California Estuary Monitoring Workgroup’s Estuary Portal Stephanie Fong State and Federal Contractors Water Agency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Advertisements

401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
by Larry Stine Estherville Lincoln Central High School
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Where Fresh Water Meets Salt Water
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
1 In the early years....  Wildlife provided the bulk of food available  Supplies seemed exhaustible  Humans destroyed wildlife habitat.
Environmental Consultants BMI Environmental Services, LLC AN OVERVIEW OF THE WETLANDS REGULATORY PROCESS AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPOSED OCEAN SPRINGS HIGH.
Section 2: Biodiversity at Risk
10. 2 Objectives Define and give examples of endangered and threatened species. Describe several ways that species are being threatened with extinction.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
SAN FRANISCO BAY By: Randall Alcorn. Golden Gate Bridge.
The Importance of Coastal Waters - Recent Reports National Coastal Condition Report National Coastal Condition Report Heinz Center’s State of the Nation’s.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS 13.1 & How much do we know? We have explored about 5% of the earth’s global ocean and the world’s interconnected oceans.
What is the Ecosystem Approach to Sustaining Biodiversity?
Lake Superior Binational Program and Lakewide Management Plan Lynelle Hanson Lake Superior Binational Forum Meeting Ashland, Wisconsin March 23, 2012.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Great Lakes Science Center Great Lakes Research.
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
11-4 How Should We Protect and Sustain Wetlands?
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
A Plan to Get Savvy About Urban Watersheds Dan Cloak, Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting Beau Goldie, Santa Clara Valley Water District Lorrie Gervin,
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Comments on Proposed Methods to Develop Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Prepared for SWRCB March 19, 2014 Valerie.
UPPER NEWPORT BAY, CALIFORNIA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Seagrass and Salt Marsh: Critical Coastal Habitats
Coastal Management Issues and Strategies: State and Municipal
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Wildlife Laws A historic perspective. Wildlife Biology – A Historical Background The earliest game law was enacted when the colony that would become.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
Have a seat quickly and quietly Today we will be learning about estuaries.
Wetland Wetland San Francisco Bay & Delta San Francisco Bay & Delta Wetland Wetland Steven Ortiz Per.1.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Deltakeeper Other Changes for the Program of Implementation (Issue 11) SWRCB D-1641 Workshop March 2005 Deltakeeper by Dan Bowman Odenweller Fishery Biologist.
By:Marcos Gonzalez David Labra
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
1. Digital Map from Dr. William Bowen California State University Northridge Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta San Joaquin River Sacramento River Suisun Bay.
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration-- Challenges to Ecological Restoration.
Copyright © Kenneth Adelman, California Coastal Records Project. Malibu Lagoon Slide 1.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
 The Living Murray. What is The Living Murray?  The Living Murray is one of Australia’s most significant river restoration programs. It aims to improve.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
GALVESTON BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM A CATALYST FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION Sarah Bernhardt, Ph.D. Lower Rio Grande Valley 18 th Annual Water Quality Management.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Estuaries Portal DRAFT Mock-up of Fish Content (This is content developed by several CEMW group members and has not been approved)
Environmental Protection Agency
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Under the management tools dropdown, there could be links to BDL
What are Zooplankton, and Why are they Important?
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Presentation transcript:

California Estuary Monitoring Workgroup’s Estuary Portal Stephanie Fong State and Federal Contractors Water Agency

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries What is an Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… An estuary is a partly enclosed body of water where fresh water coming down the rivers mixes with salt water from the sea. A range of coastal landforms fit this description, including bays, lagoons, harbors, inlets, and wetlands. There are many types of estuaries in California, including bar-built, open river mouths, and perennially tidal estuaries. Estuaries are among the most productive ecosystems on earth. They provide rich feeding grounds for coastal fish and migratory birds, and spawning areas for fish and shellfish. They are also important in maintaining the quality of coastal waters. Estuaries are amongst the most heavily populated areas throughout the world, with about 60% of the world’s population living along estuaries and the coast. As a result, estuaries are suffering degradation by human impact.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  California Where are California’s Estuaries? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  California Where are California’s Estuaries? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  California  Bolinas Why Should I Care About Bolinas Lagoon? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  California’s  San Francisco Why is the San Francisco Estuary Important? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… < > Ecology The San Francisco Estuary (SF Estuary) is a valuable ecological and economic resource. It is the largest estuary on the west coasts of North and South America with its watershed draining more than 40% of California’s surface area. Prominent physical features of the estuary include San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun Bays and Carquinez Straight to the west, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to the east. The SF Estuary provides drinking water for 25 million Californians, irrigation water for 4.5 million acres of farm land, and habitat for more than 750 species of plants, fish, and wildlife, including several endangered and threatened aquatic and terrestrial species. Two-thirds of the State’s salmon pass through the estuary, and at least half of the Pacific Flyway migratory water birds rely on the wetlands, mudflats, and shoreline areas in the estuary. Economics The SF Estuary is a global tourist destination for aquatic recreation such as boating, fishing, surfing, and swimming from beaches and in bays as well as hiking and biking along shorelines with inspiring natural beauty. The region attracts and supports a vibrant economy including Silicon Valley, the international hub of the high-tech industry, commercial and recreational fisheries, diverse agricultural production that feeds California and the world, three large commercial ports, water supply infrastructure, and major highway, railroad, and energy line corridors. Even though the SF Estuary is such a valuable resource, it is confronted with a broad range of challenges. Knowledge about the SF Estuary is developing at a rapid pace, and a list of recently released and critical documents can be found here for interested readers.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health How Healthy is the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Water Habitat Living Resources Ecological Processes Stewardship The health of an estuary can be assessed using various key attributes. This Portal uses the same key attributes that were used in the 2011 “The State of the San Francisco Bay” report: water, habitat, living resources, ecological processes, and stewardship. The initial focus here is on a robust evaluation of Living Resources using this concept, and the other key attributes under development.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Concept How to Determine the Health of Living Resources? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Identify Key Attributes Water Habitat Living Resources Ecological Processes Stewardship Describe Health Indicators Species Composition (e.g. native v. exotic) Species Composition (e.g. native v. exotic) Species Distribution Abundance STEP 1 STEP 2 Food Web Base Fish Birds Define Focal Categories Phytoplankton Zooplankton Resident Migrant Group #1 Group #2 STEP 3 STEP 4 Visualize Trends Native Richness over time Area occupied over time Abundance over time Identify & Evaluate Drivers STEP 5 Water (Quantity) Habitat loss Predation Water (Quality) Food Web Entrainment

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources How Can You Determine the Health of Living Resources? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Healthy estuaries support diverse and resilient populations of living resources dominated by native species and broadly distributed across different habitats (SOTB Report 2011). These living resources include birds, fish, and the base of the food web. The San Francisco Estuary supports a huge and diverse number of native and non-native species. Population trends differ for various species and are affected by environmental conditions. Environmental conditions include both human-induced and naturally occurring elements such as: amount, timing and quality of freshwater inflows, habitat extent and quality, ecological processes, pollution and resource management. Global climate change will also affect species populations in the future as sea levels and temperatures rise, further constricting habitat availability and suitability for many species. To evaluate the health of these living resources, scientists identified health indicators (measures of health relevant to data sets available for the estuary) for the SF Bay (SOTB 2011) < > Pictures of living resources that you can click on to get to details QUESTIONS ANSWERED  How Healthy is the Base of the SF Estuary?  How Healthy are SF Estuary Fish?  How Healthy are SF Estuary Birds?  How can I be part of the solution?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Food Web What is the Base of the Food Web and How Healthy is it? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… The base of the food web includes primary producers like phytoplankton that use nutrients, metals, and sunlight to grow and replicate. Zooplankton and other invertebrate primary consumers then feed on them to grow and reproduce. The health of phytoplankton and zooplankton can be used to determine the health of the base of the food web.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Food Web  Phytoplankton What are Phytoplankton and Why are they Important? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Primary production (carbon fixation through photosynthesis) by phytoplankton in one of the key processes that influence water quality in the estuary. Phytoplankton are small, free-floating organisms that occur as unicellular, colonial, or filamentous forms (Home and Goldman 1994). Phytoplankton can affect pH, dissolved oxygen, color, taste and odor, and under certain conditions, some species can develop noxious blooms resulting in minimal deaths and human illness (Carmichael 1981). In freshwater, the cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) are responsible for producing toxic blooms, particularly in waters that are polluted with phosphates (van den Hoek et al. 1995) In addition to being an important food source for zooplankton, phytoplankton species assemblages can be useful in assessing water quality (Gannon and Stemberger 1978). Due to their short life cycles, phytoplankton respond quickly to environmental changes; their standing crop and species composition are indicative of the quality of the water mass in which they are found (APHA 1998). However, because of their transient nature, patchiness, and free movement in a river- and tidally-influenced environment, the utility of phytoplankton as water quality is limited and should be interpreted in conjunction with physiochemical and other biological data (APHA 1998). Learn more about how phytoplankton are measured in the SF Estuary here.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Food Web  Phytoplankton  Measured How and Where are Phytoplankton Measured in the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Chlorophyll a and pheophytin samples are collected monthly at 13 sites throughout the upper estuary using a submersible pump from one meter below the water’s surface. Samples were analyzed according to Standard Methods (APHA 1998) by Bryte Laboratory. In addition to monthly, discrete sampling, 9 shore-based automated sampling stations use fluorescence to determine Chlorophyll a concentrations.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Food Web  Phytoplankton  Trends What are SF Estuary Phytoplankton Trends? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Chlorophyll a and pheophytin trends over time are shown below

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Food Web  Zooplankton What are Zooplankton and Why are they Important? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Zooplankton are typically tiny animals found near the surface in aquatic environments. They include copepods, mysids and jellyfish. Some zooplankton are native to the Delta (e.g. copepods like Diaptomus spp., Eurytomora affinis, and Acartia spp.) and others have been introduced (e.g. copepods like Limnoithona sinensis, Psuedodiaptomus forbesi, and Oithona davisae). Zooplankton are important food organisms for larval, juvenile, and small fishes, including delta smelt, juvenile salmon, striped bass, and small splittail. Some native zooplankton prefer freshwater (e.g. Diaptomus spp.), some prefer low salinity (e.g. Eurytemora affinis), and others prefer high salinity zones (e.g. Acartia spp.), so their presence and abundance can indicate water types. Learn more about how zooplankton are measured in the SF Estuary here.

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Fish What are the Different Types of Fish in the SF Estuary and Why are they Important? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What are the different types of fish in the SF Estuary and why are they important?  How and where are fish surveyed in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary fish trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve the health of fish in the SF Estuary? A severe decline of four pelagic (open-water) Delta fishes has become the concern for many scientists and resources agencies recently. Delta smelt (native), longfin smelt (native), threadfin shad (introduced) and juvenile striped bass (introduced) are collectively known as the POD (Pelagic Organism Decline) species. Anadromous Fish Anadromous (fish born in freshwater, migrate to salt water for most of their life, and migrate back to freshwater to spawn) species of major interest in the SF Estuary include commercial, sport and regulated fish, such as Chinook salmon, steelhead, and sturgeon. Other non-native anadromous fish are present in the ecosystem such as introduced striped bass and American shad, and have historically been important fisheries since their introductions in the late 1800s. Many of these native and non-native anadromous species populations abundance indices have declined precipitously in the latter part of the 20 th century. Among the four formerly robust runs of Chinook salmon spawning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system, all are classified as endangered, threatened or species of concern. The Sacramento fall-run Chinook abundance remains substantial and provides for sport and commercial fisheries in most years. Bay Fish Bay species of major interest include… Pelagic Fish Images of species

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Fish  Measured How and Where are Fish Surveyed in the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… The California Department of Fish and Wildlife and US Fish and Wildlife Service survey fish in the SF Estuary with many different types of equipment at different times of the year. These surveys include the Otter Trawl, Spring Kodiak Trawl, Spring midwater Trawl, Fall Midwater Trawl, beach seining… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What are the different types of fish in the SF Estuary and why are they important?  How and where are fish surveyed in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary fish trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve the health of fish in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Fish  Trends What are SF Estuary Fish Trends? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What are the different types of fish in the SF Estuary and why are they important?  How and where are fish surveyed in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary fish trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve the health of fish in the SF Estuary? Pelagic Fish The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, under the auspices of the Interagency Ecological Program, monitors open- water (pelagic) fishes in the Delta. The Fall Midwater Trawl Survey (FMWT) has sampled annually since its inception in 1967, with the exceptions of 1974 and The FMWT was initiated to determine the relative abundance and distribution of age-0 striped bass in the estuary, but the data have also been used for other upper estuary open-water species, including Delta smelt, longfin smelt, threadfin shad, American shad, and splittail. The FMWT abundance indices for Delta smelt, longfin smelt, age-0 striped bass, and threadfin shad are presented below. Abundance trends vary among these species; however, the abundance indices for all four species rapidly declined to record low levels around In 2005, the Interagency Ecological Program formed a Pelagic Organism Decline Management Team to evaluate the potential causes of the declines. More here. Native Non-Native

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Fish  Trends  more What are SF Estuary Fish Trends (part 2)? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Anadromous Fish Anadromous species of major interest in the SF Estuary include commercial, sport and regulated fish, such as Chinook salmon, steelhead, and sturgeon. Other non-native anadromous fish are present in the ecosystem, such as introduced striped bass and American shad, and have historically been important fisheries since their introductions in the late 1800s. Many of these native and non-native anadromous species populations abundance indices have declined precipitously in the latter part of the the 20 th century. Among the four runs of Chinook salmon spawning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system, all are classified as endangered, threatened, or species of concern. Estimated yearly natural production and in river escapement are presented below for fall-run, spring-run, and winter-run Chinook salmon (source: CDFW Grand Tab; Mills and Fisher [CDFW 1994]). More here. QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What are the different types of fish in the SF Estuary and why are they important?  How and where are fish surveyed in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary fish trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve the health of fish in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Living Resources  Fish  Trends  more  more What are SF Estuary Fish Trends (part 3)? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Bay Fish The State of the San Francisco Bay Report (2011) summarized fish indicators associated with the health of the San Francisco Bay and said the following: “Based on the Fish Index and its component indicators, the health of the San Francisco Bay has declined since the 1980s in all regions except Central Bay, near the Golden Gate. The decline is most severe in Suisun Bay, the upstream region of the Estuary heavily influenced by the amounts, timing and quality of freshwater inflows from the Bay’s Sacramento-San Joaquin watershed. Since 1993, when the CCMP (Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan) called for recovery of and reversing the declines of estuarine fish and wildlife species, none of the Bay fish communities in any part of the Bay have improved. Instead six native fish species that rely on the Bay have been listed under the federal and/or state Endangered Species Acts. Decades of scientific research have identified the causes for the declines: degraded open water and marsh habitats, impaired water quality, reduced food availability, and increasing prevalence of harmful non-native species” Graphs like p. 44 of SOTB QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What are the different types of fish in the SF Estuary and why are they important?  How and where are fish surveyed in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary fish trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve the health of fish in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Water How Can You Determine the Health of Water? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  Why are water quality and quantity important?  How and where are water quality and quantity measured in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary water trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve water in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Habitat How Can You Determine the Status of Habitat? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  Why are habitat location, type, quality, and quantity important?  How can habitat be measured in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary habitat trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve habitats in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  EcoProcesses How Can You Determine the Status of Ecological Processes? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  Why are ecological processes important?  What ecological processes are being measured in the SF Estuary?  How are SF Estuary ecological processes trending?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve ecological processes in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Health  Stewardship What Types of Stewardship Support a Healthy Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… QUESTIONS ANSWERED  Why are habitat location, type, quality, and quantity important?  How can habitat be measured in the SF Estuary?  What are SF Estuary habitat trends?  What are the issues of concern in the SF Estuary?  What is being done to improve habitats in the SF Estuary?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Laws Regulations & Standards What Laws, Regulations, and Standards Protect the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Laws regulations and policies that protect estuaries include those that are associated with freshwater (click to connect to Streams Rivers & Lakes portal [ surrounding land, including tidal wetlands, managed and seasonal wetlands, and riparian habitat (click to connect with Wetlands Portal: [ shtml]), coasts and oceans (click to connect with Oceans portal). shtml California’s estuaries, and the organisms that live in them, are protected by many federal and state laws, regulations, and policies designed to prevent further degradation and destruction. Regulations protect ecological services and benefits derived from estuaries as well as protecting special status fish, wildlife and plants and their habitats, vegetation communities, wetland extent, water quality, and beneficial uses. Each law and regulation has been put into place over many decades to address different resource and habitat protection needs, with responsibility for enforcement assigned the appropriate government agencies. Understanding the different laws and the agencies that enforce them is necessary for a complete picture of estuary protection in California and the United States. Water quality standards are an effective tool available to protect the overall health of estuaries in California and the functions they provide, including shoreline stabilization, nonpoint source runoff filtration, wildlife habitat, and erosion control, which directly benefit adjacent and downstream waters. Water quality standards, including designated uses, criteria, and anti- degradation policies can provide a sound legal basis for protecting estuarine resources through State water quality management programs. Other regulations protect wetlands within the estuaries from damage, filling, or destruction through planned construction activities. Several additional programs safeguard estuarine integrity, whether directly and indirectly, by preventing changes to important populations of plant and animal species and their habitats. In addition to enforcing regulations, the United States and California have set an overarching goal to prevent further decline of wetlands through a “no net loss” approach, a goal recommended by the National Wetlands Policy Forum in 1987 and adopted in Other mechanisms for wetland protection include acquiring land in high priority areas, integrating knowledge of wetland resources into land use planning, mitigating the effects of construction activities (wetland creation or restoration in one area to account for destruction in another area), and creating disincentives for conversion of wetlands to other land uses. For example, state transportation agencies, such as Caltrans, are required to be in compliance with regulations pertaining to wetlands and to implement the state and federal policies of "no net loss" of wetlands. As a result of these policies, disturbances or impacts to wetlands due to transportation projects are compensated through the creation, restoration, enhancement, and/or preservation of wetlands.Other mechanisms for wetland protection While government regulatory efforts are important, they cannot protect the majority of California’s remaining wetlands alone. Partnerships have developed among nonprofit organizations, private landowners, and federal, state, tribal, and local governments to manage whole watersheds (large land areas where water drains to a common point). The goal of these partnerships is to comprehensively protect all of the connected waterways in a given watershed, including wetlands. Education and volunteer wetland restoration efforts are also helping to speed wetland recovery and increase appreciation of wetland functions and values among the public. Click for information on San Francisco Estuary – specific laws regulations and policies QUESTIONS ANSWERED  What is an estuary?  Where are California’s estuaries?  How healthy is the SF Estuary?  What is being done to restore the SF Estuary?  How can I be part of the solution?

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Laws Regulations & Standards  Federal What Federal Laws, Regulations, and Standards Protect the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Federal Endangered Species Act Clean Water Act Clean Water Act, Section 404 Farm Bill Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 Coastal Zone Management Act Other Federal Agency Programs Executive Order 11990, "Protection of Wetlands" Executive Order 11988, "Floodplain Management" Click for information on San Francisco Estuary – specific laws regulations and policies QUICK LINKS Click here for more detailed information on these Federal Programs California State Laws, Regulations, and Policies to Protect Estuaries San Francisco Estuary – specific Laws, Regulations, and Policies

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Laws Regulations & Standards  Federal  More What Federal Laws, Regulations, and Standards Protect the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Endangered Species Act Federal Endangered Species ActFederal Endangered Species Act [link to The purpose of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), which was passed in 1974, is to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. It is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) [link to and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) [link to: Under the ESA, species may be listed as either endangered or threatened. “Endangered” means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. “Threatened” means a species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. All species of plants and animals, except pest insects, are eligible for listing as endangered or threatened. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species to include subspecies, varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments. The USFWS [link to has primary responsibility for enforcing the ESA in relation to protecting terrestrial and freshwater organisms. In California’s estuaries, federally listed endangered and threatened species include Delta smelt, salt marsh harvest mouse, giant garter snake, light-footed clapper rail, California least tern, Western snowy plover, salt marsh bird’s- beak, and California seablite. NMFS [link to a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has the primary Federal responsibility for the conservation, management, and development of living marine resources and for the protection of certain marine mammals and endangered species on all public and private lands, under numerous federal laws. NMFS is responsible for the protection of anadromous fish [link to definition] listed under the Endangered Species Act, including Chinook and coho salmon, steelhead trout, and green sturgeon species that use California’s estuaries [link to: Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law in the United States governing water pollution and regulating water quality standards for surface waters. The basis of the CWA was enacted in 1948 and was called the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, but the Act was significantly reorganized and expanded in "Clean Water Act" became the Act's common name with amendments in Two agencies have primary responsibility for enforcement of the Clean Water Act: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).Clean Water ActU.S. Army Corps of Engineers One of the primary civilian missions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is to manage the nation's waterways and wetlands. USACE activities include regulating activities in wetlands including issuing dredge and fill permits and authorizing the establishment of wetland areas. The Corps’ also builds and manages civil projects such as e, constructing projects approved by Congress for flood control, commercial navigation, or shipping channel maintenance; operating and maintaining flood control reservoirs and public reclamation facilities; and many other public works.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is responsible for implementing federal laws designed to protect air, water, and land. While this is done primarily through regulation, the USEPA has also developed a wide variety of funding, planning, and education programs. USEPA responsibilities which affect wetlands include, but are not limited to, developing rules to regulate municipal and industrial wastewater discharge, and stormwater discharge; overseeing drinking water quality; and overseeing USACE regulatory activities pertaining to wetlands protection, and dredge and fill activities.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act, Section 404 In 1972, Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) established a program to regulate the “discharge of dredged or fill material (such as soil or sediments) into water waters of the U.S.,” including wetlands. Dredged or fill materials can be almost any substance or pollutant that can adversely affect water quality or navigation. Section 404 permits are issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a range of activities such as construction, mining, and levee installation. Typically, the permit review process seeks to avoid or minimize impacts on aquatic ecosystems. If avoiding impacts is not possible, actions to offset the impacts by improvement or restoration of other sites (called “compensatory mitigation”) are needed.Section 404U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permits may be individual or general. General permits are given for up to 5 years for broad classes activities that are similar in nature and have minimal impacts. Activities that do not qualify for a general permit must be authorized individually through the Corps, requiring a public notice and comment period as well as specific environmental analyses. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) examines proposed individual permits during the public review period and can elevate projects for closer scrutiny if needed. Corps and USEPA regulators also partner to conduct enforcement activities if discharges of dredged or fill material violations occur.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 404 has evolved over the years, with the introduction of the latest Mitigation Rule which revised CWA Section 404(b)(1) which provides much detailed guidance on compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands.Section 404(b)(1) Farm Bill The farm bill is the primary agricultural and food policy tool of the federal government. This comprehensive “omnibus bill” is passed every 5 years or so by the United States Congress. It deals with both agriculture and all other affairs under the purview of the United States Department of Agriculture. The Farm Bill provides regulations and guidance for wetland management and protection on agricultural lands that are enrolled in Farm Bill programs. Farm Bill programs are administered primarily by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). (Wetlands on agricultural lands not enrolled in Farm Bill programs are regulated under the Clean Water Act section 404 just like any other wetlands).agricultural and food policy toolfederal governmentFarm Bill Farm Service Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service FSA directly administers programs such as the Conservation Reserve Program. NRCS makes wetlands determinations and delineations in agricultural lands for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and for Farm Bill purposes, but does not issue permits pertaining to wetlands. As part of the NRCS's Wetlands Protection Policy, landowners have the option of mitigating wetland impacts in order to continue receiving NRCS assistance. The NRCS has long provided technical assistance to those involved in land conservation and planning, and wetlands restoration and enhancement. The agency has assisted in wetlands restoration and enhancement through programs such as, the Water Bank Program, the Wetland Reserve Program, the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Small Watersheds Program (PL-566). The NRCS also provides substantial support and leadership for the Resource Conservation and Development Councils(RC&D), and local Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) which are often active in wetland, stream and watershed restoration. Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the oldest federal environmental law in the United States. Although many activities covered by the Rivers and Harbors Act are regulated under the Clean Water Act, the 1899 Act retains independent vitality. Section 10 of the River and Harbors Act prevents unauthorized obstruction or alteration of US waterways, including wetlands. As such, the Corps oversees and regulates any work activities (such as dredging, beach nourishment, and geotechnical surveys) or construction of structural features (such as piers, boat docks or ramps, wharfs, weirs, booms, breakwaters, bulkheads, and jetties) that would affect a wetland’s location, condition, or support capacities.U.S. Army Corps of EngineersUnited StatesSection 10 of the River and Harbors Act Coastal Zone Management Act The U.S. Congress recognized the importance of meeting the challenge of continued growth in the coastal zone by passing the Coastal Zone Management Act in The Act, administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, (OCRM) provides for management of the nation's coastal resources and balances economic development with environmental conservation. The CZMA outlines two national programs, the National Coastal Zone Management Program and the National Estuarine Research Reserve System. The coastal programs aim to balance competing land and water issues in the coastal zone, while estuarine reserves serve as field laboratories to provide a greater understanding of estuaries and how humans impact them. The overall program objectives of CZMA remain balanced to "preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, to restore or enhance the resources of the nation's coastal zone.“Coastal Zone Management ActNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationOffice of Ocean and Coastal Resource ManagementNational Coastal Zone Management ProgramNational Estuarine Research Reserve System Other Federal Agency Programs The USFWS is also involved in many responsibilities and services related to wetland protection and restoration: acquiring wetlands, fishery habitats, and other lands for restoration and preservation; managing National Wildlife Refuges; and reviewing and commenting on water resource projects. USFWS also manages many private-public partnerships for habitat conservation, notably through the Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program which supports thousands of wetland conservation sites nationwide. USFWS plays a key role as administrator of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, under which extensive wetland projects in California are managed through the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture and the Central Valley Habitat Joint Venture.National Wildlife RefugesPartners for Fish and Wildlife ProgramNorth American Waterfowl Management PlanSan Francisco Bay Joint VentureCentral Valley Habitat Joint Venture The National Park Service (NPS) has a multi-faceted program for protecting and managing wetland resources within the National Park System, which includes: protecting park wetlands from pollution; providing technical expertise and funding to parks for wetland inventory and restoration projects; providing up-to-date management techniques to preserve wetland functions and values; and protection or acquisition of water rights. Also, the NPS plays key roles in other local, state, and federal government wetlands-related programs including the Rivers and Trails Conservation Assistance Program, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Program, and the preparation of State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plans. The U.S.D.A. Forest Service and the Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management also play key roles in Wild and Scenic River management, and are responsible for wetland protection on federal lands.National Park ServiceRivers and Trails Conservation Assistance ProgramWild and Scenic Rivers Program Executive Order 11990, "Protection of Wetlands" In 1977, Executive Order was signed by President Carter to ensure protection and proper management of wetlands by federal agencies. It requires federal agencies to avoid undertaking or providing financial assistance for new construction projects located within wetlands unless no practical alternative is available.Executive Order Executive Order 11988, "Floodplain Management" Executive Order 11988Executive Order 11988, also issued in 1977 by President Carter, ensures federal agency activities reduce the risk of flood impacts and restore or preserve the natural beneficial values of floodplains. This guidance helps protect wetlands because they play an important role in buffering flood impacts and are often located in floodplains. Click for information on San Francisco Estuary – specific laws regulations and policies

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Research What Research is Being Performed in the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Many groups are conducting and funding original research in the San Francisco Estuary, including those listed below. Interagency Ecological Program San Francisco Estuary Institute State and Federal Contractors Water Agency SWAMP DSP - Fellows Ecosystem Restoration Program NSF NCEAS USGS (e.g., San Francisco National Estuarine Research Reserve System and San Francisco Bay Joint Venture PRBO Conservation Science – San Francisco Bay Program San Francisco Invasive Spartina Project University of California, Davis (many labs to link to) University of California, Berkeley Maggi Kelly lab - wetlands/Maggi Kelly lab - wetlands/

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  Monitoring What Monitoring Programs, Data Sources, & Reports are there for the SF Estuary? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Many groups are performing ecosystem monitoring in the San Francisco Estuary, including those listed below. The Central Valley Monitoring Directory is a good source of metadata for much of the monitoring being performed in the Central Valley. Interagency Ecological Program San Francisco Bay Regional Monitoring Program Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program USGS (e.g., DPR CDFW USFWS DWR salvage and Suisun BoR? San Francisco Bay Joint Venture PRBO Conservation Science – San Francisco Bay Program San Francisco Invasive Spartina Project

 Cal/EPA  Natural Resources Agency  About the California Water Quality Monitoring Council ESTUARIES  Stressors  Laws, Regulations & Standards  Research  Monitoring Programs, Data Sources & Reports  Restoration & Management Home Safe to Drink Safe to Swim Safe to Eat Fish Ecosystem HealthStressors & Processes Contact Us Home  Eco Health  Estuaries  References Where Did we Find the Information Used for the SF Estuary Assessments? …………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… For readers interested in more detail, you can find more from the links below. (summaries and plans-link to EPA’s page specifically for document repository) Delta Delta Historical Ecology The State of Delta Science PPIC Reports ERP Conservation Strategy Delta Plan Delta Vision Foundation EPA’s SF Delta watershed map – Erin check for other WS docs Delta Atlas Delta Science Plan Pulse of the Delta Suisun Marsh Plan Creating an Adaptive Management Decision-Making Framework to Address Uncertainties in Delta Habitat Restoration: Tidal Marsh Productivity Exports, Aquatic Food Webs, and Delta Smelt (move to PMs page) POD Report San Francisco Bay SFEP CCAMP Check-ups CCMP NEP (Erin) Nat’l Est Coastal Conditions Report State of The Bay Report State of the Birds Report Pulse of the Estuary State of the Estuary Report SF Habitat Goals Project References used on this Estuaries website [APHA] American Public Health Association, American Waterworks, and Water Environmental Federation Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th edition. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association. Gannon, J. E. and R. S. Stemberger Zooplankton (especially crustaceans and rotifers) as indicators of water quality. Trans. Amer. Microsc. 97:16. Glibert, P.M Long-term changes in nutrient loading and stoichiometry and their relationships with changes in the food web and dominant pelagic fish species in the San Francisco Estuary, California. Reviews in Fisheries Science 18: 211– 232. Horne, A. and Goldman, C Limnology. 2nd edition. New York, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc. Lehman, P.W Changes in chlorophyll a concentration and phytoplankton community composition with water-year type in the upper San Francisco Estuary. In San Francisco Bay: The ecosystem, ed. J.T. Hollibaugh, 351–374. San Francisco: AAAS. Lehman, P.W The influence of climate on phytoplankton community biomass in San Francisco Bay Estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 45(3): Kimmerer, W.J., A.E. Parker, U.E. Lidstrom, and E.J. Carpenter Short-term and interannual variability in primary production in the low salinity zone of the San Francisco Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 35: Müller-Solger, A.B., A.D. Jassby, and D.C. Müller-Navarra Nutritional quality of food resources for zooplankton (Daphnia) in a tidal freshwater system (Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta). Limnology and Oceanography 47(5): Utermöhl, H Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton Methodik. Mitt. Int. Verh. Limnol. 9: 38. van den Hoek, C., D.G. Mann, and H.M. Jahns Algae: an introduction to Phycology. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Water Quality Conditions in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun and San Pablo Bays during Chapter 4 Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll a.