COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
Advertisements

F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Costing Meeting Ajit Kurup 13 th June Page 2 Costing Meeting 13 th June 2011 Ajit Kurup Summary of CERN costing workshop. Proposed Level 3 breakdown.
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Superconducting Solenoids for COMET KEK Cryogenics Center, Osaka Univ. Kuno-san’s Team, J-PARC MLF Muon Group.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 7 September, 2009.
MICE – the UK Perspective Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB Introduction Introduction UK Contributions UK Contributions Location Location New beamline New beamline.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
Superconducting Magnet R&D for COMET Makoto Yoshida (KEK) NuFact Aug, 2011.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
1 A Joint Proposal for US-Japan Cooperation Program Proposal to JSPS US-Japan collaboration fund R&D of superconducting magnet technology for high intensity.
Ivan Logashenko for Mu2e Collaboration
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
WG4 Summary -Intense Muon Physics- Conveners Y. Semertzdis (BNL), M. Grassi (Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN) summary-1 for muon applications by K. Ishida.
Original plan for secondary line installation. Hadron hall beamlines in Phase1 Hadron hall secondary beamlines ① ② ③ ④.
PRISM and Neutrino Factory in Japan Y. Kuno KEK, IPNS January 19th, 2000 at CERN.
U H M E P PRISM/ PRIME COMET Muon - Electron Conversion at J-PARC COMET-PRISM/PRIME Ed Hungerford University of Houston for the COMET Collaboration 5/30/09.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Belarus activity in COMET experiment Dz. Shoukavy, IP NAS of Belarus Gomel, Belarus, July 27 - August 7, 2015.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Update of the DeeMe spectrometer design and its performance Nguyen Duy Thong, Masaharu Aoki, Doug Bryman C, Satoshi Mihara A, Yohei Nakatsugawa A, Hiroaki.
Search for Coherent Muon to Electron Conversion: The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab R. Tschirhart Fermilab BEACH 2010, Perugia Italy.
 N-eN Rare Process M. Aoki, Osaka University MuSAC-2009, Tokai, 2010/3/10-11.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Eric Prebys, FNAL HB2012, Beijing, China.  Representing the Mu2e Collaboration  24 Institutions  ~120 Collaborators  This talk has direct contributions.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 22, 2011.
Conceptual Design of COMET and Radiation Hardness Makoto YOSHIDA (KEK) RESMM12 FNAL Feb. 13th, 2012.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
COMET Target Design (COherent Muon to Electron Transition) Satoshi MIHARA.
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
G-2, EDM, COMET muon particle physics programmes at J-PARC Mu_01 Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK FKPPL-FJPPL workshop, Yonesei Univ.
Cryogenic System for Superconducting Final Focus Magnets* at ATF-2
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
Mu2e and Project X, September 3, 2008 E Prebys Background: Proton Economics in Project X Era* Assume  9mA*1ms = 5.3x10 13 protons/linac “blast”  Main.
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
Status of facility design Activities of the IPNS Nuclear/Particle Physics group Basic information for the working sessions Activities of Nuclear and Particle.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
COMET μ-e conversion search at J-PARC. μ-e conversion physics SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) – BR = = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) – τ→lγ SUSY-seesaw.
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
COMET Task Force 16/Oct/2008 J-PARC PAC meeting Satoshi MIHARA.
The physics of Mu2e Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology Mu2e computing review doc-db XXXXX.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Jim Miller Boston University for the Mu2e Collaboration.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
New cLFV search experiments using the mu-e conversion process Satoshi MIHARA KEK, Japan.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
A New Sensitive Search for Muon to Electron Conversion Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration: Boston U, BNL, UC Berkeley & LBNL, UC Irvine, CUNY,
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
Search for CLFV at COMET experiment muon to electron conversion
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Superconducting Magnet Development for me Conversion Experiments
Prospects for CLFV experiments
The future of the E391a experiment
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
What is μ-e Conversion ? μ μ-+(A,Z)→e-+(A,Z) muon decay in orbit
Presentation transcript:

COMET

μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the new physics beyond the Standard Model μ  eγ vs. μ-e conversion μ  e γ ~100 times larger when the photonic process dominates μ-e conversion Sensitive also to the non- photonic contribution proton pulse prompt background muon decay

COMET Phase I < COMET Phase II < % C.L. Upper Limit

COMET μ-e conversion search with a sensitivity of Phase I Phase II Phase I – Beam background study and achieving an intermediate sensitivity of < GeV, ~3.2kW, ~3 weeks of DAQ Physics DAQ in Phase II – 8GeV, ~56 kW, 1 year DAQ to achieve the COMET final goal of < sensitivity Starts around MeV/c Phase I 0.03 BG expected in 1.5x10 6 sec running time 4 Proton beam Pion production target Radiation shield Capture solenoid ~5T Transport solenoid Beam collimator COMET Phase-I Detector Detector solenoid muons

COMET Phase I Facility Schedule 2013 – Design of the building & beam line Bid tendering and start construction – Design of superconducting solenoid magnets and start of construction Production of SC wires as well – Design of the pion production target 2014 – Completion of the building – Construction of superconducting solenoid magnets – Start magnet and radiation shielding (and beam dump) installation Transport solenoid – Start preparation of cryogenic system – Tests of the target production target 2015 – Construction of superconducting solenoid magnets – Preparation of cryogenic system – Construction of the pion production target 2016 – Installation of the capture solenoid – Completion of the cryogenic system Tests of the magnet system – Installation of the target – Ready to accept the 8GeV beam JFY COMET building design construction Solenoid magnet SC wire Capture magnet Transport magnet Cryogenic system Magnet system test Radiation shield Beam dump Pion target Design & test construction

COMET & Mu2e schedule

COMET Collaboration Proposal 2007 – 18 members from 3 countries CDR 2009 – 48 members from 4 countries Phase I LoI 2012 – 106 members from 11 countries Phase I Proposal 2013 – 110 members from 11 countris Phase I TDR 2013 – 131 members from 12 countries

Collaborative works between Mu2e & COMET Superconducting magnet R&D – KEK expertise of aluminum-stabilized SC cable – FNAL test facility Measurement of proton emission (~ 200MeV/c) after muon capture – Largest contribution to the detector hit rate – No cross-section data of aluminum