The New England IFQ Referendum Provision A discussion of MSFCMA §303A(c)(6)(D) ph: 978.281.9337.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Terms of Reference for the GEO Executive Committee Note: These Terms of References were approved at GEO-6 Helen Wood, GEO Secretariat Director.
Advertisements

TC Admin Open Mic Session Copyright © OASIS 2012 TC Administration Update Report to Members February 8 th / 9 th 2012.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
School Community Council Orientation July Overview Purpose and History Membership Elections Meetings Roles of SCC Members Responsibilities References.
Ensuring that building products meet code requirements ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. The ICC-ES Evaluation Committee conducts open public hearings on proposed.
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
INITIATIVES, REFERENDA AND RECALLS This PowerPoint Covers:
Elections Process. You are the IEA-NEA Proper conduction of elections is your responsibility ! Labor organizations are governed by the Landrum-Griffin.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Secretarial Duties. The secretary records the minutes of the meetings, maintains a register of members and directors, is responsible for sending out the.
Openness and Transparency in Local Governments and Smaller Organizations June 5, 2014.
League of Women Voters of New York State Constitutional Convention Delegation Selection Process Position Update Prepared by the League of Women Voters.
Information Package on Second Vote ‘Namgis First Nation.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
1 NE Multi-species Buyback Fishing Capacity Reduction under Section 312(b)-(e) of the Magnuson- Stevens Act Leo Erwin, Chief, NE Financial Services, NMFS/NOAA,
MSRA Environmental Review Requirement. Section 107 Requirements Revise and Update Procedures Consult with CEQ and Councils, involve public Sole environmental.
Fiscal Analysis of the Fair Rent and Home Ownership Initiative A Presentation to the Fillmore City Council June 23, 2006.
NMFS Overview National SSC Workshop - IV Richard D. Methot Jr. Office of Science & Technology 1.
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
Working with Schoolsite Councils
Webinar on WIOA and Independent Living for CILs
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota Review August 17, 2010 Tab B, No. 11(a)
FEMA Update NFDA 2008 Annual Meeting Lora Eskandary, FEMA HQ April 1, 2008.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Chapter II REGULATION OF RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT ACTIVITIES REGULATION OF RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT ACTIVITIES.
MSA – Catch Shares - Economics Eric Thunberg Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Social Sciences Branch, NOAA Fisheries Office of Science and Technology,
Magnuson-Stevens Reauthorization Act of 2006 March 2007.
The Design and Use of Fishing Community And Regional Fishery Association Entities in Limited Access Privilege Programs Joshua Stoll School of Marine Sciences.
CIVIL RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Civil Rights Enforcement and Compliance.
Doc.: IEEE /0698r0 Submission May 2015 Xiaoming Peng (I2R)Slide 1 Date: Authors: IEEE aj Task Group March 2015 Report.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
IFQ Financing under the Fisheries Finance Program August 17, 2010 Tab B, No. 12(a)
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
Doc.: IEEE /0507r0 Submission TGaj CC12 on 10 April 2014 Report Author: Date: NameCompanyAddressPhone Haiming WANGSEU/CWPAN 2.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Text #ICANN49 Policy & Implementation Working Group Update.
Oil and Gas Profile Implementation Plan. 2 BUSOGFLT Background ERCOT received Oil and Gas Profile Segment request ERCOT completed.
Current Stakeholder Timelines for Emergency Issues May 6, 2008 TPTF.
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI KASKA DENA RATIFICATION RULES SUMMARY Prepared for Presentation to the Annual General Assembly August 12, 13 and 14, 2008.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
IEEE TGa Project Timeline
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JULY 24, 2017 CERTIFICATION OF SUFFICIENCY OF A REFERENDUM PETITION AGAINST ORDINANCE NO ADOPTED BY THE PASADENA CITY.
Conducting Council Elections
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
NE Multi-species Buyback
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
ELE PROPOSED REGULATIONS and the LOOK ACT
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
State Elections: Incorporated & Unincorporated
PROVISIONS OF H.R
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [4md Agenda May 2018 Interim] Date Submitted:
Consideration of Possible Action Re: Marijuana/ Cannabis Regulations
OFFICIAL MASS CANCELLATION
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [4md Agenda May 2018 Interim] Date Submitted:
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
IEEE SGa Project Timeline
March 2018 Project: IEEE P MD
<month year> <January 2019>
July 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [4y SECN Agenda July 2019 Plenary] Date Submitted:
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [4md Agenda May 2018 Interim] Date Submitted:
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
September 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [4y SECN Agenda September 2019 Interim]
Presentation transcript:

The New England IFQ Referendum Provision A discussion of MSFCMA §303A(c)(6)(D) ph:

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 MSFCMA §303A(c)(6)(D) ~ paraphrased The NEFMC may not submit and NMFS may not approve a new IFQ program proposal, unless such a system, as ultimately developed, has been approved by more than 2/3 of those voting in a referendum among eligible permit holders, or others (see below). If the IFQ proposal fails to be approved, it may be revised and voted on again. NMFS shall conduct a referendum, including notifying all persons eligible to participate and making available to them detailed information about the referendum and the IFQ proposal. By Jan. 12, 2008, NMFS shall publish guidelines and procedures to determine procedures and voting eligibility requirements. NMFS shall promulgate criteria for determining whether others can participate in the NE referendum to ensure that crew members who derive a significant percentage of their total income from the fishery are eligible to vote.

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 MSRA Implementation Tasks, re: LAPPs Referendum & voter eligibility procedures and guidelines per clause (ii). Working group with NERO, SERO, GCNE, GCF, & HQ. Proposal ~ Sep. ’07; final by Jan. ’08. Crew eligibility criteria per clause (v). NERO lead. Same timeline. ANPR for implementing regs on the new LAPP section, §303A – definitions, allocation, process, plan requirements, etc. HQ lead, nationally applicable. Tech Memo on LAPPs. Reference document for Councils on market-based management concepts and issues. HQ lead.

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 A Draft Model of The Referendum Process Publish procedures and guidelines for:-determining voter eligibility req’s-conducting referenda in a fair & equitable mannerWorking group, Jan 2008 Promulgate criteria:-for determining whether add’l fishery participants can participate-to ensure crew who earn significant% of income fm the fishery are eligible.NERO, Jan 2008 NMFS approves finalpermit holder votereligibility req’ts and setsreferendum details. Council develops a final IFQ proposal w/ proposed allocation and voter eligibility req’ts. NMFS Conducts the Referendum! NE NMFS executesprocedure to identify eligiblecrewmembers. NE Council proposal also recommends the req’ts for crew who may be eligible to vote FR Notice on process Print/send ballots Voter’s eligibility is verified Receive/validate ballots Tally and report to Council FR Notice on results Ongoing policy & reg development FR Notice, outreach Possible mailings Crew may request ballots Gulf FMC Only!

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 MSFCMA §303A(c)(6)(D) IFQ Referendum – Clause (ii) – Publish Procedures & Guidelines for: Conducting a fair & equitable referendum. Determining basic voter eligibility requirements. What should be the procedures for a referendum? What can be set in advance? What should be addressed in the Council’s IFQ proposal? What factors should be considered to determine voter eligibility? Valid permit? Landings history? Control date? Geographic range? Should voter eligibility be the same as the proposed quota allocation eligibility?

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 MSFCMA §303A(c)(6)(D) IFQ Referendum – Clause (v) – Promulgate Criteria for: Determining whether add’l fishery participants are eligible to vote. To ensure crew who derive a significant percentage of their total income from the fishery are eligible. By what criteria should we determine whether other fishery participants are eligible to participate? For example: Self-identification and self-certification when the referendum is announced? Self-ID & income documentation following an NOI/control date? Vessel owner annual report on crew as part of permit renewal? Regular crew registration and income filings? What is a crew member? Should one’s work history, shipboard duties, age, crew share, or other factors be considered? What is a significant percentage of one’s total income? What sources of income can/should be considered?

IFQ Referendum Discussion -- NEFMC, June 2007 Thanks very much for the Council’s time & input. ph: