Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Discussion of Cancer Screening: Between- vs. Within- Physician Differences Yuhua Bao, Ph.D., Sarah Fox,
Advertisements

New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (NHCRCSP) and “DRESS IN BLUE DAY” State of New Hampshire - Wellness Coordinators Susan Kuhn,
Motivation and diabetes self-management *Cheryl L. Shigaki, PhD, ABPP, **Robin L. Kruse, PhD, MSPH, **David Mehr, MD, MS, † Kennon M. Sheldon, PhD, ‡ Bin.
Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African AmericansIn Lansing Health Disparities: Breast Cancer in African Americans In Lansing Costellia Talley, PhD,
Understanding Those Who Do and Do Not Plan to Get Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Costanza ME, White MJ, Stark JR, Stoddard AM, Avrunin JS, Luckmann.
Using the Health Belief Model to Examine Differences in Mammography Compliance Among Black and White Women Susan S. Thomas, Ph.D. 1 Victoria L. Champion,
Body Image and Weight Status among African American and Caucasian Overweight Postpartum Women Participating in a Weight Loss Intervention Lori Carter-Edwards,
Sex Differences in the Prevalence and Correlates of Colorectal Cancer Testing: Health Information National Trends Survey Sally W. Vernon 1, Amy.
Methods Community coalitions of the National Black Leadership Initiative on Cancer (NBLIC) were randomized to one of four cohorts: 1) web-access with technical.
A Diverse & Aging California Health Issues Steven P. Wallace, Ph.D. Professor, UCLA School of Public Health Assoc. Dir., UCLA Center for Health Policy.
Noreen Clark, PhD Molly Gong, MD Melissa Valerio, MPH Sijian Wang, BS Xihong Lin, PhD William Bria, MD Timothy Johnson, MD University of Michigan School.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
Long-term Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Weight Management Clinic for Youth with Special Needs Meredith Dreyer Gillette PhD 1, 2, Cathleen Odar Stough.
Haley Hyde Jessica Fordham Jena Hamm  Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related deaths every year.  150,000 Americans will be diagnosed.
Turning Data into Action for Colorectal Cancer November 17, 2014 Jessica Shaffer, Director, Maine CDC Colorectal Cancer Control Program
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
1 Rachel Torres, MPH, CHES Department of Health & Behavior Studies Teachers College, Columbia University Relationships between Health Literacy, Self- efficacy.
A comparison of barriers to physical activity faced by older and younger adults with mobility impairments Vijay Vasudevan,
Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening, attitudes and information preferences Joan M. Griffin, PhD Greta Friedemann-Sánchez, PhD Diana Burgess,
Increasing CRC Screening among Filipino Americans (Maxwell, Bastani, Danao, Crespi, UCLA. ACS ) Recruitment of subjects in 45 CBOs and churches.
“The 50 – Year Project: Examining Colorectal Cancer Screening History Among Peninsula Institute for Community Health Patients Aged 50 Years and Older ”
American Public Health Association
RESULTS Individual characteristics % (N) unless otherwise specified Gender Male 65% (255) Female 35% (136) Race/Ethnicity African American 35% (137) White-not.
Predictors of Cancer-related Pain Improvement over 12 Months Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN, HFS Assistant Professor University of South Florida September,
Predictors of the Use of Assistive Devices that Address Physical Impairments Among Community-Based Frail Elders University at Buffalo Machiko R. Tomita,
A Computer-Tailored Decision Aid to Promote Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Jennifer D. Allen. Deborah Bowen, Gary Bennett, Alton.
80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates 80% by 2018 Forum: Increasing CRC Screening Rates Implementing a Quality Screening Navigation Program.
EFFICACY OF A STAGE-BASED BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION TO PROMOTE STI SCREENING IN YOUNG WOMEN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Chacko MR, Wiemann CM, Kozinetz.
Lessons Learned in Implementing Interventions in School-based Settings Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, RN, CPNP/PMHNP, FAAN Associate Vice President for.
The Impact of Navigation Services for Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening for Spanish- speaking Immigrant Latinas Lina Jandorf Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
University of South Florida College of Nursing Tampa, Florida.
Factors impacting implementation of a community coalition-driven evidence- based intervention: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial Methods.
Randy A. Jones, PhD, RN Patricia Hollen, PhD, RN, FAAN Richard Steeves, PhD, RN, FAAN Terran Sims, MSN, RN, ACNP-BC Christopher Thomas, MD University of.
® Changes in Opioid Use Over One Year in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Alejandra Garza, Gerald Kizerian, PhD, Sandra Burge, PhD The University of.
Cooperative Agreement Number U58/CCU U58DP Spirit Health Education (S.H.E.) Circle Early Detection or Survivorship of Cancer in Underserved.
J. Aaron Johnson, PhD 1 and J. Paul Seale, MD 2 1 Institute of Public and Preventive Health and Department of Psychology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta,
School of Nursing Health Literacy Among Informal Caregivers of Persons With Memory Loss Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN; Jennifer H. Lingler, PhD, RN; Lisa.
Colorado Colorectal Screening Program Holly Wolf University of Colorado School of Medicine
Men and Women are Different: Predictors of an Informed Decision about Colorectal Cancer Screening Kelly Brittain, PhD, RN Michigan State University 2012.
D EPARTMENT of F AMILY M EDICINE Colorectal Cancer Screening: Update on Guidelines and Projects Barcey T. Levy, PhD, MD Professor, Department of Family.
Janet H. Van Cleave PhD, RN1 Brian Egleston PhD2
Printed by Natural History of Sun Protection Behaviors in a Cohort of Children in Colorado Nancy L. Asdigian PhD,* Lori A. Crane.
Improving Cancer Screening Among Low Income Women: a randomized controlled trial NCI R01 CA87776 Allen J. Dietrich, MD NAPCRG 2005 Annual Meeting October.
Using a Computer Kiosk to Promote Child Safety: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department Gielen AC, McKenzie.
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation on Diagnostic Interval, Anxiety, and Satisfaction of Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: a Randomized Controlled.
Maternal Substance Use During Pregnancy and Increased Risk of SIDS among African Americans Fern R. Hauck, M.D., M.S. 1,2 Mark E. Smolkin, M.S. 2 University.
Correlates of HIV testing among youth in three high prevalence Caribbean Countries Beverly E. Andrews, Doctoral Candidate University.
Feasibility of a text messaging intervention to promote symptom management and medication adherence for patients prescribed oral anti-cancer agents S.
Literacy, Knowledge, Health Beliefs, and Self-efficacy among Urban, Low-income, Obese African American Women Feleta L. Wilson, PhD, RN 1 May T. Dobal,
Previous cancer screening behavior as predictor of colon cancer screening among women aged 50 and over Rafael Guerrero-Preston DrPH, MPH APHA 135th Annual.
Well Woman Program: A Community-based STI Prevention Trial
Correlates of Smoking Cessation among Filipino-American Men
1University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
Patient Registries and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Nipa Shah, MD1; Fern Webb, PhD1; Liane Hannah, BSH1; Carmen Smotherman, MS2;
A Quality improvement initiative
Exercise Adherence in Patients with Diabetes: Evaluating the role of psychosocial factors in managing diabetes Natalie N. Young,1, 2 Jennifer P. Friedberg,1,
Colorectal Cancer Screening, Medicare and Disability
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in Rural East Texas where there is a High rate of Adenomatous Polyps Detected Carlton Allen, MS,
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
The Effect of Key Organizational Attributes on Cancer Screening Rates
The Nurse’s Role in Overcoming Barriers to Cancer Screening of African Americans An Integrative Review of the Literature Wendy Marie Clayton and Dr. Joseph.
Lung Cancer Screening: Do Individual Health Beliefs Matter?
A Growth Curve Analysis Participant Baseline Characteristics
Evidence of a Program's Effectiveness in Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Federally Qualified Health Centers Robert L. Stephens, PhD, MPH1;
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural East Texas
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Maryland Residents Age 65 and Older Maryland Cancer Survey, Presented by: Carolyn Poppell, MS University.
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Presentation transcript:

Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN, HFS Assistant Professor University of South Florida September, 2012

Team Indiana University School of Nursing –Susan M. Rawl, PhD, RN, FAAN –Victoria Champion, PhD, RN, FAAN –Connie Krier, BS Indiana University School of Medicine –Susan Perkins, PhD –Yan Tong, PhD, MS –Netsanet Gebregziabher, MS University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center –Celette Sugg Skinner, PhD University of Georgia –Jeffrey Springston, PhD Purdue University School of Science, Department of Psychology, IUPUI –Shannon M. Christy, MA

Funding National Cancer Institute grant awarded to Dr. Rawl (R01 CA ) National Institute of Nursing Research postdoctoral training grant awarded to Dr. Wang (T32 NR007066), Indiana University

Background: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) CRC in the United States in 2012 is estimated as: –3 rd most commonly diagnosed cancer –3 rd leading cause of cancer deaths African Americans have the highest CRC incidence and mortality rate of all racial groups.

Background: CRC Screening CRC is curable and preventable by screening. Participation of CRC screening remains low, especially in African Americans. Primary care practice is often the first place for delivery of CRC screening services. Theory-based tailored messages to increase screening are more likely to be successful, especially those tailored to stage of adoption.

Purpose To examine predictors of stage of adoption for fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy screening among non- adherent African American primary care patients. Data Source: Rawl SM, Skinner CS, Champion V, Perkins SM, Springston J, Russell KM, et al. Computer-delivered Tailored Intervention Improves Colon Cancer Screening Knowledge and Health Beliefs of African Americans. Health Education Research, In press.

Conceptual Framework Stage of Adoption - FOBT - Colonoscopy Clinical Variables Body Mass Index Family history of CRC Personal history of cancer Objective risk CRC Health Beliefs/Knowledge Perceived Risk Perceived Benefits Perceived Barriers Self-Efficacy Cancer Fatalism CRC knowledge Social Support Marital status Family/friend encouragement Provider recommendation Demographics Age, Gender, Education, Employment, Income, Health insurance Clinical Site

Non-Adherent African Americans StagesPrecontemplationContemplationPreparation Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT): Never had OR had one more than 12 months ago Does not intend to have one in next 6 months. Intends to have one in next 6 months. Is planning to do in next six months, and has an FOBT kit. Colonoscopy: Never had OR had one more than 10 years ago Does not intend to have one in next 6 months. Intends to have one in next 6 months. Is planning to do in next six months, and has an appointment scheduled.

Recruitment (N= 817) 11 primary care clinics and community health centers affiliated with two urban academic medical centers, including a VA medical center.

Eligibility Criteria Self-identified as African American or Black Not current with CRC screening Ages No history of CRC Able to read and speak English No medical condition prohibiting screening No cognitive, speech, and hearing impairment

Data Collection/Instruments Structured telephone interviews conducted prior to randomization in a RCT. Scale # Items Alpha Perceived Risk50.79 FOBT Benefits30.72 FOBT Barriers90.81 FOBT Self-Efficacy80.88 Colonoscopy Benefits40.69 Colonoscopy Barriers Colonoscopy Self- Efficacy Cancer Fatalism CRC Knowledge100.64

Data Analyses Predictor variables (p<.20) for hierarchical models were identified using univariate analysis. Demographic variables were entered as predictors in Step 1, followed by clinical variables (Step 2), CRC health beliefs and knowledge (Step 3), and social support variables (Step 4). Final hierarchical models identified significant predictors of stages (p<.05).

Sample Characteristics Mean age was 57.4 years (±6.3) Average education was 12.2 years (±1.9) 47% were male. The majority were not married or partnered (69%), not employed (79%), had insurance (89%), and reported incomes of <$15, 000 (59%). The majority had no personal history of cancer (92%) or family history of cancer (74%) and were not VA patients (80%). The mean BMI was 31.2 (±7.9).

Stage of Adoption Distributions StagesPrecontemplationContemplationPreparation FOBT: Never had OR had one more than 12 months ago n (%) Does not intend to have one in next 6 months. 484 (59) Intends to have one in next 6 months. 277 (34) Is planning to do in next six months, and has an FOBT kit. 54 (7) Colonoscopy: Never had OR had one more than 10 years ago n (%) Does not intend to have one in next 6 months. 353 (43) Intends to have one in next 6 months 378 (46). Is planning to do in next six months, and has an appointment scheduled. 84 (11)

FOBTColonoscopy Significant Predictors Step 4 OR (95% CI) Step 4 OR (95% CI) Demographics Age Male Income 15K-30K vs. <15K > 30K vs. < 15K VAMC site 1.04 ( )** 1.70 ( )** 0.82 ( ) 1.03 ( ) 2.80 ( )** 0.98 ( ) 1.29 ( ) 0.83 ( ) 0.46 ( )** - Clinical Variables Personal History of Cancer 0.37 ( )** - CRC Health Beliefs/Knowledge Perceived Benefits Perceived Barriers Perceived Self-efficacy 1.15 ( ) 0.79 ( )* 1.59 ( )** 1.56 ( )** 0.88 ( ) 1.66 ( )** Social Support Family/friend Encouragement Doctor Recommendation 1.64 ( )** 2.05 ( )** 1.71 ( )** 2.47 ( )**

Discussion Involving families and friends in addition to healthcare providers may be a very effective component of interventions to promote CRC screening.

Discussion VAMC patients were at more advanced stage of adoption for FOBT compared with the non- VAMC. Participants with greater perceived benefits were more likely to be in more advanced stages of adoption for colonoscopy only. Participants with greater perceived self-efficacy were more likely to be in more advanced stages of adoption for both FOBT and colonoscopy.

Limitations Selection bias. Baseline data from an intervention trial to promote CRC screening. Limited generalizability: low income African Americans who have insurance and are able to access primary care services.