Sarah McCabe October 2014 Penn State Advisor: Joe Bishop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South River Greenway A natural jewel in the heart of Anne Arundel County.
Advertisements

1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
Habitat Fragmentation By Kaushik Mysorekar. Objective To enlighten the causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation followed by few recommendations.
Current Issues and Projects Regarding Beaver in Montana Steve Carpenedo Mt DEQ – Wetland Program.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.
Timberland Property Tax in Texas Texas A&M Forest Service 1.
North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan Jacquelyn Wallace NC Wildlife Resources Commission.
WMA and AMA Programs Implementation of Public Land Development Programs Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Dennis Simon, DNR Wildlife Management Chief January.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
WOODSHED ANALYSIS Addison County Five Towns Analysis by Marc Lapin, Chris Rodgers, & David Brynn Winter/Spring 2009.
Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group June 14, 2011
The Landscape Project Skylands Pinelands Piedmont Plains Delaware Bay Coastal.
Statewide Resource and Species Plans Guide for Restoring, Protecting, and Enhancing Wetlands, Prairies, Forests, and Game, Fish, and Wildlife Habitat -
Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Picayune Strand Restoration Project Janet Starnes, Principal Project Manager Office of Everglades Policy and.
National, State and Local Funding Sources for Conservation Easements Montana Association of Land Trusts Montana Conservation Easement Conference for Financial,
Sarah McCabe GEOG 895A April 2014 Penn State Advisor: Joe Bishop.
Regional Resource Inventory Project Update
Comprehensive Land Use/Land Cover Data, Analysis, and Predictive Modeling: A Partnership Approach for Michigan Soji Adelaja Hannah Distinguished Professor.
Some Strategic Considerations for Habitat Restoration Frederick W (Rick) Kutz, Ph.D. Environmental Scientist
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Savanna Pembroke Savanna – Kankakee, IL. Savanna in Wisconsin.
Green Infrastructure in Central Indiana Cliff Chapman Conservation Director Central Indiana Land Trust
Landscape Ecology, Urban Forestry & Wetlands.  Woody vegetation in populated places  25% of forest canopy in US.
Jeremy Erickson, Lucinda B. Johnson, Terry Brown, Valerie Brady, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of MN Duluth.
Watershed Approach to Forest Conservation by The Center for Watershed Protection
Introduction Evaluating Population-Habitat Relationships of Forest Breeding Birds at Multiple Scales Using Forest Inventory and Analysis Data Todd M. Fearer.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Palmetto-Peartree Preserve: Community Forestry in Eastern North Carolina Community-Owned Forests Conference Missoula, MT June 16-19, 2005 Mikki Sager,
Morgan and Little Creeks Local Watershed Plan Totten Center, NC Botanical Garden 3 November 2004 Chapel Hill, NC
Project Presentation to City of Bethlehem Environmental Advisory Council February 2, 2011 Call Mountain Wind LLC A Joint Venture Between Citizens Energy.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
A Land Preservation Framework for the Cacapon Watershed of West Virginia Michael P. Strager Charles B. Yuill Natural Resource Analysis Center West Virginia.
ACWQ Austin Canopy & Water Quality Progress Report: Austin Tree-Canopy Resource, Phase II Spring 2012, Geography 4427, Texas State University April 2,
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
The Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan, Balcones Canyonlands Preserve, & Public Service Infrastructure William A. Conrad Secretary BCCP Coordinating.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Green Infrastructure Network Design Analysis Beaufort County, North Carolina.
Ecological Characteristics Region H of Texas Water Planning.
Characterizing, measuring and visualizing forest resources An inadequate treatment by an unqualified presenter.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Conserving Bird Habitat in California’s Central Valley Bob Shaffer, CVJV Coordinator JVC Meeting Austin, Texas December 2006.
Aiding Conservation Efforts in Attleboro, Massachusetts Attleboro Land Trust: –Preservation of open space for public enjoyment and conservation of biodiversity.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Biological Planning Process for Partners in Flight How to Translate Population Targets into Habitat Objectives at Eco-Regional Scales West Gulf Coastal.
12 July 2010 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Critical Environmental Areas Under SEQR What Do They Mean?
Laguna Canyon Creek Protection and Restoration. Major Watercourse Laguna Canyon Creek is a major watercourse. The City identifies it as that and treats.
Transportation Projects City Council Workshop May 14, 2013.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
University of Washington Institute for Hazards Mitigation Planning and Research Visions for Kimball Creek.
Designing Sustainable Landscapes in the Northeast A Potential Application for Vernal Pool Results Scott Schwenk, Ph.D. Science Coordinator North Atlantic.
Project Profile: Four-Star NGBS Certified Development Developer Jake Bowen and Flint River Preserve, LLC. 173 acre project, with 115 acres devoted to common.
Green infrastructure includes intact forests, tree canopy, wetlands, dune systems, parks and rivers, or agricultural soils that provide clean water, air.
Capstone Project GI Analysis C Team. Leadership Forum Local/State GIS planners Planning/ZoningUtilities Citizen Groups USACoE Local Developers Parks &
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
Wayne C. Lehman Fish and Wildlife Regional Manager (Retired)
Environmental Critical Areas Regulations
Lancaster County Conservancy Long Range Protection Plan
Water Supply and Water Quality Act of 2018
King County Audubon Educational Center
% Riparian Natural Cover
Green Infrastructure Tools for Planning & Management
GIS & Land Preservation
Presentation transcript:

Sarah McCabe October 2014 Penn State Advisor: Joe Bishop

Outline: Topic : Conserving habitat for Migrating Songbirds Place: Texas Midcoast National Wildlife Refuge Complex Project Question: Making choices for a Refuge plan Identify the Criteria Identify Data Model the Criteria Identify Parcels with Forest Habitat

Columbia Bottomland Forest Crops Forest

The Columbia Bottomlands Percent Canopy, 2001 National Land Cover Dataset 1976: 305,914 acres 1996: 254,269 acres Reduction of 16% (Webb, 1996) Original extent: 700,000 acres (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2013)

Texas Parks and Wildlife US Fish and Wildlife Service Natural Resources Conservation Service Ducks Unlimited Gulf Coast Bird Observatory Cradle of Texas Conservancy Austin’s Woods Conservation Plan Goal: Conserve 10% of original forest area, or 70,000 acres. Methods: Donation of fee title Conservation Easements Purchase of Fee title from willing sellers 28,000 acres conserved.

Austin’s Woods Part II 42,000 acres for a bioreserve network What would be the ideal configuration of refuges, to select the most ecologically valuable areas, and to enhance the wildlife habitat conserved already?

Michael Lange, Biologist US Fish and Wildlife Service With members of the Gulf Coast Bird Observatory

Assigning “Suitability” values to tax parcels.

Austin’s Woods Project Land Protection Plan Priorities List 1)High quality old growth undisturbed habitat? 2)Exceptional/unique plant communities 3)Size of tract greater than 1,200 acres, or expandable 4)Near other protected areas 5) Acquisition helps maintain natural hydrological patterns 6)Plant structure complexity, topographic complexity 7)Restoration potential 8)Does the unit influence hydrologic or watershed patterns?

How to model the goals of the Land Protection Plan?

Size of the patch of Forest Old-growth Character of Forest Distance from managed lands Core Forest Neighboring Landscape Streams Wetlands How to model the goals of the Land Protection Plan?

Software: Corridor Design Toolbox for ArcGIS Desktop

National Land Cover Database 2011 Deciduous, Evergreen and Mixed Forest Woody Wetlands

National Land Cover Database 2011 Percent Canopy Cover, >50 %

Canopy Height (NACP Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Baseline Data, 2000)

Small Preserves <250 acres: Large Preserves >250 acres:

Why not Distance to Roads? Roads are well represented by NLCD in this area. The US Fish and Wildlife Service requires physical and legal access to new refuge units, so a road is actually a required feature. For abundance of Acadian Flycatchers, no difference between number of buildings, road, pavement and lawn as percent cover. (Rodewald and Shustak, 2008) National Land Cover Database 2011

Buffered to allow linear features to affect tax parcel polygons Three Classes Refuge Associated Named Streams Unnamed Streams National Hydrography Dataset

US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory

Drawbacks of the “Refuge Suitability” analysis Not a true habitat model – really a “Site Suitability” study. Each species needs its own model. Results strongly influenced by the area of the tax parcel. Most useful features of this process: Finding large parcel groups Forest Area calculations Locations of parks and conservation easements Locations of smaller streams Development of library of habitat data for modelling animal habitat. Discussion:

Joe Bishop, Phd. Pennsylvania State University Michael Lange US Fish and Wildlife Service Texas Midcoast Refuge Complex

Sarah McCabe

Prothonotary Warbler in Cypress Knee. Joel Sartore. Cape May Warbler and Northern Parula. Linda. Young Box Turtle. Lisa K Suits. Adult Box Turtle. Flicker User pondhawk. Bobcat at Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Prothonotary Warbler Pair. L. Pace.

Data Sets 1.County Tax Parcel Data Sets Brazoria.Available online from Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Fort Bend.Available on disk from County Offices Also available online from Houston-Galveston Area Council Matagorda.Data downloadable from their website Wharton. Available on disk in.dng format from County Offices 2.Infrastructure Data Sets Roads (Texas Natural Resources Information System) Texas Railroad Commission (from H-GAC) 3.Land Cover National Land Cover Database National Land Cover Database Tree Canopy Wetlands National Wetlands Inventory, US Fish and Wildlife Service 5. Water features National Hydrography Data Set 6.Vegetation National Vegetation Classification – General Vegetation Classes Texas Ecological Systems Database Project (Texas Parks and Wildlife) 7.Vegetation Complexity US Basal Area-Weighted Canopy Heights 2000 (Woods Hole Research Center) 8.Topographic Complexity National Elevation Data (NED) Gulf Coast Counties ( 10 meter grid) 9. Preserve Areas Refuge Boundaries – US Fish and Wildlife Service Other protected areas: Texas Wildlife Management Areas National Conservation Easement Database County Parks Mitigation Banks – Army Corp of Engineers – RIBITS website

Software: