©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Go To Next Slide 7-1 Diagramming Arguments The aim of this tutorial is to hone your skills.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drafting Your Outline What to do in the next week!
Advertisements

Techniques for Solving Logic Puzzles. Logic Puzzles Logic puzzles operate using deductive logic. Logic puzzles operate using deductive logic. A well-designed.
Truth Tables The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to construct truth tables and use them to test the validity of arguments. Go To Next Slide.
Making Complex Sentences
The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.
Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she must be planning on buying a home. Step 1. Number each statement and note each indicator.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 4 Diagramming Arguments.
Chapter 2 – Logic Analyzing Arguments.
Lecture 9: Analyzing Arguments – Diagramming Short Arguments.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
1 Lesson Evaluating Claims. 2 Lesson Evaluating Claims California Standards: Statistics, Data Analysis, and Probability 2.5 Identify claims.
Interpreting Empirical Research Results A Tutorial.
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Chapter 3.b.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Working with Financial Statements Chapter Three.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
© 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Valuation: The Time Value of Money (Formulas) Chapter Five.
Diagramming Arguments Congruent and Linked Arguments.
Verb Patterns Infinitive or -ing
Directions: Press F5 to begin the slide show. Press the enter key to view each part of the review.
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Unit 3: Gathering Data Chapter 11 Understanding Randomness.
How to Write a Thesis Statement... or, everything you always wanted to know but couldn’t bring yourself to ask.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses About Proportions.
Research Paper Arguments Premises Fallacies Take Notes!
How to write your special study Step by step guide.
Complex Sentences However Even though Which Where Whose Although
Research Paper Arguments Premises Fallacies Take Notes!
Persuasive Essay: writing to convince others of your opinion.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Unit 16 Firms and factories.  Objectives Objectives  Focus Focus  Warm up Warm up  16.1 Saying what you’ve done 16.1 Saying what you’ve done  16.2.
McGraw-Hill Copyright © 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Prepared by Professors Paul Harris & Rita Perkins & Rita Perkins.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Diagram this argument. Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she.
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. This tutorial well help you work through the process of spotting and identifying.
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Analyzing and Evaluating Inductive Arguments The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Argument Diagramming Part I
History of Philosophy Lecture 5 Formalizing an argument
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Identifying Rhetorical Devices Go To Next Slide The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Assessing a Claim’s Initial Plausibility Go To Next Slide The aim of this tutorial is to.
©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Analyzing and Evaluating Inductive Arguments The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze and evaluate inductive arguments.
At the end of this lesson, you will be able to Explain what independent reasons are Use theme changer expressions to communicate and analyze arguments.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Logic & Critical Herman J. SuhendraProduced by Herman J. Suhendra A.B. Gadjah Mada University & M.A. University of Santo Tomas, Manila MEETING.
 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
Finding the Main Point or Thesis. – This lecture is about finding an author’s main point or thesis.
PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial.
Chapter Nine Compound Sentences. Compound Sentence- contains at least two subjects and two verbs usually arranged in an SV/SV pattern. Bob wrecked his.
How to Fix Problem Sentences Fragments Run-ons Comma Splices.
The Toulmin Method. Why Toulmin…  Based on the work of philosopher Stephen Toulmin.  A way to analyze the effectiveness of an argument.  A way to respond.
Go To Next Slide This tutorial will help you identify examples of the types of fallacies discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 5 discusses fallacies of relevance.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Tutorials © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she must be planning on buying a home. Step.
Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Conjunctive Adverbs.
Diagram this argument. Since Mary visited a realtor and her
Making Sense of Arguments
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
II. Analyzing Arguments
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
Critical Thinking Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Starting out with formal logic
Presentation transcript:

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Go To Next Slide 7-1 Diagramming Arguments The aim of this tutorial is to hone your skills in diagramming arguments.

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Diagram this argument. Step 1. Number each statement and note each indicator word. Since (1) Mary visited a realtor and (2) her bank’s mortgage department, (3) she must be planning on buying a home. Since Mary visited a realtor and her bank’s mortgage department, she must be planning on buying a home. Go To Next Slide

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Since (1) Mary visited a realtor and (2) her bank’s mortgage department, (3) she must be planning on buying a home. Step 2. Which of the claims is the conclusion? Which are premises? (1)(2)(3) Premise Note the indicator word, “since.” PremiseConclusion Go To Next Slide 7-2

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Since (1) Mary visited a realtor and (2) her bank’s mortgage department, (3) she must be planning on buying a home. Step 3. Use arrows to represent the intended relationship between the claims. (1)(2) (3) In this case the premises are independent. Even though the combined force of both premises makes the argument stronger, either premise could stand alone in supporting the conclusion. Go to next slide for another example 7-3

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Argument Diagramming Sample #2 Sandra can’t register for her classes on Wednesday. After all, Sandra is a sophomore and sophomore registration begins on Thursday. Step #1. Identify each claim and note any indicator words that might help identify premise(s) and conclusion(s). (1) Sandra can’t register for her classes on Wednesday. After all, (2) Sandra is a sophomore and (3) sophomore registration begins on Thursday. Go To Next Slide 7-4

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) Sandra can’t register for her classes on Wednesday. After all, (2) Sandra is a sophomore and (3) sophomore registration begins on Thursday. “After all” is generally a premise indicator. This “and” serves to join two different claims. Go To Next Slide 7-5

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Step #2. Use arrows to show the relationships between the claims in the argument. (2)(3) (1) (2)(3) (1) (+) Decide whether the premises are independent. Or dependent. These are dependent premises since both (in conjunction) are necessary to prove the conclusion. Go to next slide for another example. 7-6

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Pool maintenance can cost hundreds of dollars a year and we really don’t have that kind of money. So, I don’t think we should put a pool in this summer. Besides, pools pose a real drowning danger to small children. Step #1. The first task is to analyze the argument. Decide what the various claims are and begin to decide which are premises and which are conclusions. Number the claims and note any indicator words. Go To Next Slide 7-7

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) Pool maintenance can cost hundreds of dollars a year and (2) we really don’t have that kind of money. So, (3) I don’t think we should put a pool in this summer. Besides, (4) pools pose a real drowning danger to small children. Note the “and” connecting two claims. “So” is a conclusion indicator. A premise indicator. Go To Next Slide 7-8

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Step #2. Use arrows to represent the argument. (1)(2) (3) (+) Premises 1 and 2 are dependent. While premise 1 could stand alone, premise 2 can’t. (4) Premise 4 is independent. It could be offered alone as support for the conclusion. Go To Next Slide 7-9

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) Pool maintenance can cost hundreds of dollars a year and (2) we really don’t have that kind of money. So, (3) I don’t think we should put a pool in this summer. Besides, (4) pools pose a real drowning danger to small children. (5) We don’t want dangerous things in the yard. (1)(2) (3) (+) (4) Notice that there is an implied premise here working in conjunction with #4. Do you see it? (+) (5) Go to next slide for another example. 7-10

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. You’ve often complained that mainstream television doesn’t have quality programming so I think you should support public broadcasting. Besides, you watch PBS all the time and fair is fair. Since support means money, you should write a check to PBS immediately. Step #1. As before, concentrate on analyzing the various claims. Use numbers to identify them and note any indicator words. Go To Next Slide 7-11

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Go To Next Slide This argument is more complex, but the same skills apply. What is the intended conclusion of the argument? How do the various parts of the argument work to provide support for this conclusion? (1)You’ve often complained that mainstream television doesn’t have quality programming so (2) I think you should support public broadcasting. Besides (3), you watch PBS all the time and (4) fair is fair. Since (5) support means money, (6) you should write a check to PBS immediately. 7-12

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. You can start diagramming from anywhere. Keep trying different arrangements until your diagram best represents the intended meaning of the argument. (1) (2) The indicator “so” shows claim 2 to be a conclusion and 1 seems to support this conclusion. Claims 3 and 4 offer another reason that 2 is true. (3) (+) (4) Go To Next Slide 7-13

©2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What about claims 5 and 6? The “since” before 5 marks this as a premise but for which conclusion? Context and experience tell us that this is a premise supporting claim 6. Claim 2, which says you should support PBS, combines with claim 5 which defines support as money, to support the final conclusion 6. (1) (2) (3) (+) (4) (5) (6) (+) This is the end of the tutorial. 7-14