Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G0900604.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Stefan Hild, M.Mantovani, A.Perreca and A. Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, August 2008 Automated simulations: choosing modulation frequencies à la Advanced.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Stefan Hild and A.Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, December 2008 Preliminary Thoughts on the optimal Arm Cavity Finesse of Advanced Virgo.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress and plans ILIAS, Jan 23 rd 2007 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
LIGO Laboratory1 Enhanced and Advanced LIGO TCS Aidan Brooks - Caltech Hannover LSC-VIRGO Meeting, October 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Arm Length Stabilisation for Advanced Gravitational Wave Detectors Adam Mullavey, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland Peter Fritschel, Matt.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
Modeling of the Effects of Beam Fluctuations from LIGO’s Input Optics Nafis Jamal Shivanand Sanichiro Yoshida Biplab Bhawal LSC Conference Aug ’05 LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
CITF A. Allocca, M. Mantovani. Outline CITF schematic Resonance conditions Effect of the misalignment on the error signals Comparison with Virgo+ Effect.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Next Generation Low Frequency Control Systems
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Main Interferometer Meeting
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory, Caltech 26 Aug 2017
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
nicolas smith-lefebvre MIT GWDAW 2011
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
Advanced Virgo ISC subsystem
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Automatic Alignment Control scheme for Advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G th Amaldi Conference June 09 - Columbia University, NYC

2 Outline  Alignment Sensing and Control hard(er) for Advanced Detectors  ASC in Advanced LIGO:  Impact on optical design  Lessons from Enhanced LIGO  Preliminary results from modeling Optickle Radiation pressure effects included

3 Why Aligning Advanced Detectors is Hard Muzammil Arain  Stable cavities are good… (previous talk by Muzammil Arain) …but they make alignment error signals smaller.. Advanced LIGO optical configuration  More mirrors, more degrees of freedom  High power operation complicates the problem:  radiation pressure modifies the opto-mechanical TFs (Sidles-Sigg instabilities)  Thermal compensation to keep a good mode shape

4 Sidles-Sigg Instabilities Physics Letters A 354 (2006) 167–172 Torque induced by radiation pressure  Modification of the pendulum resonance frequencies: x1x1 x1x1 x2x2 x2x2 c2c2 c2c2 c1c1 c1c1 k pen d k opt HARD SOFT

5  Initial LIGO: maximum input power ~7 W  radiation pressure already important **New ASC design in the hard and soft angular mode basis  Enhanced LIGO: same optical parameters / suspensions as in Initial LIGO, 35 Watts input power **New ASC design in the hard and soft angular mode basis  Advanced LIGO: g factors chosen for low radiation pressure impact, +50% restoring torque from Quadruple suspensions High Power in LIGO detectors **Katherine Dooley **Katherine Dooley, Controlling the Sigg-Sidles Instability in Enhanced LIGO (Poster) P_cavity (kW) f_pend (Hz) PITCH YAW f_hard (Hz) PITCH YAW f_soft (Hz) PITCH YAW Initial LIGO Enhanced LIGO Advanced LIGO

6 ASC vs Thermal Compensation  Lesson from Enhanced LIGO: it is crucial to have a good TCS for alignment stability TCS Annulus pattern (January 2009)AS port in 20 minutes with 14W input power TCS Annulus pattern (March 2009)

7 Stable Recycling Cavities  01 modes not resonant in stable recycling cavities  small alignment error signals Gouy phases chosen to maximize alignment error signal for SRC, compatibly with other requirements (mode matching, thermal effects, beam sizes) PRC: 25 degrees, SRC: 19 degrees ITM y ETM y ITM x ETM x BS To the OMC PR 3 SR 3 SR 2 SRM PRM PR 2 From IFO Plot by Muzammil Arain  Alignment signals are conceptually:

8 ASC modeling for Advanced LIGO  Hard and soft degrees of freedom for the arms  Control loops  ASC noise coupling to DARM due to:  shot noise  seismic noise  Acquisition Mode (before the OMC is locked)  Science Mode: low noise

9 Alignment Sensors REFL_A REFL_B ACQUISITION MODE AS_A AS_B f1 ~ 9 MHz f2 ~ 45 MHz fM = f2 – f1

10 Acquisition Mode Common soft dofs poorly sensed Differential soft: bad SNR

11 Alignment Sensors REFL_A REFL_B SCIENCE MODE AS_A AS_B OMCr_A OMCr_B

12 Science Mode

13 The Message  Convenient to work in the basis which diagonalizes the opto-mechanical system (hard and soft)  Greater stability  poorer sensing  Evaluation of the ASC scheme needs to take into account the whole system:  sensor noise, seismic noise  control bandwidth  stability in the presence of thermal effects  noise coupling to DARM

14 Dark Fringe