MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Update of the Regional Transportation Plan A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Using Social Marketing to Change Travel Behavior Case Study: City of Bellevue ECOMM 2008 June 2008.

Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.

What is SBCAG? Voluntary council of governments Established in 1966 under a JPA executed by local governments 13 member Board of Directors: – 5 County.

Demographic Trends Northeast Landscape Plan Update 2012 Minnesota Forest Resources Council April 18, 2012.

Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.

Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.

Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.

High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.

First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?

Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks

Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.

Analytical Needs SEMCOG Travel Model Improvement Program Donnelly, Davidson, Binkowski & Arens 12-Dec-2011.

SB 360 and Multi-Modal Impact Fees & Efficiently Managing a Street Lightning System.

Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,

Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.

Challenges of Integrated Transportation and Land Use Planning Reid Ewing Rutgers University.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.

What is rural? “The problem of defining "rural" is not new. People know when they are rural, but such perception does not satisfy demographers, policymakers,

What is Legacy? Current Comprehensive Plan for Forsyth County and Winston-Salem. Adopted in 2001 by Forsyth County and its 8 municipalities. Focuses on.

Utah’s Collaborative Approach to Transportation and Community Michael A. Allegra, President/CEO Utah Transit Authority October 9, 2014.

TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.

Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443

Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.

MAG, WFRC, UTA & UDOT 2015 Regional Transportation Plan Update Process & Schedule.

UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.

BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.

1 Coconino County Trends April 5, 2012 The Arizona Rural Policy Institute Thomas Combrink, Senior Research Specialist Wayne Fox, Director Jeff Peterson,

Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.

PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.

2022 GROWTH TARGETS I. Household Targets II. Job Targets III. Countywide Planning Policy Amendments.

Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.

Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.

EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.

2040 Population/Employment

1 Dane County Workforce Housing Discussion An Affordable Housing Report originally prepared for the Housing – Land Use Partnership January 2004.

California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.

Eastside Transit Alternatives Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013 Kick-Off Meeting Mesquite City Hall September 11, 2013.

Making the Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Connection Marianne Fitzgerald Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality

PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.

Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.

Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.

Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.

The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.

Who Sprawls Most? Density in US metro areas, Rolf Pendall Assistant Professor, Cornell University William Fulton, Mai Nguyen, and Alicia Harrison.

8/7/02 Dane County Vandewalle & Associates Strand Associates William O’Connor Roadway Concept Select Link Traffic Modeling August 7, 2002.

Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.

Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.

2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.

Patricia M. Steed Executive Director Central Florida Regional Planning Council Linking Regional Visions In Polk County.

San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.

Regional Visions: 50-Year Transportation Demand Modeling Florida Model Task Force Meeting December 13, 2006.

Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.

Prioritizing Transportation Projects National League of Cities July 14, 2011 Alan Clark Director of Transportation Planning.

Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,

Mid-term Prepared by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate.

A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.

World Geography November 05, Daily Warm-up:  How can poor urban planning affect future living conditions?

Metro Data Resource Center Portland Metro: MetroScope 2002 – 2008 A Tool for Regional Decision Making Presentation to the New York Metropolitan Transportation.

Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,

Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.

1 Draft Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, and Employment Transportation Planning Board Timothy Canan, AICP April 15, 2009 Item.

Induced Travel: Definition, Forecasting Process, and A Case Study in the Metropolitan Washington Region A Briefing Paper for the National Capital Region.

City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.

What is the state of transportation in the Middle Tennessee area?

What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)

Southwest Urban Growth Area Boundary Planning Study

Presentation transcript:

MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Update of the Regional Transportation Plan A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities Workgroup May 19, 2004

MPO General Responsibilities Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Transportation Improvement (TIP) Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Corridor and sub-area studies

MPO Planning Area Boundary Must cover existing urbanized area boundary (defined by U.S. Census Bureau) Also covers the contiguous area expected to become urbanized within a 20 year period

MPO Key Responsibility Prepare Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Conduct RTP update every 5 years –Current plan, Dane County Land Use and Transportation Plan, was adopted in 1997 and reaffirmed in –Update is required by the end of 2005

Regional Transportation Plan Identifies transportation improvements and strategies/actions (e.g. corridor studies) that will lead to an integrated, multi-modal transportation system Must have 20 year planning horizon Reflects long range land use and development plans, and population and employment forecasts of area

Questions to consider for update: How well is the transportation system performing? How well do existing plans deal with current and expected problems?

Questions continued: Can the transportation system support the kinds of future growth and development that the region desires? What are the trends in regional growth and are they desireable?

Countywide Population Growth From : 136,000 resident -Annual growth rate of 1.29% From : 153,000 residents - Annual growth rate of 1.03%

Regional Growth Trends Countywide Population PeriodChangeTotal% Change ~136,000~426,00047% ~153,000~580,00036% Countywide Employment (place of work) PeriodChangeTotal% Change ~164,000~285,000136% ~97,000*~382,000*34%* *Preliminary

Regional Growth Trends Countywide Labor Force PeriodChangeTotal% Change ~129,000~256,000102% ~69,000~325,00027% Employment Outpaces Labor Force End %102%31, %*27%*57,000* *Preliminary

Regional Travel Trends 1990 work-trip commuting to Dane County from adjacent counties ~16, work-trip commuting from Dane County to adjacent counties ~6,000

Regional Travel Trends 2000 work-trip commuting to Dane County from adjacent counties ~30, work-trip commuting from Dane County to adjacent counties ~9,000

Regional Travel Trends 2000 work-trip commuting to Dane County from elsewhere ~37, work-trip commuting from Dane County to elsewhere ~13,200

~30,000 Work-trips From Adjacent Counties CountyCommutersLabor Force% of L.F Columbia8,93028, Dodge1,44044, Green3,65018, Iowa3,16013, Jefferson3,97041, Lafayette4408, Rock5,02080, Sauk3,43030,

1970 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County

1980 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County

1990 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County

2000 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County

County Population vs. Vehicle Registration Trends Total personal vehicle registrations increasing faster than the county’s population over the age of 16.

Mode Choice Work-trip Commuting Trends Dane County

1970 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County 1980 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County

1990 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County 2000 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County

Transit Ridership Trends

Bicycle Work-trips to Downtown Madison and UW From 1990 to 2000, work-trips increased 24% from 2,240/day to 2,770/day Compared to other modes of travel, the percentage share also increased from 4.4% to 4.8%

Vehicle Miles of Travel Madison Urban Area

1990 Roadway Congestion

2000 Roadway Congestion

Verona Road/West Beltline Study USH 51 Corridor Study N. Mendota Parkway Study

Land Development Forecasts : –Increased by 49% –About 2.2 sq. mi. a year : –Increase by 33% –About 2.2 sq. mi. a year –Higher residential densities –Lower commercial employees per acre

RPC Forecasts Compared to Local Land Use Plans Reasonable fit between USA forecasts & current Local land use plans How will the new local plans fit? Some urban areas plan for much more growth than forecast A few urban areas phase growth beyond 2030 Urban areas with small current growth capacities are working on new plans

MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) Update of the Regional Transportation Plan A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities Workgroup May 19, 2004