1000 76

Types of fringes

Interference fringes Real Virtual Localized Non-localized

Real fringe Virtual fringe Can be intercepted on a screen placed anywhere in the vicinity of the interferometer without a condensing lens system. Virtual fringe Cannot be projected onto a screen without a condensing focusing system. In this case, rays do not converge.

Non-localized fringe Exists everywhere Result of point/line source

Localized fringe - Observed over particular surface - Result of extended source

POHL’S INTERFEROMETER Real Non-localized Virtual Localized

Newton’s Ring U<<R & U>>d