Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
March, 11, 2006 LCWS06, Bangalore, India Very Forward Calorimeters readout and machine interface Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ECFA LC Workshop, Durham Sep. 2, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ACFA LC Workshop, Taipei Nov. 10, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
Some Thoughts about Hits, Geometry etc Rob Kutschke, Caroline Milstene, Hans Wenzel Fermilab March 27, 2007.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
Track Reconstruction: the trf & ftf toolkits Norman Graf (SLAC) ILD Software Meeting, DESY July 6, 2010.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Cambridge ILC software tools meeting.
SiD Tracking Simulation: Status and Plans Richard Partridge for the SiD Tracking Group Vancouver Linear Collider Workshop July 19-22, 2006.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Some Thoughts about Hits, Geometry etc Rob Kutschke, Hans Wenzel Fermilab March 13, 2007.
A Pattern Recognition Scheme for Large Curvature Circular Tracks and Its FPGA Implementation Example Using Hash Sorter Jinyuan Wu and Z. Shi Fermi National.
MDC Simulation Yuan Ye BESIII Collaboration Meeting.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.
Momentum resolution study of LDC 6 th SiLC meeting, Torino, Dec M. Regler, M. Valentan Interplay of TPC and SET: influence on the momentum.
New LDC optimization studies... ILD Workshop, DESY-Zeuthen, 14–16 Jan M. Regler, M. Valentan presented by W. Mitaroff New LDC optimization studies.
Performance and occupancies in a CCD vertex detector with endcaps Toshinori Abe and John Jaros 04/21/04.
Dmitri Ossetski Obninsk State University Department of Applied Mathematics
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Tracking Toolkit for SiD ALCPG 2007 Fermilab. October 22 – 26, Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University.
Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
Calorimeter Assisted Track Finder Tracking Infrastructure Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University Linear Collider Workshop 2007 May 30 – June 3, 2007.
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
Track Reconstruction: the trf toolkit Norman Graf (SLAC) ILC-ACFA Meeting, Beijing February 6, 2007.
1 Tracking Simulation Infrastructure Norman A. Graf December 15, 2005.
07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.
SiD Workshop, Boulder 2008Dmitry Onoprienko SiD Workshop Boulder, September 2008 Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University Update on tracker hit processing.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Lcsim Status for Muon Collider Physics and Detector Studies Norman Graf (SLAC) MAP 2012 Winter Meeting SLAC, March 8, 2012.
November, 7, 2006 ECFA06, Valencia, Spain LumiCal & BeamCal readout and DAQ for the Very Forward Region Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,
Status of the ALCPG simulation & reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC09, Tsukuba April 19, 2009.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Optimizing SiD for the LOI: Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) October 9, 2007.
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Status of SiD Silicon Tracker and Tracking Performance
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Simulation Framework Norman Graf SLAC June 10, 2005.
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
CSC Digi & RecHit Validation
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4 SimTrackerHit, no readout segmentation, one simulated charged track can leave more than one hit in each layer.  Need to come up with optimum/affordable tiling/pixeling solutions for the forward tracking region.  Need to study basic quantities: Occupancy, acceptance etc.  Need realistic input for tracking/pattern recognition studies (Clusters, Digis)  once that’s in place we can do tracking and pattern recognition studies:confusion ghosting....)

Want to get feed back from the hardware experts. What kind of readout layout do you have in mind and want us to study? What studies?  Occupancy, radial dependencies etc. etc.  acceptance  What are relevant parameters we need to vary? Please let us know! June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel

Summerstudent  Francisco Javier Carrion Ruiz will be working with us for the next 2 months, he is setup with netbeans, java, jas3 etc.. But he is new to JAVA (So am I)  First project was: access the SimTrackerHits in the Forward disks. Assume readout with radial strips, in one or several belts. Occupancy is defined by the percentage of strips fired in each events. Compare occupancy distributions of physics events (done) with beam beam events (don’t know how yet). June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel

Occupancy in % for 1 mm at inner radius. For Z to jj events. (Proof of concept) June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel Francisco Javier Carrion Ruiz

Summerstudent (cont.)  Next Project: Look into creating classes representing a realistic readout (Virtual Segmentation). Readout will be implemented in org.lcsim (java). This way we can study various readout using the same simulated event as it comes out of Geant 4 (CPU expensive/ use simplified Geometry?)  We will look into: Norman's wedge class (see next page). Tony proposed to use wired to visualize. Could imagine a kind of Lego display (calorimeters). Tim's raw tracker hit creation class for strips (is org.lcsim.contrib.SiStripSim the correct place to look?)org.lcsim.contrib.SiStripSim Nick’s pixel classes for digitization. Resurrect my old CDF stuff? June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel

Summerstudent (cont.)  When we break the disk up into trapezoids (or similar) ‏ We will include a full range of aspect ratios, long in r, long in phi and approximately square. (strip lengths and orientations). Stereo. Do the studies for signal and background events. Add noise Hits June 15th 2007 Hans Wenzel

June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel e.g. Norman’s Tiling example

June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel SimHit (x,y,z,t,charge) in global reference frame Total Charge deposit, RawTrackerHit Track Strip/Pad 01NN+1N+2 X y z Sensor reference frame

June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel

Clustering: June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel Strip/Pad 01 NN+1 X y z Sensor reference frame N+2 Cluster: List of Strips/pads that make up the cluster Center of gravity of Cluster: provides uncorrected position measurements in detector reference frame Nr. of strips, pad/strip size etc. provide precision of local measurement. (covariance matrix) ‏ Tracking is driven from clusters!!!

Infrastrucure  Important: While doing this studies make sure that the infrastructure gets build up and that the corresponding objects: RawTrackerHit, Digis, Cluster are created and used in the following steps. For now we don't worry if very simplified algorithms are used to create this objects. E.g. don’t need sophisticated digitization at the moment e.g. input to pattern recognition, tracking should be clusters converted into TrackerHits (only defined for the track they are used on)! June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel

In Conclusion Please give us your input ( Ext. 6034) Thanks In advance! June 15 th 2007 Hans Wenzel