R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
1 Issues of Law, Policy and Practice in Transitioning Students With Learning Disabilities to Higher Education Diana Pullin, J.D., Ph.D. Boston College.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
I dentification of Children with S pecific L earning D isabilities July 17, 2014 Presented at MEGA Conference 2014 By Clare Ward, Billie Thompson and Christine.
1 Third Annual Massachusetts Summit on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment December 7 th and 8 th, 2010 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support –
SLD Eligibility Policy. Agenda Review SLD definition Models of SLD identification ID’s Revised SLD Eligibility Criteria and Procedures Questions.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services Louis Danielson Research to Practice.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
COSA Special Education Conference October Zen and the Art of RTI.
Response to Intervention Edward Daly & Todd Glover University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Response to Intervention Big Ideas: Since its inception as a category, SLD has been characterized by severe discrepancy between ability/achievement. In.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Understanding Tests and Evaluations of Learning
“Sorting Out Response to Intervention” Nassau Association of District Curriculum Officials February 26, 2009 Presented by Arlene B. Crandall ABCD Consulting,
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Ventura County SELPA Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses (PSW) Model: An Overview This PowerPoint is provided as an overview to the Ventura County SELPA.
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Copyright of PEN Connecting the Dots: The Evaluation Process, the Development of the IEP & Monitoring for Progress Parent Education Network 2107.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 FEBRUARY 5, 2014 SARAH TRUSTY AND AMANDA DAVIDSON.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
A Three-Tiered Model: early intervention for students “at- risk” for learning difficulties CASP Convention 2004 Allan Lloyd-Jones Special Education Consultant.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The RTI² framework allows for an integrated, seamless problem-solving model that addresses individual student need.  This.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
RTI² Overview Response to Intervention? RTI² is NOT......Just a special education initiative...Only for students with disabilities...Only for beginning.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Copyright © 2007 by Allyn & Bacon Chapter 3 Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
H860 Reading Difficulties Week 1. Today’s session 1.Introductions 2.Housekeeping 3.What factors ‘cause’ reading difficulties? 4.Philosophical bit 5.Break.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
Overview, Considerations, and Implementation Sharon Hance Erie 1 BOCES SETRC Information for this presentation.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Learning Disabilities A general term describing a group of learning problems Largest single disability area 4.0% of all school-age children are classified.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Response to Intervention New roles for Reading Teachers in the newly authorized IDEA.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Calculating Severe Discrepancy with Online Software Richard D. Baer Utah LD Test Selection Committee Learning Disabilities Association 47 th International.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services
Specific Learning Disability: Guidelines
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Early Intervening Services
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and

What are Early Intervening Services? Assistance given to students: Who haven’t been identified yet as needing special education and related services But— Who may need additional support to succeed in general education environment

Early Intervening Services Are For Children: Who are not currently receiving special education and related services under IDEA This could include students who were previously eligible for special education but who are not identified as needing it now Who may need additional support, academically or behaviorally

Early Intervening Services: Do not limit right to FAPE Do not create right to FAPE May not be used to delay appropriate evaluation of a child suspected of having a disability FAPE is an entitlement only for children currently eligible for special education under IDEA, as outlined in their IEPs Regardless of IDEA funds being used to provide EIS:

And Now… R esponse R esponse t o t o I ntervention Using research-based interventions to help determine if a child has a specific learning disability.

What is RTI? Research-based approach to helping children who are struggling Typically involves 3 levels of assistance that increase in intensity 1.Screening and classwide interventions 2.Targeted, small-group interventions 3.Intensive interventions

§ Specific learning disabilities State must adopt criteria for determining if a child has a specific learning disability More about the Criteria Among other things— Must permit use of a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention May permit use of other alternative research-based procedures for determining whether a child has LD

Yes to:Yes to ONE of THESE: Either (a)(2)(i) OR (a)(2)(ii)Yes to: (a)(1)(a)(2)(i)(a)(2)(ii)(a)(3) (1) The child does not achieve adequately for the child’s age or to meet State-approved grade-level standards in one or more of the following areas, when provided with learning experiences and instruction appropriate for the child’s age or State-approved grade-level standards: (i) Oral expression. (ii) Listening comprehension. (iii) Written expression. (iv) Basic reading skill. (v) Reading fluency skills. (vi) Reading comprehension. (vii) Mathematics calculation. (viii) Mathematics problem solving. (2)(i) The child does not make sufficient progress to meet age or State approved grade-level standards in one or more of the areas identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section when using a process based on the child’s response to scientific, research-based intervention... (ii) The child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement, or both, relative to age, State- approved grade level standards, or intellectual development, that is determined by the group to be relevant to the identification of a specific learning disability, using appropriate assessments, consistent with §§ and (3) The group determines that its findings under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section are not primarily the result of— (i) A visual, hearing, or motor disability; (ii) Mental retardation; (iii) Emotional disturbance; (iv) Cultural factors; (v) Environmental or economic disadvantage; or (vi) Limited English proficiency.

Level 1: Screening and Interventions Screenings identify “at-risk” children Children receive specific research-based instruction, usually in small groups Progress is closely monitored This step usually doesn’t last longer than 8 weeks  Yes Is student progress sufficient? Child goes back to regular instruction  No Child moves to Level 2

Level 2: Targeted Interventions Child receives more intensive services and intervention, usually in small groups In K-3 these services are usually in reading and math Progress is closely monitored Level 2 usually doesn’t last more than a marking period  Yes Is student progress adequate? Child goes back to regular instruction  No Child moves to Level 3

Level 3: Intensive Interventions Child receives individualized intensive interventions targeting his or her skill deficits Progress is closely monitored Child is considered for evaluation under IDEA Data gathered in Levels 1, 2, and 3 help to inform the evaluation If child does not respond to Level 3 interventions:

There are many RTI models in use* In RTI, progress monitoring is critical to: RTI in Practice * The Department does not mandate or endorse any particular RTI model Pinpoint child’s areas of difficulty Keep close track of child’s progress Staff use formal guidelines to decide which children are not making adequate progress or responding to the intervention

RTI does not replace a comprehensive evaluation Evaluation teams must use a variety of tools and strategies, even if RTI is used Results of RTI may be one part of information reviewed IDEA and RTI IDEA 2004 regulations do not define RTI Regulations are written to accommodate different models of RTI