Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14 th, 2012

 Facility Audit Trends  Audit findings by Program Level  Results of Safety Culture Survey  Impact of Safety Programs 2June 14, 2012

 Nox Reduction Pollution Abatement (13)  Chemical Mfg Plants (11)  Water Treatment (11)  Ammonia Refrigeration (8)  Petroleum Refineries (4)  Swimming Pools (1)  Hazardous Waste Storage Facility (1) June 14, 2012’3

June 14,  Audit every three years  Track previous actions in new audits  Ensures and Considers  “ensure” actions not the best indicator  Number of ensures over time

June 14, 20125

6

7

8

9

10

June 14, ◦ PHA (10% overall, 13% P2,13% P3 )  Recommendation tracking, timely  Program 3: siting, seismic revalidation, HF, previous incidents,  Program 2: revalidation, inspect equipment ◦ Operating Procedures (10%,14%.11%)  COD,  Program 3: S&H information/PPE, certification  Program 2: missing procedure for task, shutdown procedure (emergency & normal), start-up

June 14, ◦ Hazard Assessment (7% overall,11% P2, 9% P3 )  WCS & ARS background documentation, parameters, OCA update ◦ Training (6%, 9%, 7%)  Refresher training, Records  Program 2: initial training, contractor  Program 3: document training was understood

January 31, June 14, 2012

14 ◦ Operating Procedures (14%)  COD, S&H information/PPE, certification ◦ CSE (13%)  Review cancelled permits, permit and conditions, rescue plan ◦ PHA (11%)  Incidents reviewed, document recommendation & tracking, seismic revalidation ◦ MOC (10%)  Document training (op & maintenance), MOC for operating procedure, proper authorization

June 14, ◦ Inherently Safer System (21%)  PHA recommendations analyzed for ISS categories (I,P,A,P) and approach (m,s,m,s), ISS for new process and guidance ◦ Latent Conditions Checklist (13%)  Sign-off, feedback, rationale for customization, tracking of training and recommendations ◦ Operating Procedures (13%)  Evaluating HF, task/gap analysis, procedure writing training ◦ Safety Culture (11%)

 Completed survey of employees  No of Deficiencies: ◦ Range: 2 – 6 ◦ Average: 3.3 (28%) ◦ Median: 2 June 14,

 Develop metrics (100%)  Milestones in improvement plans (67%)  Various requirements (33%): ◦ Evaluate work groups ◦ Identification of target ◦ Assessment having all required component ◦ Records maintained ◦ Report out to the workforce June 14,

June 14,

Cho Nai Cheung Telephone: (925) Website: Jun2 14,