MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 17. Sept. 2007ILC IRENG07; SLAC1 LDC Engineering Design (Status)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Advertisements

Replies by N.Meyners (in green) 27 August 2007ILC Questions M. Breidenbach1 ILC Detector Strategy Questions Some of us have been wondering about the fundamental.
Assembly Hall in Hybrid-A’ and ILD 2014/9/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Global Design Effort Goals and Introduction Andrei Seryi, SLAC, September 17, 2007.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Global Design Effort Detector concept Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Kurt Krempetz September 17, 2007.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
Tracking Integration Challenges Y. meeting 2013/9/25.
1 GLD Surface Assembly Y. Sugimoto KEK
1 ILD/CMS Engineering Meeting M. Joré – ILD integration philosophy Integration philosophy of ILD Matthieu Joré – January 21st Integration of the subdetectors.
SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
ILC / ILD TPC Requirements of the support mechanics Volker Prahl ILD Workshop 2013 Cracow
111 ILD LOI Part-II: Detector Y. Sugimoto KEK for ILD concept group.
October 13, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 International Linear Collider Machine Detector Interface Materials for discussion at Engineering Forum: experiences.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Beam Commissioning Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Engineering Issues.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly 1 Norbert Meyners, MEA Engineering Forum at CERN 12.Okt Thoughts about LDC Hall and Assembly (Work is not finished.
1 GLD and GLDc Sep. 12, 2007 Y. Sugimoto KEK. 2 Compact GLD Option Motivation –GLD and LDC will write a common LoI –The detector design should have common.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.
Detector design optimization for push-pull IR and for surface assembly and corresponding IR requirements Tom Markiewicz/SLAC SLAC BDS Kick-Off-Meeting.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, Ravi Anumagalla.
Global Design Effort Critical Interaction Region Issues, Report from the IR engineering workshop Andrei Seryi, SLAC October 24, 2007.
18/11/04DELPHI visits, PhC1 Visits to DELPHI/LHCb Ph.Charpentier.
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Integration with LDC & Push-pull impact on LumiCal Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow, Poland FCAL Workshop, LAL Orsay,
SiD IR & MDI Status & Comments Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ALCPG, Fermilab 26 October 2007.
1 ILD meeting LAL M. Joré – Integration status Matthieu Joré – 25 th of May ILD integration status and open issues.
SiD Engineering and Solenoid Kurt Krempetz (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
Global Design Effort Working Group C Conventional Facilities Parallel Session IRENG07 V. Kuchler, A. Enomoto, J. Osborne September 19, 2007.
GLD experimental hall and detector assembly Y.Sugimoto KEK 27 Sep
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
September 20, 2007H. J. Krebs/B. Wands/B. Cooper1 SiD Collaboration Preliminary End Door Design Concept Support of Forward Systems H. James Krebs Bob Wands.
ILD and SiD in Japanese site (from discussions in SiD/ILD E/D Interface Working Meeting) Yasuhiro Sugimoto, Marco Oriunno 2011/12/15 SiD
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site 2011/11/30 Yasuhiro CFS Webex meeting 1.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
1 ILD inner region integration meeting M. Joré – Introduction ILD inner region integration meeting Welcome words Charge of the meeting The current concept.
MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 12. July 2007ILC IRENG07 WG-A1 LDC Engineering Design (Status) Introduction General Design Detector.
August 2007Andrea Gaddi, CERN Physics Dept. Detectors Infrastructures & Services Baseline to design detectors infrastructures. Tentative arrangement of.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.
Octobre LAL Orsay Report from the IRENG07 workshop at SLAC W. Lohmann, DESY from Septembre 17 – 21, ~ 100 participants - plenary and parallel sessions.
Comments on Services Elba Comments on Services & … Bill Wisniewski SLAC.
What’s new at LAL-LLR ( MDI issues) M.Jore, C.Clerc Visit at CMS Forward detectors meeting at LLR Vacuum in Beam pipe, first LAL results.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
Detector Utility/Service Cavern
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
Part II: Integrated Design of Infrastructures
Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site
Detector Service Cavern for ILC
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
Detector hall in mountain regions
Requirements of the support mechanics
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
ILD-0 overall dimensions C.Clerc ILD meeting, Seoul 17/02/09
Detector hall in mountain regions
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Presentation transcript:

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 17. Sept. 2007ILC IRENG07; SLAC1 LDC Engineering Design (Status)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 2 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Base The LDC concept is evolved from the TESLA detector concept. Picture from “Mechanical Concept of the TESLA Detector” (LC-DET )

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 3 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Now (Work in Progress) H. Videau, C. Clerc, M. Anduze, LLR; M. Jore, LAL; K. Sinram, N.Meyners, DESY; work on the Engineering Model (all part time)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 4 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept General Design 12m 12.4m Weight ~7700t 2m Iron Field = 4T L*=4.3m 6m

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 5 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept General Design (cont’d) 12m 12.4m BeamCalLHCalLumiCal VTX SIT Weight ~7700t 2m Iron Field = 4T L*=4.3m FCH FTD SET(?) 6m

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 6 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept General Design (Forwards Region) LumiCal smaller! Intermediate ECAL closes gap between ECAL and LumiCAL Tungsten Shielding (>6cm; Between LHCAL and BeamCAL; Gap at the BeamCAL to filled) Support Structure for QD0, BeamCAL, LHCAL, LumiCAL, Central Beam Pipe 14mrad solution (Top view)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 7 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Goal: Vertex Detector Maintenance without breaking the vacuum i.e. warming up QD0

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 8 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Detector Opening (Beam Position) Need 2.5-3m to access the detector (Top view) Support Structure Support Service Cryostat Supply Line close to QF1

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 9 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Detector Opening (Vertex Detector Maintenance) 2.5m detector opening would just allow to maintain the vertex detector in the garage position without breaking the vacuum. (Pumping the central beam pipe is assumed to be very time consuming.) (Side view)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 10 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Support Structure Supports >2.5m First Idea Pillar Spokes Guidance

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 11 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Surface Assembly a la CMS Clear preference! We split the barrel yoke in three rings and do it like CMS. The shaft dimension are at the moment to small! Need ~20m diameter!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 12 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Surface Assembly a la CMS 2*982,5t 1059t 1666t 1059t 2*982,5t If not split the end cap pieces would be the heaviest part to be lowered!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 13 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept End Cap Yoke split or not Under Study! The structure of the detector should allow both. Factor 2 more bending if split! At the moment we prefer end cap halves bolted together with the possibility to open in an major operation if necessary!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 14 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Detector Opening (End Cap Yoke NOT split)  If not split, the end cap yoke has to be moved 8,5m longitudinal (or aside) for TPC exchange!  QD0 and service cryostat have to go with the end cap yoke while the Helium supply line is not cut!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 15 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept QD0 Supply, “Umbilical” The supply lines from the service cryostat to the QD0s go from the bottom through the shielding. The cryostats are connected via flexible lines to Helium supply. To allow a further opening the service cryostat and the QD0 can be attached to the yoke end cap.

You may remember my July talk (page 14)  The huge height of the cavern is due to the 400t crane!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 17 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Herve’s suggestion has ~15% less volume!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 18 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept … and would allow TPC exchange …

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 19 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept … or muon chamber maintained. We do not plan to have racks on the detector!

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 20 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Underground Cavern Size Recommend ~30m floor width with inclined walls (arc~36m). Length: 120m Height: 30m Beam height (8.6m) is just sufficient. Shaft diameter: >20m Two 80t cranes to allow bigger shielding blocks (2 x 40t enough for LDC) ~19 hook height Floor prepared for air pad use

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 21 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Underground Cavern Size (contd.) A wider floor would allow a simple shielding solution (Top View)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 22 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Platform Detector should be as ridged as a platform It has to carry the QDO support and the service cryostat!  20m wide (Instead of 15.5m) Charming! It disentangles the transverse and longitudinal movement Good solution for cables and supply lines

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 23 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Locations Trailer (going with the detector; water cooled, air conditioned) All electronics All subdetector power supplies (We do not plan to have racks on the detector!) On/at the Detector Dump Resistors LHe Dewar At Surface Control Room Open PC Farm In the Service Cavern Solenoid Power Supply Cooling Systems (Water, etc.) Helium Supply Gas Supply Mains Supply (Transformer etc.) = Services Detector/Trailer  Cavern (No guesses at this stage!)

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 24 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Services Detector  Trailer Prelimary Numbers: AHcal : tile+SS, Cooling :Heat flows each end of gap Power :Per channel : P=40µW, then for 5,8Mch = 232 W with 25µW from ASIC (power pulsing) + 15µW from HV (50V*0.3µA)) FE : FPGA; Layer concentrator ( 1/4FPGA) = 2578; 1 data concentrator per module (  70) and 2 cables par LDA, 1 optical fiber  So full Hcal : 150 cables + 75 optical fiber + cooling Ecal : 80Mchannels with 25 µW per channel (power pulsing): 2kW, Cooling :Heat flows each end alveolas 1 data concentrator per 30 alveolas : then 2 exit cables per concentrator : barrel: 560 cables, 280 optical fiber + cooling endcaps : 218 cables, 109 optical fiber + cooling This numbers are a lower limit. If the sensor size changes it could double and it scales with size which may increase. From C.Clerc

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 25 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Services Detector  Trailer (cont’d) Prelimary Numbers: No data for inner and forward detectors! TPC : 200W per end plate; Air cooled! No decision about electronics yet; 1.guess: optical fibers per end plate Gas supply HV supply (1 big cable) Alignment laser kW racks (trailer) From R.Settles LumiCAL: 2 x 20W, water cooled >100cm² cable & cooling From W.Wirba

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 26 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Safety As described in the interface document: Non-flammable gas Halogen-free cables/materials Very early fire detection Fire extinguishing systems Low oxygen inside detector Short escape routes Second exit possibility

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 27 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Ventilation: Temperatures/Humidity That normal human being can work! That humidity does not condense! What can be provided? CMS standard? What about smoke removal?

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 28 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Assumptions Surface Assembly: in pure CMS style Surface Assembly Hall: 100m x 30m; Crane 2x80t, hook: 19m(h) Moving: Air Pads Main Solenoid Charge/Discharge: ~>4 hours Push/Pull Scenario: ~30 days running or maintenance 3-4 days detector exchange Push/Pull accuracy : 1mm Vertex Detector maintenance: Once a year Vertex Detector/ Beam Pipe Exchange: Very likely! TPC Exchange: Very unlikely! Vacuum: Flange and ion pump behind the LumiCAL Small Vacuum Pump: Necessary; Ion pump, No Vibration!

Personal Comment (NM) Interface Document: It is quiet good already! “Calibration of detector. After routine push pull operation or other routine switch of the magnetic field is performed with data tracks, at nominal or other energy. This operation is the detector collaboration choice and responsibility and its time is not counted as push-pull operation.” Ähh!! NO, NO, NO! Push/Pull lasts is from end of data taking to start of data taking! What is this good for? Machine against detector? Let push/pull look better?

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 30 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Assumptions (cont’d) Minimum L* 4.3m QD0 Supply: * Has to allow >2.5m opening of the End Cap * Permanent supply from Service Cryostat, * flexible line to Service Cryostat QD0 Support LumiCal Support By a support structure Central Beam Pipe Support (incl. Detectors) Support of With spokes between TPC and ECAL Support Structure Pillar close to QF1 and guided in the end cap! Long. Position BeamCAL Variable; constrained by Pump, Flanges etc. Background Shielding From LumiCal to BeamCal, Prelimarymin. 6cm thick, attached to the HCAL

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 31 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Open Points Under Study End Cap Yoke split Not mandatory, if 2.5-3m opening is possible! Platform Charming Anti-Solenoid Machine Item (and Cost) Anti-DID Interesting option Magnetic HCAL end cap Really necessary (TPC field quality)? …

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 32 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Conclusion Engineering Design is continuing Some Questions have been answered Good information about FD magnets and cryo supply (Dimensions, positions etc.) Still several open questions (internal, external and mixed; GLD/LDC merge) Question about ‘door splitting’ or ‘to use a platform’ are under study. Need further information, discussion and engineering

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 33 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept End Thank you for your attention

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 34 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Additional Material

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 35 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Half End Cap From C.Clerc, LLR

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 36 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept Central Barrel From C.Clerc

MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 37 ILC IRENG07; SLAC 17. Sept LumiCAL & LHCAL From H.Videau