Gabcikovo/Nagymaros conflict The Danube basin Gabcikovo/Nagymaros conflict

Some characteristics of the basin Length : 1 770 mi (2 850 km) Basin area : more than 312 000 sq mi (800 000 sq km) Flow at the mouth : 6 500 m3/s Main tributaries : Inn, Drave, Tisza, Save, Morava, Prout Main human constructions : Gabcikovo dam. It had very serious ecological consequences in Hungary. The Danube is linked to the Rhine by the "Europa-Kanal" and to the Oder by the" Danube-Oder Canal". The "Main-Danube" enables the communication between the Black Sea and the North Sea. 69 hydroelectric dams

Main problems in the danube basin Heigh level of pollution especially in the delta => the ecosystem is in danger. Heigh freqency of floods: the last one was last year and was the 100 year flood (march 2002:damage estimated at tens of billions of euros). To many dams built due to the communist ideology which was to control mother nature.

Main problems relative to the danube basin Heigh level of pollution especially in the delta => the ecosystem is in danger. Heigh freqency of floods: the last one was last year and was the 500 year flood (march 2002:damage estimated at tens of billions of euros). To many dams built due to the communist ideology which was to control mother nature.

Weight of history Crimean war (treaty of Paris in 1856): creation of a european commission to control the Danube delta. World war one (treaty of Versailles 1919):the european commission is confirmed. World war two:Nazi germany, communist bloc (created their own commission). River of coorperation: - Establishment of the Environmental Program for the Danube River Basin in 1992.

Weight of history - Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable Use of the Danube River Basin (DRPC), which was signed in June 1994 by the 11 countries bordering the river and the European Union. - Strategic Action Plan (SAP) developed and signed in 1994.

Gabcikovo/Nagymaros conflict 1976, the two countries signed the Joint Agreed Plan. Enormous political pressure from environmentalists, they stopped working on the Nagymoros dam on July 20, 1989. Czechoslovak Party gave notice to a new provisional solution on August 31, 1993 -- to divert the Danube on Czechoslovak territory to correct the environmental damage that would occur.

Gabcikovo/Nagymaros conflict The diversion of the Danube River onto Slovak territory will change the international   boundary between the two countries. Affect Hungarian trade flows because duties may be charged by Slovakia to cross their territory on the New Danube River. Environmental impact of diverting the river is immense. Water supplies to some ethnic Hungarian Danube villages will be cut off, while others would be flooded. In 1992 a European Commission is set up. Publication by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) of a study warning about the environmental damages caused by the dam. On October 29, 1992 both sides agreed to allow the International Court of Justice to rule on this matter (The court has concluded that both parties committed internationally wrongful acts)

Questions When we look at the Gabcikovo/Nagymaros case, what factors affect the reaching of an agreement during the building of a dam? How would you explain the failure of the agreement between Hungary and Czechoslovakia? Do you think that the era of big dams is over because it is not environmentally compatible? The number of members of the European Union has increased recently with the admission of Hungary and Czech Republic. Do you think it will improve the situation or make it more complicated? The G.N.O (WWF, UNECO etc…) seem to have the power to decide whether a project will succeed or not: they can paralyze a project in the name of the environment… what role should they play? Does the international community have the right to protect the natural treasures of the planet against irresponsible national governments?