English II Honors—September 28, 2015 Daily Warm-up: What are some issues of injustice that you’ve encountered in your life or have seen others encounter? Explain. Homework: – Cultural Narrative due tonight at 11:59. – Study for Lessons 13 and 14 Vocabulary Quiz on Friday. – Reading Plus due Sunday at 11:59.

English II Honors Lesson 13 Vocabulary Beguile- v.- charm or enchant (someone), sometimes in a deceptive way. Demure- adj.- (of a woman or her behavior) reserved, modest, and shy. Equanimity- n.- mental calmness, composure, and evenness of temper, especially in a difficult situation. Fortitude-n.- courage in pain or adversity. Hidebound- adj.- unwilling or unable to change because of tradition or convention.

English II Honors—Lesson 13 Vocabulary Laud- v.- praise (a person or their achievements) highly, especially in a public context. Obscurity- n.- the state of being unknown, inconspicuous, or unimportant. Resilient- adj.- (of a substance or object) able to recoil or spring back into shape after bending, stretching, or being compressed. Sagacious- adj.- having or showing keen mental discernment and good judgment; shrewd. Tumult- n.- a loud, confused noise, especially one caused by a large mass of people.

English II Honors Lesson 14 Vocabulary Abhor- v.- Regard with hatred and disgust. Candor- n.- The quality of being open and honest in expression; frankness. Dauntless- adj.- showing fearlessness and determination. Insinuation- n.- an unpleasant hint or suggestion of something bad.

English II Honors—Lesson 14 Vocabulary Pall- n.- a cloth spread over a coffin, hearse, or tomb. Patronize- v.- treat with apparent kindness that betrays a feeling of superiority. Suppress- v.- forcibly put an end to. Tentative- adj.- not certain or fixed; provisional. Tribulation- n.- a cause of great trouble or suffering. Volatile- adj.- (of a substance) easily evaporated at normal temperatures.

Unit 2 Embedded Assessment 2— Creating an Argument Your assignment is to develop an argument about an issue that resonates across cultures. You will choose a position, target audience, and effective genre to convey your argument to a wide audience. Skills and Knowledge – Develop an argument about an issue that resonates across cultures. – Research to support a claim. – Create an organization that shows a clear relationship among claim, counterclaim, reasons, and evidence. – Include transitional words, phrases, and clauses to clarify and connect ideas. – Establish and maintain a formal style.

Rubric—Exemplary Scoring Criteria Exemplary IdeasThe argument skillfully presents a claim and provides background and a clear explanation of the issue; synthesizes evidence from a variety of sources that strongly support the claim; summarizes and refutes counterclaims with relevant reasoning and clear evidence; concludes by clearly summarizing the main points and reinforcing the claim StructureThe argument follows a logical progression of ideas that establish relationships between the essential elements of hook, claim, evidence, counterclaims, and conclusion; links main points with effective transitions that establish coherence Language Use The argument uses a formal style and tone appropriate to the audience and purpose; smoothly integrates textual evidence from multiple sources, with correct citations; shows excellent command of standard English capitalization, punctuation, spelling, grammar, and usage.

Building Blocks of an Effective Argument Introduction and Claim: an opening that grabs the reader’s attention (hook) while informing the reader of the claim, which is a clear straightforward statement of the writer’s belief about the topic of the argument. Supporting Paragraphs: the reasons offered in support of a claim, supported by different types of evidence. Concession and/or Refutation: restatements of valid counterclaims made by the opposing side (concessions) or the writer’s arguments against those opposing viewpoints (refutations), explaining why the writer’s position is more valid. Conclusion/Call to Action: closing statements restating the major arguments in defense of a thesis (the claim) with a final challenge to the reader to take action.

3 Major Purposes for an Argument: ❖ To change a reader’s or listener’s point of view ❖ To ask the reader or listener to take action ❖ To gain acceptance for the writer’s ideas about a problem or issue

Rhetorical Triangle When crafting an ARGUMENT, writers must strike a balance between the three rhetorical appeals. To sway readers, writers must: 1.Present a logical argument 2.Establish their own credibility. 3.Show readers why they should care about the issue or concept The rhetorical appeals help writers accomplish these goals. Logos Offers debatable thesis statement Presents logical organization Provides detail and development Establishes evidence and support Pathos Appeals to shared values of audience Draws on strong imagery to appeal to emotions Avoids manipulative use of emotional references Ethos Establishes credibility through logical and reasonable support, evidence, and research Presents and fairly refutes at least one opposing argument Maintains a reasonable tone Incorporates credible and reliable scholarly sources Indicates where source information begins and ends in the text Avoids inflammatory language and logical fallacies Pathos: Audience—What values, beliefs, and emotions are appealed to within the text? How does the text evoke the audience’s feelings? Ethos: Speaker—What perception of the speaker is created within the text? How does the text evoke the audience’s trust? Logos: Text—What information, evidence, and logical reasoning are offered within the text?

Types of Evidence Facts & Statistics - Numbers from surveys, studies, or observation, as well as pieces of commonly accepted information Analogy – Comparison between two things to support conclusions about one based on similarities to another Personal Experience/Anecdote - True story that describes a person’s experience relative to the topic Illustrative Example - Description of a specific example to support the validity of a generalization Expert/Personal Testimony - Use of a person’s words to support a claim, whether the person is like the audience or an expert Hypothetical Case - Use of a possible scenario to challenge the audience to consider the claim

Types of Evidence—Examples Analogy—My neighbor's house and my house are both ranch homes with two bathrooms. They probably both use copper plumbing. Facts and Statistics—Over 75% of the murder victims in cases resulting in an execution were white, even though nationally only 50% of murder victims generally are white. Hypothetical Case—What if a prisoner who was wrongly accused was put on death row? Illustrative Example—To thwack a child over the head because he does not get his lesson is about as wise as it would be to rap a watch with a hammer because it does not keep good time. Personal Experience/Anecdote—When I dropped out of college, it wasn’t the popular decision. Many criticized me saying that I, “gave up on what could have changed my life.” Today, I make 150,000 a year and I never have to answer to anyone but myself. Expert/Personal Testimony—Dr. John Smith believes that Crest toothpaste is better at fighting cavities than Colgate.

Arguing for Justice An argument usually focuses on a topic of interest to many people. The topic may be one with many different sides, or it may be one with two sides: for and against. In this last part of the unit, you will explore issues of justice as an example of a topic on which people take definite positions. Societies create systems of justice to maintain order by establishing rules and laws that reasonable people understand and abide by. Even in well-organized systems, though, there are differences of opinion about what is just, what is fair, and what is right. Instances of injustice often provoke strong emotional reactions that give rise to conflicts. Examining important social issues relating to justice demands that you examine multiple perspectives and evaluate arguments for all sides of an issue.

Think about the following terms and write associations you have with them. TermWhat words come to mind when you see or hear these terms? What has influenced your opinion of these terms? justice, justice system laws, rules, codes, constitution judge, jury, lawyers, witnesses prosecutor, defendant, victim ethics, morality punishment, rehabilitation

Issues of Injustice—The Death Penalty As you watch take notes on: – The claim – Support for the claim—he will state three reasons – Evidence to support the claim and types of evidence – Any counterclaims and whether he refutes them or concedes to the counterclaim – Call to action Who do you think is the target audience for this piece? What evidence suggests it is for this audience?