"I'm doing my best, considering” the relationship between worker satisfaction with HRM practices and worker perception of individual performance in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact of Organizational Justice on Job Performance in Libraries: Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange Relationship Sidra Shan International Islamic.
Advertisements

Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Maternal Psychological Control: Links to Close Friendship and Depression in Early Adolescence Heather L. Tencer Jessica R. Meyer Felicia D. Hall University.
Caring, Self-Regulatory Efficacy, Empathic Efficacy and Prosocial/Antisocial Behaviors in a Physical Activity Setting Introduction Sport and exercise psychology.
Chapter 10 Human Resource Management and Performance: a Review and Research Agenda David E. Guest.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the satisfaction with HRM practices in an organization and the workers' perceived performance.
The concept of HRM perceptions is a growing interest in the literature, as one of the antecedents of HRM outcomes. Regardless, not only the cognitive aspect.
Corporate Governance across Ethics, Culture & Citizenship; What to give and what to expect? The Effects of HRM Practices on Organizational Performance.
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Welcome CRADLE summer conference
450 PRESENTATION NURSING TURNOVER.
PAY SATISFACTION, JOB SATISFACTION, ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT, AND TURNOVER INTENTION IN TAIWAN BANKING: STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING.
Keeping older workers committed and employed by means of in/formal HRD initiatives Dr. A.A.M. (Ida) Wognum M. (Martine) Horstink MSc. Wognum-HorstinkCedefop.
Attitudes at Work Dr Joan Harvey Dr George Erdos.
Employee satisfaction and commitment Prepared By: Siti Rokiah Siwok for UHS 2062 at UTM
Work and Employment Research Centre John Purcell Professor of Human Resource Management University of Bath Sustaining the People Management and Performance.
An investigation of factors moderating the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention among bank’s staff in Thailand By Warayu Thienpramuk.

Advisor: 謝焸君 教授 Student: 賴千惠
HR Practices, Interpreted HRM, and Organizational Performance: Multi-level Analysis Kim Eun Hee.
The Model of Trust Factors in Paying through the Internet (Dissertation) Franc Bračun, PhD Merkur Day 2004 Friday, 22nd October.
1309 S. Babcock St #186 Melbourne, FL Phone: Website:
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Prepared by Cheryl Dowell, Algonquin College, and Greg Cole, Saint Mary’s University.
The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance Dr. Shay S. Tzafrir University of Haifa, Israel.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Fourteen Transformational Leadership.
UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEADTEACHERS’ LEADERSHIP STYLES AND SELF- EFFICACY WITH.
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
HOW TO WRITE RESEARCH PROPOSAL BY DR. NIK MAHERAN NIK MUHAMMAD.
National Hsinchu University of Education Graduate Institute of Human Resource Development The Challenges and Trends of HRD in High-Tech Industry Hsiu-Yen.
1 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR STEPHEN P. ROBBINS Chapter 3 Attitudes and Job Satisfaction Reporter: Yen-Jen Angela Chen 2007/09/20.
Kelli J. Schutte William Jewell College Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 14th Edition Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice.
By Cao Hao Thi - Fredric W. Swierczek
WOP-P?? What, how, why, to whom, with whom? I really don’t get it… Recent Developments in Organizational Psychology Helena Martins :: 2015 ::
S.J.Deen MSW, M.Phil Ph.D Scholar Madras School of Social Work Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai
ORBChapter 31 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Chapter 3 Attitudes & Job Satisfaction.
International Conference “ АDDRESSING QUALITY OF WORK IN EUROPE”, October 2012 Employees` engagement – effects on business performance and main drivers.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
AHRQ Safety Program For Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Module 3: Staff Empowerment.
Brenda J. Stutsky RN, PhD Development and Testing of a Conceptual Framework for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice.
IMPACT OF EXPORT PROMOTION PROGRAMS ON FIRM COMPETENCIES, STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE Group Rupee.
Department of Business Administration
W HEN THE FAT LADY SINGS : Organizational Commitment in workers of a decaying Portuguese Hospital Helena Martins Teresa Proença GBATA :: 2012 :: New York.
Online students’ perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: July 11, 2007 C. Y. Lee & E. L. Witta (2001).
ABSTRACT In this study, structural equation modeling is applied to examine the determinants of students’ satisfaction and their perceived learning outcomes.
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
Job Satisfaction and Related Worker Attitudes Motivation and Commitment SHEILA AGUILLON,THIN AUNG, ADAM LEAVENWORTH, RODOLFO ORNELAS, EDGAR ZAMORA.
Attitudes MBUS 612 Prof. Elloy. Attitude Formation 1. Dispositional Approach * Attitudes represent releatively stable predispositions to respond to people.
A Path Analytic Investigation Of Job Complexity, Psychographics and Demographics As Determinants of Employees' Turnover.
Strategic Human Resource Management – Current Developments and the HE Context David Guest Professor of Organizational Psychology & Human Resource Management.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Attitudes and Job Satisfaction Chapter Four.
BUS 308 Entire Course (Ash Course) For more course tutorials visit BUS 308 Week 1 Assignment Problems 1.2, 1.17, 3.3 & 3.22 BUS 308.
Using Latent Variable Models in Survey Research Roger E. Millsap Arizona State University Contact: (480)
Values, Attitudes & Job Satisfaction
Dr Joan Harvey Dr George Erdos
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE(OS) AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR(OCB): THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT(OC) Naqib.
Helena MARTINS & Teresa PROENÇA
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES
Introduction Method Results Conclusions
The effects of technology-mediated communication on industrial buyer behavior Tony Yiu 29-Nov-2008.
Factor Effecting Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Volunteer Perceptions of Upward and Downward
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
Employee Attitudes Job Satisfaction: degree of pleasure in work, slightly correlates with performance, may be decreased by attempt to increase productivity,
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Attitudes and Positive Psychological States
Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
Grace Orlyn SITOMPUL 5th ISC – Oct 30-31, 2017 APIU
Presentation transcript:

"I'm doing my best, considering” the relationship between worker satisfaction with HRM practices and worker perception of individual performance in the healthcare sector Helena Martins :: Teresa Proença Polytechnic of Porto :: University of Porto

A polaroid of the present work Context: hospital workers (clinical and non clinical staff) of one Portuguese major hospital Question: is there an effect on performance when workers are more satisfied with HRM practices? Is this relationship mediated by constructs of the worker-organization relationship? Methodology: “quantitative festival” – procedures in validation of scales, sample description, exploratory statistics and preliminary mediation testing using SPSS; structural equations modeling (regressions, confirmatory factor analysis, moderation and mediation models) using AMOS Contributions: healthcare context; development and validation of scales; furthering the importance of perceptions in and of HR*; issues with performance in healthcare

The context Demands on healthcare (HC): same/more quality, less money Deliver quality improvements, better accountability, consumer choice as well as cost savings (Kabene, 2006; Grimshaw et al, 2010). HC is a knowledge intensive service industry HR is “the heart of the health system in any country” (Joint Learning Initiative, 2004) HR Research in HC is however lacking Methodological issues Contextual Issues

Where is this coming from? HRM practices provide employees with concrete and visual evidence of the organisation’s intent to anticipate and meet their needs (Armstrong-Stassen & Schlosser, 2010). When an organisation engages in HR practices that reflect investment in, and support of employees, it signals that the organisation is seeking to continue a social exchange relationship with them (Allen et al., 2003). According to the social exchange theory (Blau, 1964), positive, beneficial actions directed at employees by either the organisation and/or its representatives (e.g. supervisors) contribute to the establishment of high-quality exchange relationships that create obligations for employees to reciprocate in positive, beneficial ways (Settoon et al., 1996).

Where is this coming from? Underpinning this type of exchange is trust (Anderson & Narus, 1990; Doney & Cannon, 1997; Dwyer, Schurr, & Oh, 1987) and the norm of reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960; Homans, 1958; Levi-Strauss, 1957; Malinowski, 1922; Simmel, 1950). Gouldner’s (1960) “norm of reciprocity”, states that this norm implies two demands “(1) people should help those who have helped them and (2) people should not injure those who have helped them” ** However, these constructs cannot simply materialize, as they evolve as a result of some form of socialization process (Axelrod, 1986; Doney & Cannon, 1997; Ford, 1980; Jones & George, 1998; Williams, 2001). ***

Where is this coming from? The case has been made in recent years for making a clear distinction between intended HR practices (those designed on a strategic level), actual – or implemented – HR practices (those implemented by, for example, the direct supervisor), and perceived HR practices (those perceived by the employees) (Wright & Nishii, 2004). Although the effects of a company’s overall HR practices, or HR bundle, have been extensively examined, the effects of employees’ overall perception of HR effectiveness have rarely been studied (Chang, 2005).

So… Could the HRM-Performance relationship be mediated by the Worker-Organization relationship? Job Satisfaction Organizational Commitment Extra-role Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Helping and Voice Behaviors (Van Dyne and LePine, 1998)

Finally, the performance issue The most crucial part in relating to the HRM and performance is of course the linkage between the two (Paauwe, 2009). Performance outcomes of HRM can be captured in a variety of ways; e.g. Dyer and Reeves (1995) mention: Financial outcomes (e.g. pro fi ts, sales, market share, Tobin’s q, GRATE); Organizational outcomes (e.g. output measures such as productivity, quality, ef fi ciency); HR-related outcomes (e.g. attitudinal and behavioural impact among employees, such as satisfaction, commitment, intention to quit).

Finally, the performance issue Central to these more sophisticated ways of thinking about the relationship between HRM and performance is the idea that HR practices at the organizational level affect the attitudes and behavior of employees at the individual level which, in turn, affect key aggregated level behavioral or HR outcomes such as labor productivity and turnover which, subsequently, might impact organizational or fi rm-level outcomes (Paauwe, 2009).

Finally, the performance issue The perception of being in control of the situation is often referred to as self-efficacy (Bandura, 1984; 1993; 1997). Self-efficacy can be defined as a self-evaluation of one’s competence to successfully execute a course of action that is necessary to reach desired outcomes (Bandura, 1993). Meta-analytic evidence suggests that self-efficacy is rather strongly related to performance (Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998), although this connection seems to be stronger concerning state or task-specific self-efficacy rather than generalized self-efficacy (Hysong & Quinones, 1997; Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998).

Finally, the performance issue Work related self-efficacy contributes to motivation by influencing the challenges people pursue, the effort they spend, and their perseverance in the face of obstacles (Bandura, 1989) as well as task-related effort (Bandura, 1982). Self-efficacious employees have been found to experience higher levels of flow over time (Salanova, Bakker, & Llorens, 2006), while self- efficacious students reported higher levels of engagement (Llorens, Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, 2007).

Hypotheses Satisfaction with HRM WSE WOR: -JS -OC -HVB WOR: -JS -OC -HVB

Measuring the constructs 2 scales created SHRIMQ – Satisfaction with Human Resources Issues in Management Questionnaire PROSES – Performance Related Observations of Self-Efficacy Scale I contribute to organizational success I’m having a good performance I’m a good worker 3 scales validated Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (Weiss, England, Dawis and Lofquist, 1967) Organizational Commitment Scales (Meyer and Allen, 1997) Helping and Voice Behaviors Scale (Van Dyne and LePine, 1998)

Sample 942 subjects Ages of respondents between 20 and 66 years old (mode=28 years and M= 38.5 years; standard deviation= 9.6) Most respondents are female (80.3%; 16.9% male respondents; 2.2% missing). In terms of seniority, values range between less than a year to up to 39 years (mode=3 years and mean= years, standard deviation= 8.46) a significant amount of workers (71%) have an effective contract (hired with no predetermined ending date of the bond with the organization). 17% of subjects have a school level inferior to the mandatory Portuguese level (9th year), 28.8% attended or graduated from middle school, 42.8% attended or graduated from College and 19.7% have post-graduate schooling (Specializations, Masters Degree, etc.).

Jobs distribution

The official results so far… Scales: great results in all of the psychometric tests (all scale reliability equal or above α =0.70; good explained variance, communalities, item distribution; CFI and GFI above 0.90 in all scales, RMSEA below 0.70 in all cases with good confidence intervals).

Does this make any sense to you? Do find gaps here?

Other results

Satisfaction with HRM - WSE RS (+), teamwork (+) and pay (-)

Satisfaction with HRM – “I work harder than my peers” training (-), teamwork (-) and pay (+)

Satisfaction with HRM – “I feel that I have the conditions to do my best for the organization” Information (+), recruitment and selection (+)

SHRIMQ-JS

JS-WSE

SHRIMQ-OC

OC-WSE

SHRIMQ-HVB

HVB-WSE