2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Confidential A PHI Company 1 NJ Off-Shore Wind – Recommended Compliance Structure Stakeholder Meeting January 13, 2009.
Advertisements

Efficient Pricing of Energy Conservation and Load Management Programs. August 9 th,2006 Kansas Corporation Commission Staff.
Expanded Virtual Net Metering (VNM)
2013 Electric Rate Increases December 10, Electric Rate Comparison – Residential Highest charge Kelowna and FortisBC Lowest BC Hydro and Nelson.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Licence lite – a new route to market for smaller electricity generators / suppliers Robert Tudway Decentralised Energy Project Delivery Unit Greater London.
ARR/TARIFF PROPOSALS OF DISCOMS FOR FY Suggestions/objections by K.Raghu 01/03/2005.
GSPTF Schedule 13 Review for RTWG August 4-5, 2010.
Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Discussion Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Meeting September 21, 2012 Discussion of.
VCOSS Congress Will the response to the climate debate turn the heat on low income households? Gavin Dufty: Manager Policy and Research Unit St Vincent.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Ohio Regulatory Framework For Distributive Generation M. Howard Petricoff Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP.
Enhancing Participation of Consumers in Regulation Reforms in Electricity in Kenya Agnes Wachie 21 st April 2013 Nairobi Safari Club Hotel.
Containing the Cost of California’s RPS Yuliya Shmidt, Senior Analyst February 2, 2012.
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CUSTOMER OWNED GENERATION A DISCUSSION OF INTERCONNECTION POLICIES, METERING STRATEGIES AND BILLING CONSIDERATIONS IMUA ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Edward Comer Edison Electric Institute May 7, 2014 Arizona Corporation Commission: Value and Cost of Distributed Solar Generation.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Consideration of Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) Standards A Public Hearing- October 22, 2007.
Crosswire: Distributed Energy Resources, Missouri’s Renewable Energy Policy and Local Land Use Ordinances Robert S. Kenney, Chairman Missouri Public Service.
Restructuring BUSINESS PROCESSES IN MAINE. Business Transactions Contracts Metering Usage History Enrollments & Drops Billing, Collections & Payments.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
National Power Corporation Small Power Utilities Group POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENT.
32853 Evaluation of Demand-Response Programs in the Competitive Electric Market Workshop 1 September 15, 2006 Shawnee Claiborn-Pinto.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
1 of 19 Development of Industry Standards Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze, Ph.D. Director,
Small Renewable Generators Tony Marciano Public Utility Commission of Texas May 2, 2007 (512)
Net Metering Fall 2009 Customer Meetings. What is Net Metering?  Net metering allows the meter to “run backwards” and record generation in excess of.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
2 nd ACC Workshop June 20, 2014 The SSVEC Perspective David Bane, Key Account Manager
Net Metering and Embedded Generation NB Climate Action Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting – October 1, 2008 Saint John, NB Linda Berthelot.
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
Ainārs Meņģelsons Public Utilities Commission Latvia 11th Baltic Energy Regional Initiative October 1, 2010 Jūrmala, Latvia ELECTRICITY REGIONAL INITIATIVE.
R OCKY M OUNTAIN P OWER C OMPANY DSM OPT-OUT PROPOSAL Utah Industrial Energy Consumers (UIEC) November 3, 2009.
Distributed Generation Task Force November 29, 2007 TAC Report.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Southern California Edison SM Southern California Edison Company Proposed AB920 Net Surplus Compensation Rate [NSCR] July 9, 2010.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
1 Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption using Electric Rate Feedback Loops USAEE Austin, TX – November 2012 Mark Chew, Matt Heling, Colin Kerrigan,
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
1 Basic Concepts on Power Supply Agreement (PSA) Francis Saturnino C. Juan Executive Director Energy Regulatory Commission.
Renewable Energy Act of 2008
Understanding the Dynamics of Electricity Trade in the Philippines with the Entry of Retail Competition and Open Access.
Overview of Energy Policy Act of 2005 A Review of Implementation issues in New Hampshire.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
Solar, according to Click
Renewable energy support schemes in the Republic of Moldova
California Product Offerings
REVISED UNIFORM REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENT (URR)
Distributed Generation Task Force
Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA)
The Net Metering Controversy
Time-of-Use Options.
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
Stand alone vs. interconnected
2016 Action on Net Metering, Rate Design, & Solar Ownership Policies
PA Supplier Workshop Net Metering September 10, 2019.
Beartooth Electric Cooperative Rate Design Analysis
Presentation transcript:

2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission

 17 O.S. §, 156 A. As used in this section:  1. "Distributed generation”  c. is intended to offset only the energy that would have otherwise been provided by the retail electric supplier to the customer during the monthly billing period,

 17 O.S. §, 156 A. As used in this section:  1. "Distributed generation" means  f. does not include customers who receive electric service which includes a demand-based charge.

 17 O.S. §, 156 A. As used in this section:  2. "Fixed charge" means any fixed monthly charge, basic service, or other charge not based on the volume of energy consumed by the customer, which reflects the actual fixed costs of the retail electric supplier.

 17 O.S. §, 156 B. No retail electric supplier shall increase rates charged or enforce a surcharge above that required to recover the full costs necessary to serve customers who install distributed generation on the customer side of the meter after the effective date of this act.

 17 O.S. §, 156 C. No retail electric supplier shall allow customers with distributed generation installed after the effective date of this act to be subsidized by customers in the same class of service who do not have distributed generation.

 17 O.S. §, 156 D. A higher fixed charge for customers within the same class of service that have distributed generation installed after the effective date of this act, as compared to the fixed charges of those customers who do not have distributed generation, is a means to avoid subsidization between customers within that class of service and shall be deemed in the public interest.

 17 O.S. §, 156 E. Retail electric suppliers shall implement tariffs in compliance with this act no later than December 31, 2015.

 Distributed Generation Offsets Energy Component of Bill Does not include a demand charge Does not offset Fixed Cost Can not charge above full cost to serve Can have higher fixed charges in the same rate class to avoid subsidy Must implement tariff before December 31, 2015 SIMPLE, Right?

WRONG

 Executive Order Senate Bill 1456 that amends Section 156  Does not mandate tariffs or other increases for distributed generation customers.  Requires the OCC to conduct transparent evaluation of DG consistent with Oklahoma First Energy Plan  Evaluation mandates inclusion of all stakeholders,  Prior to implementation of any fixed charges, the OCC is allowed to consider all available alternatives e.g. time-of use rates, minimum bills and demand charges.

 OAC 165: Purchase rate (a) For power produced in excess of on-site requirements, the producer will be compensated by the retail purchase meter running in reverse. The cooperative/utility shall bill the producer for the excess of energy supplied by the cooperative/utility over and above the energy supplied by the producer during each billing period according to the cooperative/utility's applicable retail rate schedule.

 OAC 165: Purchase rate (b) When the energy supplied by the producer exceeds the energy supplied by the cooperative/utility during a billing period, the monthly charge and/or minimum bill of the retail rate schedule shall be billed by the cooperative/utility; the excess energy shall be provided at no charge to the cooperative/utility.  SIMPLE, Right?

WRONG

 OCC held public meetings to get stakeholder input  PUD created a check list to address various complexities of DG applications

 Tariffs Are they mandated?  Subsidy Does it have to be established?  Full Cost Can it be offset?

 Demand Charges Can they be implemented on a DG customer? May require residential customer education  Net Metering Rules May need to amend – Oklahoma stands alone  If fixed cost are being moved from energy component to another component that a DG customer can not avoid, the utility may need to allow customer to carry forward excess generation

 OG&E has a pending application If ordered as proposed, OG&E’s new rates would add a demand charge to the bills of distributed generation owners, which already include an energy charge, a fuel charge, and a customer charge. The proposed demand charge was put at $2.68 per kilowatt each month. ​  PSO has not filed for a new tariff yet.  Electric Cooperatives???