Case Brief The Legal Research Process
The Legal Research Process (FLAC) Step 1: Facts (Analyze the facts) Step 2: Issues (Determine the legal issues) Step 3: Law (Relevant Law) Step 4: Analysis – (Analyze the law & apply it to the facts) Step 5: Communication (Rationale) – Communicate the results of the research
Ricci Case Step 1: Facts Supreme Court (highest court) ruled that white firefighters in New Haven, Conn were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge White firefighters were upset that New Haven voided the entire 2003 promotional exam after the results made 18 whites – but no blacks – eligible to become officers labeling it invalid under the constitution
The city scraped the promotion board because they were afraid of a lawsuit from minorities who would be turned down following the test Judge Sotomayor was on a three-judge panel that unanimously rejected the reverse discrimination complaint by the white firefighters Sotomayor stated that the “test” was arbitrary because the there was a disproportionate failure rate among minorities
Judge Sonia Sotomayor is a minority (Hispanic Women) Frank Ricci – white fire fighter who is dyslexic filed the lawsuit
What are the Issues? Does Frank Ricci have a valid case of reverse discrimination against the city of New Haven? _embedded&v=re-_paP3lm4 _embedded&v=re-_paP3lm4 Was the fire fighter test arbitrary creating an unfair test for minorities ? Was Judge Sotomayor’s rejection of the law suit a result of her mood or personal prejudices? (Legal Realism View) _embedded&v=OfC99LrrM2Q _embedded&v=OfC99LrrM2Q
Law (Relevant Law) New Haven worried about violation of Civil Rights Act of 1964 – because exam had a “disparate impact” on minorities Disparate: elements very different from one another Title (VII) AKA Title 7 – prohibits intentional acts of employment discrimination based on race, color, sex and national origin (disparate treatment) and policies or practices that intentionally or have a disproportionately adverse discriminatory effect
Under Title VII, an employer can engage in an act of intentional discrimination for the purposed of avoiding or remedying a disparate impact only if there is evidence
Analyze the Law & Apply This step means: reading the relevant law, synthesizing it and applying the facts That is think like a lawyer! As a class what is your legal reasoning with regards to the facts and the law?
Communication (Rationale) Supreme Court (Highest Court) Buck stops here!!! Ruling: White firefighters were unfairly denied promotions because of their race (reverse discrimination). New Haven was wrong to scrap promotion exam because no African Americans and only 18 white firefighters were made eligible for promotion