Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at I.3 Instructional Methods and Pacing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High School Standards-Based Classroom.
Advertisements

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework LE.1 Demonstrates knowledge of, interest in, and respect for diverse students’ communities and.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Simulation 2 – High School Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Documenting.
» What are your goals for tonight?
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
EngageNY.org Identifying CCSS-Aligned Instruction Recognizing Effective Instructional Practices.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Analysis Grade 5—Module 3.
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Early Release Professional Development NC FALCON Module 3: Collecting and Documenting Evidence February 16, 2011 Kathy Walker.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
A UGUST 2012 Elementary Literacy Standards. New Standards for Literacy Key Intended Learnings– Teachers will… Examine capacities of college and career.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Content and Language Objectives.  What is your comfort level with content language objectives?  Place a red dot on the continuum to represent your comfort.
Checking for Understanding: Are You With Me So Far? Presented by Peer Observers Karen Buelow Jennifer Fuerman Marianne Kenney Joe Ladow.
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Core Content Coaching Social Studies Grade 6
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at Questioning.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
 Desks in pairs or groups of 3-4  Students engaged in learning, minimal whole group instruction, students in collaborative pairs, small groups, etc.
A Closer Look I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
English Language Arts ERPD September 19, Welcome, Celebrations, & Norms Begin and end on time. Keep the train of thought “on the track”. Actively.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
Hawaii Department of Education Bridging the Gap: Professional Development Protocols “Tools for Schools”
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 8: Standard 2- Instructional Planning Please sit in groups with teachers NOT from your school.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
MISD Bilingual/ESL Department
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Determining Student Mastery: Achieving learning potential using assessment Drew Maerz Asheboro City Schools July 8, 2014.
Lesson Planning Session Planning effective, standards-based lessons within the practice teaching classroom.
 Assessment Match  Match the assessment with the appropriate category  Table talk – how did everyone classify the assessments?
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Denver Public Schools Understanding the Revised Framework.
Formative and Summative Assessments 6th-12th Grade.
Based on the work of Assessment FOR Learning by Rick Stiggins October 29, 2007 ASSESSMENT “OF” AND “FOR”: DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERNCE?
A Professional Learning Series for School Teams Dedicated to the Success of ALL Students Module 3: Designing Curriculum with Intention and Rigor.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Identification E.L.L. Service Models Pull-out Integrated Facilitated Sheltered.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Denver Public Schools Illuminating the revised framework Taking a Closer Look at I3 Exploring Instructional Methods and Pacing.
» Please grab the packet and read the article, “The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom.” » Take 4 Sticky Notes and label.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
REFLECTION ON TEACHING THROUGH VIDEO ANALYSIS. UNDERGRADUATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Academic Language: Standards, Domains, Objectives Session 5 March 3, 2016.
MAKING THE COMMON CORE ACCESSIBLE FOR ELLS Cathy Fox, NBCT Margaret Schembre, NBCT.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Teaching for Deep Learning in an active and engaging way Session 9.
Instructional Review and School improvement
Workshop Model of Instruction
I6: Differentiation to Support Content Language Objectives
Instructional Meeting November 3, 2010 Instructional Framework
Instructional Review and School improvement
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Our Leadership Journey
Book Study Presented by: Kayla Hatcher
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 45 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Presentation transcript:

Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at I.3 Instructional Methods and Pacing

Content/Language Objective 1 Participants will explain orally and in writing the intent of I.3 using target vocabulary from the revised framework with the whole group by: a)Highlighting key words in the indicator b)Creating a room chart with the whole group c)Discussing with the table group

Content/Language Objective 2 Participants will distinguish the effectiveness category of two teacher’s lessons using comparative adjectives : a)from a word bank b)categorizing evidence on a graphic organizer c)Discussing rationale for category placement with the whole group

Agenda Examine I.3, Instructional Methods and Pacing Identify intent of I.3 Examine various instructional methods Compare and contrast two lessons by applying I.3 to videos Identify what I.3 means for your lesson planning and instruction

Masterful Content Delivery The order of Indicators under the Instruction Domain represents the chronological order for how a teacher should effectively plan classroom lessons. I.1 Develop Content / Language Objectives I.2 Select / Create Tasks I.3 Choose Instructional Method I.4 Incorporate Opportunities to Develop and Use Academic Language

High Impact Instructional Moves High-Impact Instructional Moves: During instruction, effective teachers enact essential instructional moves (practices): I.5 Use Formative Assessments to Check for Understanding I.6 Differentiate Data Based on the Checks for Understanding I.7 Provide Academic Feedback Based on Student Responses I.8 Create Opportunities for Students to Communicate / Collaborate While Learning

What is the Intent of I.3? Discuss at your table, what you see as the intent of I.3. Why was this indicator added to the revised Framework?

Intent of I.3 Recognizes there is not one instructional method that is “best” for all lessons Recognizes the importance of lesson pacing on student learning Recognizes the importance of a teacher’s knowledge of the content AND HOW this knowledge is being communicated to students (including ELL supports) Recognizes the importance of teachers making “in the moment” adjustments to the lesson structure/pacing based on student misconceptions or needs Recognizes the importance of clear and accurate communication and an appropriate balance of teacher talk vs. student talk

What Are You Thinking? Take 2 minutes and discuss with others at your table – What are your initial thoughts about I.3? Questions? Comments?

Applying I.3 to a Lesson We will view a clip from a (fill in with appropriate content/grade) Your Job: – Script evidence related to I.3

Debriefing Lesson Take 5 minutes and record your evidence for I.3 on Handout 1. Take 10 minutes and discuss your evidence with your group. Include rationale for the placement of your evidence.

Performance Level for I.3 What performance level does the evidence align to for I.3? What elements of the lesson made the teacher’s instructional methods and pacing align to the performance level identified?

Applying I.3 to a Lesson We will view a clip from a (fill in with appropriate content/grade) Your Job: – Script evidence related to I.3

Debriefing Lesson Take 5 minutes and record your evidence for I.3 on Handout 1. Take 10 minutes and discuss your evidence with your group. Include rationale for the placement of your evidence.

Performance Level for I.3 What performance level does the evidence align to for I.3? What elements of the lesson made the teacher’s instructional methods and pacing align to the performance level identified?

What Does This Mean for You? How will you ensure that the delivery of your instruction and the pacing of your lessons are appropriate for the content you teach and the needs of your students?  What decisions will you need to make when planning?  What actions will you need to take during instruction?

Content/Language Objective 1 Participants will explain orally and in writing the intent of I.3 using target vocabulary from the revised framework with the whole group by: a)Highlighting key words in the indicator b)Creating a room chart with the whole group c)Discussing with the table group

Content/Language Objective 2 Participants will distinguish the effectiveness category of two teacher’s lessons using comparative adjectives by: a)Scripting I.3-related evidence while watching two lesson videos b)Categorizing evidence on a graphic organizer c)Discussing rationale for placement with the whole group

Thank you for your time with the revised Framework today!