Figure S3 - Comparative maps of several solanaceous species and the deduced genome arrangement of MRCAs (close-up of Figure 4). Designation of chromosome.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Mushroom tomato pepper cucumber potato cabbage onion carrot peas lettuce egg-plant CHOOSE Play Time!

Advertisements

Additional figure 1: Immunogold labelling displaying localisation of TaASY1 prior to SC formation. The labelling is specific to the dense grey regions.

Slide 1Fig. 10.1, p.293. Slide 2Fig. 10.1a, p.293.

Slide 1Fig. 5.1, p.113. Slide 2Fig. 5.1a, p.113 Slide 3Fig. 5.1b, p.113.

High-Resolution Fine Mapping and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Analysis of sun, a Locus Controlling Tomato Fruit Shape, Reveals a Region of the Tomato.

Chapter 6 Differential Analysis of Fluid Flow. 06_01.

Genome Rearrangements CSCI : Computational Genomics Debra Goldberg

P Fig. 6-1, p. 193 Fig. 6-2, p. 193 Fig. 6-3, p. 195.

Solutions to Lecture Examples Directions and Traverse.

C2_At1g C2_At1g C2_At3g C2_At2g C2_At3g Chr. 2 cM C2_At1g C2_At4g C2_At3g

What is comparative genomics? Analyzing & comparing genetic material from different species to study evolution, gene function, and inherited disease Understand.

Slide 1Fig 28-CO, p.858. Slide 2Fig 28-1, p.859 Slide 3Fig Q28-19, p.884.

Hypothetical Trans-sialidase RHS MASP TcMUC DGF-1 GP63 Other genes Supplementary Figure 2: Normalized RDC of each position on the 41 CL Brener chromosomes.

HeterochromatinEuchromatin Relative chromosome length Relative bivalent diameter X 1.23 X 1.00 Relative area Relative optical density.

EPS109 Final Project Professor Burkhard By: Sol Kim.

Brückner et al., Fig. 1b Brückner et al., Fig. 1B a c b 6 Fig. 1. Circular representation of Streptococcus pneumoniae genome comparisons.

Additional file 1: Summary of E-painting results for human chromosomes The human chromosome coordinates of the breakpoint intervals are given to.

US Contribution to the International Tomato Genome Sequencing Effort Current structure of contributions Ongoing activity summary Funding issues.

Find Segment Lengths in Circles Lesson Definition When two chords intersect in the interior of a circle, each chord is divided into two segments.

Comparative maps of potato, eggplant, pepper and Nicotiana with respect to the tomato genome Silvana Grandillo CNR-IGV, Portici (Naples), Italy March 4,

Question 1 Q. Four cards are drawn from a pack of 52 cards. Find the probability of, 1. They are King, Queen, Jack, & Ace 2. First is King, then Queen,

1A 1B 1D Supplementary figure 1. A DArT-based genetic map of wheat

Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2003)

Figure S1 - Molecular dating of divergence time for several solanaceous species The previously published dataset [2] were used to reconstruct the maximum-likelihood.

Mid-point Theorem and Intercept Theorem

Frequency of Nonallelic Homologous Recombination Is Correlated with Length of Homology: Evidence that Ectopic Synapsis Precedes Ectopic Crossing-Over

Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)

Evolving Resistance: Research Goals and Goods

CHROMOSOME CONNECTION

Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)

Figure: 6.1 Title: Cross of Dwarf and Tall Tobacco Plants Caption:

Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)

Mattew Mazowita, Lani Haque, and David Sankoff

Der(22) Syndrome and Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome/DiGeorge Syndrome Share a 1.5- Mb Region of Overlap on Chromosome 22q11 B. Funke, L. Edelmann, N. McCain,

2481, , 2022, 2023, , , , , 2399, 2400,

Potato Genome Project Structural Genomics 2.Functional Genomics

Michael Cullen, Stephen P

Model of segmental duplication Acceptor regions of the genome acquire segments of genomic material that range from 1–200 kb from disparate regions.

A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture

Blackout Poetry Step 1: Skim, DO NOT READ, the page for words you find interesting (anchor words) and circle them with a pencil. Step 2: After circling.

A Combined Linkage-Physical Map of the Human Genome

Molecular Characterization and Gene Content of Breakpoint Boundaries in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with 17q11.2 Microdeletions Dieter E.

Genomic rearrangements of E

A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture

Enriched gene functions responding to irradiance and pO2.

Recurrent 10q22-q23 Deletions: A Genomic Disorder on 10q Associated with Cognitive and Behavioral Abnormalities Jorune Balciuniene, Ningping Feng, Kelly.

Renata C. Gallagher, Birgit Pils, Mohammed Albalwi, Uta Francke

Cereal Genome Evolution: Grasses, line up and form a circle

High-Resolution Molecular Characterization of 15q11-q13 Rearrangements by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) with Detection of Gene Dosage

Molecular and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Characterization of the Breakpoints in 46 Large Supernumerary Marker 15 Chromosomes Reveals an Unexpected.

A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.

Describing Sequencing Results of Structural Chromosome Rearrangements with a Suggested Next-Generation Cytogenetic Nomenclature Zehra Ordulu, Kristen E.

6.6 Finding Segment Lengths.

ADAGE weights reflect a gene’s common regulatory and process features.

Phenotype of S-Cp1-1 and mapping of the Cp1 locus.

Complete Haplotype Sequence of the Human Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Variable, Diversity, and Joining Genes and Characterization of Allelic and Copy-Number.

MetaPhase clustering results on the M-Y draft metagenome assembly.

Coupling of V(D)J Recombination to the Cell Cycle Suppresses Genomic Instability and Lymphoid Tumorigenesis Li Zhang, Taylor L. Reynolds, Xiaochuan Shan,

Segment Lengths in Circles

Tightly Clustered 11q23 and 22q11 Breakpoints Permit PCR-Based Detection of the Recurrent Constitutional t(11;22) Hiroki Kurahashi, Tamim H. Shaikh,

Identifying Novel Genes for Atherosclerosis through Mouse-Human Comparative Genetics Xiaosong Wang, Naoki Ishimori, Ron Korstanje, Jarod Rollins, Beverly.

A diagram summarizing the evolutionary history of the distal regions of chromosome arms 4L and 5L of Triticeae diploids. A diagram summarizing the evolutionary.

Examples of traits scored.

Der(22) Syndrome and Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome/DiGeorge Syndrome Share a 1.5- Mb Region of Overlap on Chromosome 22q11 B. Funke, L. Edelmann, N. McCain,

2012 William Allan Award: Adventures in Cytogenetics1

Chromothripsis in Healthy Individuals Affects Multiple Protein-Coding Genes and Can Result in Severe Congenital Abnormalities in Offspring Mirjam S.

Diversity and Cell Type Specificity of Local Excitatory Connections to Neurons in Layer 3B of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex Atomu Sawatari, Edward M Callaway

Enhanced Localization of Genetic Samples through Linkage-Disequilibrium Correction Yael Baran, Inés Quintela, Ángel Carracedo, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Eran Halperin

Synteny analysis of the S. meliloti genome.

Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (May 2013)

Presentation transcript:

Figure S3 - Comparative maps of several solanaceous species and the deduced genome arrangement of MRCAs (close-up of Figure 4). Designation of chromosome and chromosome segment (a-c) as well as color codes follow Additional File 2. Nomenclature of MRCAs (ATPt, ATE and ATP) follows Figure 1. Maps of non-tomato species are depicted in a comparative way to the tomato map as follows. A black arrow depicts an inversion relative to tomato (a grey arrow for an uncertain inversion). A black bar depicts the breakpoint region of a translocation relative to tomato (a grey bar for an uncertain translocation). Two black bars connected by a curve indicate that the segment in between is excised in a translocation while the remained parts stay together, e.g. E10a is embedded in E3b. “1+” (or “2+”) on a single arrow indicates that the region has experienced at least one (or two) inversions but the exact number remains to be determined. Markers displayed on the tomato map were used to define breakpoint regions of translocations and borders of inversions. The prefix (in parentheses) of a marker name specifies at which non-tomato maps the marker locates (E = eggplant, P = pepper, N = Nicotiana). Due to a different tomato map used for tomato- potato comparison, location and length of inversions on the potato map are approximate [2, 7]. White dots indicate the approximate centromere location of the tomato chromosomes.

E1P1b (EP) 1g14810 (P) 3g12685 (E) CT197 (P) 5g51970 (N) 1g26940 (N) 3g06790 (P) 5g18590 (N) 3g23590 (N) 3g08030 (P) 5g13450 (P) 2g45620 (N) 2g38730 (N) 1g25260 T1 ATP1 ATPt1 ATE1 Pt1 Figure S3 (Wu and Tanksley) N11c N9b N1a

N2P2E2 (P) 1g30540 (P) 5g44200 (E) TG554 (P) U (P) 4g18060 (E) 3g56210 (EP) 2g04700 (E) CT9 (E) TG140 (E) CT59 (P) 4g37280 T2 ATP2Pt2ATE2 ATPt2 Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

(P) E (P) 4g18230 (N) 1g61150 (P) TG132 (EP) TG517 (PN) 1g51160 (P) 3g63530 (E) 5g62390 T3 ATE3 ATPt3 Pt3 P4a P3c E3a E3c 2+ N9c N3b ATP3 Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

(E) GP180 (E) TG370 (PN) 4g25650 (P) 3g52155 (E) T0635 (P) 1g27385 (N) 5g37360 (E) 3g62940 (N) 3g54770 (P) 4g39660 (E) 4g39870 (P) 1g65230 (PN) 1g77250 (E) T0877 T4 Pt4ATPt4 E11b E4b ATE4 P5a P12b P4b ATP4 N4a N5b N4c Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

(P) CT101 (E) 1g60440 (E) T0564 (E) 1g24340 (PN) 2g01110 (N) 1g26520 (N) 1g26670 (EP) 1g69420 (E) TG379 (P) 1g67325 (E) 1g67700 (EPN) 2g46580 (N) 5g05270 (N) 5g49510 T5Pt5ATPt5 E3b(E10a) E5a P11a P5b ATE5 ATP5 N10b N5a Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

P6E6ATP6 (E) CD14 (P) 2g30100 (E) 2g39690 (P) 4g01900 (N) 3g56040 (N) 4g27700 (E)TG482 (N) 4g28530 (EN) 1g20050 T6 Pt6 ATPt6 ATE6 N3a N6b Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

P7ATP7E7 (N) 2g06925 (N) 4g33250 (E) CT223 (E) 1g55670 T7 Pt7ATPt7ATE7 N11a N7a Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

Pt8 ATP8 (N) 4g31130 (P) 2g24390 (N) 1g20830 (N) 3g53920 (P) CT77 (N) 4g32770 T8 ATE8E8ATPt8 P8 P1a N12a N8b Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

E9 (EP) 2g37240 (E) T0880 (P) 5g06130 (N) 4g12740 (P) 2g29210 (N) 3g63200 (PN)) 4g03200 (N) 1g04190 (N) 3g16840 (N) 3g24050 T9 Pt9ATPt9ATE9 P9a P3a N7b N1b N9a ATP9 Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

P10ATP10 (N) 3g13235 (E) TG230 (N) 4g03400 (E) T0637 (N) 2g46370 (E) 2g46340 (E) U (N) 5g36210 (E) TG386 (E) CT217 (E) 3g08760 (E) TG280 (E) TG285 (P) 3g57270 (E) TG63 (EP) CD32 T10 Pt10ATPt10ATE10 E4a E10c N8a N10a Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

T11 (N) 3g52640 (E) CT182 (PN) 1g21690 (N) 3g17590 (E) TG47 (N) 5g12200 (P) 1g51350 (N) 2g28800 (P) 3g44890 (P) 3g44600 (E) TG46 (EP) TG36 (N) 2g28490 (EP) 5g59960 (N) 3g53400 (N) 5g25760 (N) 5g11810 Pt11 ATPt11 E11a E12b P12a P11b N5c N4b N11b (N1c) 1+ ATP11ATE11 Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)

(E) 4g03280 (E) 4g28830 (E) TG68 (E) 5g57970 (EP) 4g11120 (E) CT99 (P) 5g42740 (N) 3g13180 (E) TG283 (P) 4g18593 (P) 3g24490 (N) 3g16290 (PN) 1g17410 (P) T0801 (N) 4g16580 T12Pt12 ATPt12 N6a N12b P9b P3b P12c ATE12ATP12 E10b(E12a) E5b Figure S3 continued (Wu and Tanksley)