S E S S I O N FOR ks2 – ks3. 1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome Back to School!!! Mr. Sortina.
Advertisements

The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Passage Based Reading for the Sat
Literary Response.
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
Unit 8. Find a new word in this unit to match the definition given.
Unlocking the mind to critical thinking. “Thinking about Thinking”
S E S S I O N. 1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK! 3. NO ONE (not even the teacher) HAS ALL THE ANSWERS!
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
Youth-Adult Partnerships
Journal: October 21, 2011 Title: Pranks
In sleep he _______to me, In dreams he ______. That _______ which calls to me And speaks my _______. And do I _______ again? For now I _______ The Phantom.
Liberty for All? Opposing Viewpoints on Democracy American History Foundations August 10, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
USING AND PROMOTING REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT AS STUDENT LEADERS ON CAMPUS Patricia M. King, Professor Higher Education, University of Michigan.
It begins with me… Feeling good about yourself and knowing that you deserve healthy relationships is VERY important! See the good in yourself and focus.
Chapter One – Thinking as a Writer
By amy woodworth With adaptations from erin Herberg’s “Evaluating web sites by type” Evaluating Web Sources.
Thesis Statements How do I write one of those anyway?
RAINBOW SPACE. READY FOR THE THREE AGREEMENTS? AGREEMENT 1: WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT! YOU.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Topic sentence: Topic sentence: Newspapers and other media do more than simply record what happens. Para. one.
Making Inferences and Drawing Conclusions
S E S S I O N. 1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK! 3. NO ONE (not even the teacher) HAS ALL THE ANSWERS!
W. Torres What is plagiarism?.
Chapter “He’s on my case, “ I say. “Thinks you’re a tikkop and that I must know all about it.” “Tik?” Zeke shrieks. “Where must I get tik”? “Every.
What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates Socrates Classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge.
SOCRATIC SEMINARS HELP US ENGAGE A TEXT IN CLASS. THE THOUGHT PROCESS IS WHEN WE WORK TOGETHER TO UNDERSTAND A TEXT IT WILL HELP EVERYONE’S UNDERSTANDING.
Bioethics 101 Lesson two.
Effective Conflict Engagement: Building stronger partnerships through interpersonal communication TRAIN THE TRAINER 2010.
Welcome Please complete the self- assessment before we get started.
“The foundation of knowledge is the willingness to listen
14 Dialogue: Learning by Talking1 Chapter 14 Dialogue: Learning by Talking Dialogue: Persuade Negotiate Learn Effective Dialogue is an ethical relationship.
Sight Words.
Purpose: To understand words and vocabulary use
Scaffolding Instruction Support for Learners. Adapted (with permission) from: From Apprenticeship to Appropriation : Scaffolding the Development of Academic.
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
Literacy Strategies There is no such thing as a child who hates to read; there are only children who have not found the right book.” ― Frank SerafiniFrank.
Vanessa Andreotti Global Education Derby/Mundi Nottingham University
SAFE SPACE session. SAFE SPACE NO ONE FEELS LEFT OUT GOOD ATMOSPHERE NO ONE TELLING YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK SAFE SPACE NO ONE FEELS LEFT OUT GOOD ATMOSPHERE.
LO: TO LEARN FROM MY HURDLE TASK AND IMPROVE MY ABILITY TO ANALYSE PERSUASIVE TEXTS.
RAINBOW SPACE. READY FOR THE THREE AGREEMENTS? AGREEMENT 1: WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT! YOU.
S E S S I O N FOR ks3 - ks4. 1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK!
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Codes and conventions of documentary’s
Generative Curriculum & Our Essential Question West Dalhousie.
Multiple Perspectives in History: The Whiskey Rebellion The BLaST IU 17 Liberty Fellowship June 27, 2011 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
DO NOW: 1.State whether you agree or disagree with this statement-and tell me WHY- “Everyone learns the same way.” Be prepared to justify your answer.
S E S S I O N. 1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK! 3. NO ONE (not even the teacher) HAS ALL THE ANSWERS!
Informative vs Argumentative. What do you think? What is the root word in informative? What is the root word in argumentative?
Vanessa Andreotti Global Education Derby/Mundi Nottingham University Addressing global issues through dialogue and enquiry (KS2/KS3) Vanessa Andreotti.
An introduction to CRITICAL LITERACY Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice School of Politics and International Relations The University of.
Called to Faithful Commitment Formation 2010 Faith and Light International.
Developing Student Researchers Part 2 Dr. Gene and Ms. Tarfa Al- Naimi Research Skills Development Unit Education Institute.
Writing an Essay. Reading a Primary Source: Step 1 Who wrote this document? In the first place, you need to know how this document came to be created.
RESPONDING TO RULES HOW TO: MAKE COMPLAINTS TAKE “NO” FOR AN ANSWER DISAGREE APPROPRIATELY CHANGE RULES.
Socratic Seminar Notes. Socratic Seminar Notes …which means you should take some.
Characterization & Inference. Characterization How the author creates characters through actions, dialogue, and movement.
TOK The Theory of Knowledge. What does the IB say? The Theory of Knowledge encourages critical thinking about knowledge itself, to try to help you make.
‘Dialogue in Global Society: Negotiating Complexity, Uncertainty and Insecurity’ Vanessa Andreotti Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice School.
Developing High-Functioning Leadership Teams
The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
Kentucky Partnership for Families and Children, Inc.
Ethical Decision Making
Critical Thinking and Viewing
How to Write a Position Argument
S E S S I O N.
S E S S I O N.
Presentation transcript:

S E S S I O N FOR ks2 – ks3

1. NO ONE LEFT OUT 2. GOOD ATMOSPHERE 3. NO ONE TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK!

STAYING FOCUSED THINKING HARD WORKING AS A TEAM STAYING FOCUSED THINKING HARD WORKING AS A TEAM

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

Adaptation of Geckos and Dinosaurs, a Brazilian story written by Rubem Alves

Small, multi-coloured geckos lived together. There was no lack of food, there was no lack of shelter. They needed very little to survive.

A fairy friend warned them: “be careful with the serpent in the oak tree – geckos are her favourite food!” But the white geckos were very very curious...

And one day they realise that the serpent is not scary at all! She is actually very friendly! She calls the geckos ‘little creatures’ and invites them to taste the magic fruit from the tree which will make them more beautiful and more powerful...

She told them that they would grow bigger and that the other geckos would respect, fear and obey them. They would be at the top for their beauty and their strength! The white geckos thought that they deserved to rule over the others, after all, they were much cleverer...So, they ate it and the transformation started.

You do as we say little geckos! We are superior and we need more food! The bigger, the better! But there was one small problem...

The forests were becoming smaller and smaller...

And their poo polluted the air, the earth, the rivers and the sea...

But they were very proud of their achievements, their size, their beauty and their strength, until...

They died – not because they were too weak, but because they were too strong! The small geckos survived, as they needed very little...

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned 1.Looking at PERSPECTIVES: image, film, cartoon, song, story 2.Drawing or writing your FIRST THOUGHTS and sharing it 3. Making QUESTIONS in pairs 4. VOTING on a question 5. TALKING about it 6. SHARING what we have learned

Preliminary Findings (Year 7): A different approach? Yes, because we are allowed to disagree. Yes, because we don’t have to find only one answer. Yes, because even the teacher doesn’t know all the answers! Yes, because I can think about my thoughts and say what I want to say. Yes. I learned that my perspective counts. Yes. We talk about different things and we think about reasons and consequences. Yes. We have to listen to what each other has to say. Yes, because we learn that everyone has different thoughts. I don’t know. It is confusing. I cannot figure out what the teacher wants me to say. Preliminary Findings (Year 7): A different approach? Yes, because we are allowed to disagree. Yes, because we don’t have to find only one answer. Yes, because even the teacher doesn’t know all the answers! Yes, because I can think about my thoughts and say what I want to say. Yes. I learned that my perspective counts. Yes. We talk about different things and we think about reasons and consequences. Yes. We have to listen to what each other has to say. Yes, because we learn that everyone has different thoughts. I don’t know. It is confusing. I cannot figure out what the teacher wants me to say.

Dialogue and Enquiry What is necessary? UNCERTAINTY: suspension of the belief that our beliefs are universal (acknowledgement that our perspectives are constructed in our contexts, and therefore always partial) RESPECT AND UNDERSTANDING: in relation to the thoughts and experiences of those who think differently OPENNESS: willingness to listen and to learn with one another OPEN-ENDEDNESS: as opposed to prescribed outcomes Dialogue and Enquiry What is necessary? UNCERTAINTY: suspension of the belief that our beliefs are universal (acknowledgement that our perspectives are constructed in our contexts, and therefore always partial) RESPECT AND UNDERSTANDING: in relation to the thoughts and experiences of those who think differently OPENNESS: willingness to listen and to learn with one another OPEN-ENDEDNESS: as opposed to prescribed outcomes

UNIVERSALISM RELATIVISM My perspective is universally right, others are simply wrong, everyone should think like me All perspectives are relative, therefore I cannot question of criticise any culture ABSOLUTISM FUNDAMENTALISM EUROCENTRISM EVERYTHING GOES PARALYSIS NO ONE CAN INTERVENE CRITICAL LITERACY: critical engagement with own perspectives and the perspectives of others

Not the search for one absolute (non-biased/neutral) interpretation of reality, but… Critical Literacy Where is this coming from? Where is this leading to? …the examination of origins and implications of assumptions (perspectives/lenses/discourses) Pedagogical implications

Comparison: ‘Traditional’ Reading Does the text represent the truth? Is it fact or opinion? Is it biased or neutral? Is it well written/clear? Who is the author and what level of authority/legitimacy does he/she represent? What does the author say? Focus on the ‘quality’ and ‘authority’ of the content

Comparison: ‘Critical’ Reading What is the context? To whom is the text addressed? What is the intention of the author? What is the position of the author (his/her political agenda)? What is the author trying to say and how is he/she trying to convince/manipulate the reader? What claims are not substantiated? Focus on context, intentions, communication and ‘reflection’

Comparison: ‘Critical’ Literacy What are the assumptions behind the statements? How does the author understand reality? What is shaping his/her understanding? Who decides (what is real, can be known or needs to be done) in whose name and for whose benefit? What are the implications of his/her claims (past/present/future: social, environmental, economic, etc…)? What are the sanctioned ignorances (blind spots) and contradictions? Focus on knowledge production, power, representation, implications and reflexivity

Comparison: ‘Critical’ Literacy What are the assumptions behind the statements? How does the author understand reality? What is shaping his/her understanding? Who decides (what is real, can be known or needs to be done) in whose name and for whose benefit? What are the implications of his/her claims (past/present/future: social, environmental, economic, etc…)? What are the sanctioned ignorances (blind spots) and contradictions? Teacher to a student in a school: YOU ARE HERE TO BE SOMEBODY IN LIFE!

Comparison: ‘Critical’ Literacy What are the assumptions behind the statements? How does the author understand reality? What is shaping his/her understanding? Who decides (what is real, can be known or needs to be done) in whose name and for whose benefit? What are the implications of his/her claims (past/present/future: social, environmental, economic, etc…)? What are the sanctioned ignorances (blind spots) and contradictions? EDUCATION FOR ALL IS THE SOLUTION TO ALL PROBLEMS!

Comparison: ‘Critical’ Literacy What are the assumptions behind the statements? How does the author understand reality? What is shaping his/her understanding? Who decides (what is real, can be known or needs to be done) in whose name and for whose benefit? What are the implications of his/her claims (past/present/future: social, environmental, economic, etc…)? What are the sanctioned ignorances (blind spots) and contradictions? MAKE A DIFFERENCE! MAKE HISTORY! DONATE £1 NOW!

VANESSA ANDREOTTI EDUCATION/OUTREACH COORDINATOR & RESEARCH FELLOW To receive a link to this presentation, please fill in the contact form!