Biomedical Informatics Research Network Gregory G. Brown, Shaunna Morris, and Amanda Bischoff Grethe, VASDHS and University of California, San Diego Proportional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Linear Model L ύ cia Garrido and Marieke Schölvinck ICN.
Advertisements

Declaration of Conflict of Interest or Relationship
Section 1 fMRI for Newbies
HST:583 fMRI Acquisition Lab1 Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli TASKS: Self Reference Sensorimotor Breath holding Sternberg Self ReferenceSternberg Breath holding.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Standard Error of the Estimate Goodness of Fit Coefficient of Determination Regression Coefficients.
Forecasting.
Standardized (adjusted) rate = A rate which has been weighted to remove the influence of some extraneous variable, such as age.
So are how the computer determines the size of the intercept and the slope respectively in an OLS regression The OLS equations give a nice, clear intuitive.
The General Linear Model
Understanding Research Results
Census A survey to collect data on the entire population.   Data The facts and figures collected, analyzed, and summarized for presentation and.
Function BIRN: Quality Assurance Practices Introduction: Conclusion: Function BIRN In developing a common fMRI protocol for a multi-center study of schizophrenia,
Function BIRN Science. FBIRN Goals Develop multi-site functional neuroimaging tools. Develop the capability to analyze, as a single data set, data acquired.
2004 NIH Building on the BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Randy Gollub, MD PhD Steve Pieper, PhD Morphometry BIRN.
Ongoing BIRN-GCRC Collaborations Medical College Wisconsin (non BIRN site) –Functional MRI acquisition calibration University of Texas (non BIRN site)
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Big Science in Schizophrenia Research Ron Kikinis, M.D. Professor of Radiology,
Analysis of fMRI data with linear models Typical fMRI processing steps Image reconstruction Slice time correction Motion correction Temporal filtering.
UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH RESULTS: DESCRIPTION AND CORRELATION © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ratio A comparison of two numbers by division 4 out of 5 people choose product X 4 out of 5 4 to 5 4:5.
Multiple Regression The Basics. Multiple Regression (MR) Predicting one DV from a set of predictors, the DV should be interval/ratio or at least assumed.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN: Milestones for 2005 Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Testing Hypotheses about Differences among Several Means.
2004 All Hands Meeting Analysis of a Multi-Site fMRI Study Using Parametric Response Surface Models Seyoung Kim Padhraic Smyth Hal Stern (University of.
BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK: FUNCTIONAL IMAGING RESEARCH IN SCHIZOPHRENIA TESTBED S.G. Potkin 1 ; J.A. Turner 1 *; G.G. Brown 2 ; G.H. Glover.
Percents and Fractions. Vocabulary A percent is a ratio that compares a number to 100. It means “per 100.” 49 out of 100 is 49%.
Statistical analysis Outline that error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data. The knowledge that any individual measurement.
DIRECT VARIATION In a DIRECT VARIATION, as one quantity increases, the other quantity increases. Equation of Direct Variation.
Types of Scaling Session scaling; global mean scaling; block effect; mean intensity scaling Purpose – remove intensity differences between runs (i.e.,
T.T. Liu, fBIRN AHM 2006 Status of Arterial Spin Labeling for the fBIRN Thomas T. Liu UCSD Center for Functional MRI.
Figure 3. Log-log plot of simulated oscillating phantom, assuming a Gaussian-shaped field. Field constants a 1 =a 2 =0.1. The data initially plateau, then.
Chapter 6 (cont.) Difference Estimation. Recall the Regression Estimation Procedure 2.
All Hands Meeting 2005 FBIRN AHM 2006 Statistics Working Group Update Greg Brown, UCSD Hal Stern, UCI.
All Hands Meeting 2005 FBIRN Tools: 2005 Subtitle added here.
2004 FBIRN Meeting FIRST BIRN: Challenges of Collaborative Multi- site, Multi-discipline Research Steven Potkin, MD Gary Glover, PhD Gregory McCarthy,
Multiplying Fractions. When we multiply a fraction by an integer we: multiply by the numerator and divide by the denominator For example, × = 54.
Jorge Jovicich, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School Biomedical Informatics Research Network Overview Testbeds Morphometry BIRN.
Direct Variation Equation for direct variation:. Page 6 Steps: 1.Set up a proportion 2.Cross multiply and solve for variable Since x varies directly as.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing fMRI in NAMIC Facilitator: Polina Golland Presenters: Jim Fallon and Andy Saykin.
Business Research Methods
FMRI and MR Spectroscopy. BOLD BOLD=Blood Oxygenation Level Dependant contrast Neurons at work use oxygen (carried by hemoglobin) 1-5 s. delay, peaks.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN Tool Dissemination.
Idiot's guide to... General Linear Model & fMRI Elliot Freeman, ICN. fMRI model, Linear Time Series, Design Matrices, Parameter estimation,
1 st level analysis: Design matrix, contrasts, and inference Stephane De Brito & Fiona McNabe.
By 5 pm Tuesday  Each group delivers their action plan/milestones to achieve current goals Phase I publication plan and public access Phase II—Intersite.
Goals of FBIRN ( )  Develop multi-site functional neuroimaging tools. Calibration: Assess and correct for the major sources of variation in multi-site.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
Interaction between chronic and acute pain: down- regulation of motivational value for relief from acute pain 589 OHBM 2009 INTRODUCTION Our recent fMRI.
First BIRN Cognitive Challenge Group Boston All-Hands Meeting October 12, 2004.
Stats Methods at IC Lecture 3: Regression.
Quiz.
Chapter 12 Understanding Research Results: Description and Correlation
Statistical analysis.
Contrast and Inferences
Statistical analysis.
Equation of Direct Variation
BUS 308 HELPS Perfect Education/ bus308helps.com.
BUS 308 HELPS Education for Service-- bus308helps.com.
Multiple Change Point Detection for Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices Dehan Kong University of Toronto JSM 2018 July 30, 2018.
5-2 Direct Variation.
Sam Norman-Haignere, Nancy G. Kanwisher, Josh H. McDermott  Neuron 
Deciphering Cortical Number Coding from Human Brain Activity Patterns
Benedikt Zoefel, Alan Archer-Boyd, Matthew H. Davis  Current Biology 
15.1 The Role of Statistics in the Research Process
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
MfD 04/12/18 Alice Accorroni – Elena Amoruso
Solve the differential equation using the method of undetermined coefficients. y " + 4y = e 3x 1. {image}
Solve the differential equation using the method of undetermined coefficients. y " + 9y = e 2x {image}
Solving Percent Problems Using Proportions
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Regression Part II.
Presentation transcript:

Biomedical Informatics Research Network Gregory G. Brown, Shaunna Morris, and Amanda Bischoff Grethe, VASDHS and University of California, San Diego Proportional Scaling of Multisite fMRI Data October 13, 2004, Boston, MA

Simplified Signal Equations: Proportional Scaling of Gray Scale Units

Subject 5 T 2 -star Weighted Images in Constant Gray Scale Units Acquired at Four Sites Sites vary by the proportionality constant k

Scaling of BOLD Response Depends on an Intrinsic Scaling Parameter M  M{1-(f  (  )  m  )}. %Signal change = M{1-(f  (  )  m  )} %Signal change  TE  V b [dHb]{1-(f  (  )  m  )}

Impact of Proportionality Constants K and M on fMRI Activation Measures Common fMRI measures Regression weight %Signal Change Z score fMRI Theory predicts that Proportionality constants, K and M, will have differential impact on fMRI measures

Time Series Regression Weight Regression Weight = Regression Coefficient = Mean Difference Image C experimental – C control C experimental = numerical code for the experimental condition C control = numerical code for the control condition Regression Coefficients inherit the original gray scale units. They are influenced by variation in both K and M scaling factors.

%Signal Change Regression Weight = Percent Signal Change = Regression Coefficient Mean MR Signal control condition Gray scale constant K is canceled. %Signal Change is influenced only by variation in BOLD constant M.

Z Score Regression Weight = t score = Regression Weight Standard Error z score: Φ(z) = T(t,df) The standard error reflects variation in the regression weight. So both proportionality constants, K and M, cancel. Yet site differences are reflected in both regression weight and standard error. Thus, it is unclear whether proportional scaling will reduce site effects of Z scores.

Proportional Scaling  For each ROI Mean of all sites divided by mean of a particular site

Calibration Study Outline Multi-Site BIRN Study: 11 Sites (BWH, Duke-UNC: 1.5T, Duke-UNC: 4.0T, Iowa, MGH, Minnesota, New Mexico, Stanford, UCI, UCLA, UCSD) 5 Healthy males as “Human Phantoms” 2 Visits on separate days per site per subject, 4 Sensorimotor runs, 2 breath-hold runs, Sternberg Scanning Task, and Auditory Mismatch Task per visit 3 Regions of Interest

Proportional Scaling  Sensorimotor Adjustment: For each ROI calculate the ratio of the mean sensorimotor response of all sites divided by the mean of a particular site. Multiply each subject’s BOLD response in an ROI by the site specific sensorimotor ratio.  Breath Hold Adjustment: For all cortical voxels calculate the ratio of the mean breath hold response at all sites divided by the mean of a particular site. Multiply each subject’s BOLD response to the sensorimotor task by the site specific breath hold ratio.

Between Site Variation – fBIRN Sensorimotor Task:: % Signal Change Range of Median Site Differences is about.5%

Generalizability and Dependability of Sensorimotor Scaled and Breath Hold Scaled Regression Weights Region of Interest Unadjusted Data Data Proportionally Scaled (sensorimotor data) Data Proportionally Scaled (breath hold data) Dependability Visual Hand Auditory Generalizability Visual Hand Auditory BOLD Response from Sensorimotor Task

Generalizability and Dependability of Sensorimotor Scaled and Breath Hold Scaled % Signal Change BOLD Response from Sensorimotor Task Region of Interest Regression Weights % Signal Change Z Scores Dependability Visual Hand Auditory.34Neg Variance.64 Generalizability Visual Hand Auditory.50Neg Variance.95

END