Patents and Patent Reform Ross Epstein October 19, 2010 Association for Corporate Growth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Protection Considerations in a Global Economy Keith D. Grzelak, Chair IEEE-USA Intellectual Property Policy Committee.
Advertisements

© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dramatic Changes in U.S. Patent Litigation.
EACCNJ European Union IP Forum Mark DeLuca Pepper Hamilton LLP September 27, 2012.
Patent System Reform(s) 2007 EDUCAUSE Policy Conference May 16, 2007 E.R. Kazenske Microsoft Corporation.
Patents in Higher Education: Issues Arising from the Blackboard Case by Bruce Wieder May 29, 2008.
TRADE SECRETS, UNFAIR COMPETITION, EMPLOYEE RAIDS AND EMPLOYEE COVENANTS Alan N. Greenspan Jackson Walker LLP.
1 of 11 Perils of Patent Reform: Flexibility’s Achilles Heel F. Scott Kieff Professor Washington University School of Law Research Fellow Stanford University’s.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
1 Click to edit Master Changes to the U.S. Patent System Steven Steger September 4, 2014.
IP 101 for LA BioMed Michael J. Shuster, Ph.D., J.D. October 9, 2013.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 12, 2007 Patent - Subject Matter.
KSR vs. Teleflex IEOR 190G Simon Xu
France: A Country on the Move Protecting your Intellectual Property Internationally.
1 Winds of Change in Patent Law by William W. Cochran Cochran Freund & Young LLC An Intellectual Property Law Firm by William W. Cochran Cochran Freund.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Healthcare Trustees of New York State Audioconference September 22, 2005 Mark Thomas Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker General.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 GSC-16bis Meeting: Recent US IP Developments Earl Nied, Chair, ANSI Intellectual Property Rights Policy Committee Document No:
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF BIOTECH IN THE U.S. Marc S. Friedman Chair, Intellectual Property Practice Sills Cummis Epstein & Gross P.C. 30 Rockefeller.
© 2011 Baker & Hostetler LLP BRAVE NEW WORLD OF PATENTS plus Case Law Updates & IP Trends ASQ Quality Peter J. Gluck, authored by.
Patents Yan Lee, Steven Boyce, Greg Wilson, Danil Zakirov, Ben Andrew.
Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship Presented at IEEE/ComSoc, Boston Section June 2, 2011 George Jakobsche For additional information, see accompanying.
Personal Finance Test Review. Post Test Review A. Credit is the ability to obtain goods/services before payment is made based on the trust that payment.
SUNITA K SREEDHARAN SKS LAW ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI 23 July 2014, Delhi.
The Effect of the Supreme Court Decision on Patent Reform Legislation John F. Duffy Professor of Law George Washington University Law School © 2007 John.
NEW INVENTIONS SUCCESS PATENT DEFINITION DR. MARK RAJAI MSE California State University Northridge.
1 “Views on the New (or Pending) Patent Reform Legislation” AIPLA Annual Meeting October 18, 2007 Gary L. Griswold President and Chief Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property Environment 1. Pharmaceutical IP Overview Biopharmaceutical IP protection fairly standard, but not fully in line with international.
Fundamentals of Business Law Summarized Cases, 8 th Ed., and Excerpted Cases, 2 nd Ed. ROGER LeROY MILLER Institute for University Studies Arlington, Texas.
Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.
CLN4U – Mr. Andrez. Domestic vs International Law Domestic Law: All law (case, statute, or otherwise) that exists within a nation’s borders. Example:
Patent Economics I Class Notes: January 16, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Patent Reform Update Technology Committee San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce Ross Epstein October 16, 2009.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Intellectual Property Choices. Intellectual Property Rights Protection Rights to Choose From Include Protection Rights to Choose From Include Patents.
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues Hosted by: Update on U.S. Patent Legislation.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
1 1 Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Shhhh! Trade Secrets Update Yuichi Watanabe AIPLA IP Practice in Japan Committee January 27-28,
Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.
Today’s Agenda Any Announcements? Any Questions? Let's Review our Bellwork.... Now... Let’s Begin Today’s Lesson…..
NECESSITY OF UNIFIED EU PATENT SYSTEM: U.S. PERSPECTIVE Jeffrey M. Samuels Professor of Law The University of Akron.
Manuel Lousada Soares Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade of Brazil Secretary for Industrial Technology IPR ISSUES IN STANDARDIZATION.
MT311 – Business Law I Seminar Presentation UNIT 3 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes I. Chapter 5, Intellectual Property and Internet Law II. Chapter 6, Criminal.
How Does a Bill become Law? Requirement for a New Law It must be approved by both Houses of the Legislature It must be identical - word for word It cannot.
Copyright © 20076/21/2016UC Berkeley IPIRA Page 1 Berkeley Tech Transfer AIA & on-line Invention Disclosure Form.
© 2015 Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP. All Rights Reserved. Ready to Patent? Value and Risk Considerations Nicolo Davidson.
The U.S. Constitution Jobs and Laws. Repair or Replace? Founding Fathers realized that the Articles of Confederation were bad. Some of them thought that.
CONGRESSSIONAL POWERS Chapter 6. Constitutional provisions The Founders created a strong executive to carry out the legislation of Congress. Expressed.
The Leading Global Business Law Firm Presentation to Cyclotron Road
Company Name Mission statement Stage of development
PATC Module 2 – Infringement/Validity
Efficient and Balanced European Patent System Comments from U. S
Status Report Austin Intellectual Property Law Assoc. August 16, 2011
New Deal/Court Packing Pg. 78
US Antitrust Limitations on Patent Licensing
SMITH-LEAHY AMERICA INVENTS ACT
The Constitution and the Amendment Process
Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights
eBay v. MercExchange: Model or Monster?
Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age.
Intellectual Property Overview for Bio-Medical Researchers (1)
How the Constitution Works
A NEW CONSTITUTION – PAGE 1
What are the types of intellectual property ?
Patents and Trade Secrets: A Silicon Valley Perspective
PATC Module 2 – Infringement/Validity
Six Basic Principles of the Constitution
Teaching IP in a business school: interdisciplinary hurdles
Company Name Mission statement Stage of development
Presentation transcript:

Patents and Patent Reform Ross Epstein October 19, 2010 Association for Corporate Growth

Intellectual Property Is... CONVERTINGINFORMATIONTOADVANTAGE

What is a Patent? The right to exclude, not to use For 20 years An Intangible Asset A tool for defining markets

What is Patentable? Compositions Devices Processes Improvements

Patent Reform Issues Big High Tech Co. Position Desire to Harmonize US Prosecution with Rest of World “Fix” US Prosecution Procedures “Fix” Enforcement Procedures Quality of Issued Patents

Examples of Reform First to File vs. First to Invent Limitations on Continuation Practice Limit Availability of Injunctive Relief

First to Invent Works The System Isn’t Broke Patent Owners Need Injunctive Relief to Enforce Not Really About Patent Reform Patent Reform Issues Non Practicing Entity Position

Recent Supreme Court Rulings NTP v. Research In Motion (injunctive relief) KSR International Co. v. Teleflex (obviousness) In re Bilski (business methods)

Where Things Are Now Federal Legislature Numerous Proposals both in House and Senate Never Got out of Committee Very Unclear Where This Will Go

Today’s Debate Today’s Debate Non-Practicing Entity vs. Large High Tech Co. Dooyong Lee - Acacia vs. Brian Fogarty – DLA Piper