An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cost- Share Irrigation Programs in the High Plains Aquifer ~Josh Roe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of 22 Irrigation Management and Technologies Freddie Lamm KSU Northwest Research Extension Center, Colby, Kansas Norm Klocke KSU Northwest Research Extension.
Advertisements

Crop choice and irrigation technology decisions: what are the future regional hydrological impacts? Michael Brady and Jon Yoder Bioearth Integration Seminar.
Opportunities for Demand Response in California Agricultural Irrigation Gary Marks iP Solutions Corp. 10/15/2012.
Water for Texas 2012 State Water Plan. Water Planning: Legislative Response to Drought  Late 1950s Drought of Record – 1957: Creation of TWDB – $200.
Crop Insurance and Corn: Helpful Hints to Make More Money and GRP in Juneau, Adams, and Marquette Counties Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics.
Percolation Precipitation Abstract 70% of the population in Oregon lives above the seven major aquifer systems in the Willamette Valley. The seven primary.
SUSTAINABLE OPERATION OF THE YAQUI RESERVOIR SYSTEM.
 Econometrics and Programming approaches › Historically these approaches have been at odds, but recent advances have started to close this gap  Advantages.
IRRIGATION Agricultural Use of Water. Amount of Water Used In western US states, 70 to 95% of the fresh water supply is dedicated to irrigation Globally.
Economics of Texas Citrus CONTENTS Descriptive Stuff  citrus industry facts  citrus supply & demand situation  citrus prices & production costs Economic.
Consumption, Saving, and Investment
Dr. Bill Golden Department of Agricultural Economics Economics of Groundwater Conservation to Agriculture Economics of Groundwater Conservation to Agriculture.
Ch. 21: Production and Costs Del Mar College John Daly ©2003 South-Western Publishing, A Division of Thomson Learning.
Evaluation of Economic, Land Use, and Land Use Emission Impacts of Substituting Non-GMO Crops for GMO in the US Farzad Taheripour Harry Mahaffey Wallace.
Recent study indicates an available supply of water of little more than 1,000 m³ per person, which puts Pakistan in the category of a high stress country.
Impacts of Climate Change on Corn and Soybean Yields in China Jintao Xu With Xiaoguang Chen and Shuai Chen June 2014.
You have seen that firms in perfectly competitive industries make three specific decisions.
WHAT’S PRECISION WORTH?
Groundwater Resources: The Desert Southwest. What has happened to groundwater levels in the area investigated as time has progressed? What were the reasons.
The Economic Problem: Scarcity and Choice
WATER ISSUES IN THE EASTERN EUROPE:
Flexibility of system to deliver water Level of control available to the irrigator e.g. ditch system on a fixed schedule vs. large capacity well supplying.
Chapter 2: Opportunity costs. Scarcity Economics is the study of how individuals and economies deal with the fundamental problem of scarcity. As a result.
Aquifers are typically saturated regions of ground water which produce an economically feasible quantity of water to a well or spring.
Perfect Competition *MADE BY RACHEL STAND* :). I. Perfect Competition: A Model A. Basic Definitions 1. Perfect Competition: a model of the market based.
Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization Nov Orlando, Florida The Economic Feasibility of Bio-energy Generation for Peak Demand.
Improving Life through Science and Technology. Irrigated Corn to Ethanol Net Energy Balance Emily Seawright, Ronald D. Lacewell, Naveen Adusumilli, Ed.
Consumer Choice 16. Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Utility –A measure of relative levels of satisfaction consumers enjoy from consumption of goods and.
Chapter 9 Pure Competition McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Why Normal Matters AEIC Load Research Workshop Why Normal Matters By Tim Hennessy RLW Analytics, Inc. April 12, 2005.
Colorado Ag. Science Curriculum Section: Plant and Soil Science Unit: 5 - Environmental Factors Lesson: 6 Managing Water – Irrigation.
PRIVATE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY A KEY TO PROFITABILITY.
1 Land in: Other Uses In Transition In Switchgrass Crop Lifetime Net SG Addition Of Acres Acres in Switchgrass Yield from Ag R&D Ave Yield in Established.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
1 of 37 PART II The Market System: Choices Made by Households and Firms © 2012 Pearson Education CHAPTER OUTLINE 9 Long-Run Costs and Output Decisions.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
2 nd International Conference Graz October 10 th, 2012 Water allocation and efficient water use in agriculture Local Council Association – LCA (Malta)
Water Use In Colorado By Travis Hoesli. Water Use In Colorado Unit Learning Objectives 1. Know the different classification of water use In Colorado.
Economics of Groundwater Use in the Beryl-Enterprise Area.
Will the Costs of Fixing the Delta Impact the Cost of Food? Mike Wade Agricultural Water Management Council.
Conserving water resources: how the Farm Bill can improve irrigation efficiency and get more water conservation for the taxpayer buck Frank A. Ward Professor.
Lesson 4 Identifying and Using Macroeconomics and Microeconomics.
The Forest Resource in Iowa. Iowa’s Forest Cover   Iowa’s forests cover 8% of our landscape   87% of our 2,97,000 acres are owned by private landowners.
Middle Flint Basin Irrigation Water Use Dr. Jim Hook National Environmentally Sound Production Agriculture Laboratory June 5, 2001 SW Georgia Water Resources.
1 of 32 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall CHAPTER OUTLINE 7 The Production Process: The Behavior of Profit-Maximizing Firms The.
6 © 2004 Prentice Hall Business PublishingPrinciples of Economics, 7/eKarl Case, Ray Fair The Production Process: The Behavior of Profit-Maximizing Firms.
1 Linear Programming (LP) 線性規劃 - George Dantzig, 1947.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Agricultural Policy Effects on Land Allocation Allen M. Featherstone Terry L. Kastens Kansas State University.
Biofuel Policy Effects on Soil Erosion C. Robert Taylor, Auburn University Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M.
Allied Grape Growers, All rights reserved. ASFMRA Outlook 2015 Agribusiness Conference Change in the Wine Business Jeff Bitter Allied Grape Growers.
Overdraft of the HIGH PLAINS AQUIFER Eric Bueser March 3, 2010.
Ogallala Formation (containing High Plains Aquifer): Deposited over 10 million years ago Coarse-grained sand, gravel, fine clay, silt, and sand 174,000.
8.1 Costs and Output Decisions in the Long Run In this chapter we finish our discussion of how profit- maximizing firms decide how much to supply in the.
2 Chapter The Economic Problem: Scarcity and Choice.
Precision Agriculture and Water Use Efficiency Clint Wilcox
NextEnd IRRIGATION SCHEDULING AND TECHNIQUES IN POTATO.
Advanced Macroeconomics Lecture: Investment Demand Date:
Ground-Water Management Plan Beryl Enterprise Area August 6, 2007 Sign up sheet.
1 Aggregate Expenditure and Aggregate Demand CHAPTER 25 © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning.
> > > > The Behavior of Profit-Maximizing Firms Profits and Economic Costs Short-Run Versus Long-Run Decisions The Bases of Decisions: Market Price of.
Homework due in recitation this week Recitation Homework on water issues in the Republican River Basin (10 points) Due in recitation class during week.
Economic Growth and Climate Change Bangkok Time Economic growth takes time to unfold Climate change takes time to unfold Cannot measure effects.
2016 Water Inventory and Analysis Report Highlights on Land Use, Water Supply, and Water Budgets Christina Buck, PhD Water Resources Scientist Board of.
Developing a Bioenergy Crop Supply Chain: Contracts and Policy ` Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Overview of Surface Water Allocation in the NSR Watershed
PowerPoint Lectures for Principles of Economics, 9e
Introduction to Economics of Water Resources Lecture 5
Utah, will we have enough water?
Trends in Groundwater Conditions in the Ogallala Aquifer
Presentation transcript:

An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cost- Share Irrigation Programs in the High Plains Aquifer ~Josh Roe

Statement of the Problem: Agriculture is the most prominent industry in W. KS. Agriculture is the most prominent industry in W. KS. Since W. KS receives very little precipitation annually, irrigation is a key component of the Agricultural Industry. Since W. KS receives very little precipitation annually, irrigation is a key component of the Agricultural Industry. An overwhelming majority of this water is supplied by the Ogallala Aquifer. An overwhelming majority of this water is supplied by the Ogallala Aquifer.

Statement of the Problem: Facts about the Ogallala and W. KS: The Ogallala Aquifer covers seven states and has turned 16 million acres of dryland ground into highly productive land since The Ogallala Aquifer covers seven states and has turned 16 million acres of dryland ground into highly productive land since Irrigation accounts for 87% of all water used in W. KS. Irrigation accounts for 87% of all water used in W. KS. Irrigation provides an estimated value of $795 million of income to the W. KS economy annually. Irrigation provides an estimated value of $795 million of income to the W. KS economy annually. Since 1980, areas of W. KS have seen experienced declines in the saturated thickness of the Ogallala as great as 2.6 feet per year. Since 1980, areas of W. KS have seen experienced declines in the saturated thickness of the Ogallala as great as 2.6 feet per year. Numerous resources have been devoted towards studies on groundwater sustainability in W. KS. since the early 1970’s Numerous resources have been devoted towards studies on groundwater sustainability in W. KS. since the early 1970’s

Data: For every water right held, Irrigators in W. KS, since 1988, have been required to report: For every water right held, Irrigators in W. KS, since 1988, have been required to report: -Annual Water Use -Crops Irrigated -Type of Irrigation System -Depth to Water Numerous possibilities for reporting error. Numerous possibilities for reporting error. Over 1,500 man hours spent on transforming the data into a reliable source. Over 1,500 man hours spent on transforming the data into a reliable source. Finished Product: Around 500,000 observations and 100 unique variables. Finished Product: Around 500,000 observations and 100 unique variables.

Do Water-Saving Irrigation Systems Save Water? An obvious solution to decreasing water pumped… adopting more efficient systems?? An obvious solution to decreasing water pumped… adopting more efficient systems?? Acre-Feet Pumped: G=C+L Acre-Feet Pumped: G=C+L - G=Gross Acre-Feet Pumped -C=Acre-Feet Consumed by the Crop -L=Water Loss Efficiency=C/G Efficiency=C/G Does an Increase in E imply a decrease in G? Does an Increase in E imply a decrease in G?

Technology Adoption: Irrigators have adopted more efficient technologies based on economic feasibility. Irrigators have adopted more efficient technologies based on economic feasibility. Cost sharing programs for more efficient technologies were added to the EQIP in the 2002 Farm Act. Cost sharing programs for more efficient technologies were added to the EQIP in the 2002 Farm Act. - Range from 30-75%, depending on the region/current technology

Levels of Efficiency: Flood Irrigation: Flood Irrigation: -Least Expensive/Efficient -E≈0.50 Pivot Irrigation: Pivot Irrigation: -More Expensive/Efficient - E≈0.90

Levels of Efficiency: Continued Sub Surface drip irrigation (SDI): Sub Surface drip irrigation (SDI): -Most Expensive/Efficient - E≈0.99

Effects of Increased Efficiency: Case 1: 12 in/ac applied to crop (E=0.50): G=C+L → 12=6+6 Case 1: 12 in/ac applied to crop (E=0.50): G=C+L → 12=6+6 Six inches of water will NOT optimize corn yields! Six inches of water will NOT optimize corn yields! Case 2: 12 in/ac applied to crop (E=0.90): G=C+L → 12= Case 2: 12 in/ac applied to crop (E=0.90): G=C+L → 12= Increased E: Increased E: -Should Increase Yield -May Increase or Decrease Gross Water Pumped

Project 1: Modeling the Demand for Water for Corn Irrigation The overall objective was to quantify the factors that an individual producer weighs when deciding how much water to pump. The overall objective was to quantify the factors that an individual producer weighs when deciding how much water to pump. The model was also be used to forecast water use for corn irrigation under different output and energy price scenarios. The model was also be used to forecast water use for corn irrigation under different output and energy price scenarios.

Index year = (Π electricity *P electricity ) + (Π gasoline *P gasoline ) + (Π propane *P propane ) + (Π diesel *P diesel )

Modeling: The dependant variable was acre-feet pumped. The dependant variable was acre-feet pumped. The 17 independent variables include: The 17 independent variables include: –Yearly Well-Yield and Number of Acres Irrigated –Yearly Hydrologic Data –Yearly Corn, Energy, and Input prices –Annual Precipitation by Irrigation District, in 3 categories –Dummy Variables for Location in W. KS –Dummy Variables for Type of Irrigation System in a Given Year

Results: R2R Standard Error62.44 VariableParameterT-StatElasticity Intercept n/a Year Pump Rate Acres Irr Lag Price EIndex Depth to Water Sat Thick Rain Rain Rain Price Index District District Hpivot LPivot Other Sprinkler

Conclusions: The model’s prediction accuracy is reduced in years where rainfall amounts are far above or below average. The model’s prediction accuracy is reduced in years where rainfall amounts are far above or below average. Overall, the model satisfactorily captured the economic factors that a corn producer weighs in deciding how much water to pump. Overall, the model satisfactorily captured the economic factors that a corn producer weighs in deciding how much water to pump. The nature of the model makes it very diverse. The nature of the model makes it very diverse.

Project 2: Groundwater Use Trends and Forecasts in Western Kansas A multinomial logit model was estimated to predict a producer’s planting decision. A multinomial logit model was estimated to predict a producer’s planting decision. Based on this decision, the amount of water pumped was estimated. Based on this decision, the amount of water pumped was estimated. Counter-factual policy/price scenarios conducted. Counter-factual policy/price scenarios conducted.

Logit Model: P(plant crop x) = f (hydrology, technology, prices, weather) Variable Marginal Effect EPALF EPCORN0.32 EPMILO-0.10 EPSOY0.038 EPWHEAT-0.20 EINDEX-0.35 PRICE INDEX FLOOD0.12 HPIVOT0.16 LPIVOT0.16 LAG CORN 0.57 FAIR-0.19

Simulation 3: No technology adoption

Conclusions Several shifts in water use trends during 1990s Several shifts in water use trends during 1990s Low commodity prices held water use down Low commodity prices held water use down Higher energy prices would have reduced water use further Higher energy prices would have reduced water use further New technologies slightly reduced water use New technologies slightly reduced water use

Peterson and Ding, “Do Water-Saving Irrigation Systems Save Water?” Empirically estimated the effects of increased efficiency on water use. Empirically estimated the effects of increased efficiency on water use. Constructed a Just-Pope production function from optimal irrigation scheduling models and a daily-loop plant growth estimator. Constructed a Just-Pope production function from optimal irrigation scheduling models and a daily-loop plant growth estimator. Estimated production and water use data were combined with actual technology choices and hydrologic data to determine the producer’s technology choice and water use. Estimated production and water use data were combined with actual technology choices and hydrologic data to determine the producer’s technology choice and water use.

Results: ItemFloodPivotDrip Water Volume Pumped (acre feet) Yield (bu/ac) Pumping Costs ($/ac) Return to Land and Capital ($/ac) Standard Deviation ($/ac) Net Return ($/ac) Net Return (30% Cost Share)

Done Deal??? According to the results thus far: increased efficiency=less water pumped! According to the results thus far: increased efficiency=less water pumped! However, I am not satisfied! However, I am not satisfied! Why? WATER SPREADING!! Why? WATER SPREADING!!

Water Spreading?? All previous studies mentioned assumed that acres irrigated did not change with increased efficiency! All previous studies mentioned assumed that acres irrigated did not change with increased efficiency! Mainly, in conversion from flood to pivot irrigation, they assumed that acres irrigated decreased from 160 to 126!! Mainly, in conversion from flood to pivot irrigation, they assumed that acres irrigated decreased from 160 to 126!! What if, in many cases, acres irrigated increased?? What if, in many cases, acres irrigated increased??

Initially: producer faces: E=0.5 and pumps acre feet per-well with a constant C: Initially: producer faces: E=0.5 and pumps acre feet per-well with a constant C: Now: producer faces E=0.9 and still pumps acre feet per-well with a constant C: Now: producer faces E=0.9 and still pumps acre feet per-well with a constant C:

Extreme Case?? The Previous Example was too Extreme! The Previous Example was too Extreme! However, what if producers optimized corn yield…Still room for more acres?? However, what if producers optimized corn yield…Still room for more acres?? Now producer faces: E=0.5 and acre-feet pumped, but increases C to 1: Now producer faces: E=0.5 and acre-feet pumped, but increases C to 1:

Spreading Under Optimal Irrigation: Producer Upgrades to Pivot: E=0.9 and acre-feet pumped, but still chooses optimal irrigation: Producer Upgrades to Pivot: E=0.9 and acre-feet pumped, but still chooses optimal irrigation: Acres irrigated increases by 80% in both cases! Acres irrigated increases by 80% in both cases! Has this transpired in reality? Has this transpired in reality?

Change in Acres From Switching From Flood To Pivot Acres Year Number of AdoptersTotal Acreage ChangeMean Total

Conclusions Water Spreading has not occurred “Optimally”. Water Spreading has not occurred “Optimally”. Land is a fixed input in many cases. Land is a fixed input in many cases. However, water spreading has attributed towards 20% of the increases in irrigated acreage. However, water spreading has attributed towards 20% of the increases in irrigated acreage. Nonetheless, water spreading is a viable phenomenon. Nonetheless, water spreading is a viable phenomenon. Cost-sharing programs lead to increases in yield, but have small effects on sustaining water. Cost-sharing programs lead to increases in yield, but have small effects on sustaining water.