Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic: Tethered Air Muscle P13001 Project Members: Nathan Couper- Mechanical Engineering Bob Day- Mechanical Engineering Patrick Renahan-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doug Follmer Shubhra Kochar Lauren Levey Adam Zurmehly K-Air FOrce.
Advertisements

Using assistive gait devices in rehabilitation.  Reasons for using an assistive gait device are:  Poor balance,  Inability to bear weight on a lower.
Biomechanical Examination Parameters
ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 6. Physical assessment PHYSIOTHERAPY ASSESSMENT session CHAPTER 6 PART
Normal Gait.
Kinematic Effects of Sloped Surfaces on Shank Angle for Persons with Drop Foot Kristin Carnahan, MSPO 2008 Dr. Robert Gregor, Advisor April 9, 2008.
Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic: Tethered Air Muscle Nathan Couper, Bob Day, Patrick Renahan, Patrick Streeter Faculty Guide: Elizabeth DeBartolo, PhD This.
Muscles of the Foot and Lower Leg
NATURAL GAIT INDUCING TRANSTIBIAL PROSTHETIC LUCIA MELARA ROBERT SCOTT ALEXIS GARO EML 4551 ETHICS AND DESIGN PROJECT ORGANIZATION FIU DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL.
Mario Liuzza | Chris Loughnane | Ashley Pierce | Dan Spangler Bionic Ankle.
Body Mechanics, Positioning and Bed Making
Pedestal BaseTiller Strut Track Platform ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Final Achievements Project Overview The goal of this project is to re-design, build, and test.
Motion Tracking System Research and Testing Rochester Institute of Technology DAVID J. MONAHAN (ME) JIM K. STERN (ME) JAHANAVI S. GAUTHAMAN (EE) BRIAN.
P08006: Physical Therapy Motion Tracking System Sponsor: National Science Foundation Customer: Nazareth Physical Therapy Clinic Josemaria Mora Electrical.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
Gait Analysis – Objectives
P11001:Balance Training Bike This project was originally begun winter quarter of It was revisited winter quarter of This was designed to help.
Motion Tracking System Research and Testing Rochester Institute of Technology DAVID J. MONAHAN (ME) JAMES K. STERN (ME) JAHANAVI S. GAUTHAMAN (EE) ASSIS.
Balance Training Bicycle Senior Design Project 8001 Team Members : Jonathan Bawas (EE), Carl Mangelsdorf (ME), James Nardo (ME), Jeffrey Tempest (ME),
Functional Electrical Stimulation ZAIN SULTAN EE NAEEM HUSSAIN EE
 Team Members: ◦ Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) ◦ Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) ◦ Dana Kjolner (EE) ◦ Robert Ellsworth (EE) ◦ Sam Hosig (CE)
 Team Members: ◦ Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) ◦ Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) ◦ Dana Kjolner (EE) ◦ Robert Ellsworth (EE) ◦ Sam Hosig (CE)
Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic Air Muscle Tethered Team P13001 Nathan Couper, ME Bob Day, ME Patrick Renahan, IE Patrick Streeter, ME This material is based.
Motion Control Locomotion Mobile Robot Kinematics Legged Locomotion
Biomechanical Examination
Ankle Linear Force Comparison A (reference)BCD Current Passive-Dorsi-flex AFO Dorsi-flex assist AFOPlantar-flex assist AFOPlantar/Dorsi assist AFO Segment.
P12015 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. BES Any opinions, findings, and conclusions.
Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic: Tethered Air Muscle Nathan Couper, Bob Day, Patrick Renahan, Patrick Streeter Faculty Guide: Elizabeth DeBartolo, PhD Rochester.
Stephen Rugg.  Ankle foot orthotics are used by individuals who have foot drop syndrome  Foot drop syndrome is the inability to flex your foot up while.
ACTIVE ANKLE FOOT ORTHOTIC (AFO) VOICE OF THE ENGINEER Design Project Management.
The Navigator Foot. PRODUCT The NAVIGATOR is a multi-axial unit with integral spherical ankle Resilient Keel The package has a foot shell and proximal.
Body Mechanics, Turning, Positioning and ROM Teresa, V. Hurley, MSN, RN.
Team Members: Vinay Barde(EE) Alfred Lee(CE) Jason Marks(EE) Alexis Reusch (EE) Goal: To develop a balance-training rehabilitation device for clients of.
System Design Review.  Team Members: ◦ Pattie Schiotis – Team Manager (ME) ◦ Shane Reardon – Lead Engineer (ME) ◦ Dana Kjolner (EE) ◦ Robert Ellsworth.
Manual Muscle Testing An evaluation system for diagnosis of disease or dysfunction of the musculo- skeletal and nervous systems.
Patient Mobility - Ambulation
Departement of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran Hasan Sadikin General Hospital.
ACTIVE ANKLE FOOT ORTHOTIC (AFO) VOICE OF CUSTOMER Design Project Management.
COMPONENTS OF FITNESS & FITNESS TESTING PHYSICAL EDUCATION MRS. MANNE.
Active Ankle/Foot Orthotic Client: Dr. Robert Pryzbelski Advisor: Professor Brenda Ogle Team Members: Jessica Hause - Co-leader Erin Main - Co-leader Joshua.
Upper Extremity Exerciser & Nazareth PT Layout Redesign James Letts – Team Leader Eduardo Borges - ISE Dennis Bradford - ME Daniel Kelly - ME Renzo Salazar.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
F EASIBILITY C ASE S TUDY ON THE USE OF D YNAMIC E LASTOMERIC F ABRIC O RTHOSES IN CMT​ Sarah Brown ​ Paediatric Neuromuscular Physiotherapist ​ Royal.
Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic Air Muscle Tethered Team P13001 Nathan Couper, ME Bob Day, ME Patrick Renahan, IE Patrick Streeter, ME This material is based.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Hidler J, Brennan D, Black I, Nichols D, Brady K, Nef T. ZeroG: Overground gait.
Upon completion of this lecture student will be able to:  Identify different parts of transfemoral prosthesis.  Differentiate between Quadrilateral.
Balance Training Bicycle
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the Ankle
Discussion and Conclusions: Materials and Methods:
P15001: Soft Ankle-Foot Orthotic
Normal Gait.
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
K-Air FOrce Doug Follmer Shubhra Kochar Lauren Levey Adam Zurmehly.
P15001: Soft Ankle-Foot Orthotic
P13001 Active Ankle Foot Orthotic: Air Muscle Tethered
Balance Training Bicycle
Modular Motion Tracking Device
Navigation Aid for the Blind
Balance Training Bicycle
Assistive gait devices in rehabilitation
Transtibial Amputee Human Motion Analysis
Final Project Review P09006 – Upper Extremity Exerciser
Upper Extremity Exerciser - P09006
Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic
Modular Motion Tracking Device
Final Status Update P09006 – Upper Extremity Exerciser
P15001: Soft Ankle-Foot Orthotic
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Human Gait Analysis using IMU Sensors
Active Ankle Foot Orthotic (AFO)
Presentation transcript:

Active Ankle-Foot Orthotic: Tethered Air Muscle P13001 Project Members: Nathan Couper- Mechanical Engineering Bob Day- Mechanical Engineering Patrick Renahan- Industrial Engineering Patrick Streeter- Mechanical Engineering Dr. Beth DeBartolo- Faculty Guide Project Customer: Dr. Beth DeBartolo Project Sponsor: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. BES Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Background Information The aim of this project is to develop an air muscle powered ankle foot orthotic that address the symptom of foot drop. Foot drop is a very common condition present in patients who are suffering from degenerative nerve diseases (ALS, MS), stroke, or trauma to the Peroneal Nerve, and ultimately leads to an inability to dorsiflex the foot while walking. Current technology in the form of ankle-foot orthotics (AFOs) is available to aid clients, however these devices are restrictive and make navigating stairs and ramps especially difficult. This is due to a restricted ability to plantarflex the foot and “point” the toes. Our focus will be to modify an existing dorsi-assist orthotic to include a controlled, air muscle-actuated, plantarflexion when navigating uneven terrain. Customer Requirements: Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the following people for their generous donations, cooperation, and assistance: Dr. Kathleen Lamkin-Kennard, Dr. J.J. Mowder-Tinney and Nazareth College Physical Therapy Clinic, The National Science Foundation, Gordon Potter Jr. C.O., Cayuga Orthotics and Prosthetics Inc., Rochester Orthopedic Labs, Inc., Colton Scott, and Christopher Sullivan System Level Physical Decomposition Input from Terrain Sensing System Flat terrain Ascending terrain (up stairs/up ramp) Descending terrain (down stairs/down ramp) Relax air muscle Release air Ankle angle at foot strike = deg Gait speed info from sensors. Ankle angle at foot strike = deg Gait speed info from sensors Future Interaction with Terrain Sensing System (above) In addition to the above Customer needs, there were several engineering specifications that involved Sensory Information (i.e. measure angle of foot or accept input from terrain sensing mechanism), Movement specifications (i.e. foot position and gate speed), Force specifications (i.e. torque on foot and force to secure orthotic), and Safety specifications (i.e. harm to equipment and harm to user). Patient Assumptions In order to define the scope of this project, several patient assumptions were made: The patient was assumed to maintain zero muscle control over both dorsi- and plantarflexion, was not prone to “tone-lock,” had an an appropriately calibrated dorsi-assist AFO to hold their foot above 90º when in mid-stride, and lastly, due to the nature of a tethered system, that they would use the orthotic in a clinical setting (i.e. pool or treadmill). To perform our calculations, Anthropometric Data from the ANSUR database was used for a 50 th percentile male and there were no resistive or friction forces in the joints. Category Objective Number rating of importanceCustomer Objective Description Safe S19follow safety guidelines and standards S39energy stored safely S48no sharp protrusions S56allergy conscious Flat Terrain FT15support regular gait cycle FT29hold foot up when stepping forward FT23range of motion to allow full dorsiflexion and plantar flexion FT46resist foot slap FT57operate smoothly/simulate normal muscle behavior FT67allow for extended use without straining leg from weight Comfort CF29non-invasive CF38secure foot in orthotic CF48non-abrasive CF65allow normal cooling of leg CF75allow bending of knee CF83allow toes to flex up CF97keep toes from curling down CF114low noise Special Terrain ST18allow natural movement up and down stairs and ramps ST25adapt to different terrains ST35fast system response between sensing and doing ST47correctly interprets sensor information ST58support foot drop over obstacles Model of Dorsi-assist AFO (Pictured Left) Distal Muscle Attachment Assembly, excluding AFO (Pictured Right) Detailed Design Concepts Exploded Proximal Attachment (Pictured Far Right) Un-Actuated air muscle with dorsi-assist AFO holding foot 90 degrees from floor (Top Left) Actuated air muscle with foot fully plantarflexed (Top Right) While the average person experiences 47 degrees of motion while walking down stairs, our AFO is capable of achieving up to 64 degrees and is customizable based on the specific client. (Right)