THE JUDGE’S ROLE IN INSOLVENCY PROCEDURES Avv. Prof. Mariacarla Giorgetti, Via Guastalla n. 15, Milano - ITALIA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DATA PROTECTION and Research University Research Ethics Committee – David Cauchi David Cauchi Office of the Commissioner for Data Protection.
Advertisements

Appeal and Postconviction Relief
International insolvency law – basic principles within the European union.
Introducing and Implementing a Law on Debt Adjustment in Greece at a time of economic crisis Melina Mouzouraki, Dublin 2012.
Recent Developments In Consumer Insolvency Regulation In Russia Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Insolvency (Bankruptcy) division.
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Bankruptcy of the purchaser and enforceability of retention of title vis-à-vis its receivership International Insolvency Law Conference Nottingham Law.
Development of the discharge procedure for secured creditors’ claims in insolvency proceeding.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
PUBLIC RECORDS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE SCOTT R. SWIER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
SITUATION OF MEDIATION IN LITHUANIA. FIRST STEPS TOWARDS MEDIATION  First initiatives to promote mediation came from the growing non-governmental sector.
DATA PROTECTION and Research University Research Ethics Committee – David Cauchi Office of the Data Protection Commissioner.
6228v2 Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards Justin Williams.
Chapter 1 1 Tax Research (Day 3) Dr. Richard Ott ACCTG 833, Fall 2007.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
Chapter 2 Judicial and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
ICC International Court of Arbitration
The Federal Court System
How does the BAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT)
National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka AMENDMENTS.
LITIGATION COSTS IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION MARTA OŠLEJA LEGAL DEPARTMENT,
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
ALRUD Confidential 1 LIQUIDATION AND BANKRUPTCY OF LEGAL ENTITIES IN RUSSIA May 2015 Maria Ostashenko Of Counsel.
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
Petr Lavický  Appeal  Revision  Cassation.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
Chapter 4 Business Law. Number 1 ◦ Is Ed bound by a third party decision? Number 2 ◦ Should Walter pay the money? ◦ Should Olivia sue, even though she.
Chapter 4 Alternative, Judicial, and E- Dispute Resolution.
1 EU LAW WEEK 3 INSTITUTIONS OF THE EU. 2 INSTITUTIONS Institutions of the EU Principal Institutions Advisory Institutions 1.European Parliament 2.The.
Chapter 12 Administrative Procedure Law Section 1 Brief Introdution of Administrative Procedure Law.
Depositions and Law & Motion
Chapter 10 Trustees, Examiners & Creditors Committees.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
The B.O.R. Process and The School District JILL THOMPSON, ATHENS COUNTY AUDITOR BOB DRAIN, TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC LISA ELIASON, ATHENS CITY LAW DIRECTOR.
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure.
António Pedro Pinto Monteiro Lawyer – PLMJ Law Firm PhD student – FDUNL INTERIM MEASURES AND PRELIMINARY ORDERS.
How are powers divided in the government (executive)?
Josh Copeland Carlson & Copeland, PLLC September 20, 2011.
Private Law Litigants: the parties involved in a civil action Plaintiff: the party initiating a legal action Defendant: the party being sued in a civil.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Getting to grips with the Act.
Ion Gâlea.  Law no. 544/2001 on the free access to information of public interest;  Government Decision no. 123/2002 – Methodological Norms for implementation.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
1.  Minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 members including the president. 2.
The Public Tendering and Bidding (招投标) Law of the People's Republic of China Effective since January 1, 2000.
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II Tutorials Karima Amellal.
COURT SYSTEMS Chapter 3. Ch. 3-1 Objectives  Explain how disputes can be settled without going to court  Name the different levels of courts and describe.
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
Insolvency Resolution & Bankruptcy
Palestinian labour law
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
STRUCTURE, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF PE
THE NATIONAL JUDICIARY
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
The Court System Appeals.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1
European Company Law Dorota Wieczorkowska
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
Presentation transcript:

THE JUDGE’S ROLE IN INSOLVENCY PROCEDURES Avv. Prof. Mariacarla Giorgetti, Via Guastalla n. 15, Milano - ITALIA

Law Decree 5/2006 involved a complete revision of the powers and jurisdiction of the Judge appointed to deal with insolvency procedures. Prior to this reform, the appointed Judge was the driving force behind such procedures, with the task of directing and authorizing the activities of the official receiver. The 2006 Law Decree revised his functions to those of supervising and ensuring the regularity of the procedure.

This latter, in fact, had previously enjoyed a marginal role in the procedure. Its faculties were limited to that of giving opinions and it was hardly ever involved in major decisions affecting the procedure. As a result of the 2006 Law Decree it has assumed an active role. It now handles the powers of authorization previously held by the appointed Judge or by the Court itself.

We will now examine more specifically the functions attributed to the appointed Judge, as they are described in the single dispositions of the revised law.

To the effects of art. 25 l. and those following, the appointed Judge, in addition to the principal functions of supervising and controlling the regularity of the procedures:

-no. 1) refers to the court on all matters for which a provision by the Panel of (3) Judges is requested. -no. 2) issues or obtains from the proper authorities any urgent provisions for the conservation of the assets, excluding those affecting the rights of third parties claiming a right incompatible with acquisition. - no. 3) summons the receiver and the creditors’ committee in the cases prescribed by the law and whenever he deems it worthwhile for the correct and speedy performance of the procedure.

- no. 4) in accordance with the receiver’s proposals, pays the fees and terminates the appointment of those persons whose work had been required by the receiver in order to carry out the insolvency procedure. - n. 5) pronounces, within fifteen days, on complaints made against acts of the receiver or the creditors’ committee. - no. 6) authorizes in writing the receiver to plead in court as petitioner or defendant. Such authorization shall always be given for specific actions and must be issued singly for each level of court hearing. In accordance with the receiver’s proposals, pays the fees and where necessary terminates the appointment of the defence counsels nominated by the said receiver.

- no. 7) in accordance with the receiver’s proposals, appoints the arbitrators, having verified that the requisites envisaged by the law are present. - no. 8) verifies credits and real and personal rights claimed by third parties as of chapter V.