Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EFFECTS OF EXTREMELY HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA John Anderson Georgia Perimeter College Lawrence.
Advertisements

TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Nutrient Retention Model Water Supply Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration Soil Depth and Plant available water Land cover Topography (slope/runoff)
Leona River Potential Loads and Sources for Bacteria and Nitrates Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas June 4, 2013.
ADRICOSM-EXT PROJECT (ADRIatic sea integrated COastal areaS and river basin Management system pilot project - EXTension) WP2 – INTEGRATED CATCHMENT SIMULATOR.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Chowan River TMDL Development Raccoon/Sappony Area 09/8/04.
WATERSHED MODELING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 28, 2012.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Modeling Copper Runoff in San Francisco Bay Area Watersheds Jim Carleton US EPA.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Pine and Mill Creek E. coli Stakeholder Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District Knife River Reducing Sediment Delivery Through Forest Restoration.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
Nutrient Effects on Springs Biota Synthesis: Springs Management and Research Needs Mark Brown & Richard Hamann.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Microbial Source Tracking Data Michael Powell 1, Martin Chandler 2, Charles Hagedorn 3 16 November EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.,
RB-Explorer M7a –Water Quality and Ecology Workgroup WFD-Explorer model wrapup.
Chowan River TMDL Development Nottoway Area 08/31/04.
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Eric Ferguson King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks November 4, 2015 Existing Conditions Assessment.
The Importance of Groundwater in Sustaining Streamflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin Matthew Miller Susan Buto, David Susong, Christine Rumsey, John.
Water Quality Analysis of The Lower Colorado River Paula Kulis CE 394K.1.
Bacterial TMDL Model for Copano Bay Research performed by Carrie Gibson at Center for Research in Water Resources Schematic processor tool developed by.
Dr. Thomas Hardy Chief Science Officer River Systems Institute Texas State University.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL for Four Mile Run
David Stevens, Nancy Mesner, Terry Glover, Arthur Caplan
Sources, Transport, Fate Treatment Methodologies BMP Case Studies
Mulberry River Watershed
Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
An Overview of Bacterial Source Tracking - Methods and Applications
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04

Impaired Waters in the Blackwater River Drainage Rattlesnake Creek Swamp – Fecal Coliform Mill Swamp – Fecal Coliform Cypress Swamp – Fecal Coliform Spring Branch – General Standard (Benthic)

TMDL Development Historical data analysis Source assessment Physical Source Identification Bacterial source tracking Modeling Allocation

Fecal Coliform Impairments Impaired Stream Segments in the Blackwater River watershed

Water Quality Data Analysis Location of VADEQ water quality monitoring stations used for TMDL assessment in the Blackwater River watershed

Water Quality Data Analysis Fecal Coliform Concentrations

Water Quality Data Analysis Location of BST water quality monitoring stations in the Blackwater River watershed

Water Quality Data Analysis E. coli concentrations

Water Quality Data Analysis Statistical Analysis of Water Quality Measurements versus Precipitation to determine the relationship between rainfall and water quality Analyzed relationships for seasonal trends No seasonal trends found

Source Assessment Identification of Sources DEQ/DCR/Locality records VPDES U.S. Census Ag Census Habitat Analysis Stakeholders, local knowledge – improve estimates BST Delivery Mechanisms Direct Land-applied Exported Out of Watershed Temporal Variation Migration Patterns/Resident Populations Import/Export of agricultural/STP waste?

Permitted Discharges

Human (2004) ImpairmentPopulation Housing Units (HU) HU with Sewer HU with Septic HU with Other Cypress Swamp 1, Mill Swamp Rattlesnake Swamp 843 1,

Human Sanitary sewer Overflows - reported to DEQ Exfiltration – rate from literature Failing septic systems Rate based on age of house Straight pipes U.S. Census and VDH consultation

Pets (2004) ImpairmentDogsCats Cypress Swamp Mill Swamp Rattlesnake Swamp

Livestock ImpairmentBeefDairyHorseSheepPoultrySwine Cypress Swamp Mill Swamp Rattlesnake Swamp ,335 4,759 6,908

Wildlife Population ImpairmentDeerTurkeyGooseDuckMuskratRaccoonBeaver Cypress Swamp Mill Swamp Rattlesnake Swamp ,968 9,432 12,007

Bacterial Source Tracking Location of BST stations in the Blackwater River watershed

Modeling Hydrologic model Runoff model HSPF Water Quality model HSPF Model Calibration and Validation Based on data availability, period of interest

Modeling

Determination of Critical Conditions: Observed Fecal Coliform Versus Stream Flow Cypress Swamp: VADEQ Station 5ACPP and USGS Station #

Determination of Critical Conditions: Observed Fecal Coliform Versus Stream Flow, cont. Cypress Swamp: VADEQ Station 5ACPP and USGS Station #

Determination of Critical Conditions: Observed Fecal Coliform Versus Stream Flow, cont. Rattlesnake Creek Swamp: VADEQ Station 5ARKN and USGS Station #

Determination of Critical Conditions: Observed Fecal Coliform Versus Stream Flow, cont. Mill Swamp: VADEQ Station 5AMSW and USGS Station #

Hydrologic Calibration

Modeling Source Loads Source Characterization Fecal production / densities / distribution Delivery Mechanisms Direct Land-applied Exported Out of Watershed Temporal Variation

Load Characteristics

Model Load Characterization “Direct to Stream” Loads Point Sources: Design Flow/Fecal Discharge Overflows: Reported overflow volume Characterize Volume and Duration Animal/Human: direct deposition, straight pipes “Land Applied” Loads Wildlife, Livestock, Pets Transported to stream during runoff producing event Use measured waste characteristics Compute die-off in between events Application timing

Wildlife

Livestock Average percentage of collected livestock waste applied throughout year

Livestock Average time dairy milking cows spend in different areas per day

Livestock Average time dry cows and replacement heifers spend in different areas per day

Livestock Average time beef cows not confined in feedlots spend in areas per day

Allocation Quantify Current Source Conditions Run model with present-day sources Develop reduction scenarios that will meet water quality standards 100% reduction in straight pipes, 25% reduction in failed septic systems 100% reduction in straight pipes, 50% reduction in livestock direct deposition Allocate loads to each source

Livestock ImpairmentBeefDairyHorseSheepSwine Cypress Swamp ,117 Mill Swamp ,957 Rattlesnake Swamp ,236 * Must get information regarding import/export of poultry litter in watershed.

Allocation