Barriers and Facilitators to Computer Use in VA for Implementing Guidelines Brad Doebbeling, MD, MSc VA Indianapolis HSR&D Center of Excellence, Indy VAMC.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Improving Depression Treatment in Primary Care: Dissemination and Implementation Edmund Chaney, PhD Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle AcademyHealth.

Advertisements

Care Transitions – Critical to Quality and Patient Safety Society of Hospital Medicine Lakshmi K. Halasyamani, MD.

Strategies for Implementing Outcomes in Practice Carolyn Baum, PhD, OTR, FAOTA.

Integration of Behavioral Health Services with Primary Care Presented by: Sharon Beaty.

The Chronic Care Model.

Precepting medical students in ambulatory clinical settings: from barriers to opportunities… Tom Barber, MD Co-director, Ambulatory Internal Medicine Clerkship,

Purpose and Utilization of PEA within UNYNET PEA’s are incorporated within the Primary Care Setting for the purpose of facilitating progressive changes.

David Garr, MD Executive Director South Carolina Area Health Education Consortium Associate Dean for Community Medicine Medical University of South Carolina.

Innovations in Process Management/Optimizing Patient Management Leslie S. Zun, MD, MBA, FAAEM Chairman & Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Chicago.

Janet M. Schneider Chief, Library Service James A. Haley Veterans Hospital Tampa, FL.

2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.

Efficient & Rapid Translation of Dementia Discovery IDND-PBRN Malaz Boustani, MD, MPH Chief Director of Research Indianapolis Discovery Network for Dementia.

Clinical Information System Implementation Project Prepared for Clinical Affairs Committee December 4, 2002.

Chapter 5. Describe the purpose, use, key attributes, and functions of major types of clinical information systems used in health care. Define the key.

Using Health Information Technology to Improve Care: Evidence and Strategies Brad Doebbeling, MD, MSc VA Health Services Research & Development Center.

Theresa Tsosie-Robledo MS RN-BC February 15, 2012

Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.

Chapter 2 Electronic Health Records

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Care: Narrowing the Gap through Solutions Joseph R. Betancourt, M.D., M.P.H. Director, The Disparities Solutions Center.

Health Information Technology for Post Acute Care (HITPAC): Minnesota Project Overview Candy Hanson Program Manager Julie Jacobs HIT Consultant June 13,

CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.

Criteria and Standard.

Current and Emerging Use of Clinical Information Systems

INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: A GUIDED ACTIVITY FOR MEDICAL AND NURSING STUDENTS ON CLINICAL PLACEMENT Professor Amanda Henderson Nursing Director, Princess.

Benton Community Health Center Located at: 530 NW 27 th Street Corvallis, Oregon (inside the Public Services building) Medical Staff consists of: 3 Physicians.

Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.

PACT and HF-How can we Optimize Care Delivery for our Patients

Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance

Aging by Design BENTLEY COLLEGE Waltham, MA September 27 & 28, 2004.

My Own Health Report: Case Study for Pragmatic Research Marcia Ory Texas A&M Health Science Center Presentation at: CPRRN Annual Grantee Meeting October.

Developing a Patient Centric Geriatric Home Based Care Management Model Presented by: Gail Silver, MS, APRN, GNP, BC.

Healthcare Institutions

Clinical Informatics VIReC CyberSeminar Series 2006 Clinical Informatics Attributes of An Ideal Informatics System with Highlights from a State of the.

PATIENT- AND FAMILY-CENTERED CARE: Partnerships for Safety & Quality Staff Physician & Resident Physician Toolkit.

Comprehensive Geriatric Care of Elderly Native Americans Miriam E. Schwartz Department of Family Medicine Gallup Indian Medical Center (GIMC) Gallup, New.

Together.Today.Tomorrow. The BLUES Project Karen C. Fox, PhD Chief Executive Officer.

Shawn Stewart, RN, CCM Thomas Edison State College August 24, 2008 Dr Donna Bailey.

Rapid cycle PI Danielle Scheurer, MD, MSCR Chief Quality Officer Medical University of South Carolina.

The Quality Colloquium at Harvard University August 27, 2003 Patient Safety Organizational Readiness Assessment Tool Louis H. Diamond, MDBeverly A. Collins,

CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.

Using the Electronic Health Record to Encourage Evidence-Based Practice Jonathan S. Einbinder, MD, MPH Partners HealthCare

The Nation’s First Statewide Health Information Exchange AcademyHealth National Health Policy Conference State Health Research and Policy Interest Group.

Context Evaluation knowing the setting Context Evaluation knowing the setting.

Clinical Decision Support Consortium Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc Clinical Informatics Research & Development Partners Healthcare Brigham & Women’s.

Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 9: Sociotechnical Aspects: Clinicians and Technology Lecture 3 This material was developed by Oregon Health.

Using VistA for Chronic Care Management Strategies for Quality Chronic Disease Management in FQHCs Matthew King MD Medical Director Clinica Adelante Community.

A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety

ADOPTION OF HHC’S  Adoption of mobile technologies is a process of social interaction between users, environment and organizations.  Organizational,

Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.

Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP)

AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Building a Culture of Safety National Content Webinar April 16, 2015.

Working with HIT Systems

Using Outcomes and other Assessment Tools to Improve Quality Quality Improvement.

1 Wins, Losses, Errors and Ties Quality Improvement in the VA 1994 to 2004 Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD, MSPH.

Group Homework # 3 How may treatment be better standardized for common conditions? MMI-402 Summer 2010 Group #1 Jacob Frimpong John Goss Kempton Presley.

Building Capacity for EMR Adoption and Data Utilization Among Safety Net Organizations Presented by Chatrian Reynolds, MPH, Evaluator, LPHI Shelina Foderingham,

1 Increasing Access to Primary Care Through Operational Redesign The Ambulatory Care Restructuring Initiative Annual Meeting of the American Public Health.

The Holistic Approach to the Design and Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: A Nursing Experience Frances Beadle, MSc Health Informatics Nurse.

ICD-10 Lessons Learned from Canada. Background of ICD-10 in Canada 1995 – Agreement reached between World Health Organization (WHO) and Canada to adopt.

Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.

1 The Holistic Approach to the Design and Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records: A Nursing Experience Frances Beadle, MSc Health Informatics Nurse.

Conference on Medical Thinking University College London June 23, 2006 Medical Thinking: What Should We Do? Edward H. Shortliffe, MD, PhD Department of.

Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control

Chapter 16 Nursing Informatics: Improving Workflow and Meaningful Use

New Approaches to Primary Care Informatics Education

VA Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence

The Research Question Patients can experience harm when their values and goals regarding their care are unclear. While many patients are able to elucidate.

By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.

Presentation transcript:

Barriers and Facilitators to Computer Use in VA for Implementing Guidelines Brad Doebbeling, MD, MSc VA Indianapolis HSR&D Center of Excellence, Indy VAMC & Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN

Focus Groups 19 VAMCs: Theoretical Sampling (Hi/Low) 19 VAMCs: Theoretical Sampling (Hi/Low) 50 Focus Groups 3/ site 50 Focus Groups 3/ site  Administrators  Primary Care Providers  Clinicians Major Stakeholder Variation: Major Stakeholder Variation:  Barriers/ Facilitators to CPG implementation

Major Barriers for All Stakeholders Data Location Essential Data Computer Glitches User Friendly Computer Literacy Attitudes Workload

Personal Concerns 7 Themes Time Attitudes Workload Computer Literacy Computer Complaints Workflow Intrusiveness

Issue MD RNAdm Major focus Continuity of care ▲ CPG Compliance ▲ Patient benefits ▲ Major Focus by Stakeholder Group

National Provider Survey 4227 physicians, nurses, PAs and RNPs Primary & ambulatory care, medicine, nursing, and geriatrics. Provider and organizational factors influencing guideline adoption and adherence 139 VAMCs nationally. Provider attitudes, time, work organization, guideline-specific data, implementation approaches, adherence tools, impact of tools on care, availability of IT, culture, support, audit/feedback.

Providers' Assessment Regarding the Extent Their Hospitals Provide IT for Key Dimensions of Practice

Results 46% indicated their hospital provided access to literature and EBM while delivering care. 22% computer assisted decision support systems (DSS) available. Attitudes regarding ACR use very positive. --74% believed ACRs helpful in adhering to clinical guidelines. --Tools or templates to facilitate documentation nearly as high. Interdisciplinary teamwork important in facilitating adherence.

Results ACRs were not widely implemented across facilities. --44% had ACRs for diabetes mellitus. -- ~1/4 to provide recommended services for COPD and MDD. Institutional factors associated with using IT: --Urban location --Cooperative culture

Types of Computerized Clinical Reminders Across Facilities (n=104)

Experiences with Clinical Reminders (Open-ended) Has an automated clinical reminder ever helped you deliver care more effectively? 63% Yes Has an automated clinical reminder ever helped you deliver care more effectively? 63% Yes Have you ever been surprised by the actions of any computerized clinical reminders in CPRS? 24% Yes

Barriers Enough workstations in each clinician exam room? 82% Enough workstations for other staff in interview rooms? 68% Are formats tailored to specific populations? 45% Does computer speed impede use? 31% Lack of staff computer skills impedes use? 25%

Computer Use to Implement Guidelines Wins: Wins:  Widely implemented electronic patient record, order entry  Significant gains in performance measures Losses: Losses:  Widespread computer use impacts provider-patient communication, teamwork Errors: Errors:  Focus on documentation to exclusion of system change  Lack of consensus on how to effectively use computers Ties: Ties:  Uncertainty regarding optimal use, benefits/tradeoffs  Sustainability for chronic care management uncertain

Questions? Comments: Brad Doebbeling (317) , 4493