Peter A. Morse Physical Science Department December 10 th, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Performance Management
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Important Points The SWF stands for Standard Workload Form. Workload is covered by Article 11 in the collective agreement. Your SWF is your personal contract.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Peninsula School District
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Implementing post-290 EVALUATION: Remediating Inadequate Performance of Teachers 1 The Hungerford Law Firm April 13, 2015.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Evaluation: Implications for your Professional Future Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: PROCEDURES AND POLICIES 17 October 2014.
O UR S CHOOLS E VALUATION P ROCESS Brad, Chad, Holly, Katie, Lily, and Pat.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Chairperson’s Evaluation of Faculty Training Session April 11, 2006 (The YSU/YSU-OEA Agreement is the definitive source on the chairperson’s evaluation.
Post-Tenure Review.  Section 7a of the Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure  Rules and Procedures for Annual and Special Post-Tenure Review.
College of Education Graduate Programs
LECTURER’S EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION (LEO) REVIEW PROCESS.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, HAYWARD Academic Affairs MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1995 T0: Department Chairs FROM: Frank Martino Provost & Vice President,
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
UACT and CVUSD Certificated Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures For The School Year.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
Lecturer’s employee organization (leo)
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
RTP For new faculty A brief introduction.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
SP / SP 17-xx UNIVERSITY RETENTION, TENURE, & PROMOTION POLICY
The Departmental Performance Review Committee
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
UNIVERSITY RETENTION, TENURE, & PROMOTION POLICY
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Presentation transcript:

Peter A. Morse Physical Science Department December 10 th, 2009

iClicker Practice What’s your favorite number below? a) 1 b) 2 c) 6 d) 7 e) 8

iClicker Practice What’s your favorite letter below? a) A b) B c) C d) D e) F

How many semesters have you taught at SMC? a) This is my 1 st semester b) This is my 2 nd semester c) 3 to 6 semesters d) 7 to 10 semesters e) 11 or more semesters…

When I drop my keys and this pen, which will hit the table first? a) Keys hit first b) Pen hits first c) Pen and keys hit at the same time d) It’s impossible to predict which hits first

When I drop a book and a piece of paper, which will hit the table first? a) Book hits first b) Paper hits first c) Book and paper hit at the same time d) It’s impossible to predict which hits first

We’re here to teach!! We want our students to learn We want to get better as teachers Can evaluations help?

What’s your experience with evaluations here at SMC? For instance… Do they help you focus on your teaching? Do you get positive feedback? Do you get constructive criticism? Are the evaluations consistent? How could they improve for you? Other thoughts…

AR-3232:Evaluation Procedure for Evaluation of Part-Time Faculty “The purpose of faculty evaluation is the improvement of professional performance and the fostering of professional growth. The aim of the following processes is to aid faculty members to locate areas of performance which might be improved and develop plans to accomplish the desired improvements.” Administrative Reg 3232, p70p70

Evaluation Facts Part-time faculty will be evaluated during their first semester at SMC. Subsequently, you will be evaluated every four semesters by your department and your students. Student evaluations are not placed in your personnel file unless you request it.

SMC Faculty Contract: Article 7: Evaluation 7.4 Techniques of evaluation may include observation, peer review, self appraisal, and student appraisal, except that peer review must be used as a component of tenured, probationary and part-time faculty evaluation. Peer review is defined as input to the evaluation process by an academic member of the faculty.

SMC Faculty Contract: Article 7: Evaluation  7.5 Each evaluator shall be encouraged to make formal recognition of areas of exemplary performance on the part of the faculty member being evaluated in the written evaluation. Should the evaluator note specific deficiencies in the evaluation, reasonable assistance shall be provided the faculty member being evaluated in developing a plan to correct the deficiencies.

SMC Faculty Contract: Article 7: Evaluation 7.6 Upon completion of the written evaluation and prior to the time such evaluation is placed in the file of the faculty member being evaluated, the faculty member shall be provided an opportunity to meet with each evaluator and discuss the evaluation.

SMC Faculty Contract: Article 7: Evaluation The faculty member being evaluated shall be provided a copy of the written evaluation prior to the meeting Each evaluator and the faculty member being evaluated shall sign the final evaluation as an indication that the meeting took place.

SMC Faculty Contract: Article 7: Evaluation The faculty member being evaluated shall be provided up to ten (10) days to prepare a written response to the evaluation. Such response shall be attached to the personnel file copy of the evaluation. Article 7 – Contract

SMC Faculty Evaluation Form As presented in the Faculty Contract…herehere

Associate Faculty Status As described in Article 6.6 of the contract…herehere

Conclusion The evaluation process is supposed to help us become better teachers.

When I let a hoop and a disk roll down a ramp, which will reach the end first? a) Hoop reaches the end first b) Disk reaches the end first c) Hoop & Disk reach the end at the same time d) It’s impossible to predict which is first