Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
A single-arm phase II trial in p treated with C, D and B (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks followed by B showed a promising efficacy, in terms of progression free.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
Therapeutic Significance of D-dimer Cut-off Level of more than 3 µg/ml in Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Standard Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Taiwan 2000 Comparative evaluation in tolerance of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer in a randomized.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Gemcitabine + Cisplatin +/- Bevacizumab as 1st-line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: AVAiL Study Manegold PASCO 25:#7514, 2007/Ann.
ASCO - Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Orlando (FL), January 2008 First-line Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and Infusional 5FU/LV (FOLFOXIRI) in combination.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
A three-arm randomized phase III trial of FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab vs XELOX + bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III.
Pharmacogenetics of Irinotecan Clinical perspectives: utility of genotyping Mark J. Ratain, MD University of Chicago 11/3/04.
1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF EVEROLIMUS PLUS EXEMESTANE IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER BEYOND THE SECOND LINE TREATMENT: A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE M. Giampaglia,
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
or other irinotecan-based regimens
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Safety Analysis of the first 800 Patients in a Randomized Phase III Trial (EPIC): Abstract.
Presentation transcript:

Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and genotype UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*28 (FFCD 0504 trial) Results of a planned interim analysis. E Mitry 1, O Bouché 2, L Dahan 3, F Bonnetain 4, P Laurent-Puig 5, T Aparicio 6, PL Etienne 7, C Lecaille 8, JP Lafargue 9, JL Jouve 4, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 1 CHU A Paré, Boulogne 2 CHU Reims 3 CHU La Timone, Marseille 4 FFCD, Dijon 5 Hôpital Européen G Pompidou, Paris 6 CHU Bichat, Paris 7 Clinique Armoricaine, St Brieuc 8 Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux 9 CHD, La Roche/Yon INTRODUCTION INTERIM ANALYSIS RESULTS (among 17 patients with UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*1 genotype) # 4065 REFERENCES CONCLUSION STUDY DESIGN Main inclusion criteria ‣ Age ‣ WHO performance status ≤2 ‣ Genotype UGT1A1*1/*1 or UGT1A1*1/*28 ‣ Non resectable metastatic colorectal cancer ‣ No prior chemotherapy ‣ Measurable disease (RECIST) ‣ No brain metastases ‣ Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions Primary endpoint ‣ Objective response (OR) at 6 months (RECIST criteria, independent review) ‣ Tolerability (NCI CTC v. 2.0 criteria) Secondary endpoints ‣ Progression-free survival and overall survival. ‣ Time to treatment failure. ‣ Quality of life (EuroQOL EQ5D questionnaire).  Ducreux M, Raoul JL, Marti P, Merrouche Y, Tigaud JM, Rebischung C, et al. High-dose irinotecan plus LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU (HD-FOLFIRI) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a new way to allow resection of liver metastases? Oncology 2008;74:  O'Dwyer PJ, Catalano RB. Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and irinotecan: practical pharmacogenomics arrives in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol 2006;24: Baseline characteristics ‣ High-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, although effective, was associated with a high toxicity rate among patients with UGT1A1 *1/*1 genotype ‣ 7 patients presented toxic events when interim analysis stopping rules required ≤ 3 patients ‣ According to interim analysis rules, the trial was closed to inclusion (for both groups) on December 16th 2008 for toxicity ‣ Toxicity however was manageable. There was no toxic death and no grade 4 diarrhea. ‣ Interim analysis for patients with UGT1A1 *1/*28 genotype is ongoing ‣ FOLFIRI-bevacizumab is a standard front line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. ‣ The combination of high-dose irinotecan (260 mg/m²) with LV5FU2 regimen was feasible with an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy data ‣ Genotype UGT1A1*28/ UGT1A1*28 is associated with an increased toxicity of irinotecan ABSTRACT Statistical Analyses ‣ Bryant & Day design, intent to treat analysis ‣ Primary endpoint : objective response rate (H0 ≤ 40%; H1 : ≥ 60%) and toxicity (gr 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia or gr 3-4 diarrhea; H0 ≥ 20%; H1≤ 5% ) ‣ 108 pts required (54 in each group) (alpha 5% and power 80%) ‣ Planned interim analysis after the inclusion of 17 pts with 6- months follow-up by group. ‣ The trial will be stopped at interim analysis if ≤ 7 pts had an OR and/or ≥ 3 pts had a severe toxicity. Enrollment ‣ Date of point for interim analysis : May, 2 nd 2008 (6-months follow-up for the 17th patient) ‣ 96/108 patients included (arm 1: 40, arm 2 : 46) Interim analysis for the first 17 patients in arm 1 ‣ Period of inclusion: to ‣ 9 participating centres n (%) n17 Median age years [range] 58 [52-74] ECOG Performance status 05 (29.4) 111 (64.7) 21 (5.9) Male11 (64.7) Genotype UGT1A1*1/*117 (100) Primary tumor location Colon10 (58.8) Rectum7 (41.2) Metastatic sites Liver9 (53) Peritoneum10 (58.8) Lung4 (23.5) Background: The antitumor efficacy of irinotecan may be dose dependent. In a recent phase II trial, the combination of high-dose irinotecan (260 mg/m²) with LV5FU2 regimen was feasible with an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of the high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients (pts) selected on the UGT1A1 polymorphism, which could be predictive of the irinotecan toxicity. Methods: Pts with UGT1A1 *1/*1 (group 1) or *1/*28 (group 2) genotypes and previously untreated mCRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg/kg D1, irinotecan 260 mg/m² D1, LV 400 mg/m² D1, 5FU 400 mg/m² IV bolus D1 and 5FU 2400 mg/m² 46h infusion D1-2 every 2 weeks. Using Bryant & Day design with OR (independent review, H0 ≤ 40%; H1 : ≥ 60%) and toxicity (gr 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia or gr3-4 diarrhea; H0 ≥ 20%; H1≤ 5% ) as primary endpoints; a total of 108 pts, 54 in each group, was required (alpha 5% and power 80%) with a planned interim analysis after the inclusion of 17 pts by group. The trial will be stopped at interim analysis if ≤ 7 pts had an OR and/or ≥ 3 pts had a severe toxicity. All analyses were performed in ITT. Results: At the time of interim analysis, done for group 1 when the 17th pt had a 6-months follow- up, 96 pts have been included (group 1: 40 pts, group 2: 46 pts). An objective response rate was observed in 9/17 pts but 7/17 pts had a severe toxicity (gr 4 neutropenia: 2 pts, febrile neutropenia: 2 pts, gr 3 diarrhea: 4 pts). Overall, 14/17 pts had a gr3-4 toxicity. There was no toxic death. According to interim analysis rules, the trial was closed to inclusion (for both groups) on December 16th 2008 for toxicity. The interim analysis for pts of group 2 is planned for February 2009 when the 17th patient will have a 6-months follow- up. Conclusions: High-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, although effective, was associated with a high toxicity rate among pts with UGT1A1 *1/*1 genotype. Multicenter phase II study 2 arms according to genotype ‣ Arm 1 (54 patients) : UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*1 ‣ Arm 2 (54 patients) : UGT1A1*1/ UGT1A1*28 Treatment ‣ Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV day 1 ‣ High dose FOLFIRI ‣ irinotecan 260 mg/m 2 IV day 1 ‣ calcium folinate 400 mg/m 2 day 1 ‣ 5FU 400 mg/m 2 IV bolus day 1 ‣ 5FU 2400 mg/m 2 IV46 hours day1-2 ‣ Treatment every 2 weeks Confirmed objective responses ‣ 9 patients ‣ Response rate 53% interim analysis stopping rules required > 7 pts Toxic events considered for interim analysis ‣ 7 patients ‣ gr 4 neutropenia : 2 patients ‣ febrile neutropenia : 2 patients ‣ gr 3 diarrhea : 4 patients 1 patient with gr 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea no grade 4 diarrhea interim analysis stopping rules required ≤ 3 pts n (%) Any14 (83.5) Non hematologic Diarrhea4 (23.5) Venous thromboembolic event4 (23.6) Nausea1 (5.9) Vomiting1 (5.9) Epistaxis1 (5.9) Hypertension1 (5.9) Hematologic Neutropenia5 (29.4) Febrile neutropenia2 (11.8) Anemia2 (11.8) Thrombocytopenia0 Severe toxicity (grade 3-4) No toxic death