Status and R&D development of Photon Calorimeter G. Atoian, S. Dhawan, V. Issakov, A. Poblaguev, M. Zeller, Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Calorimetry Cornell-ALCPG Calorimetry Detector Study Plans at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg.
NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Calorimetry-Arlington Calorimetry Detector Study Plans at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg for.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Crystals and related topics J. Gerl, GSI NUSTAR Calorimeter Working Group Meeting June 17, 2005 Valencia.
Proposal for IHEP participation in CBM ECAL
N. Anfimov (JINR) on behalf of the ECAL0 team.  Introduction  Installation and commissioning  Calibration  Data taking  Preliminary result  Plans.
Cost estimation for production & installation of Calorimeter System V. Issakov Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT /9/2004.
Status of EIC Calorimeter R&D at BNL EIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting January 13, 2014 S.Boose, J.Haggerty, E.Kistenev, E,Mannel, S.Stoll, C.Woody PHENIX.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Shashlik type calorimeter for SHIP experiment
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
Construct two layers of hadron calorimeter and test Makoto Harada High Energy Physics Laboratory Faculty of Physics Department of Science Shinshu University.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Photo-detector and scintillator studies at ITEP Outline 1. Check of casting form 2. Study of MRS APD’s from CPTA 3. MC simulation of light collection in.
PANDA electromagnetic calorimeters Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group INSTR08 28 Feb - 05 Mar 2008.
Detector development and physics studies in high energy physics experiments Shashikant Dugad Department of High Energy Physics Review, 3-9 Jan 2008.
Status of Projectile Spectator Detector A.Kurepin (Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow) I. Introduction to PSD. II. Conception and design. III. Development.
CALORIMETER system for the CBM detector Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) CBM Collaboration meeting, October 2004.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: Yerevan Physics Institute (Armenia) James Madison.
Design and optimization of Electromagnetic particle Detectors (EDs) in LHAASO-KM2A Xiangdong Sheng, Jia Liu, Jing Zhao on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration.
STUDY OF ULTRAREAR DECAYS K 0 → π 0 νν(bar) (Search of K 0 → π 0 νν(bar) decay at IHEP, project KLOD ) V.N. Bolotov on behalf of the collaboration JINR,
Hadron Calorimeter HCAL-J GEp Electron Calorimeter BigCal Hadron Calorimeter 1 G. Franklin, Carnegie Mellon University 10/13/2011.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
HE CALORIMETER DETECTOR UPGRADE R&D Y. Onel for University of Iowa Fairfield University University of Mississippi.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
E. A. Albayrak, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab, Nov HE CALORIMETER DETECTOR UPGRADE R&D STATUS E. A. Albayrak for The University Of Iowa Fairfield University.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Rare decay Opportunities at U-70 Accelerator (IHEP, Protvino) Experiment KLOD Joint Project : IHEP,Protvino JINR,Dubna INR, Moscow, RAS.
May 26-27, 2005Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy1 Studies on High QE PMT Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.) Contents –Motivation –Performance.
first results from EMCal test beam
SiPM for CBM Michael Danilov ITEP(Moscow) Muon Detector and/or Preshower CBM Meeting ITEP
The LHCb Electromagnetic Calorimeter Ivan Belyaev, ITEP/Moscow.
Photon Detector with PbWO 4 Crystals and APD Readout APS “April” Meeting in Denver, CO on May 4, 2004 presented by Kenta Shigaki (Hiroshima University,
Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
A.Olchevski, JINR (Dubna) Test Beam studiesof COMPASS ECAL0 Test Beam studies of COMPASS ECAL0 module prototype with MAPD readout ECAL0 Team, JINR, DUBNA.
SPHENIX EMCAL R&D Craig Woody BNL sPHENIX Design Study Meeting September 7, 2011.
Iowa Test Plans for ESTB B. Bilki, Y. Onel University Of Iowa.
Performance of Scintillator-Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the ILC experiment Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University) for the CALICE collaboration Mar 12.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
Sergey BarsukElectromagnetic Calorimeter for 1 Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the LHCb experiment Perugia, Italy March 29 – April 2, 2004 ECAL CALO Sergey.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) Status Dmitry Morozov, IHEP (Protvino) PANDA LV Collaboration Meeting Nov 30 – Dec Vienna, Austria.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
N. Anfimov a, V. Anosov a, I. Chirikov-Zorin a, D. Fedoseev a, O. Gavrishchuk a, N. Khovanskiy a, Z. Krumshtein a, R. Leitner b, G. Meshcheryakov a, A.Nagaytsev.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
COMPASS calorimeters S. Platchkov IRFU, CEA-Saclay GDR, 8-9 avril 2008
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 2017
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
PANDA Forward Spectrometer Calorimeter (Shashlyk) status and plans
Presentation transcript:

Status and R&D development of Photon Calorimeter G. Atoian, S. Dhawan, V. Issakov, A. Poblaguev, M. Zeller, Physics Department, Yale University, New Haven, CT G.I. Britvich, S. Chernichenko, I. Shein and A. Soldatov Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia O. Karavichev, T. Karavicheva and V. Marin Institute for Nuclear Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Photon Calorimeter for KOPIO The requirements of the KOPIO Photon Calorimeter: Energy resolution -  3[%]/  E. Time resolution -  90[psec]/  E. Photon detection inefficiency (due to holes-cracks) -  Active area  5.3 m 2 Granularity - 11  11 cm 2. Radiation length - 16X 0 (18X 0 including Preradiator). Physical length -  60 cm. The Shashlyk technique satisfies the KOPIO requirements. All sizes are millimeters

The design innovations: New scintillator tile (BASF143E + 1.5%pTP %POPOP produced by IHEP) with improved optical transparency and improved surface quality. The light yield is now ~ 60 photons per 1 MeV of incident photon energy. Nonuniformity of light response across the module is <2.3% for a point-like light source, and < 0.5% if averaged over the photon shower.. New mechanical design of a module has four special "LEGO type" locks for scintillator’s tiles. These locks fix the position of the scintillator tiles with the 300-  m gaps, providing a sufficient room for the 275  m lead tiles without optical contact between lead and scintillator. The new mechanical structure permits removing of 600 paper tiles between scintillator and lead, reduces the diameter of fiber’s hole to 1.3 mm, and removes the compressing steel tape. The effective radiation length X 0 was decreased from 3.9 cm to 3.4 cm. The hole/crack and other insensitive areas were reduced from 2.5 % up to 1.6 %. The module’s mechanical properties such as dimensional tolerances and constructive stiffness were significantly improved. New photodetector Avalanche Photo Diode ( produced by Advanced Photonix Inc. ) with high quantum efficiency (~93%), good photo cathode uniformity (nonuniformity  3%) and good short- and long-term stability. A typical APD gain is 200, an excess noise factor is ~ 2.4. The effective light yield of a module became ~24 photoelectrons per 1 MeV of the incident photon energy resulting in negligible photo statistic contribution to the energy resolution of the calorimeter. Design of Calorimeter modules The calorimeter module is a very fine sampling “Shashlyk” structure consisting of 300 alternating layers of 275  m- thick lead tiles and 1.5 mm-thick scintillator tiles, which are penetrated by 144 Wave Length Shifting (WLS) fibers for a light readout.

Calorimeter module Lateral segmentation 110  110 mm 2 Scintillator thickness1.5 mm Gap between scintillator tiles0.300 mm Lead absorber thickness0.275 mm Number of the absorber layers (Lead/Scint)300 WLS fibers per module 72  1.5 = 108 m Fiber spacing9.3 mm Holes diameter in Scintillator/Lead1.3 mm/1.4 mm Diameter of WLS fiber (Y11-200MS)1.0 mm Fiber bundle diameter14.0 mm External wrapping (TYVEK paper) 150  Effective X o 34.0 mm Effective R M 59.8 mm Effective density2.75 g/cm 3 Active depth540 mm (15.9 X o ) Total depth (without Photodetector)650 mm Total weight18.0 kG

IHEP-KOPIO scintillator facility

Development of scintillator Scintillator: PS+Fluor1+Fluor2, Manufacturer Light yield (% of Anthracene) Attenuation Length (cm) Light yield of MIP, p.e. per tile Simulated light collection efficiency PSM %pTP+0.04%POPOP, TECHNOPLAST,  64.5   0.3, 100%  0.013, 100% BASF158K+1.5%pTP+0.04%POPOP, IHEP,  65.1   0.3, (127  10)%  0.017, (127  13)% BASF165H+1.5%pTP+0.04%POPOP, IHEP,  65.3   0.3 (145  10)%  0.019, (143  14)% BASF143E+1.5%pTP+0.04%POPOP, IHEP,  65.5   0.3, (161  10)%  0.021, (160  16)%

APD readout APD LV - HV Preamp

Beam test of Calorimeter prototypes Studied prototypes 1st prototype of 3  3 modules: The conventional design of modules (with paper between lead and scintillator); A 30 mm diameter 9903B PMT (Electron Tube Inc.) ; The conventional 12-bits ADC digitizing of the PMT signal. 2nd prototype of 3  3 modules: New design of modules (no paper between lead and scintillator); A 16 mm diameter APD (Advanced Photonix Inc.) ; An 8-bits 140 MHz WFD and 12-bits ADC digitizing of the APD signal. Measurements Beam intensity was ~ 3  10 5 Hz. Triggered and tagged photon energy was in the range MeV. Beam angle spread was ~ 2 mrad. Diameter of the beam spot at the prototype was ~ 1.5 cm. Photon energy spread was  E/E  1.5% (for the triggered and tagged monochromatic photon energy line). Two KOPIO calorimeter prototypes were tested at the Laser Electron Gamma Source (LEGS) facility at BNL NSLS. The energy resolution was measured for both prototypes with the beam in the center of nonet. The time resolution was studied for the 2nd prototype (with WFD only), comparing timing in two modules when the beam is between the two. The photon detection inefficiency was measured by the detecting photons in Prototype 1 located behind Prototype 2. The stability of the Calorimeter signals was tested by a LED monitoring system during the 24-hours measurements

Beam test of Calorimeter prototypes

The best results were achieved for prototype 2 with APD/WFD readout: Energy resolution  (2.9±0.1)%  E(GeV). Time resolution  (90±10)psec  E(GeV). Photon detection inefficiency  5  (for incident beam angle  5 mrad ). APD gain stability  1% (for tested period of 24 hours).

Simulation of the Shashlyk Calorimeter The simulation of the Shashlyk calorimeter in KOPIO is based on a GEANT3 description of the development of the electromagnetic shower, and an Optical Model for the simulation of the light collection in the scintillator tile. The GEANT3 part of the simulation includes a detailed description of the geometry of the Shashlyk module. Calculations are performed with low energy cuts 10 KeV and with delta-ray simulations to obtain consistency with experimental results. The Optical Model uses the tracking of the single photons in the scintillator tile. The parameters which customize the model, such as attenuation lengths, reflection efficiencies, the probability of photon capture in the fiber, were adjusted using optical measurements. The effects of light to photoelectron conversion and noise in the photodetector-preamplifier chain were also taken into account. The results of the simulation of the energy resolution are in excellent agreement with the experimental measurements in a range of photon and positron energies GeV. Experiment vs GEANT/OPTIC simulation

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2004) Development of the photodetector HV system ($15k): A sample of the APD HV "built-in" unit with a new LV-HV converter (C20) produced by EMCO HIGH VOLTAGE CORPORATION was tested. This HV supply with digital control provides very low ripple, high stability and low pick-up noise. The 25-channel prototype of this HV system will be build and tested with the new Calorimeter prototype.

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2004) Development of the photodetector cooling system ($15k): A tested APD cooling system: An improved prototype of the cooling system will provide the APD noise of 0.2  0.3 MeV (at 10 o C). Room temperature (21  28) o C APD temperature~ 18 o C Improvement of a signal/noise ratio (1.3  1.5) Equivalent Noise~ 0.5 MeV APD gain stability  1%

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2004) Development of the LED monitoring system ($15k): A 64-channel LED monitoring system will be built and tested with the new Calorimeter prototype. Temperature stability  0.1% Duration of the light pulse  20 nsec Variation of the flash amplitude  0.1 %; Photon intensity  10,000 p./ch. Pulse rateUp to 1 MHz

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2004) Development of the photo-readout system, including the digitizing readout electronics ($45k): Study of 25 APDs (final specification and cost). Design, construction and study of 25 fast charge-sensitive pre-amplifiers (final specification and cost). Study of new WFD prototypes (10-bit, 250 MHz).

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2004) Construction of new prototype of the Photon Calorimeter ($35k) Summer 2004 An array of 5  5 modules with the final version of module’s instrumentation. This prototype will be employed to test the performance of the pre-production modules and to adjust the specification for the digitizing system and other accompanying systems.

R&D plans for Calorimeter (2005) Spring 2005 Development of the conceptual and technical design of the Calorimeter system ($20k). Fall 2005 Construction of 10  10 mass-production modules array with appropriate pre-production prototypes of the digitizing, cooling and monitoring systems ($270k). In collaboration with those responsible for the Preradiator, this prototype will be employed to study the energy and timing performance of a joined Calorimeter/Preradiator system.

References KOPIO collaboration, “ Measurement of the decay K 0    ”, Technical Design Report for the National Science foundation, June 06, 2001, page 53. G. S. Atoian et al,, “ Preliminary Research for Shashlyk Calorimeter for E926 ”, KOPIO TN015, 15 June 1999, physics/ G.S. Atoian et al., “ Study of the energy resolution of the KOPIO Preradiator/Calorimeter system “, KOPIO TN034, 18 Apr 2002.tudy of the energy resolution of the KOPIO Preradiator/Calorimeter system Photon Calorimeter for KOPIO