WIPP National TRU Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 3 Responding to Emergency Events. For additional information or questions please contact Toledo-Lucas County Health Department APC:
Advertisements

Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety “September 11th.
1 Transuranic Waste Processing Center Karen Deacon, Deputy Federal Project Director Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management.
Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) Overview Ken Keaton Department of Energy Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Westinghouse.
Presented to: National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference Presented by: Corinne Macaluso, Transportation Specialist Office of National Transportation.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate Preventive Radiological/Nuclear Detection Program 1.
U.S. DOE Preparation for Shipping of Transuranic Radioactive Waste Cross Country – The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) O.W. “Lynn” Eaton, Manager External.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
“Who’s In Charge?” “THE COMMAND SECTION”. The Incident/Unified Commander Incident/Unified Commander(s) provides direction and guidance through:  Key.
National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program Meeting April 14, 2009 Stephen O’Connor, Director Office of Packaging and Transportation.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Global Warming Climate Change Ozone Layer Resource Depletion Population Growth Waste Disposal Effects.
Incident Command System Basic Course
TEPP Briefing1 Are You Prepared? Response to a Radiological Transportation Accident, Simplified Freddie Bell DOE TEPP Contract Support Representative
1 Waste Management David Nickless Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015.
Spill Prevention and Control Regulatory Requirements Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) –29 CFR –Covers spill response.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.
EM - TRANSPORTATION. EM Office of Transportation - Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Course # Unit 3 - IEMP and PEMS. Unit 3 IEMP and PEMS Goals: Understand phases of emergency  Before the emergency (Mitigation, Prevention,
INTERMEDIATE: SFFMA OBJ – – hrs credit received.
Are You Prepared For Increased Radiological Shipments?
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
1 presented to National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force National Transportation Program: A Policy Perspective J. Kent Hancock, Director.
INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE Department of Nuclear Safety and Security IECIEC.
Update on Office of Packaging and Transportation Activities Ashok Kapoor Safety Engineer, OPT Contractors Transportation Managers Association Workshop,
Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States Earl P. Easton.
1 U.S. Department of Energy Carlsbad Field Office TRU Sites and Transportation Division James Mason Institutional Affairs Manager Carlsbad.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
Dr. Charles W. Beadling Central Asia Regional Health Security Conference April 2012 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
California Emergency Management Agency State Emergency Plan Briefing Emergency Partnership Advisory Workgroup Meeting April 16, 2009.
Commanding the Confined Space Rescue. ICS Incident Priorities Life safety Responder safety is number one priority General public Be part of the solution,
1 Resuming Operations at WIPP Frank Marcinowski Acting Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for The Office of Environmental.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office Legacy Cleanup Completion Project DOE National Cleanup Workshop September 29,
D.K. Ghosh, Head, IHS Section, S.D. Bharambe, IHS Section D.N. Sharma, Head, RSSD & H.S.Kushwaha, Director, HSE Group Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay,
1. 2 Hazard Assessment 3 Your accident rates or injury rates will be reduced by being pro-active in Hazard Assessment.
Update on EPPR Radiation Projects October 2012 Ann Heinrich, U.S. Department of Energy.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Bioterrorism and Emergency Preparedness November 16, 2005 Jon Huss Director, Community Preparedness Section.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Office of State Fire Marshal Oregon State Police Creating Opportunities For Improvement In Preparedness And Response Community Capability Assessment.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response Emergency Response Plans Lecture IAEA Post Graduate.
Part 5: Meeting the Challenge of the “EC Tracers” Healthcare Engineering Consultants How Should I Prepare for the “EC Tracer” Part of the Survey?
1 EM Update Presented to the National Governors Association Federal Facilities Task Force Dr. Inés Triay Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental.
Demonstrating and Promoting Best Techniques and Practices for Reducing Health Care Waste to Avoid Environmental Releases of Dioxins and Mercury Project.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
WIPP Integrated Performance Measurement Baseline Workshop
1 Energy Communities Alliance Meeting WIPP Recovery and Greater-than-Class C Disposal Update February 17, 2016.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
Multiple Casualties. Multiple Causalities  Disaster: “a sudden ecologic phenomenon of sufficient magnitude to require external assistance” WHO  Disaster:
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
DOE Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program Update
[Exercise Name] [Date]
EFCOG STARTUP AND COMMISSIONING TASK TEAM INTRODUCTION
Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) Update
Hospital Emergency Response Training—Home Training
Emergency Operations Planning
Low Level Radioactive Waste Forum, Fall 2014 Meeting
Shipping to WIPP Travis R. Myers 5/24/17 GV ppt.
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Department of Energy Office of Waste Management Update
Radiological Response Needs Self-Assessment Tool
Overview of Waste Disposition Activities Fall 2017 LLW Forum Meeting
Commanding the Confined Space Rescue
An Introduction To VDEM VDEM Director of External Affairs
NRC Update Nader Mamish, Director Emergency Preparedness Directorate
Presentation transcript:

WIPP National TRU Program James Mason Institutional Affairs Manager Carlsbad Field Office for Northeast High-Level Radioactive Waste Transportation Task Force Portsmouth, NH December 16-17, 2015

WIPP National TRU Program Institutional Affairs Transportation and Radiological Response Support Programs

WIPP Land Withdrawal Act Public Law 102-579; Section 16, Transportation Provides for program support and technical assistance to Tribes and States for prevention, preparedness and response for WIPP Transuranic Waste transportation activities. Support and assistance is limited to State Regional Groups, State and Tribes with jurisdictions servicing negotiated open transportation corridors. Most states are coordinated through regional State organizations; Western Governors Association Southern States Energy Board Council of State Governments, Midwest Council of State Governments, Northeast Five Tribal Nations and the State of New Mexico work under separate stand-alone agreements.

WIPP Transportation Corridors

Program Support WIPP Program Coordination Assist in providing personnel and material support to State Regional Groups, States and Tribes to coordinate WIPP related activities. Training Provide training for response to WIPP related transportation activities. Equipment Assistance in the purchase and maintenance of equipment needed for response to WIPP related transportation activities, within the scope of provided training. Exercise Assistance in planning and the conduct of WIPP Transportation Exercises (WIPPTREX). Public Outreach and Education Local exhibition of truck/TRUpact II containers , Public Education and Intergovernmental Affairs

Program Support Cont. TRAINING Modular Emergency Response Radiological Transportation Training (MERRTT) First Responder training for transportation incidents involving radiological materials. Train-the-Trainer Compressed (Refresher) Training CVSA Level VI Inspection Certification For the inspection of motor carriers transporting transuranic waste and Highway Route Controlled Quantities (HRCQ) shipments of radioactive materials. Radiological Training for Hospital Personnel Patient Care for radiologically contaminated patients. Medical Examiner/Coroner Handling of radiologically contaminated bodies, decontamination and documentation.

Program Support Cont. TRAINING TRANSCOM Users/Operators Monitoring and tracking of WIPP shipments. Emergency Communications 911 Dispatcher Handling of calls when radioactive materials are involved. Public Information Officer (PIO) Public Information for incidents involving radiological materials. WIPP Transportation Exercises (WIPPTREX) Assistance is provided to stakeholder organizations in the planning and conduct of WIPP Transportation Exercises in order to validate capabilities and proficiency of responding jurisdictions along WIPP transportation corridors.

Technical Assistance Radiological Assistance Program (RAP) DOE/NNSA RAP provides resources (trained personnel and equipment) to evaluate, assess, advise, isotopically identify, search for, and assist in the mitigation of actual or perceived nuclear or radiological hazards. Along with teams from around the nation, WIPP’s RAP team is capable of providing assistance in all types of facility or transportation incidents involving radiation or radioactive material. Incident/Accident Response Team (IART) DOE/CBFO The IART provides technical guidance for package recovery in a transportation emergency.

Resuming Operations at WIPP

Key Steps to Recovery Documented Safety Analysis Revisions Safety Management Program Revitalization Underground Restoration Re-Establish Degraded Equipment Fire Protection Maintenance and Ground Control Radiological Risk Mitigation Soot cleaning of electrical panels Expedited mine stability Initial Panel 6 and Panel 7, Room 7 Closure Interim Ventilation Supplemental Ventilation Modifications This is a list of major activities required for restart. There is more detail on subsequent slides. A few points: Nuclear Safety Documentation and Safety Management Programs (SMP) revisions Safety is paramount to the overall strategy. The Accident Investigation Board reports identified a number of weaknesses with the WIPP safety programs (nuclear safety, maintenance, radiological protection and controls, emergency management, safety culture and oversight). It is imperative that safety documentation be revised, upgraded to required standards, and implemented prior to recommencing waste emplacement operations, in order to ensure the safety of the public, the workers, and the environment. Evaluation of Safety of the Situation documents used to evaluate and perform recovery activities, until a revised Documented Safety Analysis is completed. Recovery of the Underground Routine entries into the underground are ongoing for the purpose of: Conducting geotechnical inspections for structural integrity of the mine and identify areas where ground control is needed in order for access to be safe Conducting radiological surveys and sampling to characterize contamination levels and re-post areas of the mine where Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is not necessary Cleaning and soot removal for electrical components and equipment Again, re-establishing safety systems and cleaning or replacing safety equipment including fire protection and emergency equipment Mine Stability and Ground Control—the mine went 9 months without mine stability work (bolting). More on that in subsequent slides Panel 6 and Panel 7—Initial closure completed in May—more on subsequent slide. NMED Orders on Panel Closure—WIPP had an order from the New Mexico Environmental Department to perform expedited panel closures for panel 6 and panel 7 room 7. Ventilation – additions necessary to run in filtration mode Adequate ventilation is required for life sustainability, removal of dust during mining, and to provide fresh air, and remove exhaust fumes during diesel engine operations. Since the radiological event, it has been necessary to operate the existing underground ventilation system in filtration mode. The current ventilation system is inadequate to support operations of both “clean” and contaminated underground areas. The ventilation levels must be increased to support the recovery of WIPP and resume waste emplacement and, eventually, full disposal operations and concurrent mining operations. Ventilation through High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration serves as the first line of defense in the event of an incident in the underground and was one of the key reasons the environmental release that occurred in February was so low. Phase 1--Interim Ventilation: This ongoing first phase is the installation of two skid-mounted fans, which will allow increased activities requiring diesel engines, such as roof bolting, and will provide redundancy with the current High-Efficiency Particulate Air filter system operations. This should be completed by the end of the fiscal year. Phase 2—Supplemental Ventilation: Additional fans will be added and ducting, bulkheads reconfigured. This reconfiguration allows for increased activities that create fumes and dust, including very limited mining and initial waste operations. This should be completed by late this summer Phase 3—Permanent Ventilation System: Required prior to resuming full operations. This last phase will restore WIPP to its pre-incident airflow capacity for mining and waste operations. Critical Decision-0, Mission Need, was approved October 22, 2014. This phase will take several years to be completed.

Radiological Rollback The colors: Gray = filled waste disposal rooms Orange = controlled area--clean Green = Radiological Buffer Area (radiation boundary) – clean Red = high contamination area Dark Blue = restricted area--high contamination (contaminated air exhaust from panel). Established in safety documentation (Evaluation of Safety of the Situation documents—ESS) Light blue = contamination area

Area of Significant Progress Ground control – 85% of catch-up bolting completed Radiological risk reduction – water wash/floor cover – over 65% of U/G released as controlled area Electrical restoration – soot cleaning - 98% complete Zone recovery – 98% complete Initial panel closure for Panel 6 and Panel 7 Room – isolation of nitrate salt bearing waste - complete New DSA – supports enhanced Safety Management Programs – in progress The ribs, back and floor for Rooms 1 - 6 in Panel 7 have been spray washed with water three times. In late August, WIPP personnel completed the installation of the brattice cloth and salt barrier on a 570-foot section of floor in the WIPP underground. The installation process includes rolling the brattice cloth out to cover the entire surface area of the floor and securing it to the ribs (walls) and in the center of the drift (access tunnel). Once the cloth is in place, it is covered with six to eight inches of mined salt to create a walking/driving surface. This ensures radiological contamination is trapped under the brattice cloth and salt barrier. Employees installing the brattice cloth are required to wear personnel protective equipment (PPE), including protective suits and powered air purifying respirators (PAPR) to protect against any radiological contamination that may become re-suspended during the mitigation process. However, following the installation of the brattice/salt barrier, radiological control staff will re-evaluate surface and airborne contamination levels and anticipate down-posting the area to a radiological controlled area, where employees will no longer be required to work in PPE. Crews will continue installation of the brattice/salt barrier all the way to the entrance of Panel 7. The area down to S-2520 was rolled back to an RBA.

Area of Significant Progress Repairs on Interim Ventilation System (IVS) – complete Procurement and installation of Supplemental Ventilation System (SVS) – near completion Procurement of new equipment – including hybrid bolter New Integrated Performance Measurement Baseline – in progress The ribs, back and floor for Rooms 1 - 6 in Panel 7 have been spray washed with water three times. In late August, WIPP personnel completed the installation of the brattice cloth and salt barrier on a 570-foot section of floor in the WIPP underground. The installation process includes rolling the brattice cloth out to cover the entire surface area of the floor and securing it to the ribs (walls) and in the center of the drift (access tunnel). Once the cloth is in place, it is covered with six to eight inches of mined salt to create a walking/driving surface. This ensures radiological contamination is trapped under the brattice cloth and salt barrier. Employees installing the brattice cloth are required to wear personnel protective equipment (PPE), including protective suits and powered air purifying respirators (PAPR) to protect against any radiological contamination that may become re-suspended during the mitigation process. However, following the installation of the brattice/salt barrier, radiological control staff will re-evaluate surface and airborne contamination levels and anticipate down-posting the area to a radiological controlled area, where employees will no longer be required to work in PPE. Crews will continue installation of the brattice/salt barrier all the way to the entrance of Panel 7. The area down to S-2520 was rolled back to an RBA.

AIB Reports and Corrective Action Plans CBFO/NWP Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) for judgments of need (JON) from Accident Investigation Board (AIB) reports on the haul truck fire and Phase I radiological event were approved in February of 2015 – now in implementation AIB Report for the Radiological Release Event, Phase II, issued April 2015. Phase II focused on determining the direct cause of the radiological release. CBFO and NWP Phase II CAPs were approved in early September – now in implementation NEED UPDATE FOR HQ, LANL CAPs CBFO/NWP CAPs for the AIB Phase II report were approved in August of 2015 CAPs for EM Headquarters, LANL and other parties are expected soon

TRU Waste Generator Impacts Prioritization of Shipments: It is premature at this stage of the recovery to predict and allocate the rate of TRU waste shipments to WIPP. Initial focus will be on emplacement of wastes generated during recovery activities and emplacement of wastes currently stored in the WIPP surface facilities (these wastes were received but not emplaced prior to the events).  The timing for resumption of shipments from offsite currently is uncertain and will be based on a variety of factors.   Background—INTERNAL ONLY:   Paramount sensitivity -- communications must remain internal to DOE until a communications strategy is developed to address generator site compliance issues and potential factors for prioritization among sites. We recognize pessimistic assumptions are not supportive of compliance commitments, especially at Idaho, but outyear TRU planning assumptions must be consistent, tie to current WIPP Performance Measurement Baseline and budgets; and identify impacts so we can identify strategies to mitigate them. For FY 2017 budget planning, sites may be requested to identify resources needed to mitigate impacts, e.g., time and cost of rebuilding transportation fleet; evaluate options for storage away from generator sites. In FY 2017, TRU waste sites will be planning for a more pessimistic case, e.g., substantial WIPP disposal after FY 2017/FY 2018.  The Mission Unit (EM-30) and CBFO will continue to work closely with the waste generator sites to ensure current understanding of status and future outlook.  By this summer, the Mission Unit and CBFO hope to have additional information to update and inform detailed near-term and five-year planning horizon for TRU waste disposal at WIPP. Considerations include: Progress toward goal for resumption of operations with outstanding risks/uncertainties (receipt of permits; documented safety analysis/safety envelope; completion of readiness reviews; contractor performance) Availability of transportation carriers are limited; cost and schedule for obtaining capabilities when needed. The WIPP performance measurement baseline (PMB) assumes waist hoist repair/outage in FY 2017/FY 2018 timeframe. Alternatives for TRU waste storage.

TRU Waste Generator Impacts In determining the rate of shipments among sites, DOE will consider numerous technical and programmatic factors WIPP transportation and waste acceptance capabilities Generator site compliance commitments Storage capacities Other site specific technical or safety issues Construction of additional surface storage at WIPP is one option being considered See previous.

Develop new PMB based on current schedule/cost impacts – fall 2015 Looking Ahead Develop new PMB based on current schedule/cost impacts – fall 2015 Complete installation and testing of interim and supplemental ventilation – early 2016 Complete Operational Readiness Reviews Resume waste emplacement Regarding Schedule Slip/PMB review: While the WIPP recovery program continues to make significant progress, the original target date of March 2016 for resuming waste emplacement operations is no longer viable due to a variety of unanticipated issues. A number of additional activities have been identified that need to be added to the project schedule, including safety related activities that are required to be completed prior to resumption of operation, e.g., the need to address the findings and recommendations from the Accident Investigation Boards, implement DOE’s more rigorous standards for site specific Documented Safety Analyses, resolve problems with the contractor’s oversight of the procurement and quality assurance processes for the manufacture and delivery of the Interim Ventilation System. The Department is actively engaged with the contractor to address these issues. The Department recently completed a review of all WIPP recovery activities to determine if there were efficiencies that could be found to safely maintain the current schedule. Following that review, it was determined that the schedule for resuming operations must be updated. The Department anticipates having a revised cost and schedule plan this fall. The Department is committed to resuming operations at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant as soon as it is safe to do so.

Questions & Answers