Seizing an opportunity? Union organizing campaigns in Britain, Edmund Heery & Melanie Simms
Objectives Policy opportunity Statutory recognition procedure & associated (seemingly) union-friendly public policy Union response Greenfield organizing campaigns (no bargaining) Targets, objectives, resources, methods, messages, issues, employer responses, outcomes Research Survey of 140 campaigns from 21 unions Collection mainly through Organizing Academy Data not statistically representative Prior union presence in 50% cases Most campaigns (87%) on-going at time of survey
Targets – table 1 Scale Single workplace, several hundred workers in medium-sized organizations Sector Disproportionate emphasis on manufacturing Occupation Relatively low skilled manual & non-manual workers Worker characteristics Women workers – majority in 45% of campaigns
Objectives – table 2 Recruitment Establishing or growing membership Organizing Identifying activists, forming a branch, and encouraging activist recruitment Recognition Securing or strengthening a recognition agreement – especially manufacturing Diversity Increasing diversity of membership & activism – especially where organizer female
Resources – table 3 Paid staff More than half have two or fewer Organizers typically work on more than one project Activists Most involve fewer than 5 activists More activists where union established Duration (note on-going campaigns) Most campaigns last less than six months Length of campaign increasing over time
Methods – table 4 Individual methods Widely used, relatively ineffective Employer-supported methods Infrequently used, relatively effective Face-to-face methods Widely used, relatively effective Organizing methods Workplace organizing methods used widely and rated as effective Extra-workplace organizing methods rarely used and rated as ineffective Comprehensive campaigns rare – manufacturing, manual workers, no presence, securing recognition
Messages – table 5 Instrumental arguments Emphasis on collective benefit of membership Collectivist arguments Emphasis on collective solidarity & power Employer arguments Predominance of low-trust but not militancy Rights arguments Emphasis on moral case for unionism – new language Extended case Rarely made & when it is stress on occupation/industry Diversity case Strong in a minority of campaigns
Issues – table 6 Dominance of traditional union functions Protection of employees Improving pay and hours of work Less emphasis on ‘new agenda’ Human resource management: work organization, learning, appraisal Equality and anti-discrimination Variation Occupational differences: professionals (HRM) v. manual workers (protection) Organizer choices: gender & equality
Responses – table 7 Hostility Prime response Encompasses both substitution & suppression Concerted opposition confined to a minority Support Minority response Provision of resources to assist union Variation Response relates to prior union presence Response co-varies with union methods Organizing methods & traditional issues where hostile Supported methods & new agenda where supportive
Outcomes – table 8 Membership Campaigns increased membership but typically at a modest scale; below 100 & 50% Organizing Recruitment of activists, creation of committee, self-organizing & representation Diversity Increase in women & minority members & activists in significant proportion of campaigns Recognition Recognition achieved or strengthened in 20%
Pattern of outcomes – table 9 Recruitment: Size of target Activist involvement Male organizer Partnership-oriented Organizing: Activist involvement Male organizer Gender-oriented Partnership-oriented Organizing model Gender outcomes Sales workers Women workers Woman organizer Lack of partnership Lack of organizing model Recognition: Prior absence of union Lay involvement Employer support Partnership-oriented
Conclusion Encouraging findings Innovation: techniques & language Outcomes: organizing & diversity Disappointing findings Conservatism: scale, sector, resources Outcomes: membership growth modest; recognition infrequent Variation Context: presence & response Methods: no single best approach Organisers: gender of organizer