WP3 The LiCAS Laser Straightness Monitor (LSM) Greg Moss.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Kinematics to Arm Control a)Calibrating the Kinematics Model b)Arm Motion Selection c)Motor Torque Calculations for a Planetary Robot Arm CS36510.
Advertisements

Results/Conclusions: In computer graphics, AR is achieved by the alignment of the virtual camera with the actual camera and the virtual object with the.
Lab 1 Paraxial Optics Lab in 106A. Look at paraxial optics rules Use a bi-convex singlet at 1:1 conjugates Do it double pass so can see image Lateral.
1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
SLAC National Accelerator Center
Fixed Beam Moving Stage using a stitching free exposure strategy.
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
22-Nov-2004 © Renishaw plc Not to be reproduced without written permission from Renishaw Laser & Calibration Products Division Slide 1 Laser.
Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,
FLAO Alignment Procedures G. Brusa, S. Esposito FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Zróbmy to prosto ( czyli jak ustawić akcelerator liniowy ) Grzegorz Grzelak Seminarium Fizyki Wielkich Energii; Warszawa; 14 X 2005 LiCAS Linear Collider.
The LiCAS FSI Subsystem Current Status and Initial Measurements John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IOP HEP April 2008.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
MSU CSE 240 Fall 2003 Stockman CV: 3D to 2D mathematics Perspective transformation; camera calibration; stereo computation; and more.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
1 Reconstruction and statistical modelling of geometric measurements from the LiCAS project Patrick Brockill LiCAS Group Oxford, 6 February, 2008 Talk.
Introduction to experimental errors
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
1 st Study of Tracker Misalignments with G4MICE David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
1 G4MICE Malcolm Ellis SciFi Tracker Meeting, KEK Thursday 31st March 2005.
LiCAS train simulations (current status of work done at Oxford) Grzegorz Grzelak.
Geometric Optics Ray Model assume light travels in straight line
A Laser Based Alignment System for the CLIC project
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
1 ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations using Conventional Techniques and Development of Alignment Model John Dale LCWS08 & ILC08.
© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Laser Tracker Systems Speaker : Pieter Greeff
VISPS Overview Capture visual data from two cameras Find laser Triangulate to find X, Y, Z coordinates of laser Output coordinates to RS-232 serial output.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Course 12 Calibration. 1.Introduction In theoretic discussions, we have assumed: Camera is located at the origin of coordinate system of scene.
Toby Shoobridge David Benham NERC Space Geodesy Facility Herstmonceux, UK
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Test Corrections Due Tuesday, April 26 th Corrections must be done in a different ink color Lots of 4’s for effort – doesn’t mean answer is right! Check.
LiCAS Applied Geodesy Group Warsaw University , RHUL, EuroTeV WP7, LiCAS Armin Reichold, LiCAS Linear Collider Alignement and Survey.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
STAR Sti, main features V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
DESY, Sep. 27, 2005 Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey A. Reichold, Oxford for the LiCAS collaboration 1 Survey and Alignment.
Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.
Alignment (Survey) Tolerances in Main Linac from Beam Dynamics Simulations Kiyoshi Kubo.
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line 1 Transfer Line 1 Transfer Plate.
Status of Reference Network Simulations John Dale TILC09 20 April 2009.
STAR Kalman Track Fit V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
LCWS 06 Bangalore, India, March Track fitting using weight matrix Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations John Dale 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas.
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
INVESTIGATION HELPS Planning your investigation. INVESTIGATION HELPS Introduction For a fixed resistance there is a relationship between R, V and I. Plotting.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Status of Reference Network Simulations John Dale ILC-CLIC LET Beam Dynamics Workshop 23 June 2009.
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 The Viewfinder Telescopes of Advanced LIGO’s Optical Levers Michael Enciso Mentor: Riccardo DeSalvo Co-Mentor: Tara Celermsongsak.
Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Gyroscope specifications 3. Drift rate compensation 4. Orientation error correction 5. Results 6. Gyroscope and odometers.
LiCAS Simulation Based on: Simulation of the LiCAS survey system for the ILC by G. Grzelak¤, A. Reichold+, J. Dale+, M. Dawson+, J. Green+, Y. Han+, M.
Pre-alignment of quadrupoles 1 CLIC stabilization day, STARTSLIDE PRE-ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Hartmann Wavefront Sensing for the Gingin Experiment Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch Department of Physics, University of Adelaide LSC, LLO Mar.
Laser beam trajectory measurement with a CCD camera Georg Gassner.
WP3 Frequency Scanning Interferometry Analysis Techniques for the LiCAS RTRS John Dale.
Lab 1 Paraxial Optics Lab in 106A.
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
A simple model of the ILC alignment process for use in LET simulations
First Data from the Linear Collider Alignment and Survey Project (LiCAS) The ILC requires unprecedented accuracy, speed and cost efficiency for the survey.
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Towards a common mechanical interface
Status of Reference Network Simulations
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations
Presentation transcript:

WP3 The LiCAS Laser Straightness Monitor (LSM) Greg Moss

Contents Introduction The LSM ray tracer Reconstruction Calibration Constants Determining Calibration Constants Planned work (Marker Reconstruction simulation)

Straightness Monitor Basics LSM is used to measure: - Transverse translations - Rotations Require 1µm precision over length of train z -y Translation: Spots move same direction Rotation: Spots move opposite directions CCD Camera Retro reflector Incoming beam Outgoing beam The train needs to know how it is aligned internally. Achieved by internal FSI and the Laser Straightness Monitor.

Sensitivity of Internal Components ComponentTrXTrYTrZRotXRotYRotZ LSM√√√√ FSI±±√±± Inclinometer√ (not used) √

Ray Tracer Ray tracer written in C++ Open GL interface Highly flexible Agrees with Fortran version Can use many setups: -Lab -Car -‘Virtual’ setups -Any general setup A ‘virtual’ setup has a mirror/camera combination replaced by the image of the camera in the mirror. It is mathematically equivalent (if the CCD X axes are inverted).

Reconstruction Ray tracer is used as a part of a fit function for the Minuit fitting package –Position & orientation of the LSM block used as the fit parameters –CCD spots fitted by Chi-squared Minimisation –100% effective to within nm with good convention choice and no noise

Reconstruction If perfectly set up reconstruction is limited by beam spot fit precision (limited by camera noise) 0.7 microns currently used (Lab in air) Gives reconstruction precision of 0.24 microns & 1.67 micro-radians

Calibration Still need to know the exact position of the components These are the calibration constants The errors on the constants give the systematic error There are different possible sets of constants

Effect of Errors in Constants A large set of ray traces with many different calibration constants was taken. Error on the reconstructed parameters then plotted against each calibration constant. The gradient gives the dependence on the constant.

With Standard Setup

With Virtual Setup

Calibration Constant Determination Constants are being measured using a CMM To determine the calibration constants more accurately a brute force method is in development. The LSM block produces data in many different orientations Using externally measured orientation data (from a laser tracker) the calibration constants can be determined See next slide for details

Calibration Constant Determination This method compares spot positions generated with a set of calibration constants with the measured values (knowing the correct orientation). Many orientations are used It changes the calibration constants until the difference between the measured spots are the same as the calculated spots

Calibration Constant Determination Problems with Standard model – constants are heavily dependent on each other: correct minimum not found easily Virtual model gives correct answers to O( )m if given perfect data If given realistic data some constants are found to O(10 -7 )m, some fail to be found within m. However, the constants that are found well are the ones the reconstruction is sensitive to! Reconstructing using these constants as the only source of error gives precision of microns & 0.25 micro-radians. (Currently only done twice – complete test planned) Adding 0.7 micron error to spot positions gives errors of 0.23 microns & 1.6 micro-radians - remaining miscalibration has no effect

Planned Work Some CMM measurements not made yet Errors on laser tracker data not accounted for Optimal number of measurements to take yet to be found Advanced error propagation not completed Detailed investigation into covariance not completed Real Data to be taken in May Combine with calibration of other RTRS elements

Conclusions The LSM is a critical part of the LiCAS RTRS Highly precise & accurate reconstruction needed Needs to be well calibrated Some Calibration constants critical They can be found to the accuracy required

Marker Reconstruction Simulation The following are slides from Grzegorz Grzelak They show how a complete simulation of a tunnel survey is performed After the process the (mis)alignment can be put into PLACET and a beam simulation effected.

Partially Calibrated Reconstruction

Virtual Setup – partially calibrated