Www.nr.no Models for construction of multivariate dependence 2nd Vine Copula Workshop, Delft, 16. December 2008 Kjersti Aas, Norwegian Computing Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copula Representation of Joint Risk Driver Distribution
Advertisements

Probabilistic Analysis of Hydrological Loads to Optimize the Design of Flood Control Systems B. Klein, M. Pahlow, Y. Hundecha, C. Gattke and A. Schumann.
INTRODUCTION TO COPULAS
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 05: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION Objectives: Discrete Features Maximum Likelihood Resources: D.H.S: Chapter 3 (Part.
1 12. Principles of Parameter Estimation The purpose of this lecture is to illustrate the usefulness of the various concepts introduced and studied in.
XIV International Conference on Economic and Social Development, 2-5 April 2013, Moscow A new copula approach for high-dimensional real world portfolios.
Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence Workshop on ''Copulae: Theory and Practice'' Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and.
Master thesis presentation Joanna Gatz TU Delft 29 of July 2007 Properties and Applications of the T copula.
Models for construction of multivariate dependence Workshop on Copulae and Multivariate Probability distributions in Finance – Theory, Applications,
Likelihood ratio tests
Simulating Exchangeable Multivariate Archimedean Copulas and its Applications Authors: Florence Wu Emiliano A. Valdez Michael Sherris.
CF-3 Bank Hapoalim Jun-2001 Zvi Wiener Computational Finance.
Dimensional reduction, PCA
NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.
The generalized Additive Nonparametric GARCH Model --With application to the Chinese stock market Ai Jun Hou Department of Economics School of Economics.
Multivariate volatility models Nimesh Mistry Filipp Levin.
Archimedean Copulas Theodore Charitos MSc. Student CROSS.
Partially Missing At Random and Ignorable Inferences for Parameter Subsets with Missing Data Roderick Little Rennes
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
P á l Rakonczai, L á szl ó Varga, Andr á s Zempl é ni Copula fitting to time-dependent data, with applications to wind speed maxima Eötvös Loránd University.
Binary Variables (1) Coin flipping: heads=1, tails=0 Bernoulli Distribution.
Correlations and Copulas 1. Measures of Dependence 2 The risk can be split into two parts: the individual risks and the dependence structure between them.
Inference for the mean vector. Univariate Inference Let x 1, x 2, …, x n denote a sample of n from the normal distribution with mean  and variance 
Machine Learning CUNY Graduate Center Lecture 3: Linear Regression.
H. Chen, S.H. Cox, and J. Wen Longevity 5 Conference September 26, 2009Multivariate Threshold Life Table 1 Pricing Mortality-linked Securities with Dependent.
CASA June 2006 BRATISLAVA Mária Bohdalová Faculty of Management, Comenius University Bratislava Oľga Nánásiová Faculty of Civil.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 06: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND BAYESIAN ESTIMATION Objectives: Bias in ML Estimates Bayesian Estimation Example Resources:
1 Institute of Engineering Mechanics Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck, Austria, EU H.J. Pradlwarter and G.I. Schuëller Confidence.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
Elements of Financial Risk Management Second Edition © 2012 by Peter Christoffersen 1 Distributions and Copulas for Integrated Risk Management Elements.
1 7. Two Random Variables In many experiments, the observations are expressible not as a single quantity, but as a family of quantities. For example to.
Quantification of the non- parametric continuous BBNs with expert judgment Iwona Jagielska Msc. Applied Mathematics.
An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Based Goodness-of-Fit Test for Two-parameter Weibull Distributions Presented by: Ms. Ratchadaporn Meksena Student ID:
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
Non-Informative Dirichlet Score for learning Bayesian networks Maomi Ueno and Masaki Uto University of Electro-Communications, Japan 1.Introduction: Learning.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 07: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND BAYESIAN ESTIMATION Objectives: Class-Conditional Density The Multivariate Case General.
Multiple Random Variables Two Discrete Random Variables –Joint pmf –Marginal pmf Two Continuous Random Variables –Joint Distribution (PDF) –Joint Density.
1 A non-Parametric Measure of Expected Shortfall (ES) By Kostas Giannopoulos UAE University.
Suppressing Random Walks in Markov Chain Monte Carlo Using Ordered Overrelaxation Radford M. Neal 발표자 : 장 정 호.
Lévy copulas: Basic ideas and a new estimation method J L van Velsen, EC Modelling, ABN Amro TopQuants, November 2013.
Clustering and Testing in High- Dimensional Data M. Radavičius, G. Jakimauskas, J. Sušinskas (Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius, Lithuania)
PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR ENGINEERING Hossein Sameti Department of Computer Engineering Sharif University of Technology Principles of Parameter Estimation.
Improved Cross Entropy Method For Estimation Presented by: Alex & Yanna.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8527 – Introduction to Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition LECTURE 07: BAYESIAN ESTIMATION (Cont.) Objectives:
Tip #1: Look at your data (1)
Extreme Value Theory for High Frequency Financial Data Abhinay Sawant April 20, 2009 Economics 201FS.
Chapter 5 Multilevel Models
Inference for the mean vector. Univariate Inference Let x 1, x 2, …, x n denote a sample of n from the normal distribution with mean  and variance 
Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence Vine Copula Workshop Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, 19. November, 2007 Kjersti Aas.
M.Sc. in Economics Econometrics Module I Topic 4: Maximum Likelihood Estimation Carol Newman.
CS Statistical Machine learning Lecture 25 Yuan (Alan) Qi Purdue CS Nov
A latent Gaussian model for compositional data with structural zeroes Adam Butler & Chris Glasbey Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland.
Computacion Inteligente Least-Square Methods for System Identification.
Latvijas Aktuāru Asociācija AN INTRODUCTION TO COPULAS Gaida Pettere Professor, Dr. Math. Riga Technical University, Chairmen of Latvian Actuarial Association.
1 Lecture Plan Modelling Profit Distribution from Wind Production (Excel Case: Danish Wind Production and Spot Prices) Reasons for copula.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
Bayesian Generalized Product Partition Model
Inference for the mean vector
Igor V. Cadez, Padhraic Smyth, Geoff J. Mclachlan, Christine and E
Lecture 2 – Monte Carlo method in finance
7. Two Random Variables In many experiments, the observations are expressible not as a single quantity, but as a family of quantities. For example to record.
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
LECTURE 07: BAYESIAN ESTIMATION
Parametric Methods Berlin Chen, 2005 References:
7. Two Random Variables In many experiments, the observations are expressible not as a single quantity, but as a family of quantities. For example to record.
12. Principles of Parameter Estimation
7. Two Random Variables In many experiments, the observations are expressible not as a single quantity, but as a family of quantities. For example to record.
Presentation transcript:

Models for construction of multivariate dependence 2nd Vine Copula Workshop, Delft, 16. December 2008 Kjersti Aas, Norwegian Computing Center Joint work with Daniel Berg Paper is accepted for publication in European Journal of Finance.

Introduction (I) ► Apart from the Gaussian and Student copulae, the set of higher-dimensional copulae proposed in the literature is rather limited. ► When it comes to Archimedean copulae, the most common multivariate extension, the exchangeable one, is extremely restrictive, allowing only one parameter regardless of dimension.

Introduction (II) ► There have been some attempts at constructing more flexible multivariate Archimedean copula extensions. ► In this talk we examine two such hierarchical constructions ▪The nested Archimedean constructions (NACs) ▪The pair-copula constructions (PCCs) ► In both constructions, the multivariate data set is modelled using a cascade of lower-dimensional copulae. ► They differ however in their modelling of the dependency structure.

Content ► The nested Archimedean constructions (NACs) ► The pair-copula constructions (PCCs) ► Comparison ► Applications ▪Precipitation data ▪Equity returns

The nested Archimedean constructions (NACs)

Content ► The fully nested construction (FNAC) ► The partially nested construction (PNAC) ► The hierarchically nested construction (HNAC) ► Parameter estimation ► Simulation

The FNAC ► The FNAC was originally proposed by Joe (1997) and is also discussed in Embrechts et al. (2003), Whelan (2004), Savu and Trede (2006) and McNeil (2007). ► Allows for the specification of at most d-1 copulae, while the remaining unspecified copulae are implicitly given through the construction. ► All bivariate margins are Archimedean copulae.

The FNAC The pairs (u 1,u 3 ) and (u 2,u 3 ) both have copula C 21. The pairs (u 1,u 4 ), (u 2,u 4 ) and (u 3,u 4 ) all have copula C 31. Decreasing dependence

The FNAC ► The 4-dimensional case shown in the figure: ► The d-dimensional case:

Restrictions

The PNAC ► The PNAC was originally proposed by Joe (1997) and is also discussed in Whelan (2004), McNeil et. al. (2006) and McNeil (2007). ► Allows for the specification of at most d-1 copulae, while the remaining unspecified copulae are implicitly given through the construction. ► Can be understood as a composite between the exchangeable copula and the FNAC, since it is partly exchangeable.

The PNAC Decreasing dependence All pairs (u 1,u 3 ), (u 1,u 4 ), (u 2,u 3 ) and (u 2,u 4 ) have copula C 2,1. Exchangeable between u 1 and u 2 Exchangeable between u 3 and u 4

The PNAC ► The 4-dimensional case shown in the figure:

The HNAC ► The HNAC was originally proposed by Joe (1997) and is also mentioned in Whelan (2004). However, Savu and Trede (2006) were the first to work out the idea in full generality. ► This structure is an extension of the PNAC in that the copulae involved do not need to be bivariate. ► Both the FNAC and the PNAC are special cases of the HNAC.

The HNAC Decreasing dependence

HNAC ► The 9-dimensional case shown in the figure:

Parameter estimation (I) ► Full estimation of a NAC should in principle consider the following three steps: ▪The selection of a specific factorisation ▪The choice of copula families ▪The estimation of the copula parameters.

Parameter estimation (II) ► For all NACs parameters may be estimated by maximum likelihood. ► However, it is in general not straightforward to derive the density. One usually has to resort to a computer algebra system, such as Mathematica. ► Moreover, the density must often be obtained by a recursive approach. This means that the number of computational steps needed to evaluate the density increases rapidly with the complexity of the copula.

Simulation ► Simulation from higher-dimensional NACs is not straightforward in general. ► The Laplace-transform method may be used for some specific NACs, e.g. when all copulae are Gumbel. ► Otherwise the conditional distribution method must be used. ▪This method involves the d-1’th derivative of the copula function (which usually is extremely complex) and in most cases numerical inversion. ▪Hence, simulation is challenging even for small dimensions.

The pair-copula constructions (PCCs)

PCCs ► The PCC was originally proposed by Joe (1996) and it has later been discussed in detail by Bedford and Cooke (2001, 2002), Kurowicka and Cooke (2006) (simulation) and Aas et. al. (2007) (inference). ► Allows for the specification of d(d-1)/2 bivariate copulae, of which the first d-1 are unconditional and the rest are conditional. ► The bivariate copulae involved do not have to belong to the same class.

PCC No restrictions on dependence C 2,1 is the copula of F(u 1 |u 2 ) and F(u 3 |u 2 ). C 2,2 is the copula of F(u 2 |u 3 ) and F(u 4 |u 3 ). C 3,1 is the copula of F(u 1 |u 2,u 3 ) and F(u 4 |u 2,u 3 ).

PCC ► The density corresponding to the figure is ► where

PCC ► The d-dimensional density is given by ► where ► Note that there are other types of PCCs. The density above corresponds to a D-vine. D-vines belong to a broader class denoted regular vines.

Parameter estimation (I) ► Full estimation of a PCC should in principle consider the same three steps as for the NACs: ▪The selection of a specific factorisation ▪The choice of copula families ▪The estimation of the copula parameters.

Parameter estimation (II) ► The parameters of the PCC may be estimated by maximum likelihood. ► Since the density is explicitly given, the procedure is simpler than the one for the NACs. ► However, the likelihood must be numerically maximised, and parameter estimation becomes time consuming in higher dimensions.

Simulation ► The simulation algorithm for the D-vine is straightforward and simple to implement. ► Like for the NACs, the conditional inversion method is used. ► However, to determine each of the conditional distribution functions involved, only the first partial derivative of a bivariate copula needs to be computed. ► Hence, the simulation procedure for the PCC is in general much simpler and faster than for the NACs.

Comparison

Flexibility When looking for appropriate data sets for the comparison of these structures, it turned out to be quite difficult to find real- world data sets satisfying the constraints for the NACs.

Computational efficiency Computational times (seconds) in R. Estimation and likelihood: 4-dimensional data set with 2065 observations. Simulation: 1000 observations

Structure ► The multivariate distribution defined through a NAC will always by definition be an Archimedean copula and all bivariate margins will belong to a known parametric family. ► For the PCCs, neither the multivariate distribution nor the unspecified bivariate margins will belong to a known parametric family in general.

Applications

Applications ► Precipitation data ▪Parameter estimation ▪Goodness-of-fit ► Equity returns ▪Parameter estimation ▪Goodness-of-fit ▪Out-of-sample validation

Precipitation data Four Norwegian weather stations Daily data from to observ. Convert precipitation vectors to uniform pseudo-observations before further modelling.

Pseudo-observations

Precipitation ► Kendall’s tau for pairs of variables Ski and Vestby are closely located Hurdal and Nannestad are closely located

Precipitation data We use either Gumbel or Frank copulae for all pairs. The copulae at the bottom level in both constructions are those corresponding to the largest Kendall’s tau values. NAC PCC We compare: We use either Gumbel, Frank or Student copulae for all pairs.

Estimated parameters S n is the statistic suggested by Genest and Rémilliard (2005) T n is the statistic suggested by Genest et. al. (2006).

Equity returns Four stocks; two from oil sector and two from telecom. Daily data from to observ. Log-returns are processed through a GARCH-NIG-filter and converted to uniform pseudo-observations before further modelling.

Pseudo-observations

Equity returns ► Kendall’s tau for pairs of variables Oil sector : British Petroleum (BP) and Exxon Mobile Corp (XOM). Telecom sector : Deutsche Telekom AG (DT) and France Telecom (FTE).

Equity returns HNAC PCC We compare: We use Frank copula for all pairs. We use either Student or Frank copula for all pairs. The copulae at the bottom level in both constructions are those corresponding to the largest tail dependence coefficients.

Parameter estimates

Equity returns ► With increasing complexity of models, there is always the risk of overfitting the data. ► The examine whether this is the case for our equity example, we validate the GARCH-NIG-PCC model out-of-sample. ► We put together an equally-weighted portfolio of the four stocks. ► The estimated model is used to forecast 1-day VaR for each day in the period from to

Equity returns 5% VaR 1% VaR 0.5% VaR We use the likelihood ratio statistic by Kupiec (1995) to compute the P-values PCC works well out of sample!

Summary

Summary ► The NACs have three important restrictions ▪There are strong limitations on the parameters. ▪The involved copulae have to be Archimedean. ▪The Archimedean copulae can not be freely mixed. ► The PCCs are in general more computationally efficient than the NACs both for simulation and parameter estimation. ► The NAC is strongly rejected for two different four- dimensional data sets (rain data and equity returns) while the PCC provides an appropriate fit. ► The PCC does not seem to overfit data.