ISO/IEC 19763-6 (MFI-6 ): Registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Kunming, China 2010.05 H. Horiuchi 1 SC32WG2 N1419.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Road Map of the New Project on “Framework for Registering Business Objects” Hajime Horiuchi ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 Japan, Tokyo International University SC32WG2-SEL-009.
Advertisements

Status Report of the Study Group on MDR/MFI Implemenations ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG2 Interim Meeting Santa Fe, NM, USA, November 11~15, 2013 Dongwon Jeong,
Edition 3 Metadata registry (MDR) Ray Gates May 12, /05/20151.
AIHW Knowledgebase Redevelopment project Trish Ryan –Head, National Data Development Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare –
Study Period Report: Metamodel for On Demand Model Selection (ODMS) Wang Jian, He Keqing, He Yangfan, Wang Chong State Key Lab of Software Engineering,
The NSDL Registry Diane Hillmann  Jon Phipps. What We’re Doing Received an NSF grant in Oct. 2006, to: Register metadata schemas, vocabularies, application.
Processing of structured documents Spring 2003, Part 6 Helena Ahonen-Myka.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
Procedures to Develop and Register Data Elements in Support of Data Standardization September 2000.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
RGPS Metamodel Framework for Interaction between cloud and client HE Yangfan, HE Keqing, WANG Jian, WANG Chong SKLSE(WHU), P.R.China 32N1891.
Final Report on MFI & MDR Harmonization Hajime Horiuchi May 2010 SC32WG2 N1425.
Scenario for the Integration of MDR&MFI Ad-hoc Meeting, Wuhan H. Horiuchi Study Period on the Integration of MDR/MFI.
SC32 WG2 Metadata Standards Tutorial Metadata Registries and Big Data WG2 N1945 June 9, 2014 Beijing, China.
MFI-5: Metamodel for process model registration Chong Wang, Keqing He and Baba Piprani.
MFI Part-1: Reference Model 2 nd Edition Overview Co-editor: Hajime HORIUCHI Co-editor Keith GORDON For the discussion at Krakow: SC32WG2.
1 SAIC Phong Ngo Considerations for Establishing and Managing A Registry for Metadata Phong Ngo (NCITS/L8 - SAIC) April 15-17, 1998 Metadata Registry Workshop.
Status report of : Framework for generating ontologies ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting, Redwood City, USA, November 17, 2010 Dongwon Jeong,
Final Report on Harmonization of MFI & MDR Hajime Horiuchi May SC32WG2 N 1533 OpenForum 2011 & SC32WG2 Meeting, May 2011, Kona, Hawaii.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
ETICS2 All Hands Meeting VEGA GmbH INFSOM-RI Uwe Mueller-Wilm Palermo, Oct ETICS Service Management Framework Business Objectives and “Best.
Classification and the Metadata Registry Judith Newton NIST IRS XML Stakeholders/ XML Working Group May 18, 2004.
Baba Piprani (SICOM Canada) Robert Henkel (Transport Canada)
SDMX Standards Relationships to ISO/IEC 11179/CMR Arofan Gregory Chris Nelson Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD workshop on statistical metadata (METIS): Geneva.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
IMDB Registration of Survey Variables Dec 19, 2005.
Metadata Registries Workshop April 15, 1998 Slide 1 of 20 ANSI X Douglas D. Mann Stewardship Naming & Identification Classification.
Interfacing Registry Systems December 2000.
The Final Study Period Report on MFI 6: Model registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Sydney May 26, 2008 H. Horiuchi, Keqing He, Doo-Kwon Baik SC32WG2.
Study Period Report on Registration Procedure SC32WG2 Interim Meeting, Seoul H. Horiuchi SC32WG2 N1070.
Requirements for Standardization on the Service Registries ISO/IEC JTC1 SC /10/161 A comment to WSSG, JTC1 SC32WG2 N
ISO/IEC CD and WD : Core Model and Model Mapping ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32/WG September 2005, Toronto SC32/WG2 Japan (Kanrikogaku Ltd) Masaharu.
MFI-6: Registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Vilamoura, Portugal H. Horiuchi 1 SC32WG2 NXXXX.
Issues for ISO/IEC : Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Presentation Title: Day:
Scope and Objectives of MFI family Hajime Horiuchi.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
SDC JE What is a Data Registry? v A place to keep facts about characteristics of data that are necessary to clearly describe, inventory,
LoG: A Methodology for Metadata Registry-based Management of Scientific Data July 5, 2002 Doo-Kwon Baik
Update for ISO/IEC PDTR Semantic Metadata Mapping Procedure (SMMP) May, 2010 Tae-Sul Seo and Sung-Joon Lim ISO/IEC.
OKABE, Masao /8/21 Relations between MFI Registry and Repositories outside of MFI 1 First, registration and authorization Second, periodical crawling.
Final Study Report on ROR May 2010 SC32WG2 Kunming, China Hajime Horiuchi SC32WG2-N1423.
Overview of SC 32/WG 2 Standards Projects Supporting Semantics Management Open Forum 2005 on Metadata Registries 14:45 to 15:30 13 April 2005 Larry Fitzwater.
Registries, ebXML and Web Services in short. Registry A mechanism for allowing users to announce, or discover, the availability and state of a resource:
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
Extending the MDR for Semantic Web November 20, 2008 SC32/WG32 Interim Meeting Vilamoura, Portugal - Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology -
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary and WGs Meetings Jeju, Korea, June 25, 2009 Jeong-Dong Kim, Doo-Kwon Baik, Dongwon Jeong {kjd4u,
May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.
EbXML Registry and Repository Dept of Computer Engineering Khon Kaen University.
Considerations for Establishing and Managing A Metadata Registry Phong Ngo (SAIC) February, 1999 Metadata Registration Open Forum Washington, D.C., USA.
Discussion about MFI-7: Metamodel for Service Registration Wang Jian, He Keqing, He Yangfan, Wang Chong SKLSE, Wuhan University, China
Concept Proposal Sixth Open Forum on Metadata Registries Semantic Interoperability between Registries To be held January 20-24, 2003 Bruce Bargmeyer
1 SAIC Phong Ngo Metadata Exchange amongst Registries Phong Ngo (NCITS/L8 - SAIC) April 15-17, 1998 Metadata Registry Workshop Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
Final Report on Harmonization of MFI & MDR and Disposition Hajime Horiuchi May18, 2011 SC32WG2 N1533-R1 SC32WG2.
Building Preservation Environments with Data Grid Technology Reagan W. Moore Presenter: Praveen Namburi.
National Cancer Institute caDSR Briefing for Small Scale Harmonication Project Denise Warzel Associate Director, Core Infrastructure caCORE Product Line.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
Metadata requirements for archiving structured data Alice Born Statistics Canada Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD Work Session on Statistical Metadata (9-11 April.
Metadata models to support the statistical cycle: IMDB
Scope and Objectives of MFI family
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
ISO/IEC TR (11) ( Structured Model Registration)
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
Edition 3 Metadata registry (MDR)
Issues for Discussion on MFI-9
ISO/IEC (MFI-6) Scope definition & Document Structure
Requirements for MFI Part6: Registration procedure
“Registered_Item” for MFI Registration (Recommendation)
Presentation transcript:

ISO/IEC (MFI-6 ): Registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Kunming, China H. Horiuchi 1 SC32WG2 N1419

Contents 1.Requirements and Scope of this standard 2.Objects to be registered 3.MDR/MFI Common Matamodel Package and MFI Metamodels 4.Organizational Roles related Registration 5.Use-Cases and of Registration Process 6.Registry Life Cycle Statuses 7.Identification of register objects 8.Identification Scheme 9.Registry Profile 10.Registry Quality Issues 2

1. REQUIREMENTS & SCOPE OF THIS STANDARD 3

Background & At the Sydney Meeting(May 2008), the MFI-6 (ISO/IEC ) project was initiated after the study on the Registration. At the London Meeting(Nov. 2009), It was agreed to investigate the possibility of sharing the core package of MDR-3 (ISO/IEC Ed3). Then, another study group was initiated for extracting the core package that could be shared by both MFI-6 and MDR-6. Following is an proposal for MFI-6 (Registration Procedure) standard based upon the core package. 4

Requirements(Cont’d) MFI 6 should make it clear that things to be registered and how MFI metamodels to be used Requirement-2: Registry Interoperability MFI 6 should be considered as a core part of an infrastructure which enables the interoperability by the conceivable higher lever registries (ROR) Then, all models and ontology to be registered are required to be identified by the IRDI, URI or UUID. 5 Requirement-1: thing to be registered

Requirements; (Cont’d) Requirement-3: Procedure enforcement at implementations Normative contents of the Part 6 should be enforced in both human processes and machine executable processes Requirement-4: Self registration The Part 6 should provide facilities for the encouragement of registrar to complete their model registrations through the interactive processes. These facilities could enables the promoting of the accumulation of registry contents. 6

Requirements; Requirement-5: Related other MFI standards Part-6 should be used for the registration of any kind of models including ontology those could be acceptable for MFI-2 (core) & MFI-3, MFI-5, MFI-7, MFI-8 in order to promote sharing and reusing of those for the sake of interoperability among domains. Requirement-6: Relation to MDR standards The part-6 should take the MDR(ISO/IEC 11179) part-3 Ed3 in to the core of the standard 7

What is MFI-6 MFI-6 will show; What is Metamodel Framework for Interoperability? How do they work ? Not only he Registration, Registry Life Cycle Service specification will covered 8

2. ITEMS TO BE REGISTERED 9

Objects to be registered 10 Registration Of Model Component Registration Of Model Component Set Registration Of Atomic constructs Registration of Ontology Registration of Ontology Components Registration Of Atomic Process Registration of Process Model Registration Of Model Component MFI-2MFI-3MFI-5 Registration Of Atomic Service Registration of Service Registration Of Service Component MFI-7 Registration Of Atomic ??? Registration of Role & Goal Registration Of R & G Component MFI-8 Registration of Model Concept Responsible Organization Data Element Concept Value Domain MDR -3 Value Domain Concept Submitters (Registrar) Registry Authority Identification Scheme Administration Record Registration Record Registry Profile ?? ??

Registrar, Registration Authority, Stewardship What to be Registered 11 Data Element Target ObjectObject Constructs DEC, CD, VD Model Compnents Concept Ontology components Service Components Codes Terminology Model Ontology/ Concept System Service References Identification Desssignation Scheme Classification Scheme Administered Item Outer Registry

MFI Registration concept 12 A MFI-n Registry Registry Profile Registration Authority Submitter (Registrar) Administered Item Steward Administered _record Stewardship_record RP ROR creation MFI-2 Core Metamodel MFI-n conformed Registered Item register MFI-n Metamodel submission register MDR Metamodel

3. MDR/MFI COMMON MATAMODEL PACKAGE AND MFI METAMODELS 13

14 Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Notification Relationship among MFI & MDR Packages MDR/MFI Registration Core Package Registered Item Instances MFI-6 Registration Process Model Model Constructs Service Service Constructs RGPS RGPS Constructs Registration Record MDR-6 Registration Process

MDR/MFI Registration Common Core Package 15 Namespace Registry Authority Registrar Administered_Item Stewardship_Record Submission_Record Registration _Record Registration Identification Designation & Definition MDR/MFI Registration Core Package Contact Date-and Time Individual Language_Id Organization Phone_Number Postal_address Registration A_ID Basic

MFI-6 package (Registration) 16 Namespace Registry Authority Registrar Administered_Item Stewardship_Record Submission_Record Registration _Record Registration MDR-6 (ISO/IEC ) Identification Designation & Definition > MDR/MFI Registration Core Package Contact Date-and Time Individual Language_Id Organization Phone_Number Postal_address Registration A_ID Basic Lifecycle Process (Service) MFI-6 (ISO/IEC ) Registration of Model (Service) Registration of Ontology (S) Registration of Service (S) Registry Profile

How MFI metamodels to be used in the Registration 17 MFI Registration Processes Namespace Registry Authority Registrar Administered_Item Stewardship_Record Submission_Record Registration _Record Registration Identification Designation & Definition MDR/MFI Registration Core Package Contact Date-and Time Individual Language_Id Organization Phone_Number Postal_address Registration A_ID Basic Lifecycle Process (Service) MFI-6 (ISO/IEC ) Registration of Model Proc. Registration of Ontology Registration of Service Registry Profile MFI Registry Service MFI Metamodel Specify RA, Registrar, Stewards register

4. ORGANIZATIONAL ROLES OF ASSOCIATED WITH REGISTRY 18

Human Roles Associated with Registry 19 Model Registry Ontology Registry Service Registry ROR Crawling Robot Any Service Provides

Relationship among Actors 20 Registry Registry Profile Registration Authority Submitter (Registrar) Responsible Organization Administered Item Steward Administered _record Stewardship _record User RP ROR Collector Anybody

Roles and Responsibilities(MDR-6 ) Submitting Organization Responsible Organization Registration Authority Specify Item Submit Item for registration Provide supplemental information Resolve conflict Process applications Assign identifiers Maintain a Registry Assign appropriate Registration Status Notify Submitters of its decisions Consult Reconcile Clarify Arbitrate: Semantics Name Domain Advise Notify 21

5. USE-CASES AND REGISTRATION PROCESS (HUMAN PROCESS) 22

MFI Registration Process 23 Submission Of contents SubmitterRA Registry Control Model Registered Published Submission Help Requirements Checking Submitter Registration Submitters Registered Registration Help Watching Registry Status Life Cycle Stages Issuing Identification

Use-Case(1): Register RA, RO, SO 24 Registration of RA Registration of RO Registration of SO Registration Authority A particular Registry Responsible Organization ROR Collection of Registry Profile Submitting Organization

Use-case (2) Registration of Model 25 Registration of Model Model Registry Use-case (1) > Submitter Identification & Designation Model ID Concept ID

Use-case (3) Registration of Ontology 26 Registration of Ontology An Ontology Registry Use-case (1) > Submitter Identification & Designation Model ID Concept ID Reference Ontology

Use-case (4) Registration of Ontology 27 Registration of Service An Ontology Registry Use-case (1) > Submitter Identification & Designation Model ID Concept ID Reference Ontology

Types of Registration Process 28 Common Registration Process Metadata (Item) Registration Process Model Registration Process Ontology Registration Process Service Registration Process Role & Goal Registration Process Concept System Registration Process MDR-6 MFI-6

Common Registration Process 29 Common Registration Process Registration Authority Registration Process Organization Registration Process Registry Life Cycle Process Submission Process Harmonization Process Change Process Notification Process Registry profile Process

SERVICE PROTOCOL 30

Human Process and Service Protocol 31 Submitter Registration Service Submission Registration Protocol Harmonization RA Committee Steward Human ProcessService Protocol

32 Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Interface Notification Life Cycle Services Protocol MDR/MFI Registration Core Package Registered Item Instances MFI-6 Registration Process Model Model Constructs Service Service Constructs RGPS RGPS Constructs Registration Record MDR-6 Registration Process

Service specification using ebXML RS Notification Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Interface Host Service MFI/MDR Registry

Service Protocol Definition Submission Protocol 34 Registration Submission Life Cycle Services Registrar Client Manager RegistryResponse </element ebXML RS3.0 Example: “SubmitObejctRequest”

Same services are available for registration & maintenance at every part of MFI and MDR 35 Notification Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Interf ace Host Service MFI/MDR Registry Notification Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Interf ace Host Service MFI/MDR Registry Notification Registration (Submission) Change/Delete Interf ace Host Service MFI/MDR Registry For MFI-3 For MFI-4 For MFI-5, 7, 8

MFI-8 Idea for Using ebXML RS for all parts of MFI 36 Registration Procedure Submission Instance of MFI-3 Metamodel Content (Target Metamodel) MFI-3 Metamodel Instance of MFI-3 Registry Instance of MFI-3 Metamodel Store to Repository Registration Procedure Submission Instance of MFI-3 Metamodel Content (Target Metamodel) MFI-5 Metamodel Instance of MFI-5 Registry Instance of MFI-3 Metamodel Instance of MFI-5 Metamodel Store to Repository MFI-3 MFI-5 MFI-7

6. REGISTRY LIFE CYCLE PROCESS 37

Registry Content Lifecycle Process 38 Submitted Approved Deprecated Withdrawn StatusDescription ApprovedIndicates that the content has been approved after being submitted. DeprecatedIndicates that the content has been deprecated or marked as obsolete. SubmittedIndicates that the content has been submitted to the server. WithdrawnIndicates that the content has been withdrawn from the server. This status and lifecycle refer to ebRS.

Registration Status Dynamic registration statuses – Address improvement and progression towards levels of perfection of the quality of the metadata of the item and of the preferences of usage. Static registration statuses – Denote positions at which there will be no more progression in quality of metadata or use of the administered item. 39

40 Dynamic Registration Statuses (MDR-6) Preferred Standard - preferred for use in the Registry community. Standard - of sufficient quality and of broad interest for use in the Registry community. Qualified - mandatory metadata attributes are complete and conform to applicable quality requirements. Recorded - all mandatory metadata attributes have been completed. Candidate - proposed for progression up the Registry registration levels. Incomplete - submitter wishes to make the Registry community aware of the existence of an administered item in their local domain.

41 Status of Static Registrations (MDR-6) Retired - no longer recommended for use in the Registry community and should no longer be used. Superseded - no longer recommended for use in the Registry community but the successor administered item is the preference for use. Historical - was used elsewhere in the past. Standardized Elsewhere - standardized in another community. Legacy - Application -

Registration status(TBG17) 42 Submission accepted Under harmonization Under investigation Published Deleted

8. IDENTIFICATION 43

44 Registration Authority Identifier Registration Authority Identifier (RAI) * Data Identifier (DI) Version Identifier (VI) * Same as ISO 6523 International Code Desiginator (ICD) Organization Identifier Organization Part Identifier (OPI) OPI Source (OPIS) ** ISO/IEC 6523IRDI(International Registration Data Identifier) ** Optional

IRDI( International Registration Data Identifier) 45 Registration Authority Identifier (RAI) * Data Identifier (DI) Version Identifier (VI) It is specified by MDR-5 for Indentifying registered Item

MFI Object Identification 46 Registration Authority Identifier (RAI) * object Identifier (OI) Version Identifier (VI) URI For MFI registered object, such as Model, Ontology, Process and Services, Other more light way for identifying objet must be needed. UUID Ubiquitous Code DOI etc Needed for MFI objects? or Registry ID ?

Requirements on Identification Requirements-7 Identification Schema Most of MFI parts use URI for identification object (Model, model constructs, Processes and Services, ) MFI 6 should stock take major UUID providers as widely as possible including ID schema that were used in MDR standards (e.g. IRDI) MFI 6 should take one of those as the recommended identification scheme MFI 6 should provide an own ID scheme for miscellaneous object (attached model profiles), e.g. Note: DOI (Digital Object Identification), Ubiquitous Center (Japan), 47

Classification Schema MFI 6 should provide an own model classification scheme Those schema should consist of; – Purpose and mission – Industrial sector – Modeling View point – Domin Context Note: UN/CEFACT TMG is discussing the Business Context Method 48 Requirements-8: Classification Schema

49 Secure a Registration Authority Identifier. Prescribe, amend, interpret, and document the procedures. Determine and document any additional conditions specifically required by its domain of registration. Specify the format for each attribute listed in Annex A of ISO/IEC and for any additional attributes. Determine the manner in which applications shall be submitted. The First Assignment as a Registration Authority

50 Areas of Compliance There are no requirements that all components of the model be present for a Registry to be compliant with the metamodel. The metamodel constraints are for items at “Recorded” registration status and above. There is a practical need for registering only those components of interest. Except for those situations constrained by the cardinalities of the metamodel, there is no required sequence in the registration of the components.

9. REGISTRY PROFILE 51

ROR Only collection of Registry Profiles Everybody can collect and store a set of profiles Change will be informed by Notification(RSS) 52 MFI Registry Registry Profile MDR Registry ebXML Registry ROR

Registry Interoperability by Registry Profile UDDI MFI Registry Registry Service Any Registry Discovery Layer Interoperate Layer ROR Change Service Registry Notification (RSS) RP RP: Registry Profile RP Registry Service Register 53

54 Metamodel for Registry Profile Information of owner who is managing and operating registry system. Information of Registry system. Information of access interfaces to registry system.

55 Metamodel for Registry Profile Data Type: Core Component Data Type.

10. LEVEL OF COFORMANCE 56

As a Standard Normative Informative MDR/MFI Core Registration Package Registration Authority Registry Life Cycle process Registration Protocol Registry Profile Organizational Roles Registration human process Use-case 57

58 Levels of Compliance For Dynamic Registration Statuses – A component is deemed to reach a certain Registration Status when its own attributes and those of the Required Associated Components meet the minimal criteria for that Registration Status.

As a Standard Normative Informative MDR/MFI Core Registration Package Registration Authority Registry Life Cycle process Registration Protocol Registry Profile Organizational Roles Life cycle human process Use-case 59

10. REGISTRY QUALITY ISSUES 60

Quality Requirements Quality of Registration Quality of Registry Quality of Information Representation Registry contents Registry Registrar Registration 61 Requirement- 7: Requirements on Quality

Quality of Data The quality measurements and guideline of each data element or set of data elements should be domain dependent.( e.g. ISO8000) In MFI 6, It should be out of the scope However, the “Registry Quality ” must be considered in the common process 62

Quality of the Registration To maintain the Quality of the registry, the MFI 6 should specify the processes and guideline Those processes should be possible for software automated checking and enforcement 63

Quality of the Registry The Quality of Registry means that consistency and compliances to all of mandatory criteria should be kept among all of model instances in the registry These compliance maintenance should be responsible to the steward of the MFI registry. 64

Level of Conformance Normative – MDR/MFI Core Registration Package – Registration Protocol (Sequence & Message) – Registry Profile Informative – Organizational Roles and Human Processes – Registry Life Cycle process – Registration Process 65

Normative References ISO Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions – Part 1: Country codes ISO Information technology – Structure for the identification of organizations and organization parts –Part 1: Identification of organization identification schemes ISO/IEC 646 Information technology – ISO 7-bit coded character set for information interchange ISO/IEC Information technology - Unique identifiers for item management ISO/IEC Information technology -- Open Systems Interconnection -- Procedures for the operation of OSI Registration Authorities: Generation and registration of Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs) and their use as ASN.1 Object Identifier components 66

Schedule: Draft CD text (Skelton ): End of This meeting For CD Balloting : End of July,

Editor Change Current Editor: Hajime Horiuchi New Editor : Tatsumi Adachi (NEC) 68

Thank you 69

Requirements (Con’t) Requirements-7 Identification Schema MFI 6 should stock take major UUID providers as widely as possible including ID schema that were used in MDR standards (e.g. IRDI) MFI 6 should take one of those as the recommended identification scheme MFI 6 should provide an own ID scheme for miscellaneous object (attached model profiles), e.g. Note: DOI (Digital Object Identification), Ubiquitous Center (Japan), 70

Classification Schema MFI 6 should provide an own model classification scheme Those schema should consist of; – Purpose and mission – Industrial sector – Modeling View point – Domin Context 71 Requirements-8: Classification Schema