Cecile Del Rosario, ORTA Research Agreements Officer Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Advertisements

VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Policies and Issues Regarding Intellectual Property Developed at Iowa State University Presentation to Energy Center Grantees/ BECON Users 12/12/03 Kenneth.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner May 2004.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Agreements for Commercializing Technology (ACT) A New Mechanism for Working with Industry.
1 Roles - Responsibilities ROLES - RESPONSIBILITIES.
Authorities to Accept Funds Through Agreements Louie Pectol Chief, Office of Policy and Analysis U.S. Geological Survey.
PURPOSE AND LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
ARS Midwest Area Technology Transfer Technology Transfer and the Interfaces with the Research Unit, MWA Technology Transfer Office, and Headquarters Office.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION Title of Invention Invention Disclosure Form Date Name Department School CONFIDENTIAL.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
1 VA-Affiliated Nonprofit Research and Education Corporations (NPCs) Barbara F. West Executive Director National Association of Veterans’ Research and.
PAD Seminar February Top Ten Reasons to Befriend Your Sponsored Program Administration Office SPA is the institutional office responsible for administrative.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Working With Federal Laboratories Tim Wittig Principal Technology Management Group SAIC 202/
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
Technology Transfer at Rice
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
The proper protocol for grant approval at LCSC GRANT-WRITING 101: INTERNAL PROCEDURES.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
COMP 323 Research Administration for Scientists Contracts, Grants & Cooperative Agreements: How They Are Different and Why It Matters! Wednesday, February.
Departmental Administrators Training Course (DA-202)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 NON-DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH OVERVIEW Sponsored Projects Office Jeff Weiner July 2008.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
NOVEMBER 13, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION XI OF APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Research Sponsored by Industry – Putting an Agreement in.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE DSS Role in International Security.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy ITS America May 2010 Technology Transfer Follows Many Pathways: “It’s a Contact Sport” Work for.
Public-Public Partnerships February 27, ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 2 Public – Public Partnerships Boot camp for Defense Communities Craig Zgabay.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Rebecca Nickleson, MS, CRA Assistant Director Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
The Navy and VHA Update on DoD/VA Sharing Tamara Rollins BUMED, DoD/VA Program Manager Laura Kelly VHA VISN 21 VA/DoD Liaison.
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOP AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENT ENTITIES Robert L. Charles, J.D., LL.M., M.P.H. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel.
The Navy and Marine Corps Corporate Laboratory UNIVERSITY/ FEDERAL LABORATORY COLLABORATIONS RITA C. MANAK, PHD HEAD, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICE NAVAL.
Thomas Moreland Agricultural Research Service Office of Technology Transfer.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series An Introduction to Contracts and OCIA James J. Casey, Jr., J.D. Director, Office of Contracts and.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
DAVE GANGEMI, PH.D. Senior Biomedical Advisor Retired Army Scientist (USAMRIID, Walter Reed Army Institute for Research, Health Affairs, AFRI, and Uniform.
Winter 2008 Technology Transfer and CRADAs Office of Research and Development Department of Veterans Affairs Jeff Moore Technology Transfer Program,
Technology Transfer at SSC Atlantic
Objectives 1. Define and describe each of the Agreement types being discussed today; 2. Highlight specific questions to ask when determining the administrative.
Clinical Trial Contracts Office -What’s the Hold Up?
Partnering with Business and Industry
Agreements OSR Symposium
Industry Funded Research - Process for Contracts
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
All the Things I Didn’t Know I Needed to Know When My Award Came
Presentation transcript:

Cecile Del Rosario, ORTA Research Agreements Officer Naval Medical Center Portsmouth

 COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (CRADA)  MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING/AGREEMENT (MOU/MOA)  EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (EPA)  NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS  DATA SHARING AGREEMENTS

 A Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) means any agreement between one or more federal laboratories and one or more non-federal parties under which the Government, through its laboratories, provides personnel, services, facilities, equipment, intellectual property, or other resources with or without reimbursement (but not funds to non-federal parties) and the non-federal parties provide funds, personnel, services, facilities, equipment, intellectual property or other resources toward the conduct of specified research or development efforts which are consistent with the missions of the laboratory…

It’s the LAW!!!  Federal Legislation (15 USC 3710 – 3716) Describes the general authority, enumerated authority and contract considerations for CRADAs and provides themes that should be covered  DoD Directive /DoD Instruction Implements policy, assigns responsibilities and prescribes procedures for implementation of Technology Transfer (T2) program  SECNAVINT Delegates CRADA authority to Navy laboratories by the Secretary of the Navy

 Access to outside expertise, facilities, equipment, personnel and/or services  Need for high quality, timely and integrated products  Both DoN and collaborator can leverage scarce funds, personnel and facilities  Solve technical and industrial problems that support the Warrior  Sustain a critical technology capability that would otherwise be lost or continue to erode

 Lasers  GPS  Light Sticks (developed by Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) China Lake  Enhanced digital image technology used to detect mines underwater, also used for early detection of breast cancer cells (developed by Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), Newport Division

 FULL CRADA (Standard/Non-Standard)  Collaboration between 2 or more parties  Defines topic of research  Involves a Statement of Work (SOW)  Funded or Not Funded by the outside party  Limited Purpose (LP) CRADA  Not a collaboration  Transfer of Equipment/Material or Information  No Statement of Work (SOW)

NMCP Universities Private Companies State & Local Gov’t Individuals Federal Agencies

EITHER The non-DoN collaborator provides funds Non-DoN Collaborator DoN Collaborator OR Each collaborator funds its own efforts

 Labor  Research personnel, e.g., nurse, assistant/coordinator  Travel  training  Materials  Supplies  Subject Remuneration  Per patient cost/visit  Start-up fee  CRADA fee - $1.5K  IRB fee - $2K

 Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits federal employees from  making or authorizing an expenditure from, or creating or authorizing an obligation under, any appropriation or fund in excess of the amount available in the appropriation or fund unless authorized by law. 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)(A)  involving the government in any obligation to pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law. 31 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)(B).

 Comptroller/ Budget  CID - Grants Manager  Studies with subject compensation  Subject’s information  Name, address and date completed visit/procedure  Study title and IRB approval date

 Foreign partners: Okay if allowed by their country  Seek permission from the Office of U.S. Trade Representative prior to start of negotiations  Some controlled materials or information may require an export control license

 Each collaborator owns background/pre- existing IP that it brings to the CRADA  IP developed under the CRADA is shared by both collaborators  Each collaborator granted non-exclusive license in shared data  Option available to receive an exclusive license for inventions made under a CRADA

 An information sheet  Names of collaborators  POCs  Third Party, if any  Objective of the collaborative effort  Benefit to the Navy  Funding Budget page/Schedule of Payment  Statement of Work  Research Protocol – IRBNet

 Article 2, Objective  Article 5, Funding  Article 6, Final Report  Article 7, Marking of Data  Appendix A, Statement of Work  Appendix D, Budget

CRADA No (ODURF) (UNC and OSU) PI Review UNC 14 – OSU Partner Legal Review –UNC 98 - OSU Negotiations to Approval *NMCP Legal Review11 *Comptroller Reviewn/a *NMRC IP Review45269 Signatures950 Processing Time in days Negotiations start immediately after partner’s legal review and ends upon all parties reaching an agreement. Processing time starts from receipt of information sheet to final signature. Some steps are not reflected in table, e.g., time it takes to develop a draft, and therefore Processing Time in days is not the sum of the numbers in the table.

ORTA prepares draft CRADA PI and Non-Navy Collaborator review draft PI and Non-Navy Collaborator completes information sheet ORTA prepares final document Lab Legal Team reviews ORTA sends CRADA to Non- Navy Collaborator for review and signature Lab CO signs the CRADA ORTA forwards signed CRADA to DON T2 PM DON T2 PM reviews CRADA package for completeness CRADA accepted and entered into DON DTTIS database

 An agreement between federal agencies  Sharing of resources  Describes tasks for each party  Funded or non-funded. If funded = ISSA (Inter-Service Support Agreement)

 BUMEDINST B Promotes sharing of health care and other resources and define management responsibilities and procedures for administering support agreements Program under Director of Resource Management

OT-244 (NMCP-NMCPHC) OT-255 (NMCP-NHB- MCRD) PI REVIEW 120 NMCP L EGAL REVIEW no data (NMCPH Legal Review) 317 (NHB Legal Review) 91 (MCRD L EGAL REVIEW ) BUMED REVIEW 4245 S IGNATURES P ROCESSING T IME IN CALENDAR DAYS

RAO prepares draft Principal investigators review draft RAO submits draft to MOU coordinator Legal Review at each command MOU coordinator sends to BUMED review MOU coordinator sends to collaborators for review and signature NMCP CO signs MOU coordinator notifies RAO of executed agreement

CRADA 1. Navy Collaborator and a Non-Navy Collaborator USC 3710a and SECNAVINST Good for three to five years MOU 1. Military to military or other federal agency 2. BUMEDINST a 3. Good for five years

CONTRACT: 1. Not a collaboration; a binding agreement to have work done for the Navy 2. Competitive – Request for Proposal (RFP) 3. Intellectual property: Contractor can elect to retain title to subject invention CRADA: 1. Collaboration between Navy and Civilian 2. Noncompetitive - work directly with non-federal lab to negotiate agreement 3. Intellectual Property: Title to subject invention depends on whomever the inventors are: company, government or jointly- owned

 10 USC 2194 (b)(5) Lab equipment loans Transfer of surplus property Lab personnel available to teach science course Involving faculty and students of the institution in defense lab research projects Cooperating with the institution in developing a program under which students may be given academic credit for work on defense lab research projects Providing academic and career advice and assistance to students of the institutions  Duty Under Instructions (DUINS) students

 Non-Disclosure Agreements or Confidentiality Disclosure Agreements  18 USC 1905 – Disclosure of Confidential Information  Protects proprietary data  Only CO may sign

 DSA is a legally binding agreement between a Federal agency and an external entity (e.g., contractor, private industry, academic institution, other Federal government agency, or state agency) that clearly documents what data are being shared and how the data can be used. DSAs ensure uses and disclosures of MHS data meet the requirements for both Federal laws and Department of Defense (DoD) regulations.

 TMA/BUMED required when  Sharing PHI/PII  Using the MHS system data  Usually requested by the Business Associate (BA)  TMA POC – Ms. Barbara Hazzard  Director, TMA Privacy Office is the final approval authority  DSAA approval occurs after CRADA and IRB approval

Plan ahead. They take a lot of time. QUESTIONS???