Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Craig Haney and others.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You live with a group of people ( your family) friends, classmates, fellow club or team members, people at your workplace all of these could be groups.
Advertisements

The Stanford Prison Experiment
Residential Community Supervision Programs
The Cycle of Science Research question about the real world Research question about the real world Theory Interpretation Statistical analyses Statistical.
Ch 4 - Behavior and Attitudes Part 1: Feb 7. Attitudes Favorable/unfavorable evaluation of an object. 3 dimensions of attitudes: –Affective (feelings)
Effects of Neurotransmission on Human Behavior
Behavior in a Social Context. A major influence on people’s behavior, thought processes and emotions are other people and society that they have created.
Power of the Situation (cont.)
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
Examples of Famous Experiments What Can WE Learn from THEM ? Where Did They Get Their Research Question? ZimbardoAshMilgram.
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
The Developing Person Through Childhood and Adolescence
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
Chapter One: Instructions, History, and Research Methods
Born March 23, 1933; in New York Professor at Stanford University Majors in anthropology, psychology, & Sociology from Brooklyn College in 1954 He completed.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “Do You Know the Enemy” Green Day “Change is Gonna Come” Adam Lambert.
Stanford Prison Experiment
No, this is not a guide on how to get a date..  Persuasion  Obedience  Group dynamics  Prejudice  Culture Formation  Stereotyping.
IRB – Institutional Review Board Purpose  Protect the Right of Human Subjects participating in research  Protect VULNERABLE populations  This includes.
Chapter 2. Section 1  Forming a research question  Constructs = things that can be assumed are there but cannot be seen directly (aggression, anxiety)
CJ 212 Crime Prevention Unit 7 Seminar. Unit 7 seminar Welcome to Unit 7!!!! Unit 7 Written Assignment – Describe a Local Crime Prevention Program 1.
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
Psychological Research Strategies Module 2. Why is Research Important? Gives us a reliable, systematic way to consider our questions Helps us to draw.
Prejudice & Discrimination Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
Chapter 7 Flashcards. building tenders inmates who were tacitly acknowledged by prison administrators to have informal social control of a given inmate.
Philip Zimbardo By: Steph Cataline. Who is Philip Zimbardo? The “voice and face of contemporary American psychology”. Presently, an Emeritus professor.
1 Experimental Research Cause + Effect Manipulation Control.
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment College students on summer break recruited through a newspaper ad for a two week experiment being paid $15/day.
Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Sabrina Santana James Solomon Sammy Carroll Tom Geen.
Research Methods In Psychology Mrs. Andrews. Psychology… The scientific study of behavior and mental processes.
Zimbardo recap. Participants were assigned to each condition… 1.Based on age 2.Based on health 3.Randomly 4.Based on ethnicity.
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “He Got Game” Public Enemy.
Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.
Types of Research Studies. Observation Observation is the simplest scientific technique Participant and researcher bias can occur Naturalistic observation.
Zambardo Induction and Result. Purpose of the Study Study aimed to answer the question: – “Are the state of prisons due to the dispositional or internal.
Social Psychology (Chapter 8)
Psychological Research Strategies Module 2. Why is Research Important? Gives us a reliable, systematic way to consider our questions Helps us to draw.
 Do Now  Sign out text books (time varies)  Learning goal and scale  Performing a controlled experiment notes  Wrap up.
Pro-Social & Anti Social Behavior Pro-Social & Anti-Social Behavior.
Welcome to Unit 2 Any Questions So Far?. Getting Ready For Project 1: Unit 3 Read assignment carefully Review Rubric and use as checklist Proof read carefully.
Chapter 10:Behavior in Social & Cultural Context Section 1: Roles & Rules “We cannot live for ourselves alone.” Herman Melville.
Theories and Methods in Social Psychology David Rude, MA, CPC Instructor 1.
Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.
Social Psychology The tremendous power of the situation....
The Stanford Prison Experiment 1 Video Clip. Background 1971 – Stanford University Experiment overseen by Dr. Philip Zimbardo –PH. D. in Psychology from.
Chapter 9 – Lecture 8. Some ways to control threats 1.General control procedures 2.Control over subject and experimenter effects 3.Control through participant.
Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Chris, PJ, Keenan, Elissa, Christine.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Chapter 2: 1 Ethics and Criminal Justice Research.
Homelessness and Its Impact on Children By: Chiazam Omenyi.
Group Processes. The Nature of Groups  The Nature of Groups Group - two or more people who influence each other Group - two or more people who influence.
I. Discover and Define problem Conduct exploratory research  Literature review, Secondary data, Pilot studies, Focus groups, Survey, Case study Define.
9 Procedure for Conducting an Experiment.
Non-Compliance Behaviors General Overview of Physical Restraint Requirements for Public Education Programs Prepared by the Massachusetts Department of.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
In what ways are prisons brutal places?
Groups and Obedience The Stanford Prison Experiment
Methods of Studying Human Behavior
Methods of Studying Human Behavior
Ethical Considerations

The Stanford Prison Experiment
How would you answer this question??
BE-5305 Ethics in Research.
Stopping Maltreatment
The Stanford prison experiment
Presentation transcript:

Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Craig Haney and others

Author contends that prisons are failing “Rehabilitation” not happening Not a deterrent to future crime Recidivism rates of up to 75% Plus, huge expenses associated with prisons

Dispositional hypothesis- Rarely spoken, this states that The deplorable conditions in our prisons are due to the “nature” of those who administer them, or The “nature” of those who are incarcerated, or both

Problems are caused by “bad seeds”, not “prison soil”

System remains unchallenged Basic structure remains unexamined

Method Experimental simulated prison Created “real prison life”

22 participants Those judged to be “most stable” were selected Half assigned role of guard Other half assigned role of prisoner No pre-existing friendships

Role instructions Guarantee minimally adequate diet, clothing, housing, etc. No physical abuse Not told anything else

Guards Have orientation Meet “superintendent” (researcher) Meet “warden” (grad assistant) Told to “maintain order” Work eight hours shifts

Prisoners In “prison” 24 hours a day

Physical aspects of the prison

Uniforms

Induction Process Prisoners “arrested” at their residences HandcuffedBookedStrippedDelousedMugshot

Administrative routine “Count” – learn ID numbers Eventually last a long time

Data collection Videotaping Audio recording Rating scales Individual difference scales Personal observations through diaries and post experimental questionnaires

Data Analysis

Researchers are looking for Certain types of interactions Ex. Threats, insults, resistance, etc.

The environment of the simulated prison Had great impact upon the affective (emotional) states of both guards and prisoners And The interpersonal processes within and between groups

Both groups Decrease in positive emotion Outlook becomes negative Prisoners wished to do more harm to others

Behavior was often HostileNegativeDehumanizing

Prisoners became very passive While guards became very active in initiating contact Contact is very impersonal No references to individual identity

5 “prisoners” had to be released Depression, crying, rage, acute anxiety Had to stop experiment early, only six days rather than two weeks Prisoners overjoyed, guards disappointed

No guard ever came to “work” late Stayed on for no extra pay

Power of social forces operating Is overwhelming All guards participated in sadistic treatment of prisoners

Personal statements p.50

Debriefing First prisoners, Then guards, Then all together

Follow ups over the year revealed the negative effects were temporary the negative effects were temporary

Conclusions The environment caused “sadistic” behavior from non-sadistic types And Acute emotional breakdowns from those not prone to them

To learn more…