Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Teaching Strategies Gold
Key Messages Learners need to know  What skills are available  When to use them  Why they are appropriate for the task  How to apply them to achieve.
IFSP and Functional Outcome and Goal Development
The Information Domains and Information Collection.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Introduction to: Assessing Pupil Progress (APP)
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Professional Judgment: Then and Now During the previous two decades, “professional judgment” was often used to indicate that a process wherein the EDT/IEP.
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Orientation Core 100_OR_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1. Module 1: Introduction to the Child Welfare Pre-Service Training OBJECTIVES : Identify Child Welfare Pre-Service.
Faculty Senate Writing Skills Committee Scott Lazerus, ChairChristy Jespersen Jessica YoungJoAnn Arai-Brown Nancy GaussAnne Ryter Julie LukengaCourtney.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Portfolios Definitions Advantages and Disadvantages Specific Steps Examples Try it!
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
10/ Introduction to the MA Department of Children and Families’ Integrated Casework Practice Model (ICPM) Fall 2009.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Safety Framework Supervisors as Coaches Department of Children and Families.
How classroom talk supports reading comprehension.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Evaluating a Research Report
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
Coalition 101. RESPECT AND VALUE “The group respects my opinion and provides positive ways for me to contribute.” EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS “The roles.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
Introduction to Key Concepts
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.
Aged Care and Home and Community Care. Step 1: Analyse the application. Identify any key questions for competency conversation. Step 5: Identify any.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium.
GCSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT. Summary of Assessment Unit 1 Written Paper 1½ hours (40% final mark, one tier only) Unit 2 Controlled Assessment – Child Study.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, CDIO conference 2009 Lessons learned from developing and operating a large-scale project course.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Case Consultation.
Florida’s Safety Methodology
Case Management Module 2
Module 9 Safety Planning
Assessment and Analyzing Family Functioning
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
The Framework for Teaching
204: Risk Assessment: A Closer Look at the Factors and Summary
1300: Pennsylvania Risk Assessment: A Closer Look at the Factors and Summary: Booster Shot Sunday, November 18, 2018.
Ongoing Assessment and Safety Planning
Assessment of Impending Danger and Caregiver Protective Capacities
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Assessment of Hotline (Screen-In) Assignments
Present Danger Assessment and Planning
The Family Functioning Assessment: Investigation and Safety Planning
Introduction to Child Protective Investigations
Further Information Gathering for Impending Danger Assessment
Commencement of the Investigation: Initial Contact and Present Danger
703: Coaching for Performance Improvement
The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data
Family Functioning Assessment - Ongoing
Presentation transcript:

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Developed by TACT: Pamela E. Aeppel, M.A. Shawna L. Thomas, B.A. Chief Visual Designer: Kayvrie Vega Child Welfare Training Consortium University of South Florida Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Introductions  Name/role and how long have you been working cases in the new Practice Model?  What is an area of documentation within assessments that works well for you and you think you have grasped pretty well?  What is an area of struggle or challenge in regard to documentation? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Opening Discussion Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Reasons for Documentation

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Lisa’s Story

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Pre-Test Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

What Can Be Expected? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Information Collection Competencies Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  I know what information I must learn about a family. I know what information I must collect on each case I am assigned.  I understand the purposes or reasons for needing to know this information.  I demonstrate the ability to gather the information.  I demonstrate awareness that everything I do to reconcile and validate information influences the overall quality of the information.  I can discuss and write about information I collected logically, succinctly, and in a way that justifies my conclusions

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Learning Objectives  Distinguish the role and purpose of documentation assessment instruments and develop a Present Danger Assessment summary that reflects practice standards.  Define and develop how the elements of information organization of case facts and written presentation supports a logical, objective and coherent flow of information within the FFA.  Construct and author an analysis, using the key components of the Practice Model to express and defend how danger threats, protective capacities and child vulnerability are reflected and evaluated within a domain, contributing to a justifiable and supported safety decision. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Learning Objectives  Distinguish the role and purpose of documentation assessment instruments and develop a Present Danger Assessment summary that reflects practice standards.  Define and develop how the elements of information organization of case facts and written presentation supports a logical, objective and coherent flow of information within the FFA.  Construct and author an analysis, using the key components of the Practice Model to express and defend how danger threats, protective capacities and child vulnerability are reflected and evaluated within a domain, contributing to a justifiable and supported safety decision. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

 How do you “show your work” for the job that you do?  How do you “give yourself credit” for the work you do? Methodology is like Math:

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Purpose of Notes:  Purpose is to document who we saw, what they said, what we did, and how we conducted our data gathering for our assessments.  The notes are about the CPI tasks, actions and duties.  It is a log of contacts, phone numbers, addresses, telephone contacts, referrals and general communications needed to obtain information.  Avoid overuse of excessive fillers such as “stated, reported, indicated, and said” whenever possible.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Purpose of PDA:  The purpose of the Present Danger Assessment is exactly what it sounds like.  It is to assess for present danger. It happens when we have seen the child/children or have enough information to determine there is or is not present danger.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium “The child was not hurt. The mom was at grandma’s house. Nobody does drugs in the house and the children are not afraid of anybody according to the children. Dad was not home when it happened. The oldest child gets home earlier than the younger kids so it was okay. The oldest child was home when it happened. No present danger.” Present Danger Assessment Summary:

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Critique of PDA Summary:  Do you know what happened? Do you know what didn’t happen?  Do you know who was involved?  Do you know age of the child or how many children we are talking about?  Do you know what “it” was about?  If you reviewed this information, as the PDA summary, would you know the context, content or meaning of the documentation? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Present Danger Assessment Summary Examples: Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Present Danger Threats:  Danger threats on handout are listed one per page in the same order as they appear in FSFN. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity #1 Read it, Review it, and Try it!  Purpose: To read and review documented present danger assessments and then re-work and/or create a new assessment summary based on the identified criteria and sufficiency of information.  Refer to PG page 27 for directions Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Purpose of FFA Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  The purpose of the FFA is to document what is happening in the family and how there is or is not impending danger, as a result of the family conditions.  Just as the PDA is all about PRESENT DANGER the FFA is all about IMPENDING DANGER.  The FFA pulls together all the information needed to show how we made decisions and what information led to those decisions.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Impending Danger Threats:  Danger threats on handout are listed one per page in the same order as they appear in the FFA. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Structure of FFA: Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  Handout represents the structure and content of what should be documented with each field of our assessment instruction.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Safety Analysis Questions and Conditions for Return Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  The following 2 handouts represent examples for each safety analysis question and possible conditions for return.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Learning Objectives  Distinguish the role and purpose of documentation assessment instruments and develop a Present Danger Assessment summary that reflects practice standards.  Define and develop how the elements of information organization of case facts and written presentation supports a logical, objective and coherent flow of information within the FFA.  Construct and author an analysis, using the key components of the Practice Model to express and defend how danger threats, protective capacities and child vulnerability are reflected and evaluated within a domain, contributing to a justifiable and supported safety decision. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Writing Style: Caution Needed Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  Overuse of Quotes  Tone & Biases  Minimizing Language  Feuding Files

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Activity #2 Domain Documentation Practice  Purpose: To write either an Adult Functioning domain or a Parenting General domain for a case brought in by each participant.  Refer to PG page 56 for directions. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Learning Objectives  Distinguish the role and purpose of documentation assessment instruments and develop a Present Danger Assessment summary that reflects practice standards.  Define and develop how the elements of information organization of case facts and written presentation supports a logical, objective and coherent flow of information within the FFA.  Construct and author an analysis, using the key components of the Practice Model to express and defend how danger threats, protective capacities and child vulnerability are reflected and evaluated within a domain, contributing to a justifiable and supported safety decision. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

What is an Analysis? Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium  A detailed examination of elements, as a basis for interpretation. It is a division of a whole into necessary parts to examine or determine their relationship or value to each other.  Example: Dividing information into each domain, information provided through research, and from multiple interview sources. This information is closely examined to determine its meaning/value within the context of each case.  Example: DCF priors are recorded one by one. This requires close examination of each prior, looking for patterns in maltreatments, patterns of allegations, patterns of perpetrators, patterns of victims, etc. in order to determine the whole meaning within context of each case.

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium What Is an Analysis?

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium From Information Collection to Analysis

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Activity #3 What Is Your Analysis?  Purpose: The purpose of this activity is to have participants practice skills for an analysis in one of their own cases. In order for the activity to have meaning for the participants, they will be using one of their own cases.  Refer to PG page 66 for directions. Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium

Activity Debrief

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium Post-Test

Technical Advising Consultation Training (TACT) · University of South Florida · Child Welfare Training Consortium What “Adds up” for you?  Lessons Learned  Ah Ha Moments